Kaikōura's Bid For World Heritage Status Gathers Momentum
Te Korowai o Te Tai o Marokura is looking to marine research to boost Kaikura's bid for world heritage status.
Marine research could provide a catalyst for achieving world heritage status for Kaikōura, community advocates say.
Te Korowai o Te Tai o Marokura (Kaikōura's marine guardians) first mooted the idea of making a bid for Unesco's (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) World Heritage list 20 years ago.
Now Te Korowai secretary Gina Solomon and committee member Mel Skinner want to organise a research hui to find out what is happening and where the gaps are.
The Kaikōura District Council has identified the potential for marine research to provide economic benefits for the town.
A business case for the future development of South Bay Harbour was completed in July 2022, thanks to funding from the Government's Provincial Growth Fund.
It identified Kaikōura as having the potential to become an international hub for marine research and education – if it could get the funding.
Chief executive Will Doughty has said the council is keen to attract marine researchers from New Zealand and overseas, but it lacks the funding to support it.
He said the council is keen to partner with Government and other agencies to support marine education and research.
Mrs Skinner said achieving world heritage status would likely make Kaikōura more attractive as a research destination, and gathering momentum will help to get the bid across the line, she said.
''We need to be able understand what is going on here and to create more of a research focus.
''We don't necessarily need the bricks and mortar now, but with the aim of eventually having the facilities in the future.
Ms Solomon said Kaikōura has long been considered ''the world's seabird capital'' by scientists.
But locals often had little understanding about their local bird life, she said.
''Often we think of seagulls as a nuisance, but they are an important part of the eco-system.
''Have some targeted research would help to improve our understanding of what we have.''
The University of Canterbury used to have a research facility in Kaikōura, which it was damaged in the 7.8 magnitude earthquake in 2016.
World heritage sites are landmark locations protected by an international treaty administered by Unesco.
Kaikōura's world heritage journey began in 2004 when it was first included in a tentative global list of 304 sites.
Te Korowai was established by Te Rūnanga o Kaikōura in 2005 and successfully lobbied both local and central government for marine protections.
The Kaikōura Marine Strategy was published in 2012 and the Kaikōura (Te Tai o Marokura) Marine Management Act passed into law two years later.
The legislation established the Kaikōura Marine Area, which comprises the 10,416 hectare Hikurangi marine reserve, a 4686ha whale sanctuary, five customary management areas, a fur seal sanctuary and restricted fishing areas.
The Kaikōura district's international dark sky sanctuary status, obtained in September, also boosted to the district's case.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
New Investment To Drive AI And Biotech Innovation
Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology The Government is investing $24 million in smart, practical science that will help New Zealanders live healthier lives and support the development of sustainable food industries. Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Dr Shane Reti today announced two major research programmes in partnership with Singapore, focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) tools for healthy ageing and biotechnology for future food production. 'Science and innovation are critical to building a high-growth, high-value economy. That's why we're investing in research with a clear line of sight to commercial outcomes and real public benefit,' Dr Reti says. 'This Government is focused on backing the technologies that will deliver real-world results for New Zealanders – not just in the lab, but in our hospitals, homes, and businesses. 'Whether it's supporting older Kiwis to live well for longer or developing smarter food production systems, these projects are about practical applications of advanced science to solve problems and grow our economy.' Funded through the Catalyst Fund, designed to facilitate international collaboration, the investment will support seven joint research projects over the next three years, deepening New Zealand's research ties with Singapore and building capability in AI and biotechnology. The AI programme, delivered alongside AI Singapore, directly supports the Government's Artificial Intelligence Strategy – a plan to use AI to safely and effectively boost productivity and deliver better public services. 'Our AI Strategy is about encouraging the uptake of AI to improve productivity and realise its potential to deliver faster, smarter, and more personalised services, including in healthcare,' says Dr Reti. 'These projects will help develop tools that support clinicians and improve care for our ageing population. Our collaboration with Singapore, a country well advanced in their use and development of AI, will help grow Kiwi capability to explore future practical uses of AI.' The biotechnology programme will focus on turning scientific research into scalable food solutions, including alternative proteins and new food ingredients, in partnership with Singapore's A*STAR. 'These partnerships are about future-proofing our economy and our communities — tackling global challenges with New Zealand science at the forefront,' Dr Reti says.
