logo
How the Army is cutting costs and rethinking policy to move faster on new tech

How the Army is cutting costs and rethinking policy to move faster on new tech

CNBC16-06-2025

In western Louisiana, a Black Hawk helicopter ride away from the Fort Johnson military base, sits a vast complex of wilderness that the U.S. Army uses to train soldiers for combat.
The expanse, what the Joint Readiness Training Center's calls the "Box," stretches 242,000 acres. It was there that the 1st Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division recently completed a two-week rotation and that the service's top military official, U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George, paid servicemembers a visit.
"We immerse our units in the training that's here. We have a professional opposing force that also has the latest technology, and this is where we learn, adapt and transform," George told CNBC. "This is our fourth brigade that we have basically brought through here and we are completely changing the technology that they're using, how they're organized, and then how they operate."
The 1st Brigade is a new type of military unit: a "transformation in contact" (TIC) brigade. The Army stood up the concept a year ago, and this one represents the most modern to date, equipped with artificial intelligence-enabled platforms, SpaceX Starlink internet connectivity, retrofitted autonomous vehicles and nearly 400 drones.
"What makes this one unique is the scale," said Trevor Voelkel, commander of the 101st Airborne Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team. "The technology has improved, and we're trying to maintain pace with that."
George, whose military career spans four decades, said the Army is on the cusp of a "paradigm shift," ushered in by TIC brigades.
Last month, America's oldest military branch unveiled the Army Transformation Initiative in what is expected to be its biggest restructuring in at least a generation.
Greenlit by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and spearheaded by both George and his civilian counterpart, Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, the initiative enables the Army to trim some jobs and reposition others. It also calls for shifting more defense dollars to products that can be made quickly and cheaply as battlefields become more autonomous and as "exquisite weapons systems" like tanks and aircraft that cost millions to make have proven to be vulnerable to drone strikes.
Part of the reimaging is an effort to expand beyond the rigid, years-long acquisition process that has defined defense procurement and helped perpetuate legacy programs — whether services like the Army want to continue investing in them or not.
"We know our formations want to move faster, and we are trying to get the whole system to move much more rapidly," said George. "A big part of that is stop buying the things that we know are not going to be as effective on the battlefield so that we can infuse our formations with the things that really will be."
Army leadership has talked about improvements to bureaucratic processes for years, but it's been slow going. What makes this initiative potentially different is an extended continuing resolution coupled with a flurry of presidential executive orders — and the existence of the Department of Government Efficiency that could help a deeper cultural shift take root.
"There's just so much change happening inside the Army, inside the [Defense] Department that wouldn't have been possible a couple years ago," said Katherine Boyle, a general partner at investment firm Andreessen Horowitz, who cofounded the firm's American Dynamism practice and has invested in startups like Anduril.
"To see that culture of change, and that culture of DOGE-ing oneself, of cuts, of making sure that you're spending money in the right way, of innovation really hitting different agencies, I think, it's in some ways very hopeful for people who are building new technologies who want to work with the government," Boyle said in a recent interview with CNBC.
In the Box, the TIC brigade soldiers were supplied with 40 new technologies from 10 different companies — many of them not traditional defense contractors. Engineers and executives from the companies were embedded alongside the soldiers to troubleshoot issues and ensure changes could be communicated back to production lines in real time.
Take Skydio, the largest commercial drone maker outside of China, which sells products to the Army. Its drone wasn't flying the full range advertised during testing in the Box.
"We were able to discover that it wasn't some crazy electromagnetic issue. It was actually an issue in the settings where the drone was set on low power," said Mark Valentine, president of Skydio's global government business. "So instead of going through weeks of trying to understand how that happened, within 24 hours, we were able to identify the default setting was low power, set it on high power, and that solved the problem."
Then there's the example of autonomous vehicles.
The Army has a fleet of 100,000 Humvees acquired and sustained over decades. The service needs new capabilities, and General Motors is manufacturing new infantry squad vehicles (ISV) based off a modified Chevy Colorado.
Driscoll asked why commercial self-driving tech couldn't be adapted for military vehicles, and in 10 days startup Applied Intuition had retrofitted a GM ISV to be autonomous and to the Box it went, according to Applied Intuition cofounder and CEO Qasar Younis.
"I think we can move faster than we are," George said. "Our troops can handle the move. They can go fast and so what we've got to do is break down all the bureaucracy … to make sure that we're moving at the speed that we need to for them."
"Nobody's still using the VCR. We don't need to continue to buy a VCR just because somebody sells it," he said. "We need to have the latest technology that's on the battlefield."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Company walks back 'inappropriate' criticism of Cowboys WR George Pickens over youth camp
Company walks back 'inappropriate' criticism of Cowboys WR George Pickens over youth camp

