The cost of being: A dentist getting ready to go on maternity leave
Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.
Gender: Female.
Age: 31.
Ethnicity: New Zealand.
Role: Dentist, about to go on maternity leave.
Salary/income/assets: 2023-24 $146,000; 2024-25 projected $98,000.
My living location is: Urban.
Rent/mortgage per week: Mortgage $1272/fortnight, so $636/week – shared between my husband and I.
Student loan or other debt payments per week: Student loan has $35,819 remaining (down from a high of $98,500). Approximately $13000 repayment per year, so $250 a week.
Typical weekly food costs
Groceries: $90-100 per week at Pak'nSave, shared with husband.
Eating out: We tend to go out for dinner once per fortnight – $100 for that, but we try and use First Table where possible.
Takeaways: $20 pizza or fish and chips, usually once per month.
Workday lunches: Never, always bring in leftovers from home.
Cafe coffees/snacks: One solo cafe trip per week while at work ($6.70, decaf) and one cafe trip with husband on the weekend ($20 – two drinks and a scone/muffin).
Other food costs: $15/month on seeds/plants from garden centres.
Savings: $200 per fortnight into an account for extra mortgage repayments, $100 for emergency fund, anything extra into joint account with husband, $10 per week into new savings account for unborn daughter.
I worry about money: Sometimes.
Three words to describe my financial situation: Lucky, focused, nervous.
My biggest edible indulgence would be: Tajin, a Mexican chilli-lime salt from import stores.
In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: Currently, none. When not pregnant perhaps $10/week.
In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: $30 for petrol to and from work – I drive a fuel efficient Suzuki.
I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: $1,500.
My most expensive clothing in the past year was: A pink and white chequered dress from KILT, $159.
My last pair of shoes cost: $80 Adidas Advantage shoes on sale – had to size up due to my feet getting bigger in pregnancy!
My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: Haircuts, 3-4 per year at $75 each. Makeup, approximately 4-6 mascaras at $20 each, and one Hawaiian tropic sunscreen each month (including winter) at $16 each. Total cost perhaps $800/year.
My exercise expenditure in a year is about: Two pairs of sneakers and one pair of leggings and a sports top per year – $350.
My last Friday night cost: $20 – brought food over to my sister's for a potluck.
Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: The aforementioned KILT dress. I didn't realise it was see-through!
Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: A banana mirror from Simon Lewis Wards on sale for $1000. I had eyed it up for nearly a year and had a dedicated savings account for it. It makes me smile every time I see it in my house.
One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Movies. I love going, but seeing the ticket cost (without food or drinks) top $20 recently means I rarely do it any more.
Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Conscientious, occasionally indulgent, spreadsheets, lucky.
I grew up in a house where money was: Available but used on 'big' things rather than small (e.g. buying home brands at the supermarket). Had some great holidays which I will always remember with my family growing up; and my parents stressed the importance of paying off the mortgage as soon as possible.
The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: 2018, when I was a student at the supermarket.
In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: Working part-time, secure, ideally half of the mortgage paid off and with a 3-6 month emergency fund.
Describe your financial low: Starting my first job six years ago – not much money in the bank, monthly pay not due for another three weeks, and bond due for the rental house. Was a very tight three weeks with a lot of toast eaten in the staff room.
I would love to have more money for: Travel!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
RBNZ Launches 2025 Cash Use In New Zealand Survey
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand – Te Pūtea Matua (RBNZ) is again surveying New Zealanders to understand how people are using and thinking about cash and payments. The RBNZ Cash Use in New Zealand survey is open from now until 10 October 2025 and is being undertaken by an independent research company, Rangahau Aotearoa Research New Zealand, through a postal survey. Director of Money and Cash, Ian Woolford says that cash is important to New Zealanders. 'As the steward of money and cash for New Zealand, we need to ensure that New Zealanders can access, use, and bank cash. This survey enables the RBNZ to effectively monitor the cash system,' Mr Woolford says. The survey asks: How people prefer to pay for things, how often people use cash and why, how often they withdraw cash, how easy or difficult it is to withdraw or deposit cash and if they keep or store cash and why. Things are changing in the cash system, so we are also asking new questions this year, such as whether people may be experiencing any challenges in using cash. The survey is based on a representative sample of New Zealanders randomly selected from the Electoral Rolls. People will be able to voluntarily respond by post (postage-paid return envelope) or online. If people receive a letter to voluntarily participate in this survey, they can check it is legitimate by visiting our website, emailing us cashusesurvey@ or phoning the RBNZ main phone number on +64 4 472 2029. The RBNZ has undertaken this survey every second year since 2017 and use the results to make sure New Zealand has a reliable and efficient cash system that supports inclusion. 'We are redesigning the cash system and need more up to date information about how people are using and accessing cash so from 2025 we will survey annually,' Mr Woolford says. The results from the Cash Use in New Zealand survey will inform our work to redesign the cash system and ensure we continue to meet New Zealanders needs for banknotes and coins. The RBNZ expects results from the survey to be available to the public in the first quarter of 2026. More information
