
BBC hit new low allowing rap star to call for murder of Jews – sinister move goes beyond double standards
Over the weekend, it broadcast around the world disgraceful scenes of thousands of people chanting demands to murder Jewish people.
6
6
6
It sends hundreds of staff and spends millions broadcasting Glastonbury every year, but no one thought to pull the plug when Pascal Robinson-Foster — who ludicrously calls himself Bob Vylan — ranted about working for a 'f***ing Zionist' and then led the crowd in chanting 'death, death to the IDF'.
Let's be clear: That is a call for the murder of Jewish people.
First, because most members of the Israeli armed forces are Jewish.
But second, because the IDF prevents the mass murder of Israel's Jewish citizens.
Whether it is the racist terrorists Hamas and Hezbollah on Israel's borders or Iran trying to build nuclear weapons, without the IDF, Israel would be destroyed and its Jewish citizens murdered.
That is what was broadcast on Saturday.
The BBC's own rules say: 'Broadcasting hate speech can constitute a criminal offence if it is intended or likely to stir up hatred relating to race, or intended to stir up hatred relating to religious belief.'
Its Director General Tim Davie should already have sacked whoever allowed this to happen.
And if, as Attorney General Richard Hermer claimed last week, it is 'disgusting' to suggest the law is not being applied equally and impartially, then the police must take tough action too.
They and the courts must act as quickly now as they did when Lucy Connolly was prosecuted for whipping up a mob with a call to commit racist violence after the Southport murders last year.
Fury as Glastonbury crowd chants 'death to the IDF' during Bob Vylan set aired live on BBC
And we are entitled to ask why the leader of Palestine Action won't face trial until next year for offences committed in 2023.
Or why the police announced last week that the ridiculous rappers Kneecap won't be prosecuted for telling a crowd: 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.'
But we have long since got used to different standards being applied by the BBC, politicians, the police and prosecutors when it comes to Israel.
Report after report has shown the BBC's consistent and systemic bias.
Take one example: In October 2023, the BBC rushed to cover an explosion at the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza.
Pompous international editor Jeremy Bowen claimed it had been 'destroyed' and 'flattened'.
Another BBC correspondent said it was hard to see what could have caused it, 'other than an Israeli airstrike or several airstrikes'.
Millions saw those reports, including in the Middle East where riots took place.
Arab leaders cancelled peace talks with President Biden.
Iran hit a hospital in Beersheva in Israel.
And when it turned out that the rocket in Gaza had not hit the hospital, but landed in the car park after being misfired by Palestinian terrorist, the BBC brushed it all aside and Bowen said that he 'doesn't regret one thing' about his reporting.
Look at Parliament too.
6
6
6
Every single week there are emergency debates in which childish MPs trot out teenage lies about Israel committing war crimes, genocide or apartheid.
Most of them know next to nothing about Israel or its history, but that doesn't matter as long as it gets a few likes on Twitter or TikTok.
As a result, Israel and Gaza have been mentioned ten times more than Sudan, where famine has killed more than 500,000 children and thousands more have been killed in the civil war.
Israel has even been discussed more than twice as much as Russia and Ukraine and almost twice as much as the NHS or immigration and asylum — issues our MPs can actually do something about!
Let's be really clear. If you single Israel out or accuse it of committing uniquely evil crimes, you are responsible for causing racism and hatred against Jewish people in Britain.
There are 200 land-based conflicts in the world, so if the only conflict you care about is the one that involves Israel or the only country you campaign against or think shouldn't exist just happens to be the only Jewish one, don't tell me you are not an anti-Semite.
The Labour Party need to be very careful on this.
One of the reasons Jeremy Corbyn was beaten so badly in 2019 is because ordinary decent British people thought an obsession with Israel and one-sided support for the Palestinians looked mad — and they were appalled by the anti-Jewish racism that poisoned the party under his leadership.
And BBC bosses must finally wake up too. Their job is to stand up for British values of democracy, freedom, fairness and tolerance.
