US oil futures unchanged despite API showing surprise build in US crude stocks
Crude Oil WTI Futures, the U.S. benchmark, recently traded at $65.54 a barrel following the report after settling up $0.34, or 0.5%, at $65.45 barrel.The positive start for oil prices followed a recent retracement as the geopolitical risk premium continues to be price out of prices after Israel and Iran agreed a ceasefire.
U.S. crude inventories rose by about 680,000 barrels for the week ended Jun. 28, compared with a decline of 4.3M barrels reported by the API for the previous week and expectations for an decrease of about 2.3M barrels.
Gasoline stockpiles increased by 1.9M barrels, while distillate inventories -- the class of fuels that includes diesel and heating oil -- fell by about 3.4M barrels.
The official government inventory report is due Wednesday at 10:30 a.m. EDT (1430 GMT).
Related articles
US oil futures unchanged despite API showing surprise build in US crude stocks
Saudi Arabia leads OPEC+ push for more output increases - Bloomberg
US oil futures rise from lows after API shows large draw in US crude supplies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Martin Wiggen: Oil Inventories Still Low
The Pulse with Francine Lacqua Since global oil inventories are still low, there is little risk that OPEC's decision to increase production will lead to a supply shock says Nadia Martin Wiggen, Director at Svelland Capital. Nadia spoke to Francine Lacqua on 'Bloomberg: The Pulse'. (Source: Bloomberg)
Hamilton Spectator
25 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
U.S. envoy receives the Lebanese government's response to Hezbollah disarmament proposal
BEIRUT (AP) — A U.S. envoy said Monday he was satisfied with the Lebanese government's response to a proposal to disarm the militant Hezbollah group, adding that Washington is ready to help the small crisis-hit nation emerge from its long-running political and economic crisis. The U.S. envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, spoke to journalists after meeting President Joseph Aoun, saying he will study the government's seven-page response. Barrack said the American and Lebanese sides are committed 'to get a resolution.' 'What the government gave us was something spectacular in a very short period of time and a very complicated manner,' Barrack said during his 20-minute news conference at the presidential palace southeast of Beirut. His meetings in Lebanon came amid fears that Hezbollah's refusal to immediately disarm would renew war between Israel after a shaky ceasefire agreement went into effect in November. Last month, Barrack gave Lebanese officials a proposal that aims to disarm Hezbollah and move on with some economic reforms to try get Lebanon out of its nearly 6-year economic crisis, the worst in its modern history. The economic meltdown is rooted in decades of corruption and mismanagement by Lebanon's political class. Barrack said Lebanon should change in the same way as Syria has following the fall in December of Syrian President Bashar Assad ,who was replaced by a new leadership that is moving ahead with major economic reforms. Barrack said President Donald Trump and the U.S. are ready to help Lebanon change and 'if you don't want change, it's no problem.' The rest of the region is moving at high speed,' he said. Hezbollah's weapons have been one of the principal sticking points since Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000, ending an 18-year occupation. The two sides fought a destructive war in 2006 that ended in a draw. The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began a day after the Hamas Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel and intensified in September, leaving the Iran-backed group badly bruised and much of its political and military leadership dead . Since a U.S.-brokered ceasefire went into effect in November, Hezbollah has almost ended all its military presence along the border with Israel, which is insisting that the group disarms all over Lebanon. Aoun said Sunday that the number of Lebanese troops along the border with Israel will increase to 10,000, adding that only Lebanese soldiers and U.N. peacekeepers will be armed on the Lebanese side of the border. On Sunday night, hours before Barrack arrived in Beirut, Israel's air force carried out strikes on southern and eastern Lebanon, wounding nine people, according to state media. The Israeli army said the airstrikes hit Hezbollah's infrastructure, arms depots and missile launchers. Earlier Sunday, Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem reiterated the militant group's refusal to lay down its weapons before Israel withdraws from all of southern Lebanon and stops its airstrikes. The Hezbollah-Israel war left over 4,000 people dead in Lebanon and caused destruction estimated at $11 billion . In Israel, 127 people, including 80 soldiers, were killed during the war. Since the November ceasefire, Israel has carried out hundreds of airstrikes on different parts of Lebanon, killing about 250 people and injuring over 600. Israel is also still holding five strategic posts inside Lebanon that it refused to withdraw from earlier this year. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Evers signs ‘compromise' budget quickly after Wisconsin Legislature gives final OK
