
We must address the problem of over-management if we are to succeed
The same applies to nurses and teachers. We have improved the ability to diagnose illnesses and also the difficulties our children face with ADHD and the like. Whilst this is great news we haven't adapted to handling these new workloads and our nurses, police and teachers are struggling to cope. We are under-resourced at basic level whilst being way over-managed. We have also removed the power of people to make decisions without a fear of being sued, sacked or accused of some 'ism' or other.
Private industry has similar challenges but is much more efficient and makes quicker decisions, especially as they are usually accountable to shareholders.
The recent fiasco at Dundee University is a good example of something that would be very unlikely to happen in a PLC.
All politicians need to address this massive problem of over-management if we are to retain our best workers and get the most for our cash.
John Gilligan, Ayr.
Read more letters
Tree planting fall is shameful
Picking up on the news the other day that tree planting in Scotland had predictably fallen away after funding was cut, it is useful to put another year of failure in context.
I first became aware of tree planting targets in Scotland in 2006, with an ambition to plant 15,000 hectares of trees a year until 2040, which would have given us 25 per cent woodland cover. The objectives then were to increase our timber supplies, create more woodland habitat, and get people out and about walking in woodland to help the NHS by getting them fitter. The following year, after the film, An Inconvenient Truth, we started hearing about carbon and climate change mitigation as well.
Since then, the target has only been achieved in one year, and the accumulated deficit (I know, I keep a spreadsheet of it) is now 152,000 hectares, or 305 million trees if planted at an average of 2,000 per hectare. The accumulated failure is colossal. That is, trees that agreed policy suggested that we should plant, but we did not.
The responsibility for this rests completely with the Scottish Government for (1) not making sufficient funding available, and (2) not having processes and mechanisms in place which would allow us to efficiently license this additional woodland area.
What this tells us is that the environment in Scotland is not important to our politicians, regardless of what they say about it. I hope people remember that next time we are subjected to their virtue signalling on climate change mitigation. They are not even starting to get the basics right.
Victor Clements, Aberfeldy.
We need Scottish National Degrees
Now that the new Education (Scotland) Bill has passed the final stage of debate, anyone reading it will wonder why they bothered since it seems a charter for maintaining stasis. The new agency, Qualifications Scotland, will doubtless have the sins of the father handed down to it.
Strictly speaking, I take the view that the actual delivery of qualifications is provided by schools and colleges with only the accreditation for their courses being conferred by this new body and this should have been embedded in the new title.
In this respect I suggest the new agency should in law have taken steps to address the disparity in values we are stuck with due to a series of historical accidents which split courses which are characterised as purely academic from those with the practical application of knowledge and understanding. As we have seen in many other organisations, the claim of ownership can be a toxic demarcation.
In order to attempt to address this issue I feel the new agency should design and offer Scottish National Degrees at a national standard both at general and subject level for delivery within all colleges. For too long we have accepted independence within the university system and an assumed supremacy in educational standards.
I fear however that in forming this new Qualifications Scotland body we have missed a golden opportunity to press for one game and one set of rules on the educational playing field.
Bill Brown, Milngavie.
Lecturer posts should be reduced
Several universities in Scotland are in a severe financial position and having to consider redundancies. Part of this is due to a reduction in foreign students paying large fees which in the past allowed high salaries to be paid to university staff. Now these staff are demonstrating against the cuts.
After a pay deal, financed by the Scottish Government of £4.5 million of additional funding, lecturers will receive starting salaries of nearly £42,000 from September 2025. Senior lecturers will get more than £50,000. Perhaps those striking could hold up placards saying "I am only getting £42,000 but deserve more" and see the public response.
It is the Scottish taxpayers who fund part of the university staff salaries. The public sector and universities should not be closeted from reality and job cuts are obviously needed to balance the books.
Clark Cross, Linlithgow.
Tree planting targets have been missed (Image: PA)
Our NHS can be woeful
I was interested to see Andy Maciver remove the rose-coloured spectacles about our 'wonderful' NHS ("Time to talk about debunking the NHS as a national cult", The Herald, June 27).
