
1 million people to be deported by the Trump administration soon - these 4 countries to bear the brunt
In a dramatic move likely to impact nearly 1 million migrants, the Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to begin mass deportations. The court's decision affects immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, who were previously granted temporary protection under a humanitarian parole program launched by former President Joe Biden.
The ruling opens the door for what could be the largest deportation wave in recent U.S. history, targeting hundreds of thousands of people who fled violence, poverty, and instability in their home countries. Here's a full breakdown of what this means and who's most affected.
What did the supreme court decide and how many immigrants will it affect?
The Supreme Court's decision on Friday lifted a previous court order that had protected more than 500,000 immigrants from deportation. These individuals, primarily from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, were allowed to stay in the U.S. under the humanitarian parole program, a policy President Biden expanded in late 2022.
In a separate case, the court also allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status from about 350,000 Venezuelans. Together, that brings the number of people at risk to nearly 1 million immigrants.
Although the court hasn't issued a final ruling, the justices allowed the deportation process to begin while the case continues in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.
Live Events
Which countries will be hit hardest by these deportations?
The four countries that will bear the brunt of the deportation wave are:
Venezuela
Haiti
Cuba
Nicaragua
Migrants from these countries were the main beneficiaries of Biden's parole program. To qualify, they had to fly to the U.S. at their own cost and secure financial sponsors. They were granted a two-year legal stay under this program.
According to government data, more than 532,000 people came to the U.S. under these rules since late 2022. The Trump administration is now moving to cancel these permits before they expire, making this the first mass revocation of humanitarian parole in U.S. history.
How did this case reach the supreme court?
The decision followed an emergency appeal by the Trump administration after a federal judge in Boston, Indira Talwani, ruled against them. Talwani, an Obama appointee, said ending the program early would leave people with a 'stark choice: flee the country or risk losing everything.'
She said parole could be revoked, but only case by case — not in bulk. But the Supreme Court overruled her order temporarily, siding with the Trump team's push for faster deportations.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissented. Jackson wrote that this move will 'unravel the lives of half a million migrants' before the legal questions are fully resolved.
What is the Trump administration's argument for mass deportation?
The Trump team says humanitarian parole is temporary by design, and the law gives the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the power to end it — with or without court approval.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer, representing the administration, argued that revoking parole one person at a time would be a 'gargantuan task' and would delay removals. He also said the Biden administration abused the parole system by granting it en masse rather than assessing cases individually.
The Department of Justice claims the parole program doesn't legally require individual termination, even if the beneficiaries met financial and travel requirements.
Why is this considered the largest mass immigration rollback in decades?
Lawyers for the affected migrants have called this 'the largest mass illegalization event in modern American history.' They argue that the Trump administration's actions amount to a blanket criminalization of lawful immigrants, many of whom have built lives in the U.S. legally over the past two years.
This case is one of several emergency immigration appeals the Trump team has brought to the Supreme Court. In earlier cases, the justices had ruled against Trump, such as when the administration tried to deport Venezuelans accused of gang involvement under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely-used wartime law from the 1700s.
What happens next in the immigration case?
The legal fight isn't over. The case now returns to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, which will review the full arguments. However, because the Supreme Court lifted the protections for now, migrants could start receiving deportation notices soon, even as the case moves forward.
Until a final decision is made, hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela will be left in limbo — unsure whether they'll be able to stay or be forced to leave the U.S. abruptly.
FAQs:
Q1: What is the Trump administration deportation plan about?
It's a plan to deport nearly 1 million migrants by ending Biden's parole protections.
Q2: Which countries are affected by the mass deportation order?
Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela will be hit the hardest by this ruling.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Justice Department's Pam Bondi fires 20 officials involved in Trump prosecution: Report
US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Friday fired several Justice Department employees who worked for Special Counsel Jack Smith and were involved in two federal prosecutions of President Donald Trump during the Biden administration, according to multiple reports quoting people familiar with the matter. A Reuters report states that 20 lawyers, support staff and US marshals who worked on Smith's investigation were laid off by the Justice Department. The report adds that at least two people fired by Attorney General Pam Bondi worked most recently in other US Attorneys' offices in Florida and North Carolina. Trump, who had declined to accept the 2020 presidential election results and continues to allege election fraud without providing any evidence, was being investigated by the then Justice Department officials over retention of classified records and efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The Justice Department has been on a firing spree since January citing Trump's executive powers under the US Constitution of employees who worked on matters involving the Republican president or his supporters. The earliest employees dismissed by the Justice Department was on January 27 when 14 attorneys were fired for working on Smith's team against Trump. Since Trump took office on January 20, at least 37 people from Smith's team have been fired from the Justice Department, a report states. The Justice Department has recently also fired officials involved in the investigation of January 6, 2021 US Capitol riots, wherein defendants stormed the Capitol building in an attempt to restrict the US Congress from certifying President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. The two cases brought by Smith in 2023 against Trump, which includes illegally retaining national security documents and plotting to overturn his 2020 election defeat, were dropped by the court just before Trump took oath of office and never went to trial. Attorney General Pam Bondi has received President Trump's backing over decisions taken by her and the department related to Epstein files.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
President Donald Trump says he is considering taking away the US citizenship of a longtime rival, actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship, Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland if they want her. The two have criticised each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive GOP-backed tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to US citizenship. The US State Department notes on its website that US citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish US nationality by taking certain steps but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing US citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born US citizen," Frost said in an email Saturday. In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people. O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Charting the global economy: Trump ramps up tariffs again
Trump unveiled a wave of letters again threatening key trading partners with high tariff rates even as he delayed the increased duties until Aug. 1 and suggested that he was still open to negotiations. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Bloomberg Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Bloomberg Bloomberg US President Donald Trump ramped back up his tariff plans with an eye on copper and Canada, deflating hopes that the administration was dialling back its initial Liberation Day levies first announced in said that US imports of copper — a vital component in power networks, plumbing and industrial machinery — will face a 50% duty from Aug. 1. He also threatened a 35% tariff on some Canadian goods and raised the prospect of increasing levies on most other countries, following threats to impose a 50% tariff on Brazil over its domestic political Thursday, Trump told NBC News he's eying blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't been informed yet of their rates. The current global baseline minimum levy for nearly all US trading partners is 10%.Here are some of the charts that appeared on Bloomberg this week on the latest developments in the global economy, markets and geopolitics:Trump unveiled a wave of letters again threatening key trading partners with high tariff rates even as he delayed the increased duties until Aug. 1 and suggested that he was still open to negotiations. Still, the US president said the Aug. 1 deadline was 'not 100% firm' and signalled he might tweak the rates Reserve Bank of Australia shocked markets this week by keeping interest rates on hold at 3.85%, despite widespread expectations for a third cut in five months. Central bankers in Israel, Romania, New Zealand, Peru, Egypt, Serbia and Kazakhstan also kept interest rates unchanged. Uruguay surprised with a quarter-point rate cut, while Malaysia lowered borrowing costs for the first time since threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Brazil over its domestic political affairs, the most extreme case yet of the US president weaponising trade policy to make unrelated demands. Trump's latest threat, against a nation that sells fewer goods to the US than it buys, risks reinforcing concerns that formal trade agreements may offer limited protection against future tariff annual inflation ticked up further above target, a signal of the long road ahead before the central bank can begin easing sky-high interest buyers of copper will pay a high price if President Donald Trump pushes ahead with a 50% tariff on refined metal as opposed to products such as wiring, according to producers and analysts. As Trump prepares to slap a 50% levy on imported copper as of Aug. 1, the global supply chain is sweating on details of the manufacturers secured the business tax provisions they'd hoped for in Trump's budget megabill, but the president's erratic trade policy risks tempering any pronounced pickup in capital investment. Still, some expect any notable upturn in capital expenditures to take longer to evolve because of the administration's frenetic tariff announcements as well as the levies assortment of cautionary signals emerged in the latest US jobs report, including weak and concentrated hiring in the private sector as well as a dip in hours worked that underscore a fragile job market. Private payrolls rose 74,000 last month, about half as much as in May. The health care and social assistance industry accounted for nearly 80% of all private sector job growth in June. Excluding that advance, companies added roughly 15,000 jobs — the least in eight Central Bank Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel said there'd have to be a major downward shift in inflation to justify another reduction in borrowing costs, dismissing concern that the economy is UK economy shrank for a second straight month as companies and consumers struggled to bounce back from the blow dealt by US tariffs and a raft of tax increases. Gross domestic product declined 0.1% in May after contracting 0.3% the previous have ramped up bookings at German natural gas storage sites, marking a sharp turnaround from earlier this year when the country exited winter with stockpiles at a three-year low and an unusual market structure made refills leading up to the Australian central bank interest rate decision Tuesday, policymakers sat silent as hot wars in the Middle East and trade wars from the US shook global confidence. That turmoil, along with local data skewed largely to the downside, boosted expectations for a rate cut. So when the bank stunned with a decision to keep rates unchanged, it caught just about everyone automakers slashed the price of products exported to the US at a record pace, in a sign that companies are sacrificing profits to remain competitive as Trump's tariffs hit cars. Last month the export price index for vehicles shipped to North America plunged 19.4% from a year earlier on a contract currency basis, the biggest drop in records going back to 2016.