Gov. Tony Evers signed the budget, now 2025 Wisconsin Act 15, at 1:32 a.m. in his office Thursday, less than an hour after the Assembly passed it. (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) Gov. Tony Evers signed the $111 billion two-year state budget bill into law overnight following a marathon day of overlapping Senate and Assembly floor sessions where the bill received bipartisan support from lawmakers. The budget cuts taxes by $1.3 billion, makes investments in the University of Wisconsin system, boosts public schools' special education reimbursement rate to 45% and allocates about $330 for child care. Evers signed the budget, now 2025 Wisconsin Act 15, at 1:32 a.m. in his office Thursday, less than an hour after the Assembly passed it. Just before signing it, he thanked legislative leaders for working with him and said the budget reflects the fair legislative maps that he signed into law in 2024 and that were in place during November elections. 'We need to work together,' Evers said. As the Assembly and Senate prepared to meet for debate Wednesday evening, Evers was outside of the east wing of the Capitol for Concerts on the Square and telling people not to 'drop meatballs' on themselves. 'I was actually chatting with people about tonight outside,' he said. 'Many of them were saying 'How about that? Compromise.' Compare that to what's going on in Washington, D.C., and it's significantly different, so I'm very proud to sign it.' The passage and signing of the state budget comes two days after the end of the fiscal year. Following months of negotiations and the announcement of a deal between Evers, Republican legislative leaders and Senate Democrats on Tuesday, the Legislature worked for about 15 hours Wednesday to get the bill over the finish line. Their goal was to get the bill signed by Evers before the federal reconciliation bill made it to President Donald Trump's desk. One reason for the rush was a provision in the state budget that increases a Medicaid-related hospital assessment from 1.8% to 6%, the current federal limit, to supplement the state's Medicaid resources. It's estimated to result in over $1 billion in additional Medicaid revenue that will go back to Wisconsin hospitals, but the state's ability to make that change is set to be restricted under the federal bill. 'We want our health care system to be in good shape, and in order to do that, we're going to need help from the federal government,' Evers said. In addition to signing the budget, Evers exercised his partial veto on 23 items . He had agreed not to partially veto any part of the deal that he came to with lawmakers, but other pieces of the legislation were fair game. Evers vetoed language that set 2029 for closing Green Bay Correctional Institution. He said he supports closing the facility, but said more needs to be done before a date is set. 'We need more compromise on that. We need to get things going before we start taking people out of Green Bay,' Evers told reporters. 'Saying that we're going to do Green Bay by '29 doesn't mean a damn thing.' He also partially vetoed $750,000 in grants to the Lakeland STAR Academy, a Minocqua charter school that specializes in serving students with autism and diverse learning needs; vetoed language excluding two of Wisconsin's 11 federally-recognized tribes from a grant program; and vetoed $25,000 for a street project in the village of Warrens. In addition, he vetoed funds for five projects that would go through the Department of Natural Resource. 'I object to providing an earmark for a natural resources project when the Legislature has abandoned its responsibility to reauthorize and ensure the continuation of the immensely popular Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship program,' Evers stated in his veto message. Lawmakers said they are still working on legislation to continue the program. 'Instead of renewing the program and helping the many, the Legislature has opted to benefit the politically connected few,' Evers wrote. 'The Legislature must do its job and renew the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship program.' Evers said if he would change anything about the budget, he would have wanted 'more in the area of specificity in child care.' The budget will spend about $330 million on child care including $110 million to extend direct payments to providers for another year, $65 million to a new program for providers serving 4-year-olds and $123 million to increase the reimbursement for child care costs for low-income families under the Wisconsin Shares program. Evers also rejected the calls of some advocates that he veto the entire budget, noting the uncertainty that could result and the funding that could be put at risk by starting from scratch on a budget. 