Transport Secretary to draw ‘line in the sand' over HS2 as she reveals failings
Heidi Alexander will tell the Commons on Wednesday that she is drawing a 'line in the sand' over the beleaguered rail project, as the Government attempts to reset how major infrastructure is delivered.
Ministers plan to learn from the mistakes of HS2 so that they do a better job when it comes to projects like Northern Powerhouse Rail and the Lower Thames Crossing, it is understood.
'HS2 has made Britain a laughing stock in terms of its ability to deliver big infrastructure projects, and it has to end. This will set out the way we will do that,' a Government source told the PA news agency.
The result of two reviews into HS2 are expected to be announced alongside the Transport Secretary's statement.
The first of these is an interim report by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2, who was appointed late last year.
He will assess the construction of the project's first phase from London to Birmingham.
A second, wider review into the governance and accountability of HS2, led by James Stewart, will also report back.
This is expected to set out what has gone wrong with the project, and what ministers can learn for future infrastructure projects.
As she addresses MPs, the Transport Secretary is expected to address allegations of fraud by contractors to HS2 which have emerged recently.
Earlier this week, it emerged HS2 Ltd reported a sub-contractor working on the rail line to HMRC following an internal probe.
During the statement, Ms Alexander is also set to announce a new chair of HS2.
The current chair, Sir Jon Thompson, previously announced he would stand down in the spring of this year.
His replacement will be Mike Brown, according to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
Mr Brown is the former commissioner for Transport for London, who helped to oversee the deliver of Crossrail, the transport project which became London's Elizabeth Line.
HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power due to spiralling costs.
Concerns about the costs of the stunted project have persisted, with £100 million spent on a bat tunnel aimed at mitigating the railway's environmental impact singled out by Sir Keir Starmer for criticism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maximus to Continue Providing Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Support in West Virginia
Renewed partnership focuses on streamlining access and enhancing customer experience TYSONS, Va., July 21, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Maximus, a leading employer and provider of government services, today announced it has been selected by the West Virginia Department of Human Services (DoHS) to continue serving as the state's enrollment broker for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Since 2015, Maximus has delivered a wide range of enrollment and eligibility services to West Virginia residents. During that time, the company supported the state's efforts to expand the number of programs and populations the enrollment broker project served including the expansion of Medicaid in 2015, the expansion of CHIP in 2017, and the addition of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits in 2017. Maximus has partnered with the state to improve the delivery of eligibility and enrollment services for more than 400,000 West Virginia residents. The majority of Medicaid enrollment in West Virginia is handled through the customer contact center operated by Maximus, offering residents the choice to engage by phone, web, online chat, and mail. The company conducts caller surveys to monitor customer experience, earning a 98% average customer satisfaction score in 2024. Maximus also provides in-person outreach and education at local community events. "We've developed a deep understanding of residents' needs over the last decade and are pleased to continue providing West Virginians a high-quality, person-centered customer experience," said Robin LaFrance, Executive Managing Director of U.S. Services East, Maximus. "As the leading provider of Medicaid enrollment broker services to states across the nation, we prioritize delivering accurate program information and streamlined enrollment services, ensuring residents are promptly connected with the right benefits." In 2018, Maximus partnered with West Virginia to help implement a successful Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) pilot project across two large counties. The company leveraged its enrollment broker infrastructure, developed a full SDOH survey, and added the survey delivery to the Medicaid enrollment process. The surveys, with completion rates of nearly 70 percent, revealed an average of 2.5 unmet SDOH needs per resident. The pilot project's results will be used by the state to better identify the needs of at-risk people, coordinate services, and ultimately improve health outcomes. Learn more about Maximus's eligibility and enrollment services for government programs. About Maximus As a leading strategic partner to government, Maximus helps improve the delivery of public services amid complex technology, health, economic, environmental, and social challenges. With a deep understanding of program service delivery, acute insights that achieve operational excellence, and an extensive awareness of the needs of the people being served, our employees advance the critical missions of our partners. Maximus delivers innovative business process management, impactful consulting services, and technology solutions that provide improved outcomes for the public and higher levels of productivity and efficiency of government-sponsored programs. For more information, visit View source version on Contacts Media & Public RelationsEileen Cassidy Rivera, media@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Congressional Republicans face bruising battle to avoid government shutdown
Congressional Republicans are facing an uphill battle over the next two months to deliver on their promises to cut spending in the next fiscal year – while avoiding a partial government shutdown if no deal is struck."When's the last time we got 12 appropriations bills actually done, and completed in a couple of weeks? It's almost impossible to do," Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga., told Fox News Digital last week. Passing 12 individual appropriations bills, each funding separate aspects of the federal government, has been Republicans' goal each time the Sept. 30 fiscal year (FY) deadline nears. But that has not happened since 1996 — FY1997 — and the partisan environment in Washington has only gotten more polarized since. Recent Republican-backed legislation has all but sidelined the once-powerful appropriations committees in both chambers. Meanwhile, House Republicans are more broadly eager to adhere to the Trump administration's request to cut $163 billion from non-defense government spending than their Senate counterparts – which could result in a standoff between the two chambers. "It's looking like it's going to be higher than what the president's budget is. And that, I'm not a fan of," Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., a member of the House Appropriations Committee, told Fox News Digital last week. Another committee Republican, Rep. Riley Moore, said, "I'm really proud of the work the committee has done so far. I do feel like we're gonna be able to get these bills done. The question is, what's the Senate going to do?" Further compounding difficulties between the two sides of the U.S. Capitol is the 60-vote filibuster threshold that most bills in the Senate must ram through. That means that any spending bills have to be bipartisan, but after Senate Republicans advanced President Donald Trump's $9 billion rescissions package, Senate Democrats have warned that they won't play ball. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that he would like to go ahead with a regular appropriations process, but that Senate Democrats "have signaled that they don't want one." "The Democrats have been very clear," he said. "They are already conferencing the idea of a government shutdown — I don't have any idea, no idea how that is helpful for them or to anyone." Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., previously warned that if Republicans were successful in passing the rescissions package — after icing out Democrats during the budget reconciliation process — that there could be trouble down the road in generating enough bipartisan support to pass spending bills, nonetheless avert a partial government shutdown. Sen. John Hoeven, chair of the Senate Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies appropriations subcommittee, told Fox News Digital that if Democrats planned to block everything, then "what would you expect?" "By working with us, that's how they actually will get some of their priorities," the North Dakota Republican said. "But when they're going to just block us, then why should their priorities be included?" A House Appropriations Committee member who spoke with Fox News Digital on the condition of anonymity indicated that Republican lawmakers are beginning to accept the possibility of a short-term continuing resolution (CR), a stopgap measure extending the previous fiscal year's funding levels in order to keep the government open. "You could see a situation where you're in a short-term CR, and we'll try to negotiate topline numbers and all that," that House lawmaker said. It's a situation that House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., didn't rule out to reporters early last week – while agreeing with Senate Republicans' concerns about Democrats failing to work across the aisle. "I'm always worried about a shutdown, because I think the Democrats have a very hard time bargaining with Donald Trump. I mean, that's why we ended up in a CR," Cole said, referring to the last round of government funding talks that resulted in a CR from March through the end of FY2025. "We offered them a much better deal than a CR, and they couldn't do it. So I hope this time they can, but the temperature on the other side is very high, and Democratic voters are punishing their own members for cooperating on things like keeping the government open." That could create issue with members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, however, who have fiercely pushed back against CRs or "omnibus" spending bills in the past – though no such standoffs have led to a shutdown in recent years. Both House and Senate Republicans are dealing with razor-thin margins of just three votes. House Republicans scored an important victory last week in passing their $832 billion defense funding bill. That, along with the bill funding military construction and Veterans' Affairs, make up more than half of the discretionary budget requested by the White House earlier this year. But they're not expected to hold House-wide votes on any of the remaining 10 bills before early September, when Congress returns from August recess. Senate Republicans are also gearing up to consider their first spending bill, one for military construction and the VA, on Tuesday that will likely end up being a test of how the appropriations process, and likely government funding extension, will play out in the coming months. Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said after the rescissions package passed that she wanted to see the panel return to form, and in doing so, keeping the bipartisan spirit of appropriations alive. "It is unfortunate that many members of this body have voted to make that a whole lot harder," the Washington state Democrat said. One senior House GOP lawmaker who spoke with Fox News Digital ultimately downplayed concerns of a shutdown, however. "The factors of the Senate wanting more money than the House, Democrats wanting more money than Republicans – those have been in place for a generation. And most of the time, shutdowns don't happen," that lawmaker said. "It would seem to me that although the Democrats are big mad about Elon and Trump, and reconciliation, at some point, that temperature's going to fade and people are going to realize that a shutdown doesn't really serve our national interests."
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South African president removes minister criticised by key coalition partner
JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) -South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has removed the higher education minister from her position, his office said on Monday, after his party's key coalition partner accused her of misconduct. The removal of Nobuhle Nkabane from her post could help defuse tensions between Ramaphosa's African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), the two biggest parties in the coalition government, ahead of a budget vote this week. The DA alleges that Nkabane helped engineer the appointment of ANC-connected individuals to the boards of skills development organizations and lied to parliament to cover that up. Nkabane has denied the allegations against her, according to local television station eNCA. She said in a statement that it had been a privilege to serve in her position. The DA welcomed Nkabane's dismissal. The party stepped up its criticism of the minister after Ramaphosa fired its deputy trade minister for not receiving presidential permission for an overseas trip, in the latest spat between the two main governing parties. The DA threatened to vote against the budgets of departments led by ANC ministers it has accused of wrongdoing, including Nkabane, potentially disrupting the national budget. Lawmakers are due to consider the last major piece of budget legislation, the Appropriation Bill, on Wednesday. Solve the daily Crossword