Newsroom
13-07-2025
- Newsroom
NZ can't afford to be careless with its AI strategy
Opinion: The Government's new strategy for AI was announced last week to a justifiably flat reception. As far as national-level policy goes, the document is severely lacking. One of the main culprits is prominently displayed at the end of Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Shane Reti's foreword: 'This document was written with the assistance of AI.' For those with some experience of AI, this language is generally recognised to be a precursor to fairly unexceptional outputs. The minister's commitment to walking the talk on AI, as he says, could have been seen as admirable if the resulting output was not so clumsy, and did not carry so many of the hallmarks of AI-generated content. To be blunt, the document is poorly written, badly structured, and under-researched. It cites eight documents in total, half of which are produced by industry – an amount of research suitable for a first year university student. It makes no effort to integrate arguments or sources critical of AI, nor does it provide any balanced assessment. This same carelessness is exhibited in the web version of the document which has scarcely been edited, and includes a number of errors like 'gnerative AI' as opposed to generative AI. It also contains very little actual strategy or targets. It reads more like a dossier from Meta, Open AI or Anthropic and is filled with just as much industry language. In short, it is entirely unsuitable to be the defining strategic document to guide New Zealand's engagement with what it accurately defines as 'one of the most significant technological opportunities of our time'. Especially not in a global climate where there is an ever-growing appreciation for the potential harms of AI, as seen in the growing number of class actions in the United States, or resources like the AI Incident Database. AI harm and job displacement are very real and important problems. Yet, in the Strategy for AI they are described as dystopian scenarios being used by the media to compound uncertainty. The problem is not necessarily that AI was used to assist the production of the document, it is the extent to which it was used, and how. AI has a number of useful applications such as spellchecking, assisting with structure, and providing counter-points which can help further flesh out your writing. However, it is inappropriate to use generative AI to produce national-level policy. What is particularly alarming is that anyone with a ChatGPT licence and about a minute of spare time could very easily produce a document similar in content, tone and structure to the government's strategy. Thankfully bad policy can be improved, and hopefully this will be eventually. But, by far the most damning aspect of the strategy is the underlying notion that generative AI should have a key role in developing policy in New Zealand. There is an unappealing hubris in thinking that New Zealand's public servants, many of whom are phenomenally skilled, deeply caring, and out of work, could be replaced or meaningfully augmented by such a ham-handed and poorly thought out application of generative AI. Unfortunately, it is likely that the strategy's fast and efficient rollout will be seen by the Government as a success regardless of the quality of the output. This will no doubt embolden it to continue to use generative AI as an aid in the production of policy in future. This is a real cause for concern, as it could be used to justify even more cuts to the public service and further undermine the function of our democracy. Use of generative AI in the development of policy also raises fundamental questions as to what our public service is and should be. It would seem imprudent to employ our public servants on the basis of their care, knowledge, expertise and diligence and then require them to delegate their work to generative AI. A public service defined solely by the pace at which they can deliver, as opposed to the quality of that delivery, is at best antithetical to the goals of good government.
RNZ News
08-07-2025
- RNZ News
Government unveils its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy
In the plan's forward written by Science and Technology Minister Shane Reti he said New Zealand was the last OECD country to publish such a strategy. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii New Zealand has - at last - joined other countries in tackling the AI opportunity and challenge, with the government unveiling its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy. The plan - titled "Investing with Confidence" - has been met with enthusiasm from the business sector, but concern from critics who say it sets a "dangerous path forward" and is "worryingly light" on ethical considerations. In a foreword, Science and Technology Minister Shane Reti said New Zealand needed to get moving on AI, noting it was the last OECD country to publish such a strategy. "Artificial intelligence represents one of the most significant technological opportunities of our time," Reti said. "For New Zealand, embracing AI is not merely an option - it is essential." The plan - which was developed with the assistance of AI - positions New Zealand as a "sophisticated adopter" rather than as an inventor of new foundational models. For its part, the government is promising a "light-touch and principles-based" approach using existing legislation and regulations, rather than introducing new ones. "The government aims to encourage investment in AI adoption by reducing uncertainty, removing unintended and unwanted barriers to AI in legislation, and providing clear guidance on responsible AI innovation within New Zealand's existing legal framework." As well, the strategy includes a commitment to grow AI expertise in New Zealand, noting that this year's Budget includes more than $200 million for tuition and training subsidies and more than $60m for STEM and priority areas. Dr Andrew Lensen, a senior lecturer in Artificial Intelligence at Victoria University, said the strategy was heavy on economic growth opportunities but "worryingly light" on ethical and societal issues. "The strategy suggests that new legislation is unnecessary, which I, and many other AI researchers, disagree with," Lensen said. "Having 'principles' is not nearly sufficient to reduce AI-induced harm, bias, and inequity. We need clear legislation and well-resourced enforcement mechanisms to ensure AI does not further harm New Zealanders." Lensen, who also co-directs an AI consultancy, raised the risks of sourcing modern healthcare AI systems from overseas, for example, which might have no regard for New Zealand's unique demographics. "This AI Strategy sets a dangerous path forward for New Zealand, with an attitude of economic growth above social good." In contrast, the Auckland Business Chamber chief executive Simon Bridges applauded the new strategy, saying it would give "clarity and confidence" to many small and medium enterprises which were currently unsure where to start. "This strategy cuts through the fog," Bridges said. "It's practical, not hype. If we don't get moving, we'll fall behind - but this gives Auckland a real platform to lead." A 2024 Datacom survey found that 67 percent of larger New Zealand businesses utilised some form of AI, up from 48 percent in 2023. However, a separate Spark-NZIER survey, also last year, said 68 percent of SMEs had no plans to explore the technology. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