'Failing to reach consensus and vetoing this budget in its entirety was an untenable option, not just for me, but for the people of our state,' Evers wrote in his budget message. Evers told reporters he wasn't caught off guard by the number of Democratic lawmakers who didn't support the budget. 'They have to do what they think is right, and everybody's kind of looking for what's going to happen in a couple years, and so I'm not surprised,' Evers said. 'But there's a whole bunch of Republicans that supported it so God bless them.' Republican lawmakers also said throughout the day that the prospect of losing hospital funding if the budget wasn't signed ahead of the federal reconciliation bill moving through Congress played a role in wanting to get the budget done as quickly as possible. 'That's why we're working really fast to get it done,' Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-Oostburg) said during a press conference Wednesday morning. 'We will get the bill to the governor's desk prior to the President [Trump] signing the Big Beautiful bill.' Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) said at a mid-afternoon press conference he expected Evers would sign the legislation late Wednesday or early Thursday. 'It's about a billion dollars that will be able to flow to an awful lot of rural hospitals, people who are taking care of those with urgent needs,' Vos said. 'We want to get it done and we want access to those dollars.' The Senate took action on the bill first, passing it 19-14 shortly after 9 p.m. Five Democratic senators, including Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein (D-Middleton), joined 14 Republicans to pass the bill. Four Republicans, including Senate President Mary Felzkowski (R-Tomahawk), voted with the 10 Democrats against the legislation. Democrats' votes were needed to pass the budget bill in the Senate after several Republicans expressed concerns about the legislation. Hesselbein was at the negotiating table as a result. The hospital funding, which led to lawmakers rushing work to pass the budget in one day, was also the top reason that Felzkowski voted against the budget. Democrats voting yes, in addition to Hesslebein, were Sens. Kristin Dassler-Alfheim (D- Appleton), Brad Pfaff (D-Onalaska), Jeff Smith (D-Brunswick) and Jamie Wall (D- Green Bay). Republicans voting no, in addition to Felzkowski were Rob Hutton (R- Brookfield), Chris Kapenga (R-Delafield) and Steve Nass (R Whitewater). Felzkowski said she felt bad because there were good things in the budget, but that she was appalled the budget didn't address the cost of health care, noting Wisconsin has the fifth highest health care costs in the country. Felzkowski said that there should be other health care reforms if hospitals were going to get a 'windfall' of over $1 billion a year and blamed Evers and hospital lobbyists for opposing those, including additional hospital price transparency measures. 'Gov. Evers, you failed Wisconsin,' Felzkowski said. 'You failed constituents. You failed employers.' Evers rejected the claims, calling them 'bulls – – t.' 'The people that work in those hospitals are working real hard,' Evers said. 'The last thing we need is to have hospitals going belly up in the middle of the pandemic or something.' Sen. Rob Hutton (R-Brookfield), who voted no, mentioned Evers' previous vetoes of Republican tax cuts and said the current budget bill leveraged those vetoes 'to hide the 12% increase in spending' as well as a structural deficit. 'In a time of economic uncertainty, when our spending decisions warrant further restraint and discernment, we need a budget that creates proper spending priorities and puts taxpayers first,' Hutton said. Sen. Steve Nass (R-Whitewater) called the budget an 'orgy' of spending in a statement explaining his 'no' vote. Implicating fellow Republicans, he criticized lawmakers for spending the state's $4.3 billion surplus on one-time earmarks and 'funding for special interests' instead of larger tax cuts. Despite the handful of opponents, the majority of Senate Republicans supported the budget, touting the tax cuts that they secured and some of the investments. LeMahieu called it 'a responsible budget that invests in core priorities' and touted the $1.4 billion tax cut. At the Senate GOP press conference Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) singled out some of the University of Wisconsin system funding that will 'put the thumb on the scale…to help some of those campuses like UW Platteville that have had declining enrollment over the last decade.' The budget allocates $53 million for UW system funding, distributed through two formulas: one for declining enrollment and another for the number of credit hours undergraduates complete. The University of Wisconsin system will also get $840 million for capital projects, $94 million for staff wage increases, $54 million for recruitment and retention and $7 million for virtual mental health services. Sen. Dan Feyen (R-Fond du Lac), who voted yes, said the budget didn't do everything he wanted it to do and included some things he didn't support. 