Legal group apologizes after cancellation of noted Syrian Canadian speech sparks 'profound' reaction
Last Friday, CBC News was first to report that The Advocates' Society rescinded an invitation for Hadhad, founder of Peace by Chocolate, to deliver a keynote speech, saying some members expressed concerns about his position on Israel's war in Gaza.
Now, the organization says it's acknowledging the "profound reactions" surrounding its decision.
"Our members have expressed deep concerns with the way our decisions were made, the basis for them and with the lack of diverse consultation in our deliberations," it said in a statement Friday.
"We hear you. We are sorry and regret the harm we have caused," it said, adding "through these decisions and related communications we have not fully lived up to our mission and core values."
CBC News has asked The Advocates' Society if it now plans to reverse its decision and is awaiting a response.
The statement comes after a wave of lawyers resigned from the legal organization including high profile criminal lawyer Marie Henein, who served as president of TAS from 2010 to 2011.
Litigator Danielle Robitaille also confirmed she cancelled her membership and an upcoming speaking engagement over the move.
"Personally, it is very difficult for me to align myself with an advocates' organization that cancels speakers because we may disagree with them," Robitaille wrote in a social media post this week.
"I continue to engage with leadership and membership at the TAS to see if there is a path forward for the organization. In the meantime, I am out."
Employment and human rights lawyer Arleen Huggins cancelled her membership as well. "Rather than engaging in dialogue, there are those who, in the Trumpian manner, want to cancel and stifle free thought and speech, and wish to use associations such as the Advocates' Society to do so," wrote Huggins in a letter to TAS.
As CBC News reported last week, TAS, which says on its website that it was "established to ensure the presence of a courageous and independent bar," rescinded Hadhad's speaking invitation at its upcoming end-of-term dinner in Toronto after it said some members had raised concerns about his "public posts on the ongoing conflict in the Middle East."
The message did not point to any specific posts made by Hadhad or elaborate on what about them raised concerns.
The Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association (CMLA) previously told CBC News that when it pressed the organization for specifics, it was told the concerns stemmed from complaints about Hadhad's use of the term "genocide" on social media, adding he had not provided what they deemed "equal comment" on other impacted groups.
TAS would not confirm those details to CBC News.
Lawyer flagged 'one-sided view' of war in Gaza
On Oct. 19, 2023, amid Israeli air raids in Gaza following the attacks by Hamas days earlier, Hadhad wrote on X, calling for humanitarian aid to be allowed into the enclave and for an end of the fighting.
"Our Canadian government needs to not only call, but to pressure for an immediate ceasefire and save civilians' lives. All human lives have equal weight and peace should prevail," Hadhad wrote.
In another X post on Oct. 30, 2023, he wrote in part: "A child in Gaza is being killed every 15 minutes ... How many are enough? Stop the killing. Stop the war."
On May 27, 2024, Hadhad wrote in reference to the children of Gaza: "This genocide must be stopped. Children should wake up to the sound of birds, not the sound of bombs."
Lawyer Jonathan Lisus was among those who wrote to the organization to flag what he described as Hadhad's "one-sided view" of the conflict, noting Hadhad did not appear to have posted in solidarity with the Israeli victims of Hamas's Oct. 7 attack or the hostages taken that day.
"I appreciate and advocate for the distinction between bona fide criticism of Israel and its policies on one hand and ill will towards the Jewish people on the other," he said in a letter dated March 15.
"Sadly, Mr. Hadhad's record of public statements makes a strong case that while expressing understandable concern for civilian deaths in Gaza he is unsympathetic, and certainly indifferent, to the harm and suffering of Jewish people and the Jewish state."
'If lawyers are not fighting for freedom of speech then who the hell will?'
Since the decision, fallout has continued, with numerous lawyers and advocacy groups, including the National GC Network (NGCN) and the South Asian Bar Association of Canada, calling on the organization to reverse course.