In the last eight years I have been in hospital five times and on each occasion mistakes (some more serious than others) were made in my treatment. Doctors (including consultants) and nurses need better supervision so that patients do not require unnecessary additional hospital visits.
Marion Carson, Dunblane.
Venice Lagoon or Whiting Bay?
Forty million pounds. That's how much the billionaire Jeff Bezos spent on his obscenely lavish wedding in Venice. Maybe the Scottish Government could have persuaded him to buy a working ferry and have the wedding on Arran.
Ian Smith, Troon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
US FDA to revise label of ADHD medications to add weight loss risk in patients younger than 6
June 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Monday that it is revising the labeling of all extended-release stimulants to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to warn about the risk of weight loss and other side effects in patients younger than six years. The FDA said that it is requiring a "limitation of use" section in the prescribing information of all extended-release stimulants to include a statement on higher rates of adverse reactions in children younger than six years. Extended-release stimulants are prescription drugs primarily used to treat ADHD as an initial therapy and come in a variety of dosage forms, including tablets, capsules and liquid suspensions. Although extended-release stimulants are not approved for children younger than 6 years, health care professionals can prescribe them "off label" to treat ADHD.


Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
‘It's such a relief': NI dad who only learned he had autism in his 40s says diagnosis changed his life
But Larne man Gary Peoples warns too many people in his position are still waiting for help A Larne man diagnosed with ADHD and autism in his 40s has told how the conditions stopped him living a 'normal' life. Dad-of-two Gary Peoples sought help after his children were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
AI doctor four times better at identifying illnesses than humans
Microsoft has developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that it claims is four times better than doctors at diagnosing complex illnesses. The tech company's AI diagnosis system was able to correctly identify ailments up to 86pc of the time, compared to just 20pc on average for British and American physicians. Announcing the findings, Microsoft claimed it had laid the groundwork for 'medical superintelligence'. It comes as Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is seeking to bring AI into widespread use in the NHS to improve efficiency. In April the NHS waiting list rose for the first time in seven months, reaching 7.42m in a blow to one of the Government's key pledges to cut waiting times. Microsoft claimed its system could solve problems more cheaply than doctors – beating physicians even when sticking to a budget for diagnostic tests. The system, known as Microsoft AI Diagnostic Orchestrator, or MAI-DxO, was tested on 304 cases from the New England Journal of Medicine, a medical journal known for publishing complex medical cases from Massachusetts General Hospital. The system comprised a virtual panel of five different AI bots, each serving different roles such as 'Dr Hypothesiser', 'Dr Test-Chooser' and 'Dr Challenger' that would internally deliberate before asking further questions or ordering tests and providing a diagnosis. In one case, the system diagnosed embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, a rare form of cancer that normally occurs in children, in a 29-year-old woman. The system was able to diagnose 85.5pc of conditions when paired with the most advanced AI model developed by ChatGPT developer OpenAI and when it had no budget limit on ordering tests. However, even when it had to stick to a $2,000 (£1,458) budget for tests, it was correct more than 70pc of the time. The 21 human doctors, who had an average of 12 years' experience, spent an average of $2,963 on tests. The average doctor was correct 19.9pc of the time, although they were unable to use textbooks or software to look up information and were generalist physicians, rather than specialists. Microsoft's AI tool correctly diagnosed the condition more than half the time even when unable to order any tests, Microsoft said. 'Complement' doctors The researchers said the journal that had provided the cases was behind a paywall and that many were published after the AI system was trained. This ensured that the cases could not have been included in the datasets used to build the AI, and the system had to arrive at the diagnoses itself. Microsoft's AI health division is led by Mustafa Suleyman, the British entrepreneur who co-founded DeepMind before the lab was acquired by Google. He who moved to Microsoft last year. The company said it received 50m health queries a day on its Bing search engine and Copilot chatbot, adding: 'AI companions are quickly becoming the new front line in healthcare.' However, it said AI would complement rather than replace medical professionals. '[Doctors] need to navigate ambiguity and build trust with patients and their families in a way that AI isn't set up to do,' the company said. Last week, Mr Streeting unveiled an NHS app that he said would include a chatbot that serves as a 'doctor in your pocket'.