USA Today

time17 hours ago

  • USA Today

Company walks back 'inappropriate' criticism of Cowboys WR George Pickens over youth camp

The company organizing the George Pickens Youth Football Camp has walked back its criticism of the former Steelers receiver for canceling his participation at the event. Headlines out of Pittsburgh on Thursday blasted the often-mercurial wideout for backing out of the camp, a commitment he reportedly said he would honor even after being traded to the Cowboys in early May. But in an email sent to the families of camp registrants earlier this week, the company was rather colorful in explaining how Pickens had "decided to walk back on his word" and went on to trash him for his "disappointing lack of accountability" and "disregard for the families and children who were excited to meet him." Now TruEdge Sports calls the tone of that email "inappropriate" and says their statement "did not accurately reflect the full scope of communication or the context surrounding the event." The company has revealed that it was communication only with Pickens's representatives- and not with Pickens himself- that "led to confusion about the camp's status and future direction." News of Pickens's cancellation- breaking just a couple days before the camp was to be held- made the development seem like the receiver was flaking out at the last minute, but according to their own email, TruEdge actually learned of the change in plans sometime the previous week. That did not stop the company from painting Pickens as the irresponsible party who had left everyone high and dry with next to no warning, a suggestion they now say they regret. "Regrettably, the language used in our original message mischaracterized George's original intent and actions. While our frustrations stemmed from the uncertainty surrounding the event, it was never our intention to publicly question George's professionalism, integrity, or commitment to the community. We now understand that the tone and implications of our message were not only inappropriate but inconsistent with our values as an organization." Pickens has been working with his new Cowboys teammates as part of the official offseason program and was also spotted in social media posts just this week as being one of the offensive playmakers attending quarterback Dak Prescott's annual retreat. In its follow-up email to camp attendees, TruEdge acknowledges that the 24-year-old, who is entering a contract year, has been "navigating a significant career transition during this time and that his team kept open lines of communication with us." The camp has been rescheduled for July 20 in Pittsburgh, with other Steelers players vowing to attend in Pickens's place. That will be the day Pickens and his new Cowboys teammates report to training camp in Oxnard, Calif. Follow Cowboys Wire on Facebook to join in on the conversation with fellow fans!

Panthers Win Second Stanley Cup Under Owner Vincent Viola
Panthers Win Second Stanley Cup Under Owner Vincent Viola

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Panthers Win Second Stanley Cup Under Owner Vincent Viola

