New book reveals what top ex-Biden aide was thinking during disastrous debate
"2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America," a new book released Tuesday by journalists Josh Dawsey of The Wall Street Journal, Tyler Pager of The New York Times and Isaac Arnsdor of The Washington Post, is the latest analysis of how Biden lost the White House.
The authors described how, during the June 2024 debate, "Biden's aides winced as the president started answering the first question about the economy and voters who felt they were worse off under his presidency."
And backstage, as Biden stumbled over an answer that questionably ended with, "We finally beat Medicare," back in the holding room, Klain stood up and announced, "We're f---ed," according to the authors.
Mike Donilon, Bruce Reed and Klain were among those leading Biden's final prep ahead of the debate, according to the book.
Despite Klain expressing doubt internally, Klain continued to defend the president amid calls from donors and politicians for Biden to step down.
On June 30, 2024, Klain reshared an X post that urged Americans to ignore the "news reports" with "anonymous sources about Dem donors calling for Biden to withdraw."
"We are the Democratic Party! These people don't get to decide to oust a pro-labor pro-people President," Klain said on July 4, 2024, in response to The New York Times reporting about the Democrats' pressure campaign against Biden.
According to the book, after the debate, Klain called Jeff Zients, his successor as Biden's chief of staff, to say he was "disturbed that Biden was planning to spend the weekend at Camp David."
"We have an emergency," Klain told Zients, according to the book. "We have a crisis on Capitol Hill, and the crisis is going to accelerate."
But Zients insisted Biden was going to Camp David to be with his family, instead of Klain's plan to appease the progressive wing of the party with a bold second-term agenda.
"I have no f---ing clue why he's going to Camp David this weekend," Klain said, according to the authors. "He needs to be working the phones, day and night."
Even before the debate, when concerns about the first octogenarian president's ability to lead the country through a second term came to a boiling point, Klain had concerns, as portrayed in the book.
Klain had overseen debate prep for every Democratic presidential candidate since 2004, according to the authors. Between Biden's cold, a shorter prep window than usual and staffers privately expressing concern, debate prep in Camp David did not quite go as planned, the authors claimed.
"This is going to be really touch and go in Atlanta," Klain told Donilon and Reed ahead of the debate, according to the book.
Fox News Digital has written extensively dating back to the 2020 presidential campaign about Biden's cognitive decline and his inner circle's alleged role in covering it up.
When reached for comment, Klain told Fox News Digital, "I have nothing to add."
Biden did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Speaker Johnson says it would be 'great service to country' if Ghislaine speaks on Epstein
House Speaker Mike Johnson on Sunday said it would be a 'great service to the country' if late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, comes clean and discloses the information she has. Johnson (R-La.) acknowledged he is unsure whether Maxwell can be trusted to tell the truth to the House Oversight Committee, which has subpoenaed her for testimony, and argued that she should still face more than 20 years behind bars. Asked on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday if Maxwell could be trusted, the speaker admitted, 'It's a good question. 4 House Speaker Mike Johnson admits Sunday he has reservations about whether Ghislaine Maxwell can be trusted to be truthful. NBC/Meet the Press 'I hope so,' Johnson said. 'I hope that she would want to come clean. We certainly are interested in knowing everything that she knows. 'She is convicted. She is serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking, and so her character is in some question,' he said. But if she wants to come clean now, that would be a great service to the country, and we'd like to know every single bit of information that she has.' A rift among MAGA faithful and President Trump ripped open earlier this month when the Justice Department and FBI concluded that evidence indicated Epstein did not have an 'incriminating client list' and that he had in fact killed himself in prison. 4 Maxwell is accused of helping to procure underage girls and sex-assault victims for late sicko pal financier Jeffrey Epstein. US District Court for the Southe 4 Epstein's former lawyer has said Maxwell 'knows everything' about the sex predator. US District Court for the Southe On Thursday and Friday, US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche — President Trump's former defense lawyer — met with Maxwell in Florida for several hours of questioning. Her lawyer has said she is still mulling whether to testify before the Oversight panel or invoke her Fifth Amendment rights. Trump has publicly claimed that he hasn't thought about pardoning her but also stressed, 'I am allowed to do it.' Johnson suggested that he would not be in favor of Maxwell getting presidential clemency. 'If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least,' Johnson told the show. 'Think of all these unspeakable crimes, and as you noted earlier, probably 1,000 victims. 'It's hard to put into words how evil this was and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it,' he said. 'I think it is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would.' 4 Johnson talks about the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case to NBC's Kristen Welker. NBC/Meet the Press Johnson dealt with the political reverberations over the MAGA rift on Epstein. Amid the firestorm, Trump publicly lashed out against his base, and Democrats worked to put Johnson on the spot by attempting to force votes compelling the disclosure of the Epstein files. Last Monday, Democrats on the House Rules Committee, a gatekeeper panel that determines the manner in which most pieces of legislation come up for a vote on the House floor, again attempted to put Republicans on the spot over the kerfuffle. The GOP opted to recess the Rules Committee, which effectively froze up the House of Representatives. Johnson decided to send the House home a day early for the August recess as a result. 'What we did do this week is end the chaos in the Rules Committee because the Democrats are trying to use this in a shameless manner for political purposes,' Johnson said Sunday. 'Quite obviously, they hijacked the Rules Committee, and they tried to turn it into an Epstein hearing. 'That's not what the Rules Committee is about.'
