US to create military zones in Texas, Arizona on Mexico border
The Defense Department is establishing two additional military zones along the U.S.-Mexico border, in an effort to further crack down on unlawful migrant crossings, a Defense official confirmed to The Hill.
The Pentagon is creating one designated area along Arizona's border and one in southern Texas, according to The New York Times, which cited two Defense Department officials.
The former will become part of the Marine Corps Air Station in Yuma, and the latter will become a part of Joint Base San Antonio, the Times reported.
A Defense official confirmed the report to The Hill, saying Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth directed the secretaries of the Air Force and Navy 'to take necessary action to establish National Defense Areas along the U.S.-Mexico border.'
'DoD's new jurisdiction over these stretches of land and river will enhance the authority of the Department to secure the U.S. southern border from unlawful entry and to maintain the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and security of the United States,' the official said in a statement.
The two new military zones add to the two others designated by the Pentagon earlier this year — in southern Texas and New Mexico.
In the designated zones, military personnel are authorized to take custody of migrants who illegally cross the border until they are transferred to civilian authorities in the Department of Homeland Security.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
What's next for Bryan Kohberger's defense after judge dismissed bid for ‘alternate perpetrator' theory
CrimeFacebookTweetLink Follow It's been a tough week for Bryan Kohberger's defense team. Defense lawyers for Kohberger, the 30-year-old accused of killing four University of Idaho students in their Moscow, Idaho, home in November 2022, had long suggested the 'alternate perpetrator' theory – the idea that someone else killed the students. But on Thursday, Judge Steven Hippler dealt a crushing blow to the defense, denying their request to identify specific alternate perpetrators before the jury. Idaho law requires the 'alternate perpetrator' theory to be approved by a judge before a trial begins. The defense offered four individuals as alternate perpetrators, according to the judge's order, of which portions were redacted. The defense's motion is sealed and not open to the public. The judge ruled the 'defendant's offer of proof can give rise to only wild speculation that it is possible any one of these four individuals could have committed the crimes,' which does not meet the requirements of state law. 'Nothing links these individuals to the homicides or otherwise gives rise to a reasonable inference that they committed the crime,' Hippler said in his ruling. 'Indeed, it would take nothing short of rank speculation by the jury to make such a finding.' The judge also rejected a bid from Kohberger's defense team to delay the trial, slated to start August 11, saying the defense has not shown 'there is good cause' to move back the trial start date. The trial has already gone through numerous delays due to disputes about evidence and witnesses, as well as a change of venue from Latah County to the state capital of Boise. Lead defense attorney Anne Taylor argued in court last week the 'challenges and difficulties' over the last two and a half years have made it so the defense team is still not ready to go to trial. The blow to Kohberger's defense comes after Hippler previously ruled he also cannot present an alibi defense – since no one can vouch for where he was during the time of the killings. His defense team has said he was driving alone in the early morning hours of November 13, 'as he often did to hike and run and/or see the moon and stars,' when the students were stabbed. Kohberger – on whose behalf a not guilty plea was entered – could face the death penalty if convicted of the quadruple murders. Here's more of what we know about the 'alternate perpetrator' theory – and where Kohberger's defense team can go now as the options to defend their client continue dwindling. The judge's ruling says the defense suggested four possible alternate perpetrators of the murders, each of whom had some connection to or interaction with the victims in the days before they were fatally stabbed. Three of the alternate suspects proposed by the defense were 'each socially connected to one or more of the victims, interacted with one or more of the victims at social events in the hours prior to the homicide, lived within walking distance of the crime scene and were familiar with the layout of the victims' home from prior social events,' said Hippler. But the proposed perpetrators' opportunity to commit the crime is 'an opportunity shared by dozens of others in the victims' social circles,' said the judge, adding, 'there is no compelling evidence that any of them had motive to kill the victims - much less physically harm them - or means to do so.' A fourth possible alternate perpetrator did not know the victims but had noticed one of them shopping at a store five weeks before the killings, according to the ruling. The moment was captured by surveillance footage. 'He followed her briefly out the exit of the store while considering approaching her to talk,' said Hippler. 