Two brothers fire-bombed home in family feud over engagement ring, court hears
Two Ennis brothers carried out a firebomb attack on a home where their 22 month old niece was present at the time arising from a family row sparked by an engagement ring, a court has heard.
At Ennis Circuit Court, Judge Francis Comerford has jailed Peter Molloy (23) and Martin Molloy (25) for 20 months for the 'completely outrageous' petrol bomb attack on the home of the Quinn family on Ennis's Watery Rd in November 2023.
The court heard that the Quinn and Molloy families at the time were in dispute over an engagement ring.
Seven months after the petrol bomb attack, Peter Molloy suffered an 'unspeakable tragedy' through the loss of his infant son, Hunter in May 2024 when he was struck by a vehicle near his home on the Quin Rd in Ennis.
On the events of November 2023, Judge Comerford said that this was 'a planned petrol bomb attack on a house'.
Peter Molloy and Martin Molloy.
News in 90 Seconds - Wednesday, July 30
He said that he was 'deeply conscious of all of the tragedy that has touched the Molloy family'.
'Peter Molloy lost his 18 month old son last year but a 22 month old daughter of his deceased brother was present in the house at the time.'
'It is a deeply, deeply serious crime.'
No one was injured in the petrol bomb attack which took place at 8.30pm on the night where the fire was quickly put out and the damage caused totalled €3,000.
Both Peter Molloy and Martin Molloy of Ballaghboy halting site pleaded guilty to the criminal damage of windows and the front door belonging to Margaret Quinn at Ennis's Watery Rd on November 18th 2023.
Judge Comerford imposed a 45 month prison sentence on both and suspended the final 25 months in each case.
He said that it was impossible not to impose an immediate custodial sentence to make sure that 'blatant attacks of this nature involving petrol bombing of occupied residential homes don't occur'.
Counsel for Martin Molloy, Aaron Desmond BL (instructed by Shiofra Hassett) said that a brother of the two Molloys, Jim died and had been in a relationship with a member of the Quinn family.
He said: 'There was an argument about an engagement ring between the two families and the engagement ring had significant sentimental value for both families.
'This unfortunate and tragic circumstance was the root of the animosity between the two families.'
Mr Desmond said that his client has never served a custodial sentence before.
Counsel for Peter Molloy, Pat Whyms BL (instructed by Daragh Hassett) said that families have resolved their difficulties and 'and there are members from both families seated together in the back of the courtroom'.
Mr Whyms said that his client had engaged in a 'ludicrous escapade' on November 18th 2023.
He said that 'the families were fighting over an engagement ring' and what occurred on the night 'was totally out of proportion'.
Mr Whyms said that Peter Molloy was 'in a heightened state on the night and what happened was not pre-planned. They had talked themselves up into a state'.
He said that everything must be seen through the prism of 'the speakable tragedy' suffered by the Molloy family with the loss of their 18 month boy in May 2024.
He stated that the tragic event of May 2024 put something like the row over the engagement ring in context.
Mr Whyms said that Mr Molloy's attitude to life has changed over what is important and what is not important.
