&w=3840&q=100)
Delhi HC issues notice to govt, police over plea on school bomb threats SOP
Press Trust of India New Delhi
The Delhi High Court on Thursday issued notices to government's chief secretary and police in the capital after a plea alleged failure on their part in formulating a comprehensive mechanism to combat emergent situations such as bomb threats in schools.
Justice Anish Dayal called it a serious issue, saying it required the urgent attention of authorities especially when repeated hoax calls had become very common and troubled children, their parents and schools.
The plea before Justice Dayal claimed authorities were in contempt of the court's November 14 2024 order which directed them to develop a comprehensive action plan with a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to address such concerns.
The directions required the government agencies and police to develop the mechanism within eight weeks of the issuance.
On Thursday, the court sought an update on the matter and posted the hearing on May 19, when government and police officials were asked to remain present.
In his plea, petitioner advocate Arpit Bhargava alleged inaction and negligent approach of Delhi government and Delhi Police in addressing the recurring bomb threat emails received by schools in the capital.
He claimed the eight-week period got over on January 14, 2025, but there was no intimation on either the formulation or implementation of any detailed action plan or SoP in line with the court order.
Advocate Beenashaw N Soni, representing Bhargava, underlined an "apparent" disregard of the court orders by authorities and ineptness in acting in larger public interest.
She said the court's directions were aimed at ensuring safety and security of school children and educational institutions in the event of bomb threats or similar emergencies.
"Continued failure of the contemnors/respondents to implement the directions of this court has left the school ecosystem across Delhi vulnerable to the recurring menace of bomb threats," the petitioner argued.
The contempt plea went on, "These threats, regardless of their actual veracity, create an environment of fear and panic among children, teachers, and parents. The lack of a standardised response protocol and preventive measures directly endangers the safety and mental health of lakhs of school going children in the capital." Seeking coercive steps in line with Contempt of Court Act, the plea sought the court to impose punitive cost of litigation in favour of the petitioner and against authorities.
The SOP, the high court in November 2024 said, should clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies, school management and municipal authorities ensuring seamless coordination and implementation.
Hoax threats, particularly those perpetrated through sophisticated methods such as the dark web and VPNs, were not unique to Delhi or even India and they were a global problem which continued to challenge the law enforcement agencies worldwide, it added.
Delhi Police previously revealed the presence of five bomb disposal squads and 18 bomb detection teams for over 4,600 schools in the capital.
The petitioner initially moved court in 2023 in the wake of a hoax bomb threat to the Delhi Public School, Mathura Road.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
2 Delhi Police sub-inspectors arrested in Rs 75-lakh cyber-fraud case
Last Updated: New Delhi, Jul 22 (PTI) Two Delhi Police sub-inspectors have been arrested for allegedly siphoning off money from case property related to cyber-crime investigations in northeast Delhi, officials said on Tuesday. The arrests followed an internal probe triggered by irregularities flagged during the disposal of cases at the Cyber police station in Northeast district, police said. Three FIRs were registered against the investigating officer who was missing since March 19. 'A special team led by Inspector Rahul, SHO of Cyber Police Station, and comprising SI Nandan Singh, Head Constables Amit and Rohan, and Constable Deepak, was constituted to investigate the matter," Deputy Commissioner of Police (Northeast) Ashish Mishra said in a statement. During a routine audit of disposed-case properties, discrepancies in account statements and judicial order formats raised red flags. 'Detailed scrutiny revealed that forged judicial orders — supposedly issued in favour of complainants — had been used to siphon off Rs 75 lakh from cyber-fraud recoveries," the statement read. The team employed both technical surveillance and ground-level intelligence gathering to track the absconding officer, Sub-Inspector Ankur Malik (32), to Indore in Madhya Pradesh. Police sources said Malik had switched multiple SIM cards and was using encrypted applications to communicate with his associates. 'On July 18, a coordinated raid with local police was conducted at a rented flat in Indore. Malik and a woman accomplice, who is also an SI of the Delhi Police, were apprehended from the premises. During the raid, the team recovered Rs 12 lakh in cash, 820 grams of gold coins and bars, 200 grams of gold jewellery, 11 mobile phones, a laptop, three ATM cards and several incriminating documents," the statement read. 'Analysis of the laptop and mobile data pointed to a broader nexus involving the use of mule bank accounts to route the stolen money," said a source, privy to the investigation. During interrogation, Malik revealed the names of other accomplices, leading to subsequent raids in Delhi and the arrest of Mohammad Ilyaas (40), Arif (35) and Shadab (23) — all residents of northeast Delhi. The trio had allegedly provided their bank accounts to facilitate the illegal transfers in return for commissions. Sources said the accused were planning to settle permanently in Indore. The investigation is ongoing. PTI BM RC view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Watch: 2006 Mumbai Train Blasts: Why 12 men were acquitted after 18 years