If they can't or won't do that, they must be replaced by people who will.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk does surprise U-turn amid heated Trump feud to give the president 'credit' on a major conflict
Elon Musk took to his X account to talk about President Donald Trump but, in a surprising twist, he was there to praise him instead of criticize him. He made his complimentary comment after re-tweeting Trump's update on peace talks between Israel and Gaza including a 60-day ceasefire deal. 'Credit where credit is due. @realDonaldTrump has successfully resolved several serious conflicts around the world,' the world's richest man wrote. It was a remarkable change in tone considering the two men have spent the month sniping at each other on social media, each trying to out top the other with threats and insults. The Tesla CEO has come out publicly against Trump's signature spending and tax 'big, beautiful bill' that is snaking its way through the House and Senate this week. He slammed the bill over its cuts to electronic vehicle subsidies and says it increases the country's deficit. After Musk's public condemnation of the legislation, Trump even indicated he was open to the idea of deporting the Tesla founder, who was born in South Africa and is a naturalized American. The president also threatened to turn Musk's DOGE agency against him, telling the Daily Mail that he might have the agency 'eat Elon' - which likely meant Trump was threatening to cancel Musk's billions in government contracts. The simmering tensions between the two men have boiled over in the past week as Musk railed against Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and Trump snapped back. It was a throw back to their breakup last month, which was public and messy. Their long alliance appears to be over but Musk, who said he was leaving DOGE to concentrate on his private businesses, appears to be making a return to politics. Musk spent almost $300 million to support Trump and other Republican candidates in the 2024 election. And now he's threatening to start a new political party. In response, Trump escalated matters, saying he is open to deporting Musk and adding that additional threat: turning DOGE - the agency Musk founded - against him. 'I don't know. We'll have to take a look,' the president told Daily Mail on Tuesday when asked about deporting Musk. 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,' Trump added. Musk responded on X, writing: 'So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now.' Their feud, which had quieted down, reignited after the Tesla founder spent much of the weekend railing against Trump's signature bill, complaining about its cuts to electronic vehicle subsidies and showing that it increases the country's deficit. The Senate, however, ultimately approved the 'big, beautiful bill' on Tuesday. It now faces another vote in the House. Trump shrugged off Musk's criticism and warned the Tesla founder has more to lose than EV subsidies that help support his car business. 'Elon is not getting his mandate,' Trump said Tuesday. 'He's not going to get his mandate and he better be careful. He might not get anything else.' Trump also appeared to regret his Tesla purchase, which he made earlier this year, paying cash. He turned the South Lawn into a Tesla showroom in a nod to his relationship with the world's richest man. 'Not everybody wants an electric car. I don't want an electric car,' Trump said. At the time, Musk was the head of the Department of Government Efficiency and his auto dealerships became the target of protests due to his sweeping cost-cutting. Musk was a top contributor to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, spending millions to help the president win a second term. But their relationship went South after Musk left the government to return to the private sector. They sparred on social media after Musk amped up his criticism of the Big, Beautiful Bill. But Trump made it clear that Musk knew the subsidies for electronic cars was not an option from the start. And he said Musk may have to go back to his homeland of South Africa. 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly endorsed me for president, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate,' Trump wrote on Truth Social early Tuesday. Musk, in response, threatened to start a new political party and target Republicans who ultimately vote for the president's package. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' he wrote on X. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' Musk, the world's richest man, gave nearly $300 million to Republican candidates last year. Now he may leverage that seismic war chest among the very GOPers he once aided, writing he would work to dislodge GOP incumbents in primaries 'if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.'


The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves appears to be crying as her position is questioned during PMQs– video
The chancellor appeared to be tearful after a series of questions from Kemi Badenoch, who said Labour MPs had said Reeves was 'toast', and suggested the prime minister had failed to confirm she would stay in post until the next election. Downing Street weighed in immediately to support Reeves, with aides saying she was 'going nowhere' and there would be no reshuffle


BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Llanharan horse sex abuser Corey Coleman sentenced in court
A man with "an unhealthy interest" in horses was found to be sexually abusing the animals after a stallion injured him while trying to mount Coleman, 26, assaulted two stallions and a mare at Ynyscrug Livery in Pantybrad, Rhondda Cynon Taf, where he helped was only caught after being found injured on the ground on 27 June 2024 in what Merthyr Tydfil Magistrates' Court heard was "an element of instant karma".Coleman, of Llanharan, admitted two charges of subjecting a horse to sexual, physical and/or emotional abuse and two of failing to protect animals for which he was responsible and was given a 12-week prison sentence, suspended for 12 months. Geraint Richards, prosecuting on behalf of the RSPCA, said despite suffering "serious injuries", including to his back, in June, it was not long before Coleman was "back at the stables".When asked by stable owner Alex Hill about his injuries, Coleman suggested that "one of the stallions in the yard had attempted to mount him". This prompted him to check CCTV footage from 15 July that showed Coleman "teasing and arousing" a from 27 June - the date he was injured - and 29 July also showed similar incidents, but the court heard it was hard to establish the details of what exactly was Richards said the stables were "quite busy" and there were often "children in the vicinity" outside and it was likely the abuse had gone on "for many months". Daniel Mags, defending, admitted it was a "very unusual case", and Coleman found it difficult to discuss the incidents because of his "embarrassment".He added his client had already suffered an "element of instant karma" following his injuries and accepted he had "an unhealthy interest" in was previously involved in an equine events organisation, but had "destroyed any future career of that nature" and was now having counselling. The court heard the abused animals - stallions Benny and Bear and a mare called Nala - were "fit and healthy upon examination".Chairman of magistrates Jeffery Edwards said Coleman committed "numerous offences over a prolonged period of time" but there was a "prospect of rehabilitation".Coleman was also disqualified from owning, keeping or transporting horses, or participating in their keeping, for five years and ordered to pay costs of £474.