He said the Molloys have three children and are expecting another baby next month. Mr Whyms said that his client is very remorseful for his actions and has engaged well with the Probation Service.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
2 hours ago
- Sunday World
‘What a f***ing b***h' – Call centre worker who thought she was on hold loses unfair dismissal claim
'The problem is that the customer heard it and took it to be a direct reference to her,' a WRC adjudicator wrote. A telephonist who was 'marched out' of a call centre after being sacked for using 'abusive and foul language' over an open phone line in the mistaken belief she had put the customer on hold has lost a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. Bosses at Infosys BPM Ltd concluded the worker, Colleen Lonergan, jeopardised a 'valuable' client contract and committed gross misconduct when she was heard to remark 'what a f***ing b***h' by the customer last year, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) heard. In a decision just published, the employment tribunal has rejected a series of statutory complaints against the firm by Ms Lonergan, including claims under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Employment Equality Act 1998. Ms Lonergan told the WRC the phrase was intended to 'describe the situation rather than the customer', the tribunal noted. Stock image. News in 90 Seconds - Saturday, August 2 'The problem is that the customer heard it and took it to be a direct reference to her,' a WRC adjudicator wrote. It happened during a 'particularly difficult' call on June 27, 2024, when Ms Lonergan said she had been 'on the phone for an hour and 45 minutes without help', the tribunal noted. Ms Lonergan's evidence was that she 'thought the call was on hold'. Adjudication officer Penelope McGrath wrote in her decision document that by the time the case came before her, the tape of the call that had been reviewed in a company investigation had been wiped. 'There does not seem to be any doubt that the complainant used the word 'b***h' while on the call,' the adjudicator wrote. She noted the sworn evidence of the company investigator, a junior operations manager, that the phrase used was: 'What a f***ing b***h.' 'I understand that the tape was played in the course of the investigation and disciplinary process and that there was, at that time, no dispute that the language which was used was unacceptable,' Ms McGrath wrote. The adjudicator wrote that it was to Ms Lonergan's credit that she 'owned her mistake immediately' and raised it with the team leader. Ms Lonergan was allowed to keep working for a number of days while a disciplinary process took its course in early July 2024, but was 'marched out of the building' upon her dismissal in what the adjudicator considered to be 'regrettable' circumstances. Ms Lonergan, had also advanced a complaint of workplace discrimination against her former employer, referenced absences from work owing to health trouble on one occasion, and 'a breakdown crying at work over home issues and bad calls from customers' on another. 'I was continually harassed about taking too long coming back from toilet and breaks even though I was struggling with my various health issues,' Ms Lonergan wrote in a letter to the WRC. 'It's my belief that when I made the mistake on the call…the company took full opportunity to terminate my employment because of my ongoing health issues,' she added. The company's position was that there was 'no substance whatsoever to these allegations', the WRC noted. Addressing the disability discrimination element of the claim, the adjudicator wrote that she did not form the impression that the Ms Lonergan's team leader had to 'chivvy' her along from bathroom and smoke breaks any 'more or less' than other staff. 'I note there were never any disciplinary issues around time keeping and must assume that the team leader was simply doing her job,' Ms McGrath wrote. 'The respondent's position is that the claimant's behaviour in calling a customer a 'f***ing b***h' on a recorded call was completely unacceptable in the workplace, constitutes gross misconduct and warranted dismissal,' its representative Muireann McEnery submitted. Referencing this in her decision on the unfair dismissal claim, Ms McGrath wrote: 'I approve the respondent position as set out in the submission received.' She dismissed both the unfair dismissal and the disability discrimination complaints, along with further claims by Ms Lonergan under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997, the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994, and the Payment of Wages Act 1991 and the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973.
Sunday World
2 hours ago
- Sunday World
Donation page set up for woman who was brutally tortured in Dublin flat by gang
Five men were jailed last week for a combined 55-and-a-half years for the 'evil and truly barbaric' attack Sean Conroy (21), Mark McMahon (55), Mark Keogh (33), Kian Walshe (22) and Braxton Rice (20) all admitted to falsely imprisoning the woman at Henrietta House A donation page has been set up for Natalie Ennis who was brutally tortured in a flat in Dublin's north inner city. Ms Ennis, who was abducted after a batch of drugs which she knew nothing about went missing, was only rescued when gardaí raided the flat as part of a separate investigation. Five men were jailed last week for a combined 55-and-a-half years for the 'evil and truly barbaric' attack, in which the 37-year-old was stabbed, beaten with a metal pole, burnt, and had clumps of her hair removed. She was also threatened with the rape of her and her daughter during the 'medieval' ordeal at Henrietta House in Dublin last September 26. In a post on the Facebook page for Sonas Domestic Abuse, David Hall, CEO, said that in the wake of Natalie's story becoming public, 'there has been an incredible outpouring of support, compassion and collective outrage'. 