logo
100 years ago, the first trains pulled into Union Station

100 years ago, the first trains pulled into Union Station

Chicago Tribune11-05-2025
Chicago's Union Station has borne witness to the gamut of emotions, its cavernous waiting room echoing with everything from raucous laughter to profound despair ever since the first train arrived there 100 years ago this month.
The imposing station that sprawls along Canal Street west of the Loop was artistically inspired by the massive ruins of Rome's Baths of Caracalla. On a more practical level, its blueprints addressed a problem identified earlier by architect Daniel Burnham in his 1909 'Plan of Chicago.'
With 22 railroad lines converging on Chicago, the city's center was covered by a spider's web of tracks. If one switch failed, a massive traffic jam ensued. In 1881, three lines made a dent in the problem. The Chicago & Alton, the Pittsburgh & Fort Wayne, and the Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad jointly established a Union Depot between Madison and Clinton streets and just west of the Chicago River.
When trains pulled into a terminal, the final station on their route, it meant another train couldn't use that track until its predecessor backed out. When Burnham got the contract to design the new Union Station, he placed it between two sets of multiple tracks. That 'permitted trains from the east and west to enter and leave simultaneously,' the Tribune reported on the station's July 23, 1925, opening day.
Burnham died in 1912 and while the station was built with his vision, it was completed by the firm later known as Graham, Anderson, Probst and White.
The station's cost was estimated at $75 million and picked up by a consortium of railroads. Burnham justified going big on a train station by forecasting in his 1909 plan that 'within a few years the waking hours of a million Americans will be spent in the business center of Chicago, where unpleasant sights and sounds should be abolished.'
Burnham took a similarly hyper-rational allotment of space to his design of the eight-story Union Station building.
Its predecessor had 'an energetic man in blue uniform and cap' who steered immigrants to quarters across Adams Street from the station.
The separation of newcomers continued in the Union Station, which had an immigrants' waiting room. Conductors telegraphed the names of immigrants aboard incoming trains.
The Woman's Waiting Room had stairs leading down to a nursery. A doctor, a nurse, and a matron were present at all times.
There were formal and casual dining facilities, staffed by the famed Harvey Girls, who waited on tables in what's considered the nation's first restaurant chain at train stations across the country.
There were two jail cells for offenders being taken to prison, a morgue for travelers who died on a train, and a chapel for those feeling spiritually needy. One hospital handled customers' medical emergencies. Another cared for railroad employees.
The entrances from Clinton Street were quite modest. The Pennsylvania Railroad's manager insisted on that. He wanted to send a message that folks using those entrances weren't welcome.
On that side, the station was bordered by an intimidating motley of saloons, furniture-making workshops, and Chicago's garment district.
The station's cavernous space was emphasized by architects' age-old gambit of bringing people through a cramped space into a towering one, thus psychologically underlying the latter, noted Fred Ash in his book 'Chicago Union Station.'
'Patrons entering from the east had their visual field first constricted then expanded, causing them to instinctively lift their eyes,' Ash wrote. 'Columns of Italian travertine soared over a belt course of warm gray marble ten feet high.'
At one end, a pair of niches were occupied by hulking, plaster figures. Day was accompanied by a rooster, Night by an owl.
The scene was diffusely lit by skylights and shadows cast by the coffered barrel-vaults through which they ran, 125 feet above the floor.
At its formal opening, Mayor William Dever pronounced the Union Station the finest thing Chicago had accomplished in a long time. But his eloquence was outdone by a chemical analysis made by the R.W. Hunt & Co.
It revealed that the station's heritage was far older than the 1888 establishment of a predecessor station, the Union Depot. The lengthier chronology was formulated after an examination of what appeared to be a 'bleeding pillar.'
'Sure enough, there were long streaks like old blood or iron rust, running from a point about ten feet up,' assistant station manager F.J. Burton told the Tribune in February 1925, before the station opened. 'Travertine marble is extremely porous, with crumbly holes in it that make it look like gorgonzola cheese.'
Coroner Oscar Wolff 'was called from a game of chess at the Hamilton Club' to examine the pillar, the Tribune story said.
He gave orders that no one touch the column, one of four at the south end of the Waiting Room, while he investigated.
Samples of whatever was causing the 'bleeding' were sent to the R.W. Hunt laboratory, which determined the substance to be 'rotted vegetable matter and iron oxide.'
'It was probably caught in a cavity about 7,000,000 years ago when the marble was forming,' the lab concluded.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former CIA Insider Highlights America's Buried Advantage in Online Presentation
Former CIA Insider Highlights America's Buried Advantage in Online Presentation

Business Upturn

time4 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Former CIA Insider Highlights America's Buried Advantage in Online Presentation