'I always have, and always will, advocate for a smaller, smarter state government,' he said in a statement. 'I'm glad to see that this budget cuts over 300 vacant positions from state government.' Feyen highlighted his support for special education funding and child care provisions in the document. He said if people want a more 'conservative' budget, then Republicans would need to expand their majority and elect a Republican governor in 2026. Senate Democrats, whether they voted for or against the bill, all had a similar message: it doesn't do enough. 'What we have on the floor today is better than it would have been if Senate Dems had not been at the table, but let me be clear, it is not perfect,' Hesselbein said at a Wednesday morning press conference. She described the budget as a 'bipartisan deal' where 'everybody left the table wishing it was different, but this is something that we can agree on trying to move forward.' Asked about the advocates who called for lawmakers to vote against the budget and Evers to veto it, Hesselbein said she knew some people were upset. 'I'm glad they're making their voices heard,' she said. 'That's why today, we're going to be fighting for every single Wisconsinite.' The Senate convened a little after 10:30 a.m., but didn't pass the bill until after 9 p.m. The first several hours of debate centered on Senate Democrats' 25 proposed amendments that ranged from increasing funding for the UW system, K-12 education and child care to expanding postpartum Medicaid. The body got through about half of those amendments before pausing for several hours to caucus. During the delays, Republicans were working on a 35-page 'technical amendment' with several changes, including an added requirement that the UW system conduct an efficiency study on declining student enrollment and future operations. When the Senate reconvened around 7 p.m., it tabled the rest of the Democratic amendments and started debate on the full budget bill. Sen. Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) said Democrats helped improve the budget but that it l would not allow people in Wisconsin to thrive. 'We understand the urgency to act. Congress is actively restricting our future funding. This budget must move forward, but that does not make it a good budget,' Spreitzer said. The budget broke the 'rule of 17' — the Senate Republicans' practice of making sure 17 members support a measure before it's put on the floor — Spreitzer said, and criticized them for not breaking the rule to pass other measures, including postpartum Medicaid expansion or funding for the Knowles-Nelson Conservation program in a bipartisan way. 'Wouldn't it be easier to just get it done today?' he said. Spreitzer said the Democratic votes on the budget were not an endorsement, but were rather an acknowledgement that it was better than it would have been without bipartisan negotiations. Asserting that the budget didn't deserve one more vote than was necessary to pass it, he voted against it. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee) said the optimism after Evers introduced his budget in February soon faded and criticized the governor for not fighting harder for his priorities. The result is 'grossly' insufficient and 'will do more harm than good,' he said 'It's a 'failure to fight' budget,' Larson said. 'This budget is cowardice. We all deserve so much better.' 'We have a guarantee that we're going to have a transformation budget that works for everyone,' Vos said during the Assembly floor debate. 'I assume, like in the state Senate where Democrats and Republicans are going to vote for the budget, we would have the same thing here in the Assembly, if people are serious about saying we want to work together.' The Assembly concurred in the bill 59-39 at around 12:40 a.m. Seven Democrats voted with Republicans in favor of the bill: Reps. Jill Billings (D-La Crosse), Steve Doyle (D-Onalaska), Jodi Emerson (D-Eau Claire), Maureen McCarville (D- DeForest), Lori Palmeri (D-Oshkosh), Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D-Milwaukee) and Tara Johnson (D-Town of Shelby). One Republican — Rep. Scott Allen (R-Waukesha) — voted with Democrats against the bill. Rep. Calvin Callahan (R-Tomahawk) was not voting. Assembly Co-Chair Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said the budget process this time was different from any other that he's worked on. This is his fourth as co-chair of the Joint Finance Committee. 'We did spend more time working with the governor's office, the governor and Democrats,' Born said, and called the budget 'more conservative' than the state's 2023-25 budget, to his surprise. He noted that the $1.3 billion tax cut will get signed into law, unlike previous tax cuts that Evers has vetoed. The budget spends the state's estimated $4 billion budget surplus down to about $800 million, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. The budget also has a 6% increase in general purpose revenue spending and a 12% increase overall. While Republicans highlighted the bipartisan nature of the budget and measures included, Democrats throughout the day focused on their critiques and the measures that didn't make it in. Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer (D-Racine) said at a press conference Wednesday morning that she was appreciative of Evers and Hesselbein for being at the negotiating table and getting what they could — but it wouldn't be enough to win her vote. 'This proposal is a far cry from the budget that Assembly Democrats would have written,' said Neubauer. She said she was not at the table when the budget deal was made. With a 54-45 majority, Assembly Republicans had the votes to pass the budget without the Democrats, Assembly Majority Leader Tyler August (R-Walworth) said at a GOP press conference. Neubauer said that as a consequence, the Assembly Democrats 'were not part of those negotiations.' School districts will get an increase in the special education reimbursement rate from about 32% to 42% in the first year of the biennium and 45% in the second year. It will be the highest that the rate has been in many years, but still lower than the 60% advocates and Democrats wanted. Democratic lawmakers said that without increases in general aid or schools, districts will have to continue relying on property tax increases to keep up with costs. 'You didn't set out to stop the cycle of [property tax increase] referendums, you set out to continue it,' Rep. Robyn Vining (D-Wauwatosa) said on the Assembly floor. 'When 96 of 99 Assembly districts have gone to referendum recently and the statewide demand for public school funding increases isn't partisan for our constituents, why are we fighting so hard to get Republicans to adequately fund our schools? This isn't a Democrat versus Republican issue across the state, and it shouldn't be a Republican versus Democrat issue in the state Capitol.' The four-member Wisconsin Legislative Socialist Caucus — including Reps. Ryan Clancy (D-Milwaukee), Darrin Madison (D-Milwaukee), Christian Phelps (D-Eau Claire) and Francesca Hong (D-Madison) — voted against the bill. In a joint statement they called the agreement between Republican lawmakers, Senate Democrats and Evers a 'catastrophic failure of leadership that surrenders to Republican austerity.' They cited the lack of a general school aid increase for public schools, the special education reimbursement not meeting 60% and the failure to expand Medicaid. 'This is not a compromise, this is capitulation,' the caucus said. Assembly Republicans mostly focused on the parts of the state budget they were appreciative of but also took jabs at Democrats for saying they would vote against the bill. The Agriculture Roads Improvement Program, which was created in 2023 to support local agricultural road improvement projects statewide, will get an infusion of $150 million. 'That's a big deal in my community and up in the rural part of the northwest,' Rep. Clint Moses (R-Menomonie) said. 'It helps our state's largest industry by improving the quality of our roads to get their products and goods out and inputs and services that farmers need into the field as well.' Rep. Jessie Rodriguez (R-Oak Creek) said lawmakers committed to providing tax cuts for seniors and Wisconsinites as a whole through the elimination of the utility tax, a policy Evers had advocated for. 'I know that some people on the other side of the aisle said that people are not seeking tax relief,' Rodriguez said. 'Yes, they have been. You just haven't been listening.' The Office of School Safety, housed in the Department of Justice, will get 13 permanent staff positions and $1.57 million in the budget. The office provides training and grants to schools for safety and runs the Speak Up, Speak Out tipline where students can anonymously report safety concerns. Funding for the office became a flashpoint of criticism in the 2023-25 budget debate. Rep. Todd Novak (R-Dodgeville) touted the new budget's provision for the office and spoke about working with Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul on getting the funding in this year's budget. He also credited lawmakers on the finance committee for helping to keep the office going. 'The process is ugly, but working together to get something done is a really great thing, so I will defend this budget. I will run on this budget,' Novak said. Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-Wonewoc) said on the floor that lawmakers who voted against the budget shouldn't take credit for any of its accomplishments in the budget later or attend groundbreakings for projects it funded.'If you vote against this, do not show your face,' Kurtz said. 'You didn't have the courage to vote yes.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