The Florida Panthers have skated to another Stanley Cup, defeating the Edmonton Oilers for the second straight year, this time in a 4-2 series triumph. Florida dominated from the get-go in its Game 6 decider, with first period goals from Matthew Tkachuk and Sam Reinhart putting the Panthers on course for a 5-1 win. Reinhart finished with four goals. Advertisement More from While the players deserve the credit for winning on the ice, team owners stake a claim to the glory as well. As the business head of the Panthers, guiding the organization to its two Stanley Cup titles and three straight appearances in the championship series, Vincent 'Vinnie' Viola has his named etched on the Cup alongside his players. Who is Vinnie Viola and how did he make his money? In many ways, Viola is a typical South Floridian—he's originally from New York. The son of a blue-collar worker—his father was a truck driver—Vinnie grew up in Brooklyn and then attended West Point, graduating in 1976. After fulfilling his required military service, he started as a trader on Wall Street in 1982. Viola also earned his law degree from New York University in 1983. Advertisement By the end of the 1980s he had founded three businesses: a futures trading group, a Texas bank and a derivatives market maker in Europe. While also serving in the Army reserves, eventually rising to the rank of Major, Viola's career on Wall Street progressed until he was chosen as chairman of the NYMEX—the New York Mercantile Exchange, a commodities and futures exchange—in 2001. In 2008, he founded Virtu Financial, a high-speed trading firm that primarily makes markets in various securities, providing liquidity for institutional traders. Virtu went public in 2015 and is the main source of his wealth. A billionaire, Viola was briefly considered to be nominated as secretary of the Army during Donald Trump's first administration. He withdrew himself from consideration for the post due to a potential conflict of interest that could have resulted in him, as a government official, benefitting from government contracts. He was seeking at the time to acquire a stake in Swiftair, which charters jets to the government. What is Viola's net worth? According to Forbes, Viola has a net worth of $6.1 billion, placing him among the 600 wealthiest people on the planet. When did Viola first get into sports ownership? Viola originally got involved in sports ownership with the purchase of a minority stake of the New Jersey Nets. He had been a season-ticket holder since about 1989 and bought into the team when real estate developer Bruce Ratner gained control of the franchise in 2004. During his time with the Nets, he had the job of making the major financial decisions for the team, according to a biography of Viola in the club's website. Viola sold his stake to Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov in 2010. Advertisement A couple of years after selling his Nets equity, Viola reportedly reentered sports through ownership of a number of thoroughbred horses. He still owns a troop of race horses through his St. Elias Stable. His horses have won more than $7 million, according to America's Best Racing, a horse racing publication. When did Viola buy the Panthers? Viola bought control of the Panthers in 2013, paying $250 million for all of the franchise's equity from hedge funder Cliff Viner and his limited partners. Joining him at purchase time as aminority owner was Doug Cifu, a Virtu cofounder who is now vice chairman of the club. At the time, Viola had his work cut out for him. The franchise had largely been moribund in its two-decade history since expansion. The season prior to the purchase, the Panthers were the worst NHL team on the ice, and had made the playoffs only once in 12 years before he acquired the team. Under his ownership, the club has made the playoffs seven out of 13 years, including six straight. He also renovated the team's Fort Lauderdale arena and added a two-sheet practice facility and community skating rink, which opened a little over a year ago. Advertisement The team has thrived under Viola. While the Panthers rank 26th in the latest Sportico NHL franchise valuations, their $1.25 billion valuation is more than double the $520 million the team was worth in 2021. Coming off its first Stanley Cup, the club had a 91% season ticket renewal rate for the current season. Best of Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Stay away from these two big U.S. banks as valuations become stretched, Baird says
Stay away from these two big U.S. banks as valuations become stretched, Baird says

CNBC

time2 days ago

  • CNBC

Stay away from these two big U.S. banks as valuations become stretched, Baird says

The recent rally in shares of JPMorgan and Bank of America may soon reverse, according to Baird. Analyst David George downgraded JPMorgan to underperform and Bank of America to neutral, citing a less attractive risk-reward outlook. His $235 12-month price target for JPMorgan implies more than 18% downside from Thursday's close, while the $52 target on Bank of America results in more than 9% potential upside. "We understand the optimism around mega cap banks here – benefits from deregulation, solid capital positions, capital markets are opening up and JPM is the gold standard in the group," he wrote in a 9-page report published Friday. "However, [we] are of the view that BAC is at [fair value] and JPM has modest downside from current levels, with JPM trading at record valuations. We understand that few care about valuation currently, but we still believe they are one of the primary drivers of forward returns." Both U.S. banks have outperformed the S & P 500 in 2025. JPMorgan has soared more than 20% so far this year while Bank of America has advanced about 8%, while the broad market index has risen 4%. As a result, the JPMorgan forward price-to-earnings ratio had widened to 15.5 and Bank of America's to 13.1, according to FactSet. JPM BAC,.SPX YTD mountain JPM vs. BAC and S & P 500, year-to-date With JPMorgan selling for a record 2.9 times tangible book value, George said that its future returns will "likely not be what they've been the last several years at these valuation levels," leaving its risk-reward profile "unattractive." "We realize we are fighting the tape here, and understand that JPM is a best-in-class franchise, with dominant share in all of their businesses and truly a fortress balance sheet," he added. "We simply think that expectations are super high here." Bank of America's risk-reward profile is more "balanced," still leading George to the sidelines. "We upgraded BAC in April, being of the view that the market was under-appreciating its earnings power and overly focused on [Berkshire Hathaway's] selling of the stock during the tariff panic," he wrote. Bank of America is up almost 12 % in the past three months alone. "We remain huge fans of the BAC franchise and the bank should continue to experience the tailwind of an improving [net interest margin] along with a more favorable capital markets backdrop, but feel like the stock is largely reflecting it here." The majority of Wall Street analysts remain bullish on both. Some 14 of 26 have a strong buy or buy rating on JPMorgan, and 21 of 25 analysts rate Bank of America the same, according to LSEG data. Both banks are falling less than 1% premarket Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store