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NCEA changes: What led to Government's radical overhaul, why we shouldn't be shocked
The proposal does, however, represent massive upheaval for a sector that has faced its fair share of stop-and-start in the past few years and is a step away from the flexibility beloved by some in the education community. Education Minister Erica Stanford revealed the proposal on Monday morning. Photo / Alyse Wright The Government's proposal would lead to two new certificates being established for Years 12 and 13 that are more structured and subject-driven than the current standards-based model. Instead of students trying to grab every credit they can across disparate standards like kids in a money booth with paper notes blowing around in the air, they will be tested and marked on their knowledge of an entire subject. The return of an 'out of 100' and A to E letter grade is intended by the Government to be a clearer indication to parents, employers and tertiary education providers of a student's knowledge. The package is one of the most consequential steps the coalition has taken this term and will likely be remembered as a landmark moment in this Government's approach to education. Pending any last-minute adjustments during consultation, these changes will have a direct impact on the readiness of future generations entering the workforce and tertiary education. When the Government talks about tackling the infrastructure deficit, improving productivity and ultimately achieving its prized economic growth, there are, of course, short-term initiatives to get the ball rolling. But long-term, it's students in class right now who will have a lot to contribute. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who has spent considerable time working overseas and is known to be personally passionate about education, is clearly concerned NCEA isn't preparing Kiwi kids to be the top of class internationally. You only have to look at an OECD study released last year that found New Zealanders aged 16 to 24 had below-average literacy, numeracy and problem-solving skills. The results have worsened compared to a similar study in 2014-15. Asked by the Herald last month about possible fixes, Luxon made it clear the Government was readying for a 'fundamental overhaul' of secondary school assessments. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has a passion for education. Photo / Michael Craig What led to change? This hasn't come out of nowhere. Stanford has been looking to make changes to NCEA for years, including when she was National's education spokesperson in Opposition. The then-Labour Government announced a programme of work to deal with various issues facing NCEA. It devised new literacy and numeracy co-requisites and fewer standards to refocus students, but there were delays as the sector asked for more implementation time. Stanford believed the change programme was 'fundamentally flawed' and thought simply making tweaks wasn't enough. After taking office in late 2023, she pushed out the introduction of some reforms. But the new minister didn't have enough time to halt the Level 1 amendments set to begin just a couple of months later. So she later commissioned a review by the Education Review Office (ERO), which found that despite the overhaul, Level 1 remained 'difficult to understand' and was not preparing students for future achievement. It said one option was to drop it entirely. That report was hugely influential and formed the basis for discussions about what to do not just with Level 1, but the entire qualification. Stanford told the Herald last month that ERO 'unearthed a lot of things that we weren't possibly expecting'. Over the following year, Stanford received more briefings, including papers from the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) the Herald got hold of. They warned of a credibility crisis over 'overused' flexibility, a lack of coherent vocational education pathways and an over-reliance on internal assessments. They also showed nearly half of Year 12 students who achieved Level 2 last year did so 'without engaging in a full programme of coherent subject-based learning'. About a third of Year 12 and 13 students who achieved Level 2 or 3 relied on unit standards from 'disparate' subjects. Education Minister Erica Stanford has been thinking about reform since her time in Opposition. Photo / Mark Mitchell A more prescriptive approach While this was happening behind the scenes, Stanford was beginning to announce reforms focusing on primary and intermediate schools. This sequencing was important. Stanford believed to address issues with students at high school, you first had to start with the challenges facing them earlier in their school life. The Government instructed teachers to spend an hour a day teaching reading, writing and math. Structured literacy and numeracy was rolled out, while standardised testing was brought in much earlier in a child's school life. The actions showed the Government's prescriptive approach. Today's secondary school qualification proposal keeps to that pattern, rolling back some flexibility and replacing it with more direction. The Opposition sees this as the Beehive enforcing 'one-size-fits-all' and has argued the minister is moving too fast. But the Government thinks the 'back to basics' style is easier for students and parents to understand, and also simpler for teachers. Stanford wants an overall education package driven by consistency, with the hope children can move between schools and expect the same level of learning, driven by the same assessments and standards. Whether that works out will depend on how well the changes are implemented and if the minister is able to bring those in the sector along with her. Stanford is critical of how reforms were being rolled out under Labour, though Chris Hipkins – current Labour leader and former Education Minister – says they were disrupted by factors such as Covid-19. He believes Labour's work provided insights into NCEA's issues. Labour's main point of concern on Monday was not directed at the substance of the proposed changes, but instead around the uncertainty caused and ensuring teachers, parents and others had an appropriate period to share their views. The Post-Primary Teachers' Association responded to the proposal by saying while no system is perfect, the current one has 'clear advantages' over the previous qualification and no changes should be made 'for change's sake or political legacy'. 'The lack of adequate support for, and political flip-flopping on, NCEA means teachers are left trying to fill the gaps. We need stability and certainty.' Consultation will take place over the next six weeks, while any new qualification won't be introduced until the end of the decade. Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
KiwiSaver: Kiwis shift billions from big banks to boutique operators
KiwiSaver members are quitting big bank providers and shifting their investments to independent and boutique operators. Data for the most recent financial year, compiled from documents filed on the Disclose register, shows that Milford Asset Management was the biggest winner, with almost $1.5 billion of net funds transferred in. In total, there is about $120b invested in KiwiSaver. Generate was second, Simplicity third and Kernel fourth. At the other end of the table, ANZ lost a net $728.7 million in transfers, ASB $476.6m and Westpac $353.2m. ADVERTISEMENT ANZ still has the largest market share, at 17.5%, followed by ASB with 14.7%. In 2015, ANZ had almost a quarter of the market, but since then it has suffered through a period of poor performance. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including toddler found in suitcase on bus, Russian volcano erupts, and Liam Lawson pips former world champion. (Source: 1News) In Morningstar's March survey, ANZ's conservative fund was bottom of the pack over 10 years, balanced was 15th out of 16, and its growth funds were 11th and 14th out of 14. ANZ said the market was "extremely competitive". "Across the industry, a total of 163,000 KiwiSaver members transferred providers in the year to March 2025, up 22%. "ANZ continues to focus on helping New Zealanders feel more confident and in control of their KiwiSaver investment. ADVERTISEMENT "That means supporting better conversations, especially through our banking channels. We're also proactively checking in and communicating with members, not just waiting for them to come to us. "We're continuing to invest in intuitive tools and digital experiences, such as our Fund Chooser Tool and government Contribution Tracker, to make managing KiwiSaver simpler for customers. "Additionally, we've refreshed our investment beliefs and continued to reduce fees across several of our funds, benefiting our members and reinforcing our commitment to delivering strong, long-term value." Composite image by Vania Chandrawidjaja (Source: iStock/1News) (Source: 1News) Greg Bunkall, data director at Morningstar, said Milford and Generate were the only providers with more than $1b in net inflows in the year. "Those two providers also feature heavily in the top of the league tables regularly. As a provider, you need to have strong brand awareness, marketing, and lead generation functions - but the performance would help. "If you talk to some of the KiwiSaver providers that do well and receive earned media, they will typically see larger than normal switches in days that follow - so that would at least anecdotally support at least some degree of performance chasing in the KiwiSaver cohort." ADVERTISEMENT KiwiWrap topped the table on a measure of the number of dollars in versus the number out, followed by Kernel. Kernel had the biggest percentage growth in funds under management. Milford head of KiwiSaver Murray Harris said its long-term returns were helping to draw customers in. Morningstar reports showed Milford among the top performers over three, five and 10-year periods. He said there tended to be more interest in provider switching in the middle of the year, when people were encouraged to check their funds and ensure they had contributed enough to get the full government contribution. "Members are quite focused on their KiwISaver and get a reminder to look at it. We often see a boost this time of year." He said KiwiSaver balances had become more significant for many members, and it made sense that they were looking at what options were available to them. ADVERTISEMENT People considering switching should compare long-term returns, he said, not just the most recent quarter or year. "We've seen some very specialist funds do very well, gold and crypto are doing well at the moment… don't just look at the short-term returns but the long-term. "How consistent are they at providing those market-leading returns throughout time? Five and ten years would be the minimum ... These are very long-term investments, so the longer the track record you look at, the better." People were more likely to move when markets were performing well, he said. "We've had strong market returns almost every day since the wobble in April, that makes people more confident to transfer. When markets are not doing well, they tend not to transfer because they think they'll crystallise the loss with one provider." But as long as people were moving to a similar fund type, they would not be in a worse position for shifting providers. "You might do better if you recover the fall in value driven by the market sooner." ADVERTISEMENT Kernel founder Dean Anderson said people were becoming more engaged and realising that KiwiSaver wasn't just a bank product. "Now that education and awareness is growing, people realise there are better solutions out there." But compared to the number of people who switched for a better deal on their power or phone, he said, switching activity was still very low. "I think we should expect to see that increase. As balances get bigger, people think, 'Am I better off elsewhere? Are there better fees, better service, better values that align with mine?" The growth of smaller, newer providers showed people had confidence in the scheme, he said. "There's confidence that these players are good, stable, growing businesses. You don't have to be with the bank."
