logo
Ed Miliband has to go – before his net zero obsession wipes out our factories

Ed Miliband has to go – before his net zero obsession wipes out our factories

Telegraph15-03-2025

Taxes were pushed up too much in the Budget. Global stock markets have been rattled by Donald Trump. And business and consumer confidence has collapsed.
There were plenty of different factors that could explain the unexpected 0.1pc drop in Britain's GDP reported on Friday. And yet, you hardly need to be Hercule Poirot to figure out who the real culprit is: the climate-obsessed Ed Miliband, our Energy Secretary.
The decline was led by a massive drop in manufacturing production. In reality, the collapse of Britain's industrial base is turning into a national emergency – and Miliband has to go before he wipes it out completely.
According to Rachel Reeves, Donald Trump was to blame for the disappointing and unexpected fall in output reported this week. Without naming the US president directly, she argued that 'the world has changed, and across the globe we are feeling the consequences' – as she attempted to deflect the blame away from the government she is a part of.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Almost 60 people killed in Gaza, Hamas says, as Trump calls for ceasefire deal
Almost 60 people killed in Gaza, Hamas says, as Trump calls for ceasefire deal

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Almost 60 people killed in Gaza, Hamas says, as Trump calls for ceasefire deal

Almost 60 people have been killed in new Israeli strikes in Gaza, Hamas-run health authorities have said, as residents reported heavy bombardments. The Israeli military issued evacuation orders on Monday to people in large areas of the north, leading to further displacement. Israeli officials are due in Washington for a new attempt at a ceasefire promoted by the Trump administration. Salah, a 60-year-old father-of-five from Gaza City, said: "In the news we hear a ceasefire is near, on the ground we see death and we hear explosions," Reuters reported him as saying. "Explosions never stopped; they bombed schools and homes. It felt like earthquakes." Health authorities said 10 people were killed in Zeitoun and at least 13 were killed southwest of Gaza City. Medics said most of those 13 were hit by gunfire, but residents reported an airstrike, too. They also said 20 people, including women, children and a local journalist were killed in an Israeli airstrike on a beachfront cafe in Gaza City. The IDF ordered people to head south, saying it planned to fight Hamas militants operating in northern Gaza, including in the heart of Gaza City. Donald Trump has urged Israel and Hamas to agree a ceasefire - as the number of Palestinians killed in Gaza reached 56,500, according to Hamas-run authorities. "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!," he wrote on social media on Sunday. The US president had raised expectations of a possible agreement this week, but some Palestinians were doubtful of the latest efforts to end the 20-month war that has laid waste to most of Gaza. "Since the beginning of the war, they have been promising us something like this: release the hostages and we will stop the war," said one Palestinian, Abdel Hadi al Hour. "They did not stop the war." An eight-week ceasefire was reached in the final days of Joe Biden's US presidency, but Israel resumed the war in March after trying to get Hamas to accept new terms on next steps. Meanwhile, Israeli attacks in Gaza also continued on Sunday. At least 15 people were killed when an IDF airstrike hit a house sheltering displaced people in the Jabaliya al-Nazla area, according to an official in Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry. He said women and children made up more than half the dead. During a visit to Israel's internal security service Shin Bet, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the Israel-Iran war and ceasefire have opened many opportunities. "First of all, to rescue the hostages," he said. "Of course, we will also have to solve the Gaza issue, to defeat Hamas, but I estimate that we will achieve both tasks." The war in Gaza, which has continued for more than a year and a half, began after Hamas militants launched attacks in Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. 0:55 Talks between Israel and Hamas have stalled over whether or not the war should end as part of any ceasefire. Hamas official Mahmoud Merdawi accused Mr Netanyahu of stalling progress on a deal, saying the Israeli leader insists on a temporary agreement that would free just 10 of the hostages. Omer Dostri, a spokesperson for Mr Netanyahu, said that "Hamas was the only obstacle to ending the war", without addressing Mr Merdawi's claim. Hamas says it is willing to free all the hostages in exchange for a full withdrawal of Israeli troops and an end to the war in Gaza. Israel rejects that offer, saying it will agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and goes into exile - something that the group refuses.

Lara Trump is ‘taking a strong look' at running for now-open North Carolina Senate seat
Lara Trump is ‘taking a strong look' at running for now-open North Carolina Senate seat

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Lara Trump is ‘taking a strong look' at running for now-open North Carolina Senate seat