'So many of you have reached out to Sonas, and to me, personally, asking how you can help as Natalie faces the long and difficult road of rebuilding her life after enduring unimaginable abuse,' Mr Hall wrote. 'On behalf of Natalie and all of us at Sonas, thank you for the solidarity, the outrage, and the kindness. 'We're passing on every message to Natalie, and your support truly means the world.' The post includes a link with a donate button where '100% of your donation will go directly towards Natalie's care'. Sean Conroy (21), Mark McMahon (55), Mark Keogh (33), Kian Walshe (22) and Braxton Rice (20) all admitted to falsely imprisoning the woman at Henrietta House Speaking outside the court on behalf of Natalie, 'a woman who was lured, trapped and subjected to a level of violence and cruelty that defies belief,' Mr Hall said this was not an assault 'it was torture deliberate, sustained and devastating'. Mr Hall added: 'I would like to thank Justice Codd on Neasa's behalf for her compassion towards me and her understanding of the horror I was subjected to and for imposing sentences that recognised the gravity of the crimes inflicted upon me.' Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard how Ms Ennis was beaten to the head and body with a metal pole, burned with a makeshift blow torch and a heated hammer head, cut with a knife, kicked and punched, had her hair cut off and was threatened with rape. Five of the eight men present that day entered guilty pleas, while another man and a juvenile are still before the courts. The eighth person is not before the courts. Natalie Ennis News in 90 Seconds - Saturday, August 2 Mark Keogh (33), Mark McMahon (55) and Braxton Rice (21), all of Henrietta House, Henrietta Place, Dublin 7, along with Sean Conroy (21) of Sillogue Road, Ballymun and Kian Walshe (22) of Constitution Hill, Dublin 7, all pleaded guilty to false imprisonment and assault causing harm to the woman at Henrietta House on 26 September 2024. We later revealed how the torture gang were dealing drugs for a significant crime figure in the Tallaght area at the time of the attack. The drugs boss, who is aged in his mid-30s, runs a large-scale cocaine operation in the capital, with sources saying his name 'constantly features' in drug-related investigations around the city. In her victim impact statement Ms Ennis said that if "the police hadn't come in that day" she was "sure" she was dead. Speaking later to Prime Time, Ms Ennis said the assault has left her traumatised, physically scarred, and fearful to leave her home. "They beat me with metal poles. They were coming at me with flying kicks into the face. They were standing on my head on the floor. Then they were heating up hammers and sticking them to my legs... I had a hatchet held to my neck and then it was stuck in my head," she said. "After that, they spat at me as well. That was one thing. They were just beating me to a pulp. There's no words for it." One of the men, she said: "was coming at me with a blowtorch and he was putting in my face and burnt my ear and my face". "It was just unbearable. The pain was unbearable. I had bones sticking out of my was just pure evil what they done to me." Ms Ennis was left with serious injuries after the attack, that she still suffers from today. "I had staples in my head leaving hospital as well. I can't remember how many, but it was a good lot from the hatchet being stuck in my head," she said. "I can't feel that side of my face still to this day." Her teeth were also significantly damaged. "My teeth was knocked down my head, so my confidence when I'm smiling, it's just, I don't really smile." At one point during the assault, she said, the men threatened to rape her. The men also threatened to rape her daughter, she said, adding they 'were going to go to my daughter's school, she was 17 at the time, and they were going to rape her'. In the wake of the conviction, Mr Hall said there had been an 'abject failure' of the State to join up all the services required by victims. 'It will be eleven months before Natalie has a psychiatric appointment,' he said. 'There's a raft of basic services that are needed. There is an abject failure to join the dots to ensure all services required by victims are offered.' He said: 'It's expensive to be a victim of crime', noting that there is a large cost associated with being a victim, citing health appointments as an example.
Sunday World
2 hours ago
- Sunday World
Two people in hospital after serious crash in Co Donegal
The two have been hospitalised in the wake of the two-car crash. Two people have been hospitalised following a two-car collision in Co Donegal this morning. The collision took place on the R246 at Main Street in Kerrykeel shortly after 10.45 am. The driver of one of the cars involved, a man in his 40s, was taken to Letterkenny University Hospital where his condition is understood to be serious. The passenger, a female in her late teens, did not require immediate hospital treatment. Stock image News in 90 Seconds - Saturday, August 2 The driver of the second vehicle, a woman in her 70s, was also taken to hospital for assessment. The scene has been preserved for examination by Garda Forensic Collision Investigators and traffic diversions remain in place. Gardaí are urging anyone who witnessed the collision or has relevant camera footage, including dash cam, from the area at the time to come forward. Anyone with information is asked to contact Milford Garda Station on (074) 915 3060, the Garda Confidential Line at 1800 666 111, or any Garda station. Investigations are ongoing.