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
U.S. And EU Reach Trade Deal—Setting Tariffs at 15%
The U.S. has agreed to a trade deal with the European Union, President Donald Trump announced Sunday afternoon, agreeing to a 15% tariff rate on most exports, including European cars, from EU countries—just days before the Aug. 1 deadline set for Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs. US President Donald Trump meets with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland ... More on Sunday. AFP via Getty Images This is a breaking story and will be updated.
CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Vought won't rule out more rescissions funding cuts before September
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said his office is considering more options to claw back funding approved by Congress and isn't ruling out sending more bills to lawmakers with further cuts before September. Vought confirmed on CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" Sunday that "we are looking to do [a] rescissions package" to take back some funding from the Education Department. A rescissions bill is the president's request to rescind funding already appropriated by Congress. Last week, President Trump signed a bill clawing back foreign aid, NPR and PBS funding, becoming the first president in decades to receive approval for such a measure. "We're thrilled that we had the first rescissions package in decades, and we've got the process moving again," Vought said of the $10 billion clawback. Asked to confirm there'd be no rescissions package before September, as Congress attempts to fund the government and head off a shutdown, Vought responded, "Not here to say that. We're looking at all of our options, we will look at it and assess where the Hill is, what are the particular funding opportunities that we have?" Asked about National Institutes of Health funding for research into heart disease and cancer that has yet to be released, Vought replied, "We're going through the same process with the NIH that we did with the education." He alleged NIH had wasted funds, claiming "$2 million for injecting dogs with cocaine that the NIH spent money on, $75,000 for Harvard to study blowing lizards off of trees with leaf blowers." He vowed to go "line by line to make sure the NIH is funded properly" and said funding would be released "when we are done with that review." Vought's use of rescissions measures to amend government spending is seen by Democrats and some Republicans as a backdoor method of infringing on Congress' constitutional power of the purse. "Rescissions is just a Washington name for double cross," Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, also on "Face the Nation," said after Vought's interview on the program. "They support one thing one day — the president even signs off — and then they come back and say they change their mind." But the OMB director argued, "We have the ability and the executive tools to fund less than what Congress appropriated" under the Impoundment Control Act, which enables the president to delay spending funds appropriated by Congress, and he didn't rule out a legal battle over the executive branch's authority to revise lawmakers' spending downward, if it "could find waste" by an agency. Vought has also caused GOP Senate Majority Leader John Thune some headaches with a comment he made Thursday suggesting the appropriations process must be "less bipartisan." But this put Thune in a bind as he oversees negotiations to avoid a government shutdown in October, since Republicans hold a slim majority of 53 - 47 in the Senate, and most legislation must reach a 60-vote threshold. "It's going to take 60 to fund the government," Thune said in response to Vought's remark, and he added, "we plan to move [appropriations] bills that will have cooperation from the Democrats." Van Hollen said it was ironic that Vought is "calling for these deep cuts to education, NIH, when he has asked for an increase for his OMB budget." And referring to reduction-in-force — or RIF — staff cuts the administration wants across the government, Van Hollen added, "He asked for a 13% increase for his OMB budget. He's asked for more people to join the OMB staff while he's talking about RIF-ing people at other departments." The Maryland senator said that Democratic senators, as they negotiate funding government operations, are "asking for four Republican senators just to publicly declare that when they say they're gonna fund the Veterans Affairs Department, that they actually mean it."
