No jobs for families of deceased civil servants under new govt rule
Listen to article
The government has abolished the facility of offering employment to a family member of a government employee who passes away during service, Express News reported.
The Establishment Division has issued formal instructions to all ministries and divisions to implement the Supreme Court's decision regarding this matter.
According to the notification issued by the Establishment Division, this facility has been withdrawn in compliance with the Supreme Court's ruling dated October 18, 2024. The decision will come into effect from the date of the Supreme Court's ruling.
However, the family members of deceased employees will still be eligible for other benefits under the Prime Minister's Assistance Package.
The memorandum clarifies that the decision will not apply to the families of law enforcement personnel who lose their lives in terrorist attacks. Additionally, appointments made prior to the Supreme Court's decision will not be affected by this ruling.
Following this government decision, all ministries and divisions have been instructed to strictly enforce the new policy.
Last year, the Supreme Court ruled to dismantle the government's job quota scheme for the family members of civil servants, declaring it discriminatory and unconstitutional.
Under the scheme, a widow, widower, spouse, or child of a deceased or medically retired employee was appointed to a government position without the need for open competition or merit-based selection.
In its ruling, the Court noted that the scheme was specifically discriminatory against low-grade employees and their families. "These jobs neither are nor can be made hereditary," the order stated.
The 11-page judgment, authored by Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, emphasized that public sector employment could not be "parcelled out to the functionaries of the state," as it would undermine the principles of fairness and equality. The Constitution mandated that equal employment and economic opportunities must be provided to all citizens.
The Court also explained that any policy or law that contradicted constitutional principles was subject to judicial review. "Any law, policy or rule was subject to judicial review if it was manifestly inconsistent with the constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the citizens," the order said.
The ruling struck down previous orders, declaring that appointing a widow, widower, spouse, or child of a civil servant—who had passed away during service or become permanently disabled—under this quota scheme was "discriminatory and ultra vires to Articles 3, 4, 5(2), 18, 25(1), and 27 of the Constitution."
However, the Court clarified that the decision did not affect appointments already made under the hereditary quota for current employees.
Federal and provincial authorities were instructed to withdraw these laws, aligning them with the constitutional framework.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Adult sites must check users' age, US court rules
Failure to comply risks fines of up to $10,000. Photo: File The US Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify visitors' ages, rejecting arguments that this violates free speech and boosting efforts to protect children from online sexual content, reported AFP. The court's decision will impact a raft of similar laws nationwide and could set the direction for internet speech regulation as concerns about the impact of digital life on society grow. Texas is one of about 20 US states to institute checks that porn viewers are over 18, which critics argue violates First Amendment free speech rights. Britain and Germany also enforce age-related access restrictions to adult websites, while a similar policy in France was blocked by the courts a week ago. US companies like Meta, meanwhile, are lobbying Washington lawmakers for age-based verification to be carried out by smartphone giants Apple and Google on their app stores. The Texas law was passed in 2023 by the state's Republican-majority legislature but was initially blocked after a challenge by an adult entertainment industry trade association. A federal district court sided with the trade group, the Free Speech Coalition, saying the law restricted adults' access to constitutionally protected content. But a conservative-dominated appeals court upheld the age verification requirement, prompting the pornography trade group to take its case to the Supreme Court, where conservatives have a 6-3 supermajority. Under the law, companies that fail to properly verify users' ages face fines up to $10,000 per day and up to $250,000 if a child is exposed to pornographic content as a result. To protect privacy, the websites aren't allowed to retain any identifying information obtained from users when verifying ages, and doing so could cost companies $10,000 daily in fines. During arguments in January before the Supreme Court, a lawyer representing the Free Speech Coalition said the law was "overly burdensome" and that its goal could be accomplished using content filtering programs. But Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the mother of seven children, took issue with the efficacy of content filtering, saying that from personal experience as a parent, such programs were difficult to maintain across the many types of devices used by kids. Barrett also asked the lawyer to explain why requesting age verification online is any different than doing so at a movie theater that displays pornographic movies.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
JUI-F chief says govt lacks mandate, warns of protest
