El Salvador's Bukele defends ending term limit
'Ninety% of developed countries allow the indefinite re-election of their head of government, and no one bats an eye. But when a small, poor country like El Salvador tries to do the same, suddenly it's the end of democracy,' Nayib Bukele wrote in English on X.
El Salvador's Congress, dominated by Mr. Bukele's New Ideas party, passed the reform on Thursday (July 31, 2025). It also extends presidential terms from five to six years.
Mr. Bukele, 44, who has been president since 2019 and was re-elected in 2024 with 85% of the vote, now holds near-total control over the country's institutions — in what the opposition calls a 'dictatorship.'
He enjoys enormous domestic support for his tough campaign against criminal gangs, but has been sharply criticised by international and local rights groups over his approach.
Mr. Bukele has notably supported U.S. President Donald Trump's deportation campaign, taking in hundreds of expelled Venezuelan migrants under contentious legal grounds and housing them at the country's notorious CECOT penitentiary.
The constitutional reforms came after a wave of arrests targeting human rights defenders and government critics, prompting dozens of journalists and humanitarian workers to flee the country.
One of the few opposition lawmakers in the unicameral legislature, Marcela Villatoro, criticised the reforms on Thursday (July 31, 2025), saying, 'today, democracy has died in El Salvador.'
Mr. Bukele argued that the changes brought El Salvador into line with parliamentary systems where the prime minister can hold office indefinitely.
Critics will 'rush to point out that 'a parliamentary system isn't the same as a presidential one,' as if that technicality justifies the double standard,' he wrote in his post.
'But let's be honest, that's just a pretext. Because if El Salvador declared itself a parliamentary monarchy with the exact same rules as the U.K., Spain, or Denmark, they still wouldn't support it,' he added, claiming critics would 'go ballistic if that happened'.
With its reform, El Salvador joins Nicaragua and Venezuela as Latin American nations without presidential term limits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Will ensure tickets to all castes, says BPCC chief
PATNA: The Bihar Pradesh Congress Committee (BPCC) chief Rajesh Kumar (Ram) has asserted that the party will follow the principle of 'Jiski jitni hissedari, uski utni bhagidari' (The share depends on the level of participation) when distributing tickets for the upcoming state assembly elections. Ram, a prominent Dalit face of Congress in the state, said that the party would ensure tickets to all castes, communities, and organisations in proportion to their population. In an exclusive interview with this newspaper, Ram exuded confidence that grand alliance, which is a part of Opposition INDIA bloc, would perform better in the state polls, paving the way for formation of next government by secular forces. He, however, admitted that caste factors continue to play a major role in states like Bihar and UP. Even BJP by deviation from its plank of 'Hindutva' has started talking about caste equations in elections. Party leaders, including PM Narendra Modi, do not hesitate in revealing their castes at public places, he added.
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Remembering Shibu Soren: The leader of a people
It was 2019. The Jharkhand assembly elections had already been announced. On an early winter morning, I was sitting beside the ageing Shibu Soren at his house in Dumka. A huge crowd, cutting across caste, creed and community, had gathered there and was waiting for their leader to flag off the campaign for the day. When we finished our conversation, Soren stood up and wished them good luck. Two kilometres away, another crowd had gathered for the same reason — Prime Minister Narendra Modi was about to come and address the election campaign. Days later, Soren's magic worked again. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) formed the government, and broke all previous records. Soren's death marks the end of an era in the national life of Adivasis. He instilled in them a sense of political struggle. Soren was destiny's child. The gruesome murder of his father, Sobaran Manjhi, who was a teacher at a school in Gola near Nemra, his ancestral village, changed his life. Sobaran stood against exploitation by moneylenders and was eventually killed when Shivcharan, as Shibu was known in his early life, was still very young. This incident turned Shivcharan into an adult overnight. From Shivcharan, he became Shibu, later Guruji and then Dishom Guru — all through a life dedicated to eradicating moneylending, exploitation and oppression of Adivasis in the region. Legend has it that Shivcharan had promised that he would not shave his beard until he took revenge for his father's murder. However, his revenge did not stop at curbing moneylending. The struggle led him to mainstream politics and resulted in the formation of Jharkhand as a separate state in 2000. After the murder of his father, Soren raised a band of youth and led a movement against moneylenders in his region, who used to collect exorbitant interest against loans. Failure to pay them off would result in crops being snatched from the tribal farmers' lands. Often, the moneylenders would grab their lands and till them. Against this practice, Soren led a dhan katni (harvesting) movement. His supporters harvested the standing crops that the moneylenders had grown on the 'grabbed' lands. Due to the violent nature of the movement, many FIRs were filed against Soren. But the police could never catch him. In 1972, Soren, along with veteran communist leaders Binod Bihari Mahato and A K Roy, formed the JMM. However, he continued to lead the life of a fugitive due to police lookouts and his conflict with the moneylenders. To his own people, Soren was a messiah, but to others, including the then-ruling Congress, he was anathema. Stories of Soren soon reached the corridors of power — both in Patna and in Delhi. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi reportedly wanted him 'under control'. A young Indian Administrative Service officer, K B Saxena, was sent to Dhanbad as its deputy commissioner to deal with him. Saxena, however, soon learnt that the government's notes on Soren were not all true. Eventually, Saxena met Soren in the deep forest of Tundi, where Soren ran a ratri pathshala for the people in the region. He found Soren's struggle legitimate and convinced him to surrender before the law. He even sent a letter to Mrs Gandhi briefing her on Soren's life and struggle. This letter changed Soren's political destiny. When he surrendered in 1975, Congress was willing to join hands with the JMM, under the leadership of united Bihar's chief minister, Jagannath Mishra. Mishra arranged a meeting between Soren and Mrs Gandhi. In 1980, Soren became an MP and emerged as the undisputed leader of the tribal people, who had long been fighting for a separate state. Although he was accused in many cases of violence, including the Chirudih massacre, he was acquitted in all these cases, one after another. From 1980 to 2000, Soren led the Jharkhand statehood movement from the front. He worked with leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee, L K Advani, Lalu Prasad, and many others to achieve his goal — statehood for Jharkhand. The tribal people of India will remember Soren for his grit, determination and leading the struggle for political self-determination, while for the people of Jharkhand, he will always be alive — in their thoughts and in their resilience. The writer is head of the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, St. Xavier's College, Ranchi
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
White House preps order to punish banks that discriminate against conservatives
The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order that threatens to fine lenders that drop customers for political reasons. A draft of the executive order, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, directs bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws. Violators could be subject to monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures, according to the draft. The order could be signed as soon as this week, according to people familiar with the matter. It is possible the order could get delayed or that the administration's plans will change. The draft order doesn't name any specific banks but appears to refer to an instance where Bank of America was accused of shutting down the accounts of a Christian organization operating in Uganda based on the organization's religious beliefs. The bank has said it shut down the accounts because it doesn't serve small businesses operating outside the U.S. The draft order also criticizes the role that some banks played in an investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol. Banks have been on edge about potential action by the Trump administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that the administration was considering an executive order in June. Conservatives for years have accused banks of denying them services on political or religious grounds, and cryptocurrency companies have said they were shut out of banking services under the Biden administration. Banks, for their part, have said their decisions are driven by legal, regulatory or financial risks, including those stemming from the U.S.'s anti-money-laundering laws. They have blamed regulatory pressure for prior decisions to largely steer clear of the crypto industry. A Bank of America spokesman said the bank welcomed the administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity. 'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework," he said. Over the past several months, banks have moved to head off action by the federal government, meeting with Republican attorneys general and updating their policies to clearly state they don't discriminate on the basis of political affiliation. The draft of the order viewed by the Journal directs regulators to strike any policies they have that might have contributed to banks dropping certain customers. It also directs the Small Business Administration to review the practices of banks that guarantee the agency's loans. Under Trump, banking regulators have said they would stop assessing banks for the so-called reputational risk posed by their customers—a practice that banks have cited for their decisions to avoid certain customers or industries. The draft order also calls for regulators to refer potential violations to the attorney general in some cases. The Justice Department in April said it was launching a task force in Virginia, to examine allegations of banks refusing customers access to credit or other services based on 'impermissible factors." Write to Dylan Tokar at and Alexander Saeedy at