Months after saying she 'would seriously consider' taking over Marco Rubio's Florida Senate seat, only to instead jump over to Fox News to host a weekend show, Lara Trump is now 'taking a strong look' at running for Senate in North Carolina after incumbent Republican Thom Tillis announced he was not seeking re-election. Amid a falling out with President Donald Trump over the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which Tillis says he opposes due to the massive cuts in Medicaid, the conservative lawmaker announced this past weekend that he would be stepping down next year rather than seek another term. 'I respect President Trump, I support the majority of his agenda, but I don't bow to anybody when the people of North Carolina are at risk and this bill puts them at risk,' Tillis told The Independent. With the president celebrating the pending retirement of Tillis, who has long faced anger from MAGA for his attempts at bipartisanship and occasional criticisms of fellow Republicans, speculation quickly arose over who would run for the soon-to-be open seat. And the president's daughter-in-law appears to be front of the line on the Republican side. Lara Trump, who served as the Republican National Committee co-chair through the 2024 election, 'is 'taking a strong look' at the race and will have the family's support if she chooses to run,' according to Politico. NOTUS' Reese Gorman additionally stated that a source told him she is 'seriously considering a bid' for Tillis' seat. NBC News' Vaughn Hilyard also reported that a source close to the Trump family said that the current Fox News host is 'strongly considering jumping in the race,' adding that the odds of her throwing her name in the ring are 'as high as one could be considering it.' On top of that, if she decides to run, the source noted the 'race will be over before it begins.' If Lara Trump would decide to stay at her cushy Fox News gig rather than run for the Senate, which would entail her having to quit her show and the conservative cable giant releasing her, other GOP hopefuls have been floated as possibilities. The current RNC Chair Michael Whatley, who previously led North Carolina's GOP, is seen as a 'strong candidate' by the White House. Elsewhere, Reps. Pat Harrigan and Richard Hudson are also being propped up by Republicans as 'solid' choices. Democrats, meanwhile, are hoping to convince popular former Gov. Roy Cooper to jump into the race. He is expected to make an announcement on his intentions later this summer. Ex-Congressman Wiley Nickel has already launched his campaign for the Democratic nomination. Lara Trump has made no secret of her ambitions for political office over the years. After Richard Burr revealed in 2021 that he would not seek re-election for his North Carolina Senate seat, she was reportedly eyeing a run to succeed the moderate Republican. Burr had run afoul Trump loyalists after he was one of seven GOP senators who voted to convict the president in his impeachment trial over the January 6 Capitol attack. 'It would be an incredible thing. It's my home state, a state I love so much, and look, I think we need some strong Republicans in Washington, DC. We had a great run with the Senate and the House this go-round, but you know, let's see what happens,' she told Fox News in 2022. With it looking likely that Tillis could step down in 2026, and the MAGA wing of the party considering a primary race against him if he didn't, Lara Trump's name was floated for the seat after her father-in-law won the presidential election last November. A poll in December found that she would trounce Tillis in a one-on-one primary for the GOP nomination. However, after Donald Trump chose Rubio to be his secretary of state, leaving an open Senate seat in Florida to be filled, the president's daughter-in-law – who had just left her position with the RNC – was seen as a likely choice. Especially since the president wanted her to replace Rubio at the time. Instead, she decided she'd rather 'shape narratives' than craft legislation and headed over to Fox News, where she had been engaged in negotiations with network chief Suzanne Scott to host her own show. The hiring of Lara Trump came on the heels of the administration hiring roughly two dozen former Fox News staffers and was seen as a way of further tightening the already close relationship between the right-wing network and the president. With the president irate with Tillis over his non-support for his signature legislation, he spent much of the weekend vowing to back a primary challenger before the senator announced that he would not seek re-election. 'Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis,' Trump groused on Truth Social. 'I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.'

US Supreme Court to hear Republican challenge to 'coordinated' campaign spending curbs
US Supreme Court to hear Republican challenge to 'coordinated' campaign spending curbs

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US Supreme Court to hear Republican challenge to 'coordinated' campaign spending curbs

WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a Republican-led challenge on free speech grounds to a provision of federal campaign finance law that limits spending by political parties in coordination with candidates running for office in a case involving Vice President JD Vance. The justices took up an appeal by two Republican committees and Vance, who was running for the U.S. Senate in Ohio when the litigation began, of a lower court's ruling that upheld restrictions on the amount of money parties can spend on campaigns with input from candidates they support. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which begins in October. Republican President Donald Trump's administration filed a court brief backing the Republican committees and Vance, who is now serving as his vice president. Lawyers for the Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to take up the case and appoint a third party to defend the lower court's ruling in place of the Justice Department. At issue in the case is whether federal limits on coordinated campaign spending violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protection against government abridgment of freedom of speech. The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 and its amendments regulate fundraising and spending in U.S. elections by limiting the amount of money that people, groups and political parties can contribute or spend on a candidate, with the aim of preventing corruption. Under that law, spending that is made by a political party to advocate for or against a candidate, but is not coordinated with a candidate's campaign, is considered an "independent expenditure" not subject to amount limitations. Spending that is coordinated between a party and a campaign, however, is restricted by the law and varies based on the population of the state where the candidate is running for office, lower in states with smaller populations and higher in those with larger populations. In 2024, limits ranged from around $123,000 to $3.7 million for Senate candidates and from around $62,000 to $123,000 for House of Representatives candidates, according to court papers. In a 2022 lawsuit, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, Vance and former Republican congressman Steve Chabot of Ohio sought a court order blocking the Federal Election Commission from enforcing limits on so-called "coordinated party expenditures." Vance was running for a Senate seat in Ohio at the time. The plaintiffs argued that the limits "severely restrict political party committees from doing what the First Amendment entitles them to do: fully associate with and advocate for their own candidates for federal office." The Cincinnati-based U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2024 ruling upheld the limits on coordinated campaign expenditures, concluding that they comported with the Constitution. The 6th Circuit in its ruling said it was required to follow a 2001 ruling by the Supreme Court arising from Colorado that addressed the very same issue. On appeal, the plaintiffs told the Supreme Court that developments in campaign finance over the intervening decades, including shifts in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence, have eroded the rationale underlying the 2001 ruling in the Colorado case and urged the justices to consider overruling it. Vance was vice president-elect when the appeal was filed in December 2024. Three Democratic groups - the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - asked to intervene to defend the 6th Circuit's decision. In a landmark decision on campaign finance in a case called Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court in 2010 enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited amounts of money on elections, striking down federal limits on independent expenditures as a violation of the First Amendment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store