Listen to article Chief of his own faction of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Sunday issued a stern warning to the federal government, claiming that his party could 'take over Islamabad within a week's notice' if pushed to the brink. Addressing the Shaair-e-Islam Conference in Battagram, the JUI-F chief said his party rejected both the 2018 and the 2024 general elections, describing them as 'fraudulent and manipulated.' He accused the ruling coalition of lacking legitimacy and warned the establishment against ignoring the public's will. 'These kinds of governments cannot last,' Rehman said. 'Those who consider themselves powerful should bow before the will of the people.' Claiming that his party stands for constitutional supremacy, the JUI-F leader vowed to lead a movement that would bring about a 'revolution' in the country. 'We want rule of law and the Constitution. JUI-F workers will be in the field, and success will be ours, because the power of Allah is with us,' he added. بٹگرام: قائد جمعیت مولانا فضل الرحمٰن مدظلہ جلسے سے خطاب کر رہے ہیں۔#JUIBattagramJalsa — Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Pakistan (@juipakofficial) June 29, 2025 Taking a strong anti-US stance, Fazl accused Washington of hypocrisy and betrayal. 'The same America that abandoned us many times is now asking to join hands again, invoking the name of Prophet Ibrahim (AS),' he said. 'But how can we forget America's role in the oppression of Muslims in Palestine, Libya, Egypt, Syria, and Jordan?' Referring to recent praise for US President Donald Trump by the government, he criticised the prime minister's nomination of Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. 'Our view is clear: if Trump exists, peace does not — and if peace exists, Trump does not,' he said. The JUI-F chief also expressed solidarity with Iran in opposition to Israel and pledged readiness to defend the sanctity of the holy sites. 'We are committed to the unity of the Muslim Ummah and ready to protect the Haramain,' he said. Warning of dire consequences, he said his party was being 'forced' toward a confrontation. 'We prioritise national security, but if the need arises, we will declare jihad and lay down our lives for this country's defence,' he asserted. Reiterating his rejection of the prevailing political order, Fazl said his party would continue to oppose the current setup. 'We did not allow the previous government to function, and we will not allow this one to function either,' he declared. 'We are not willing to accept this government and will continue to stand against it.' The conference was also addressed by senior JUI-F leaders, including Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Haideri, who alleged that the current provincial government in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa had 'broken all records of corruption."
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
IHC orders abolition of CDA
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Saturday ordered the federal government to dissolve the Capital Development Authority (CDA) and transfer all its powers and assets to the Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI). In a detailed verdict, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani ruled that the CDA has no legal authority to impose taxes. The court further declared that any amount collected by the Authority from individuals or institutions under the guise of "Right of Way" or direct access charges must be refunded. The federal government was instructed to initiate and complete the process of dissolving the CDA and transfer all its powers and assets to the Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI). The judgment emphasised that the rights of Islamabad's citizens must be protected under the law. The ruling was issued in response to a petition filed by Taj Residencia Housing Society and its residents. The court also declared SRO dated June 9, 2015 — regarding CDA's right-of-way and access charges — null and void, along with all actions taken under it, labeling them as illegal. Any funds collected under this SRO must be returned. Justice Kayani noted that the CDA Ordinance was originally enacted to establish the federal capital and oversee its development, but due to evolving governance structures and new laws, its practical relevance has ended. The original objectives of the CDA have been fulfilled, and it is now appropriate for the government to formally dissolve the authority. The court also directed that following the transfer of powers, the Islamabad administration must operate in a transparent and accountable manner. The judgment reaffirmed that Islamabad's entire administrative, regulatory, and municipal framework is governed by the Local Government Act, which mandates that no tax could be imposed without the approval of the elected local government. Therefore, CDA lacks any legal authority to levy taxes. It is worth noting that CDA had imposed right-of-access charges on petrol pumps and CNG stations, and direct access taxes on private housing societies for connecting to main roads. These charges were challenged in the IHC, resulting in this significant decision. Rains prompt monsoon action On the other hand, the CDA has finalised a special action plan for the monsoon season and issued a notification outlining the responsibilities of all relevant departments to ensure effective implementation. On the instructions of CDA Chairman, Member Administration Talat Mehmood has been assigned to oversee the plan. According to the notification, special teams will be deployed following a survey of illegal basements and low-lying areas. Flood relief camps and other safety measures will be established to handle any emergency situations. A Flood Relief Cell will remain operational from July 1 to September 30, headed by the Director of Emergency and Disaster Management. A dedicated helpline will also be set up, and assistance will be available via rescue and fire brigade services. Heads of relevant departments will appoint focal persons at the relief camps. The sanitation department will operate under the authority of the relief camps. A special operation will be launched against makeshift houses and illegal constructions.