"In cancelling Mr. Hadhad's keynote, TAS has abandoned its principle of giving a voice to all, reflecting a troubling lack of respect for the freedom of its members to hold diverse ideological perspectives. This decision has alienated many members and is plain wrong," NGCN said in its letter, dated March 31.
On Thursday, 40 law professors from across the country also issued a letter containing a similar message.
"Put simply, the willingness to defend pro-Palestinian expression has become the canary in the coalmine for an organization's ability to effectively foster diverse perspectives, and ultimately, to act as a meaningful force for democratic values," the lawyers' letter said.
"It is disturbing to see that, faced with this test, the Advocates' Society has profoundly failed, and decided that the path of least resistance was to allow a veto over any speaker whose perspective may push members out of their comfort zone."
In its letter, the South Asian Bar Association said: "Diversity and inclusion are not just words, they require action and commitment. In recent years, TAS has vocally committed to these ideals and fostered them. This decision sends that commitment stumbling backwards."
And while TAS alluded to members raising concerns over Hadhad's stance on the war in Gaza, lawyer Kathryn Marshall spoke out over the decision on social media Tuesday, saying she was speaking "as a lawyer who is a staunch supporter of Israel and will fight to the end for my clients, many of whom are victims of anti-Semitism."
"It is highly disturbing to me to see lawyers who claim to be top shelf litigators engaging in cancel culture," Marshall wrote.
"If lawyers are not fighting for freedom of speech then who the hell will?"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil repeatedly refuses to condemn Hamas in tense CNN interview: ‘It's disingenuous to ask'
Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas during a tense CNN interview – insisting it was 'disingenuous' for the anchors to demand his position on the terror group. The outspoken Palestinian activist, who was detained for over three months by the Trump administration for his prominent role in often-times violent Columbia University protests, dismissed co-anchor Pamela Brown's repeated grilling over his views on Hamas as both 'absurd' and hypocritical. 'Do you specifically condemn Hamas, a designated terrorist organization in the United States, not just for their actions on October 7?' Brown pressed the 30-year-old who appeared on 'The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer' Tuesday morning. 4 Mahmoud Khalil in a CNN interview. CNN A tongue-tied Khalil replied that he condemns the killing of 'all civilians, full stop,' but not Hamas. Brown interrupted Khalil and asked again if he would disavow 'Hamas specifically.' Mahmoud Khalil refuses to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS 'painted' him as one. He 'branded' himself as antisemite through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric. It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the… — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) July 22, 2025 'No, I am very clear with condemning all civilians. I'm very straight in my position in that part,' said Khalil, who was visibly flustered, later blasting the question as 'selective outrage.' 'But it's disingenuous to ask about condemning Hamas while Palestinians are the ones being starved now by Israel. It's not condemning October 6, where 260 Palestinians were killed by Israel before October 7,' he continued. 'So I hate this selective outrage of condemnation because this is not, this wouldn't lead to a constructive conversation. And this is also, like what we want to deal with is the root cause of why that happened. And it's no way anyone can justify the killing of civilians.' 4 Khalil refused to condemn Hamas after being asked about three times during the interview. CNN Brown pushed back on Khalil's claims, arguing that her question was justified after the Trump administration accused him of sympathizing with the Palestinian terrorist group responsible for the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel, while he was studying at the Ivy League. He replied that he was 'simply' protesting the war in Gaza. 'That's my duty as a Palestinian, as a human being right now, is to ask for the stop of the killing in my home country. And that's consistent with who I am,' Khalil said, noting he's a 'firm believer in international law and human rights.' 4 Palestinians celebrating on top of a destroyed Israeli tank. AP 'As I said, disingenuous and absurd to ask such questions…That's why I wouldn't really engage much into such questions on condemnation or not. Because selective condemnations is not, wouldn't get us anywhere. It's just like hypocrite, to be honest.' Blitzer then stepped in and ended the heated back-and-forth. Khalil was arrested by federal immigration authorities on March 8 and spent 104 days at a Louisiana detention center as the Trump administration fought to deport the Syrian-born permanent resident. 