'He turned away before ever speaking to her.' The suggested alternate perpetrators have all cooperated with law enforcement, providing DNA samples and fingerprints, the judge's ruling said. Lab reports have excluded their DNA from samples taken from the crime scene, according to Hippler. The 'alternate perpetrator' has been one of several tracks the defense has highlighted as the trial approaches. During a pivotal pre-trial hearing in April, the defense announced it had received a tip of an alternate suspect, which they were taking very seriously and were investigating. In May, Hippler said during the final pre-trial hearing he had received the defendant's proffer or offer on an alternate perpetrator. At that time, the judge said he would be sealing the paperwork but wanted additional information, asking for actual evidence of an alternate perpetrator rather than just allegations. He also wanted the defense to show how they believed what they were offering was admissible. Now, in the court's final order, while the defense may cross-examine law enforcement on investigating and ruling out other leads, they are not permitted to ask about specific individuals as potential alternate perpetrators. In another blow for the defense, Judge Hippler previously ruled that Kohberger cannot have an official alibi defense. In August 2023, prosecutors told the court that Kohberger's alibi was only that he was out driving around the night of the killings, and that he had not complied with Idaho's alibi statute – which specifically requires him to provide names of witnesses to be called to support the alibi, along with their addresses. They said it was now too late to do so. Since 2023, the defense has continued to push to use an alibi defense, saying the alibi may emerge from cross-examination or expert testimony about Kohberger's cell phone tower data. The court, however, has continually told the defense they have to comply with the specific requirements of the statue. During a motion hearing in April, the alibi defense was argued again. Prosecutors renewed their position that the defense can only say Kohberger was out driving around that night and the time his phone was turned off 'coincided with the time of the murders.' They pointed out the only person who can testify to Kohberger's alibi is the defendant himself. Taylor, Kohberger's lead attorney, emphasized her client has a right to remain silent. Hippler then asked Taylor, 'if not Kohberger … who is going to say he was driving around looking at the stars?' The judge ruled the defense expert could show Kohberger was at a certain place until 2:50 a.m. on November 13, 2022, but that no alibi witness would be able to testify, and there would not be an alibi instruction given to the jury. He also ruled the defense should immediately notify the court if it comes across evidence that supports an alibi. The defense hasn't filed any motions related to the alibi since that April court decision. Unable to present an official alibi or suggest specific alternate perpetrators of the killings, the defense will likely focus on raising reasonable doubt that Kohberger committed the crimes. During the cross-examination of every witness, the defense will likely work to show that Kohberger had no connection to the crime scene and no connection to the victims. They will also try to raise reasonable doubt during cross-examination of prosecution experts testifying about surveillance video allegedly of Kohberger's car driving to Moscow in the months before the killings and during the early morning hours of the day the students were found dead. The defense will likely try to discredit any cell phone tower data used to show the location of Kohberger's phone on the night of the killings, as well as surveillance video from businesses in the area. The defense has an expert of their own who will argue that Kohberger's phone data shows he was outside the area at the time of the killings. Unidentified DNA from blood found on a handrail inside the home could also be helpful to the defense, to further raise doubt that Kohberger was the killer and suggest investigators did not fully do their job. Cross-examination of the victims' two surviving roommates will likely be aggressive, especially of Dylan Mortensen. Mortensen told police she saw a masked man with 'bushy eyebrows' and wearing all black in their home the night of the killings. Kohberger's defense have painted Mortensen as an unreliable witness whose recollection of the night has been muddied by intoxication and post-event media exposure. Both sides agreed they would not focus on investigative genetic genealogy, the technique that led to the identification of Kohberger as a potential suspect. But in court filings, defense lawyers have floated the idea that the knife sheath found in the Moscow home could have been planted by the real killer. A single source of male DNA on the sheath, found next to the body of Maddie Mogan, was determined to be a 'statistical match' to Kohberger. And although Kohberger has a right to remain silent, he could take the stand himself – testifying in his own defense to explain the many unanswered questions around the case. CNN's Lauren del Valle, Taylor Romine, and Eric Levenson contributed to this report.
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
US did not use bunker-buster bombs on one of Iran's nuclear sites, top general tells lawmakers, citing depth of the target
Washington CNN — The US military did not use bunker-buster bombs on one of Iran's largest nuclear sites last weekend because the site is so deep that the bombs likely would not have been effective, the US' top general told senators during a briefing on Thursday. The comment by Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, which was described by three people who heard his remarks and a fourth who was briefed on them, is the first known explanation given for why the US military did not use the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb against the Isfahan site in central Iran. US officials believe Isfahan's underground structures house nearly 60% of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, which Iran would need in order to ever produce a nuclear weapon. US B2 bombers dropped over a dozen bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites. But Isfahan was only struck by Tomahawk missiles launched from a US submarine. The classified briefing to lawmakers was conducted by Caine, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. A spokesperson for Caine declined to comment, noting that he cannot comment on the chairman's classified briefing to Congress. During the briefing, Ratcliffe told lawmakers that the US intelligence community assesses that the majority of Iran's enriched nuclear material is buried at Isfahan and Fordow, according to a US official. Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy told CNN on Thursday night after receiving the briefing that some of Iran's capabilities 'are so far underground that we can never reach them. So they have the ability to move a lot of what has been saved into areas where there's no American bombing capacity that can reach it.' An early assessment produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency in the day after the US strikes said the attack did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program, including its enriched uranium, and likely only set the program back by months, CNN has reported. It also said Iran may have moved some of the enriched uranium out of the sites before they were attacked. The Trump officials who briefed lawmakers this week sidestepped questions about the whereabouts of Iran's stockpile of already-enriched uranium. President Donald Trump again claimed Friday that nothing was moved from the three Iranian sites before the US military operation. But Republican lawmakers emerged from the classified briefings on Thursday acknowledging that the US military strikes may not have eliminated all of Iran's nuclear materials. But they argued that doing so was not part of the military's mission. 'There is enriched uranium in the facilities that moves around, but that was not the intent or the mission,' Republican Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas told CNN. 'My understanding is most of it's still there. So we need a full accounting. That's why Iran has to come to the table directly with us, so the (International Atomic Energy Agency) can account for every ounce of enriched uranium that's there. I don't think it's going out of the country, I think it's at the facilities.' 'The purpose of the mission was to eliminate certain particular aspects of their nuclear program. Those were eliminated. To get rid of the nuclear material was not part of the mission,' GOP Rep. Greg Murphy told CNN. 'Here's where we're at: the program was obliterated at those three sites. But they still have ambitions,' said Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. 'I don't know where the 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium exists. But it wasn't part of the targets there.' '(The sites) were obliterated. Nobody can use them anytime soon,' Graham also said. Weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies Jeffrey Lewis told CNN that commercial satellite images show that Iran has accessed the tunnels at Isfahan. 'There were a moderate number of vehicles present at Isfahan on June 26 and at least one of the tunnel entrances was cleared of obstructions by mid-morning June 27,' Lewis said. 'If Iran's stockpile of (highly enriched uranium) was still in the tunnel when Iran sealed the entrances, it may be elsewhere now.' Additional satellite imagery captured on June 27 by Planet Labs show the entrance to the tunnels were open at the time, according to Lewis. The preliminary DIA assessment noted that the nuclear sites' above ground structures were moderately to severely damaged, CNN has reported. That damage could make it a lot harder for Iran to access any enriched uranium that does remain underground, sources said, something that Graham alluded to on Thursday. 'These strikes did a lot of damage to those three facilities,' Murphy, the Connecticut Democrat, told CNN on Thursday night. 'But Iran still has the know-how to put back together a nuclear program. And if they still have that enriched material, and if they still have centrifuges, and if they still have the capability to very quickly move those centrifuges into what we call a cascade, we have not set back that program by years. We have set it back by months.' Caine and Hegseth on Thursday said the military operation against Fordow went exactly as planned but did not mention the impacts to Isfahan and Natanz.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer mocks sex trafficking case in closing, calls charges 'badly exaggerated', AP explains
Sean Diddy Combs' defense lawyer says the government "badly exaggerated" its evidence against the music mogul in a four-hour closing argument. (AP video by Joseph Frederick)