By GlobeNewswire Published on July 28, 2025, 02:00 IST Washington, D.C., July 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Rediscovering America's Strategic Core In a released presentation , renowned former national security advisor Jim Rickards warns that the next major shift in U.S. policy may come not from Wall Street or Washington—but from beneath the surface of federally controlled lands. 'This story is not about real estate… the government retained the most valuable part'. Rickards points to a dormant but active legal provision—originally designed to encourage domestic growth—which may now hold the key to America's technological future. The Invisible Wiring of Modern Power The materials Rickards identifies are not commodities in the traditional sense—they are foundational enablers of global advancement: Application Mineral Inputs AI Chips & Data Centers Silicon, gallium, germanium, copper EV Batteries Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, graphite Missile Systems & Drones Neodymium, dysprosium, samarium, rare earth alloys Satellite Navigation Indium, tantalum, beryllium, aluminum 'These seemingly obscure minerals… they're the building blocks of everything from NVIDIA chips to advanced military weapons'. Sources: U.S. Department of Energy CSIS Visual Capitalist A 150-Year-Old Law, Still in Effect Rickards centers the opportunity on Title 30—a little-known federal statute from the 1800s that allowed Americans to claim rights to public lands, which were often rich in mineral deposits. 'Back then, anyone could make a claim… pay $2 to $5 per acre… and do a minimal amount of work'. The framework still exists—and Rickards believes it may quietly be resurfacing to address modern strategic needs without requiring congressional debate. Technology May Be the Catalyst Rickards believes a convergence of technology and geopolitics is making this moment different: The use of AI mapping tools to identify previously unreachable mineral deposits The Pentagon's direct involvement in securing U.S. rare-earth supply chains Escalating foreign control over strategic mineral exports 'We have truly massive mineral wealth here. It's not hard to extract. We know where it is. And how to get it' About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, Pentagon, White House, and Treasury. His work has guided U.S. leadership during global crises including the Iran Hostage Situation and the 2008 financial collapse. He is the editor of Strategic Intelligence , a monthly report on national security, macroeconomics, and resource policy. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.

Walmart launches plan to steal customers away from Target, Amazon
Walmart launches plan to steal customers away from Target, Amazon

Miami Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Walmart launches plan to steal customers away from Target, Amazon

If you're looking for a deal, you probably think to wait until the holidays, when most retailers launch big Black Friday sales. This is a sound idea; the holiday shopping season remains the most lucrative time of the year for most retailers. Related: Walmart cracks down on a growing type of fraud But the back-to-school shopping season is kind of like Black Friday's little sister. "The back-to-school shopping period from July to mid-September is the second-biggest sales driver of the year after the holiday season," the U.S. Chamber of Commerce reports. Every year, usually in the weeks that lead up to late August or early September, most big-box retail stores hold their own versions of back-to-school sales. It may seem gimmicky to celebrate a pretty routine part of the year to get shoppers through the door, but it works. "Americans are expected to spend $38.8 billion on clothes and supplies for children in grades K-12, and $86.6 billion on college students," the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said, per a 2024 National Retail Federation report. But tariffs, rising prices, and inflation complicate this picture. Many families have indicated they'll either slow their spending or specifically shop at discount retailers in search of deals. Some retailers, like Walmart (WMT) , are poised to win in such an environment. Image Source: Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images The late summertime is typically a busy shopping period for Walmart. Customers are shopping for vacation, outdoor activities, picnics, and barbecues. And the most prepared ones begin to trickle in around mid-July for back-to-school shopping. More Retail: Walmart makes drastic change to fight theft amid worrying trendTarget has new plan to win back customers with big savingsHome Depot makes clear statement amid boycott threatsFamous retail chain makes two more alarming store closures So Walmart has decided to roll back the cost of some crucial items for families. The Arkansas-based retailer has cut the price of its top 14 most popular items to prices lower than they were one year prior. Some items are as low as $0.25, and its popular private brand Wonder Nation backpack is less than $5 at just $4.98. All told, Walmart says a student can get outfitted for the new year for just $65. But tariffs, which are duties on imported goods, have complicated the typically profitable back-to-school shopping period. Walmart CEO Doug McMillon explained the complication during the Q1 2026 earnings call. "We started to see increases happen in April and through May. We've been really focused on back-to-school receipts," McMillon explained. "When you have an imported item, you pay the tariff at the time it comes through customs. And so the cost is higher, even if the tariff rate comes down later, the cost has been elevated. McMillon added that tariffs could touch certain items, including back-to-school supplies, with an outsized effect. "So I wouldn't think of this as a moment in time necessarily, except when you think about seasonal things like back-to-school." Other top retailers, including Target (TGT) and Amazon (AMZN) , are also hosting early back-to-school promotions. Amazon's Prime Day served as its early back-to-school launch. It featured deals on books, notebooks, and pens for as low as $3. And Target announced it would put over 20 items on sale for back-to-school. The Minnesota-based retailer said it was freezing the prices of these items at 2024 prices. It claims students can bundle most of their school essentials for just around $20. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers
US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers

The Hill

time6 hours ago

  • The Hill

US-EU trade deal wards off further escalation but will raise costs for companies, consumers

FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) — President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: What's in the agreement? Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on 'the vast majority' of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S. What's not in the deal? Trump said the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. What's the impact? The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' What is some of the reaction to the deal? German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations' and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' The Federation of German Industries was blunter. 'Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry,' said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, 'the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet,' said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy,' Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' What about car companies? Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump's 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%. The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a 1.3 billion euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years. What were the issues dividing the two sides? Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade. Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for U.S.-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store