4 Khalil was arrested back in March and detained in Louisiana for 104 days. Getty Images The administration said Khalil engaged in activities 'aligned to Hamas.' Khalil, who is now suing the federal government for $20 million over what he claims was false imprisonment and a smear campaign to label him as an antisemite, drew fresh backlash after the interview – with the Department of Homeland Security blasting him as a 'terrorist sympathizer.' 'Mahmoud Khalil refused to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS 'painted' him as one,' DHS wrote in a fiery post on X, arguing that the green card holder 'branded' himself as an antisemite 'through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric.' 'The Trump Administration acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detain Khalil, as it does with any alien who advocates for violence, glorifies and supports terrorists, harasses Jews, and damages property.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sources: Potential Hamas deal may lead to withdrawal to Jan. Gaza security perimeter
In January, the IDF withdrew from all deeper portions of Gaza it had been in, in Gaza City, Khan Yunis, Rafah, and central Gaza to a security perimeter of around 700-1,100 meters around the border The impending potential deal with Hamas may include the government agreeing to an IDF withdrawal to virtually the same Gaza security perimeter that Israel held in January, sources have acknowledged to The Jerusalem Post. In January, the IDF withdrew from all deeper portions of Gaza it had been in, in Gaza City, Khan Yunis, Rafah, and central Gaza to a security perimeter of around 700-1,100 meters around the Israel-Gaza border. The IDF withdrawal being discussed now could leave the IDF in almost the same place, with a perimeter of around 1,100-1,200 meters. However, since Israel renewed hostilities with Hamas in March, the IDF had taken control of 75% of Gaza. While top Israeli officials had sent mixed messages on whether the IDF would hold onto the new Morag Corridor splitting Khan Yunis from Rafah in southern Gaza, many top Israeli officials' statements had indicated that the IDF would hold onto a larger slice of a security perimeter in any additional hostage and ceasefire deal. All of this was part of the threat and leverage that Israel had employed to try to get Hamas to agree to a deal at an earlier date and to keep it under pressure to eventually hand back all of the remaining Israeli hostages that it is holding on to. Controlling the Philadelphi Corridor In fact, even discussions about a ceasefire and hostage deal back in summer 2024 included some similar terms, though Israel did achieve keeping control of the Philadelphi Corridor bordering with Egypt, which Hamas had refused in summer 2024. Solve the daily Crossword
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Groups in Canada Fight for Access to Forbidden Chinese EVs
Like in the U.S., Canadian car buyers see a carefully curated group of brands and vehicles on dealers' lots, thanks to safety regulations, trade relations, and a whole host of other factors. Many have pressed the Canadian government to relax those rules as tariff pressure builds, and now, an EV advocacy group has joined the fight. Daniel Breton, head of Electric Mobility Canada, said, "Right now, Transport Canada is saying, well, we have to change the bumpers and we have to change the headlights and this and that for safety reasons, which, as far as I'm concerned, is total B.S." He continued to say that, "If the car is good enough to be driving on European roads, where you can drive much faster than here, don't come and tell me that they're not safe enough to be driven in Canada." Groups in Canada are looking for ways to keep more affordable vehicles flowing into the country as its trade relations with the U.S. have soured over tariffs and other actions. Breton and others feel that allowing vehicles from Europe, China, and elsewhere would strengthen trade relations and help more Canadians afford new cars. That said, our northern neighbors tend to buy larger vehicles like trucks and SUVs, similar to their American counterparts, making it riskier for automakers to invest in smaller new models for the country. Small vehicle sales in Canada are far below those of SUVs and trucks, but Breton said there is a place for the vehicles in the market. Breton wants the Canadian government to reconsider its 100 percent tariff on Chinese imports, and the public seems to be behind him. A recent poll showed that 70 percent of Canadians are in favor of allowing EVs approved for European roads into the country, and 5 percent said they'd like to see the 100 percent tariff dropped to the 35 percent level European countries impose. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
