logo
Trump Administration Opens Investigation Into Diversity Efforts at Virginia School

Trump Administration Opens Investigation Into Diversity Efforts at Virginia School

New York Times22-05-2025
The Trump administration announced on Thursday that it was investigating the admissions system at an elite public high school in Fairfax County, Va., which has been accused of discriminating against Asian American students to favor other racial groups.
The administration has repeatedly argued that the Supreme Court's ban on affirmative action in college admissions should also apply to K-12 education. But the court has never made such a statement, and it chose last year to allow the high school's admissions program to stand.
The school, Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, is considered one of the best in the country. In 2020, the Fairfax County School Board overhauled the admissions process for Thomas Jefferson in an effort to diversify the majority-Asian student body. It did away with a high-stakes admissions exam and instituted a policy to reserve seats for top students from each area middle school. Applicants must also submit grades and essays.
Under the new admissions process, evaluators do not know the names or races of applicants. But they do consider whether candidates overcame challenges such as poverty or learning English as a second language.
The new admissions system led to a decrease in the percentage of Asian students at the school, and an increase in the percentage of Black, Hispanic and low-income students.
Asian Americans still make up the largest ethnic group at Thomas Jefferson, accounting for 60 percent of students, according to district data. Nineteen percent of all students in the district are Asian.
Asian American parents and other plaintiffs sued the school system in 2021 over the new policy, saying it discriminated against Asian students. A district court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, but an appeals court ruled against them. And last year, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, allowing the new admissions program to continue.
That case was based on an equal protection claim under the Constitution. The Trump administration has based its own battle against school diversity efforts on a different law — Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prevents discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin. The administration has repeatedly argued that liberal-leaning schools and colleges have violated the rights of Asian, Jewish and white students, and has tried to withhold funding from institutions that do not comply with its agenda.
In a written statement announcing the investigation into Thomas Jefferson, Linda McMahon, the U.S. secretary of education, said the school's admissions system appeared to stand 'contrary to the law and to the fundamental principle that students should be evaluated on their merit, not the color of their skin.'
Asra Nomani, the parent of a Thomas Jefferson graduate and a member of the coalition that filed the lawsuit against the admissions system, said the federal investigation 'revives our fight for justice and restores hope to families who have long felt ignored.'
After the district eliminated the test that previously controlled admissions to Thomas Jefferson, many Asian American families in the county said they felt officials were penalizing them for encouraging their children to study for the exam.
'Our children have been vilified — called 'cheaters,' 'white-adjacent,' even 'resource hoarders' — for working hard and daring to dream,' Ms. Nomani said.
Richard Kahlenberg, a prominent liberal opponent of race-based affirmative action, said he favored systems like Thomas Jefferson's, which are race-neutral but still aim to diversify schools and equalize opportunity.
The Trump administration's investigation is 'a classic case of overreach,' he said. 'Of course a student who managed to do well despite growing up in a disadvantaged family or poor neighborhood deserves extra consideration.'
Historically, even conservative Supreme Court justices have signaled that they are comfortable with class-based diversity efforts. But at least three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — have indicated that such programs could be understood as a sort of backdoor system of racial preference.
Conservative legal groups have continued to test various cases that could prompt the court to revisit the issue of diversity efforts in K-12 education.
The Trump administration announced its investigation into Fairfax County Public Schools days after a conservative advocacy group, Defending Education, filed a federal complaint against the district. Virginia's attorney general, Jason Miyares, a Republican, concluded his own investigation into the admissions system on Wednesday, finding that it violated Title VI by explicitly seeking to decrease Asian American enrollment while increasing enrollment of other groups.
Given the continued federal and state legal scrutiny of such practices, 'it is entirely possible that T.J. will find itself before the Supreme Court again in due time,' said Sarah Parshall Perry, the vice president of Defending Education, using a common nickname for the high school.
In a written statement, Fairfax County Public Schools said it was reviewing the new legal documents, but argued, 'This matter has already been fully litigated.'
Joshua P. Thompson, an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, which represented the Asian American parents fighting the new admissions system, said the political landscape has changed because the Trump administration has threatened to withhold federal funding from schools.
'The question,' he said, 'is going to be if Fairfax County decides to defend their admissions changes again in federal court.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD Vance latest GOP politician to enter Syndey Sweeney jeans ad debate
JD Vance latest GOP politician to enter Syndey Sweeney jeans ad debate

