Two Oceans Marathon chairperson squares off with blogger over ‘defamatory' articles
In the aftermath of last month's Two Oceans Marathon, in which the race organisers drew widespread criticism over multiple issues, the chairperson of the marathon, Toni Cavanagh, is dragging one of her loudest critics to court.
Cavanagh has approached the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Johannesburg on an urgent basis. She wants popular running blogger Stuart Mann to rescind claims that he has made on his platform over the last couple of months.
In her affidavit, she said the articles written by Mann were defamatory and contained half-truths to suit a specific narrative, thus disrupting the operations of the Two Oceans Marathon board. She said her health had suffered since Mann zeroed in on her.
On his blog, The Running Mann, Mann wrote articles in which he alleged that Cavanagh (who was elected as Two Oceans chairperson in October 2024) did not attain the position in an honest manner.
Mann's allegations included the Two Oceans chairperson lying about her running credentials, as well as embellishing her professional CV.
In one of his articles, Mann labelled this year's Two Oceans 'the worst organised' edition of the marathon.
As a direct consequence of accepting more runners than were permitted for the 2025 event, the Two Oceans organisers did not have enough medals to distribute after the race.
Participants also bemoaned the limited number of water tables along the route. Some runners complained of the distance between the tables, which they said were often overcrowded. Mann also highlighted these issues on his platform, with Cavanagh acknowledging to Daily Maverick that she and her colleagues could have done a better job.
Reputational damage
Nevertheless, she said the issues had been blown out of proportion. In her affidavit, she contended that Mann fuelled this furore with his publications.
'This application arises from a series of allegedly defamatory publications authored by the respondent, Stuart Mann, a blogger operating under the alias 'The Running Mann', which the applicants contend constitute a sustained campaign of reputational harm, harassment and character assassination,' she said.
'The publications falsely impugn the first applicant's personal and professional integrity, question the legitimacy of her leadership and cast aspersions on the governance and ethical standing of the Two Oceans Marathon.
'The applicants submit that the publications violate constitutional rights to dignity and psychological integrity, have caused measurable reputational and medical harm and jeopardise the credibility and sponsorship viability of the Two Oceans.'
Cavanagh is asking the court to force Mann to retract and delete his article, and to issue a public apology in the form of a media statement. The Two Oceans boss also wants Mann to stop writing about her and has asked for an interdict to be granted to this end.
Not backing down
Mann, though, is not backing down and argued that he did not set out to humiliate Cavanagh, but aimed to use his powerful platform to hold Cavanagh and her colleagues accountable for their shortcomings.
In his affidavit, Mann highlighted the injustices within the running community that he has exposed over the years.
This includes him breaking the story of Steven Swarts earlier this year. Swarts was the Athletics Free State president despite being a convicted sex offender serving a suspended sentence. Mann's writing led to Swarts being removed from his post by Athletics South Africa.
Mann said he had nothing to gain by aimlessly picking on Cavanagh, but wished to preserve the prestige of the Two Oceans Marathon and extend its lifespan.
'I deny that any statements or comments in the articles were defamatory, but are indeed truthful and in the public interest. [They] represent fair comment and criticism,' he said.
'Any attempt by the first applicant to paint me as a sexist is completely unfounded and I submit (with utmost respect) done in an effort to gain sympathy from the court.'
Mann also said whatever criticism Cavanagh and her colleagues had been subjected to was by virtue of their own incompetence. He used the permit breach saga, which cost the Two Oceans Marathon its sponsorship from the City of Cape Town, as an example.
'I am not sure how I can be blamed for this. The City of Cape Town has, on its own accord and completely separate to any of my articles, shown distrust in the second applicant's leadership as a result of the permit scandal,' Mann said of Cavanagh.
The court case will be heard on Tuesday, 13 May. DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Bushiri Likely to Avoid Extradition as Documents Go Missing in Malawi — Accountant Faces Perjury Claims
Sifiso Mahlangu | Updated 6 hours ago Controversial Prophet Shepherd Bushiri may never face justice in South Africa after key extradition documents mysteriously vanished in Malawi. The development has cast serious doubt over the upcoming September hearing, raising fears that the prophet — who fled the country while out on bail in 2020 — could permanently escape prosecution. At the same time, his former accountant, Landiwe Ntlokwana, is at the centre of a legal storm of her own. Once a trusted insider in Bushiri's financial operations, she now faces possible charges of perjury and defeating the ends of justice. South African authorities have been trying to extradite Bushiri and his wife Mary since they violated their bail conditions and escaped the country under murky circumstances. They face multiple charges, including fraud and money laundering. The extradition case was due to be heard in Lilongwe's High Court in September. But reports suggest the documents required to proceed with the case have gone missing from court files — a development some legal observers believe is no coincidence. Bushiri's lawyers have argued in court that the disappearance of the papers is not just a bureaucratic mishap but a deliberate obstruction that could halt the entire extradition process. Meanwhile, Bushiri has continued to enjoy warm relations with Malawi's political elite. He has received praise from senior government officials, including the Minister of Civic Education and National Unity, who also recently honoured Bushiri's wife for her 'positive role in national development.' While the extradition effort stalls, new controversy has erupted in South Africa involving Bushiri's former financial officer, Landiwe Ntlokwana. The 42-year-old chartered accountant was once closely involved in managing the finances of the Enlightened Christian Gathering Church and Bushiri's now-infamous Commodities Trading Platform, which prosecutors allege was used to defraud investors of millions. Initially arrested alongside Bushiri in 2021, Ntlokwana maintained her innocence and kept a low profile for years. But in a sudden turn, she has now submitted an affidavit indicating she intends to cooperate with the prosecution. The detailed statement outlines how she joined Bushiri's organisation, believing in his mission, and became part of the administration team behind the church's financial schemes. The civil society group Right to Justice has called on prosecutors to formally charge Ntlokwana with perjury and obstruction. The group says her decision to come forward now — after remaining silent for four years — is both suspicious and potentially damaging to the integrity of the legal process. 'It is deeply concerning that she remained silent all this time,' said Siphesihle Jele, the group's chairperson. 'Now, she wants to flip the script. We believe she withheld crucial information, and only revealed it now when it suits her.' Jele added that if Ntlokwana is using her testimony as a way to escape prosecution while implicating others, she should be investigated thoroughly. Legal experts point out that under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an accused person can be granted immunity if their testimony significantly contributes to a conviction. But Right to Justice argues that Ntlokwana's sudden cooperation could be a calculated move to avoid jail. Her credibility will now be under intense scrutiny. Prosecutors will need to weigh the value of her insider knowledge against the risk of relying on someone who, until recently, was also under criminal investigation. Meanwhile, Bushiri remains defiant. In recent social media posts, he dismissed his critics as 'jealous politicians' and claimed that his church had created thousands of jobs while uplifting the poor. With extradition efforts faltering and a key former insider now under fire, the case surrounding Bushiri continues to grow more complex and more political.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Bushiri Likely to Avoid Extradition as Documents Go Missing in Malawi — Accountant Faces Perjury Claims
Controversial Prophet Shepherd Bushiri may never face justice in South Africa after key extradition documents mysteriously vanished in Malawi. Image: Dimpho Maja/Independent Media Controversial Prophet Shepherd Bushiri may never face justice in South Africa after key extradition documents mysteriously vanished in Malawi. The development has cast serious doubt over the upcoming September hearing, raising fears that the prophet — who fled the country while out on bail in 2020 — could permanently escape prosecution. At the same time, his former accountant, Landiwe Ntlokwana, is at the centre of a legal storm of her own. Once a trusted insider in Bushiri's financial operations, she now faces possible charges of perjury and defeating the ends of justice. South African authorities have been trying to extradite Bushiri and his wife Mary since they violated their bail conditions and escaped the country under murky circumstances. They face multiple charges, including fraud and money laundering. The extradition case was due to be heard in Lilongwe's High Court in September. But reports suggest the documents required to proceed with the case have gone missing from court files — a development some legal observers believe is no coincidence. Bushiri's lawyers have argued in court that the disappearance of the papers is not just a bureaucratic mishap but a deliberate obstruction that could halt the entire extradition process. Meanwhile, Bushiri has continued to enjoy warm relations with Malawi's political elite. He has received praise from senior government officials, including the Minister of Civic Education and National Unity, who also recently honoured Bushiri's wife for her 'positive role in national development.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ While the extradition effort stalls, new controversy has erupted in South Africa involving Bushiri's former financial officer, Landiwe Ntlokwana. The 42-year-old chartered accountant was once closely involved in managing the finances of the Enlightened Christian Gathering Church and Bushiri's now-infamous Commodities Trading Platform, which prosecutors allege was used to defraud investors of millions. Initially arrested alongside Bushiri in 2021, Ntlokwana maintained her innocence and kept a low profile for years. But in a sudden turn, she has now submitted an affidavit indicating she intends to cooperate with the prosecution. The detailed statement outlines how she joined Bushiri's organisation, believing in his mission, and became part of the administration team behind the church's financial schemes. The civil society group Right to Justice has called on prosecutors to formally charge Ntlokwana with perjury and obstruction. The group says her decision to come forward now — after remaining silent for four years — is both suspicious and potentially damaging to the integrity of the legal process. 'It is deeply concerning that she remained silent all this time,' said Siphesihle Jele, the group's chairperson. 'Now, she wants to flip the script. We believe she withheld crucial information, and only revealed it now when it suits her.' Jele added that if Ntlokwana is using her testimony as a way to escape prosecution while implicating others, she should be investigated thoroughly. Legal experts point out that under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an accused person can be granted immunity if their testimony significantly contributes to a conviction. But Right to Justice argues that Ntlokwana's sudden cooperation could be a calculated move to avoid jail. Her credibility will now be under intense scrutiny. Prosecutors will need to weigh the value of her insider knowledge against the risk of relying on someone who, until recently, was also under criminal investigation. Meanwhile, Bushiri remains defiant. In recent social media posts, he dismissed his critics as 'jealous politicians' and claimed that his church had created thousands of jobs while uplifting the poor. With extradition efforts faltering and a key former insider now under fire, the case surrounding Bushiri continues to grow more complex and more political.
Daily Maverick
4 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Political burial row — former Zambian president Edgar Lungu snubs incumbent from the grave
Edgar Lungu's wife, Esther, says in an affidavit that her husband had insisted that Hakainde Hichilema should be 'nowhere near his funeral or body'. Lungu's family says he was repeatedly denied permission to travel to South Africa for medical care and argues that his cancer could have been treated if identified sooner. The Zambian government accuses his widow of making 'scandalous and vexatious' allegations. The family of the late former Zambian president Edgar Lungu says plans to repatriate his body to Zambia were halted over the government's inclusion of current president Hakainde Hichilema in the funeral programme. In papers submitted to the High Court in Pretoria, former first lady Esther Lungu has explained why the family has refused to allow the Zambian government to repatriate Lungu's remains to Zambia, forcing a court battle over who has the right to bury the former head of state. Esther Lungu, who now lives in Centurion, is adamant that her late husband would not have wanted to be buried by the Zambian government if Hichilema was involved in the funeral. A draft programme released by the government showed that Hichilema would play a key role, presiding over the burial of his one-time rival. 'During the late former president Lungu's time in South Africa, he was open and consistent in expressing his wish that, upon his death, the current president (Hakainde Hichilema) should be nowhere near his funeral or body. These intentions were communicated on numerous occasions to me and other family members. His reasons were rooted, not only in his personal mistreatment, compromised safety and medical care, but also in the principled rejection of a ceremonial burial by a government that had, in his view, forsaken and persecuted him in life,' Esther says in the affidavit. Esther Lungu has accused the government of denying him the opportunity to seek lifesaving medical attention in the two years before his death, further souring an already tense political relationship. Who decides? According to the papers, the Lungu family have not found a will belonging to the former president and as a result argue that they should decide on where he should be buried. '(Lungu's) status as a former Head of State does not displace or override the rights of his immediate family, particularly in the absence of any legal authority, judicial order, or formal consent authorising interference with those burial arrangements,' Esther Lungu says in her affidavit. Lungu died in a Johannesburg hospital on 5 June and was due to be repatriated a few days later. He had travelled to South Africa for medical treatment and upon arrival was told that he had advanced cancer of the oesophagus. According to Zambia's attorney-general, Mulilo Kabesha, who deposed an affidavit on behalf of the Zambian government, the family had initially agreed to having Lungu returned to Zambia. Kabesha says the family planned to return to Zambia via private jet and 'planned to transport the body to Ndola, where the late President Lungu was born, Kitwe where he lived during his formative years and Petauke where he hailed from'. 'This was to provide the opportunity to the late President's supporters and friends to pay their last respect before proceeding to Lusaka.' The government offered to transport the mortal remains on a military jet and foot the bill for the burial, but the family objected, saying Lungu wanted to be repatriated 'in the same manner that he travelled to South Africa, namely by charter plane'. Kabesha also confirmed that the government officials were informed that Lungu did not want Hichilema to attend the funeral. Kabesha says the family and government officials continued to negotiate for another week and during a meeting on 14 June a 'roadmap was agreed upon' that would see Lungu returned to Zambia via charter jet and buried on 23 June at Embassy Memorial Park. This roadmap was communicated to Zambian media. