The House: Parliamentary week achieves two out of three goals
Photo:
123RF
While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event - Thursday's debate on the
report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber
- the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note.
The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget.
The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues.
This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement.
The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June.
A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week - to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency.
Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate.
The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted.
This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace.
After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House).
Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts.
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi moved the vote on his own punishment.
Photo:
RNZ/Mark Papalii
Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress.
The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack.
The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster.
The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end.
As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: "My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today.
"Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country."
That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi.
The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately.
- RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Key Wellington areas identified as vital to survival of native bird species
Wellington City Council urban ecology manager Daniela Biaggio. Photo: Supplied/Wellington City Council Wellington is lucky to have nearly 40 species of native birds living along its urban coastline, but with more than half of these under threat, their nesting habitats must be looked after, says an ecologist. An annual bird survey of 55km of Te Whanganui-a-Tara coastline from Petone Beach to Oteranga Bay has identified four key areas essential for the survival of indigenous coastal bird populations. Wellington City Council urban ecology manager Daniela Biaggio said the survey also showed the capital was "a vital refuge" to 37 native bird species, "which is pretty amazing for the national capital". However, 20 of those species were classified as threatened or at risk. "It's really important to balance our urban life with caring for these taonga species." The four key areas identified by the survey are Oruaiti Reserve on the Miramar Peninsula, Taputeranga Motu in Island Bay, Wellington's south coast and the southern end of Wellington's international airport runway. Biaggio said they supported rare breeding colonies and critical nesting habitats for species like the spotted shag and banded dotterel. "For example, Taputeranga [motu in Island Bay] is one of the key breeding area for matuku moana - the reef heron," she added. "Twenty percent of the region's reef heron population breeds on that small island, so these places are really, really important places for us to care for our birds." Biaggio said the survey did more than identify habitats. "How we care for coastal birds goes beyond these key areas. Lots of things that we wouldn't normally think of as important can provide habitats. "Old infrastructure, such as piers and marinas, can also be strongholds for perching places for breeding birds." Locals and visitors could help protect the region's unique biodiversity by understanding and respecting the city's natural spaces, she added. "Whether you're visiting for a scenic view, on a fishing trip or just enjoying the coast, taking care to minimise disturbance to these bird habitats goes a long way to preserving Wellington's coastal bird populations for generations to come. "Human disturbance from off-road vehicles, fishing and other activities threatens sensitive breeding grounds, especially for ground-nesting birds. "The last remaining important breeding areas for our native coastal manu are areas with limited access, ruggedness and remoteness which tells us that with a bit more care in how we share the coast with this taonga species we may be rewarded and encounter them more often." The four key essential areas are: Submissions are now open on Tātou ki Uta - the council's draft Coastal Reserves Management Plan until 5 August. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Prime Minister's Office Only Given Hour's Notice Before Winston Peters' Speech Dismissing 'Trade War'
The Prime Minister's office was only given an hour's notice of the contents of a speech by the Foreign Affairs minister, in which Winston Peters criticised the language used by politicians regarding a "trade war." While Peters did not name Christopher Luxon in his speech, it was seen as a veiled swing at a series of phone calls the Prime Minister made to other world leaders over US tariffs, and the lack of notice he had been given ahead of a Foreign Policy speech by the Prime Minister a few days earlier. Correspondence first obtained by Newsroom and also released to RNZ show the communications Peters' office had with officials ahead of the speech in Hawai'i, and the notice it gave the Prime Minister's office. The background On 10 April, the Prime Minister delivered a speech to the Wellington Chamber of Commerce, in which he said free trade was "worth fighting for" and raised the idea of CPTPP and European Union nations working together to champion rules-based trade. He also announced his intention to speak to other world leaders about trade, amid the tariffs which had then-recently been announced by US President Donald Trump. The same afternoon, Peters told reporters at Parliament such remarks were "all very premature," and confirmed the Prime Minister had not discussed with him the idea of getting CPTPP and EU nations together. A day later, Peters was in Tonga, and during a press conference advised politicians to "tone down" and wait for the dust to settle. "Markets lose their nerve. Share market speculators lose their nerve. Politicians should not lose their nerve." He also said the Prime Minister should consult with him. "He didn't check it out when he made that speech and made those phone calls. And so I hope that he'll get my message and he'll call me next time." From there, Peters was off to Hawai'i, and delivered a speech in Honolulu. He told a gathering at the East-West Centre the "tendency to hype up a debate about how international trade works into a black-and-white, polarising issue has been unfortunate and misguided" and criticised "military language" like "trade war" and the "need to fight." Peters said such language "has at times come across as hysterical and short-sighted." Giving notice WhatsApp messages show Peters' senior foreign affairs adviser Michael Appleton informed staff in the Prime Minister and Trade Minister's offices about the quote Peters had given reporters at Parliament about the Prime Minister's idea to get the CPTPP and EU together to talk trade being "premature", as well as the responses he gave reporters in Tonga about the tariff approach. On 12 April, he also gave the group a heads up that Peters would be giving a speech in Honolulu, and that they would get an advance copy once it was finalised. In a separate WhatsApp group with Ministry of Foreign Affairs officials, Appleton informed them Peters had "decided" to "deliver brief (5-10 minute) remarks" about the US/NZ relationship in Hawai'i. Appleton said he would work on a draft on the six-hour flight to Honolulu, using the "existing briefing/comms pack" and Peters' instructions as a guide. "But warning you I'll want some reactions to a draft text later today once we have arrived in Honolulu," he said. The responses to Appleton's message were redacted. Via email, Appleton informed senior diplomats and officials of Peters' intention to deliver the speech on US/NZ relations, and sent them a draft. "It has been written to his instructions, and he has signed it off (subject to same [sic] final tweaking tonight). So the scope for further edits is limited." The recipients included the Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade Bede Corry, the US Ambassador Rosemary Banks, MFAT's deputy secretary for trade and economic Vangelis Vitalis, its deputy secretary for the Asias and America Grahame Morton, Americas divisional manager James Waite, and Pacific divisional manager Sarah Lee. Appleton told the group Peters' office would alert the Prime Minister, the Trade Minister, and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet "to the fact of this speech, and then provide an advance copy one MFA has finished his tweaking. "So no need for you to do any coordination on that front." The advance copy was sent to the offices via WhatsApp an hour before Peters delivered the speech. 'Nothing to add' Following the speech, Luxon said coverage had been a "media beat-up" and insisted that he and Peters were actually on the same page. "We both agree that tariffs and trade wars are bad. We both think cool, calm and collected approaches are what is needed from ourselves and from our partners. We'll continue to build out our US relationship, and we're strengthening our bilateral ones," he told Morning Report. "So from our side, whether it's Winston and I, whether it's the five ministers dealing with it, and frankly, our whole cabinet, we're very aligned on our approach." Asked on Friday about the released of the communications and the notice his office was given, Luxon told reporters he had said all he wanted to say on the matter. "I've spoken about that ages ago, I've got nothing further to say about it. As you know, we're just making sure we're upholding the rules-based trading system." Peters' office did not wish to comment further. "We have nothing to add on this issue, which was well traversed at the time."
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Glitch sends one person's rates bill to up to 1000 Central Hawke's Bay residents
A software problem at Central Hawke's Bay District Council is being investigated. Photo: LDR via Central Hawke's Bay Mail / Ian Cooper A software glitch at Central Hawke's Bay District council sent one person's rates bill to up to 1000 ratepayers. The council's chief executive, Doug Tate, said they were made aware of an issue with the rating system on Friday morning. "When our rate notices were sent out, one person's information from 2024 was sent out to multiple people," Tate said. "We're working to establish the fault. At this point, we understand it to be under 1000 people. "I'd urge anyone who received it to protect the person's privacy, please delete the email. "We take these matters, including protecting people's privacy, really seriously. I will be working with the team at Council to better understand what the fault was." The Council said on its Facebook page there was no need to phone them, "as we're aware and working hard with our software suppliers to understand the issue". "We'll will let you know more soon." Central Hawke's Bay District Council set its 2025/26 rates increase at 7.4 percent. It follows a 20 percent increase last year. The council is working to reduce predicted water rate hikes of $5000 per household over the next decade. At a meeting on Thursday, councillors voted to stay at the table to consider recommendations for the Regional Water Services Council-Controlled Organisation (HBWSCCO), including one on the impact of a 30-year investment strategy. Deliberations were held to consider the community's submissions on three options, a Regional CCO with our Hawke's Bay councils, in-house delivery, and a standalone CCO, and the views heard during the five-week consultation period. "Now's the time we need to sit at the table with Government and our regional partners to ensure the challenges of the district's three waters infrastructure are turned into opportunities for generations to come," Central Hawke's Bay mayor Alex Walker said. From the submissions, it was clear that most residents connected to and paying for water supported the change to the Regional CCO. "It's this group of people who are most impacted," Walker said. "But we also recognise this is a complex issue of ownership, control, Government reach, trust, confidence, as well as affordability. "We've listened to these points, and they helped strengthen our response. Your voices have armed us with the support for clear advocacy in the region and to push back at Government policy, and how to better right-size our investment. "Addressing the challenges of our water infrastructure is one of the most significant - if not the most significant issue for this district. "We have been advocating to the Government, and anyone who will listen, that the system is broken and must change to support districts like ours. "I have called on Local Government Minister Simon Watts, imploring him to consider changes that would benefit smaller rural communities, including Central Hawke's Bay." Council will meet again on 24 July. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