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

JD Vance latest GOP politician to enter Syndey Sweeney jeans ad debate

Sydney Sweeney's jeans – excuse us, *genes – are continuing to stir controversy. Vice President JD Vance became the latest Republican politician to weigh in on a controversial American Eagle ad featuring Sweeney that critics argued promoted eugenics. "My political advice to the Democrats is continue to (call) everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi," Vance joked during an episode of the conservative "Ruthless" podcast on Friday, Aug. 1. "That appears to be their actual strategy." The Nazi party used the pseudoscience of eugenics, which promotes some genetic features as better than others, to justify the killing of Jews and countless other minority groups during the Holocaust. Sydney Sweeney dishes on the best jeans, her favorite rom-com and what's on her playlist American Eagle's campaign, which has spawned a fierce cultural debate, used wordplay to describe Sweeney, 27, as having "good genes," a wordplay to promote the brand's denim jeans. Critics have said the ad blitz amounts to a glorification of whiteness and a dog whistle for racist ideologies. But her supporters have said the ad is meant to be a light-hearted wordplay, defending the "Euphoria" actress and the brand. Sweeney previously told USA TODAY that denim was a staple of her wardrobe, but left out AE in her list of favored brands at the time. "I'm very much a white, plain T-shirt kind of girl. I jump around from a bunch of different brands and that kind of depends on what vibe I want to go for," she said. "I have my Levi's white T-shirts and my Cotton On white T-shirts that are just paired with casual jeans. Jean wise: I mean, I love Levi's, Frame, Agolde." Sydney Sweeney controversy, explained In one of several videos for AE, Sweeney, clad in a denim-on-denim outfit, says: "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color." "My jeans are blue," she says as the camera pans across her blue denim and her blue eyes. Soon after the campaign dropped, people began to sound the alarm on what they saw as a dangerous message about the beauty ideal, race and "good" versus "bad" genes. Vance, though, chalked the whole ordeal up to an overreaction from the "left" and a doubling down on a strategy that he thinks lost the Democrats the 2024 presidential election. Dunkin' ad about 'genetics' draws comparisons to Sydney Sweeney drama "I actually thought that one of the lessons (Democrats) might take is 'we're going to be less crazy.' And the lesson they have apparently taken is 'we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful,'" he said on the podcast. "Great strategy, guys. That's how you're going to win the midterm, especially young American men." The ad's critics, however, argued that a campaign selling jeans to women should not have been shot so clearly from the male gaze. Some consumers were quick to point out what they saw as the regressive nature of the material: A buxom blonde woman drawing attention to her body and employing a sensual tone, they argued, calling back to a stereotypical symbol of a bygone era. "Wasn't she the one who said she didn't want to be seen as an object?" one commenter asked on Sweeney's Instagram page, while another chided: "We can leave Nazi Germany back where it got conquered ty next!!!" Sweeney has not yet spoken out about the controversy, though several prominent members of the GOP have chimed in on her behalf. Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, for instance, took to X on July 29 to blast the left for criticizing the ad. "Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well…." he wrote. White House's communications director Steven Cheung, a longtime adviser for President Donald Trump, also maligned the criticism, calling it "cancel culture run amok." "This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024," he wrote on X July 29, adding that people are "tired" of this way of thinking. But, when a second ad campaign, this time from Dunkin', dropped featuring the same "genetic" themes, many critics felt vindicated, arguing that it signaled a greater cultural shift toward genetic hierarchy and racism. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Sydney Sweeney drama: JD Vance addresses American Eagle ad controversy

Trump warned he would have to sell Mar-a-Lago, setting off ‘second-tier' rant against ally Hawley over stock bill
Trump warned he would have to sell Mar-a-Lago, setting off ‘second-tier' rant against ally Hawley over stock bill

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump warned he would have to sell Mar-a-Lago, setting off ‘second-tier' rant against ally Hawley over stock bill

Sen. Josh Hawley is explaining why President Donald Trump went nuclear and attacked him for his bill that would ban elected officials from trading stocks. On Wednesday, Trump attacked Hawley, a Republican ally from Missouri, calling him a 'second-tier' senator after the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee passed his legislation to ban members of Congress and other federal elected officials as well as their spouses from trading stocks. Hawley spoke to Business Insider's Bryan Metzger and The New York Sun's Matt Rice and said that other Republican senators told Trump that the president would need to sell his Mar-a-Lago property under the legislation. 'What he said is that he had a number of people call him and say that the bill had been changed at the last minute to force him to sell Mar-a-Lago and his assets, which is, of course, totally false,' Hawley said, adding: 'It exempts them.' The legislation would only require members to sell their stocks when their next term began, which Chairman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) criticized during deliberation of the bill, since he said it should also apply to Trump. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) also criticized the legislation and tried to include a stipulation to investigate former House speaker Nancy Pelosi's stock trading. That meant that the legislation passed through committee with Hawley being the only Republican who supported the legislation. 'When we walked through the text of the bill, he was like 'oh, okay,'' Hawley said. 'And I said 'your assets are all protected. I mean, it doesn't apply. It applies to the next president.' So, yeah. He finished by saying 'you're exonerated Josh, we love you.'' Members of both parties ardently support legislation banning members from trading stocks. Sens. Elisabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) and Steve Daines (R-Mont.) all support some version of it. In the House of Representatives, Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) support similar legislation. But it has failed to get off the ground for many years. Hawley had sought to entice Republicans to support his bill by calling it the PELOSI Act. It was later renamed the HONEST Act and Pelosi, who still serves in the House of Representatives, later came out in favor of it. 'The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well,' she said. 'I strongly support this legislation and look forward to voting for it on the Floor of the House. Despite the fact the bill made it out of committee, it will likely not make it to the floor of the Senate any time soon. The Senate will break for recess after this week. And when Congress returns, it will have to pass spending bills to avoid a shutdown. In addition, the Senate is going into overtime to move through Trump's nominations.

The radio host told the president's daughter-in-law Lara Trump he thinks the White House needs a 'change agent' who can really 'shake things up' and 'speak to all people.'
The radio host told the president's daughter-in-law Lara Trump he thinks the White House needs a 'change agent' who can really 'shake things up' and 'speak to all people.'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The radio host told the president's daughter-in-law Lara Trump he thinks the White House needs a 'change agent' who can really 'shake things up' and 'speak to all people.'

Charlamagne Tha God says he'd back one of his fellow media personalities for a run at the presidency in three years' time. 'I would love to see Jon Stewart run in 2028,' the popular radio show host told host Lara Trump, President Donald Trump's daughter-in-law, in a teased clip from a sit-down due to air Saturday. 'If we're talking about like a change agent coming from the outside that's really going to shake things up and somebody that I feel like can speak to, you know, all people, plus we actually… he's a celebrity who actually knows what they're talking about,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store