In a landmark judgement, the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12 individuals convicted in one of India's deadliest terror attacks – the 2006 Mumbai train blasts. But why did these men spend 18 years in prison, and then get acquitted on 21st June 2025? First, let's go back to the day of the terror attack - it was the 11th of July 2006. The time was just past 6:20 in the evening. It was rush hour in Mumbai. The city's lifeline - the suburban trains - was packed. People heading home after a long day, chatting, dozing off, others lost in their thoughts. And then, out of nowhere, a blast ripped through the first-class compartment of a suburban train travelling from Churchgate to Borivali, between Khar and Santa Cruz stations. Before anyone could even process what had happened, six more blasts followed. One after the other: Bandra–Khar Road. Jogeshwari–Mahim Junction. Mira Road–Bhayander. Matunga–Mahim Junction and Borivali. Between 6:23 and 6:29 p.m., seven serial blasts ripped through Mumbai's suburban railway network. According to police, the bombs were hidden inside pressure cookers, packed with RDX and ammonium nitrate, and placed in carry bags. 189 lives lost, around 800 injured, for a city that never sleeps, everything came to a standstill. What followed was swift action. The Anti-Terrorism Squad launched an investigation. Within weeks, they arrested 13 men, accusing them of being part of a larger conspiracy involving Lashkar-e-Taiba. A chargesheet was filed under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act also known as MACOCA. In 2015, after a long legal process, a special court convicted 12 of the accused. Five were sentenced to death, and seven to life imprisonment. The court found them guilty of planting the bombs, helping terrorists cross the India–Nepal and India–Bangladesh borders, and aiding the conspiracy. But from the very beginning, there were murmurs of doubt. Multiple agencies later offered contradictory findings. The Mumbai Crime Branch, and even the Delhi Police, claimed that the real culprits were operatives of Students Islamic Movement of India or SIMI and the Indian Mujahideen. In fact, two IM operatives – Mohammad Sadiq Sheikh and Yasin Bhatkal – reportedly confessed that it was their group that carried out the bombings, allegedly in retaliation for the 2002 Gujarat riots. The Delhi Police even named Abdul Subhan Qureshi, a SIMI ideologue, as a key conspirator. So how did this group of 12 men come to be convicted? In court, the prosecution relied mainly on three pillars – eyewitness accounts, recoveries, and confessional statements. But over time, cracks started to show. Eyewitnesses contradicted each other. Confessions were said to have been made under duress. Circumstantial evidence didn't quite connect the dots. One of the most powerful voices in court was senior advocate S. Muralidhar, former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court. Representing two of the convicts, he argued earlier this year that there was a bias in the investigation. Innocent people had been sent to jail, and when they were released years later, there was no possibility of reconstructing their lives. He added that in many such terror-related cases, investigating agencies had failed miserably. First, so many lives were lost, and then innocents were arrested. Years later, when they were acquitted, no one found closure. Fast forward to July 2025. A Special Division Bench of Justices Anil S. Kilor and Shyam C. Chandak set aside the convictions delivered by a special MCOCA court, which had sentenced five of the accused to death and the remaining seven to life imprisonment. The Bench observed that the prosecution had 'utterly failed' in establishing the case beyond reasonable doubt. It was hard to believe that the accused committed the crime. The judgement stated that punishing the actual perpetrator of a crime is a concrete and essential step towards curbing criminal activities, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring the safety and security of citizens. But creating a false appearance of having solved a case by claiming that the accused have been brought to justice gives a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermines public trust and falsely reassures society, while in reality, the true threat remains at large. The verdict was delivered via video conference, with the accused appearing from various prisons across Maharashtra. Visibly emotional, several of them were seen expressing gratitude to their legal counsel after the judgement was announced. They were ordered to be released but were asked to sign a ₹25,000 bond in case further appeals are filed. The acquittal of the 12 individuals in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case marks a significant moment in India's legal and investigative history. While the High Court's decision brings closure for those imprisoned, it also reopens critical questions about the investigation, prosecution, and accountability in cases of national security. Credits: Producer: Athira Madhav | Camera: Thamodharan B


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Interstate cyber-fraud gang busted in Delhi, 7 held: Police
Agency: PTI New Delhi, Jul 22 (PTI) The Delhi Police has busted an interstate gang of cyber fraudsters that was allegedly involved in duping people by promising guaranteed returns on investments through social-media advertisements, an official said on Tuesday. Police said seven people have been arrested in connection with the case. According to police, the accused targeted victims through social media, luring them into investing money with the promise of 100 per cent returns on their investments. 'They routed the cheated funds through mule bank accounts and withdrew the cash through ATM transactions in exchange for commissions," a police officer said. The case came to light when a woman submitted a police complaint, alleging that she was duped of Rs 1.23 lakh after being tricked into transferring money under various pretexts, such as investment, verification and GST. A case was registered at the Cyber police station in North district and a team formed to nab the accused. 'Investigation led police to Anshuman Nath (23), a student from Ghaziabad, who had provided his bank account for fraudulent transactions. He was arrested and his disclosure led to the arrest of Dhruv Aggarwal (21), also from Ghaziabad, who acted as a middleman and had routed the scam money to the key handler, Yatharth Bansal (22), in Kasganj," the officer said. Subsequent raids in Kasganj, with the help of the local police, led to the arrest of Bansal and his associates, Gaurav Verma (22), Adesh Kumar (24), Rahul alias Hardev (23) and Kuldeep (22). All played roles as cash mules, withdrawing and handing over money for commissions. 'The teams recovered Rs 1.39 lakh in cash, 11 mobile phones, 17 SIM cards, nine ATM cards and a bank passbook from the accused. The accused admitted their roles," the officer said, adding that further investigation in the matter is underway. PTI BM RC (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 22, 2025, 19:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.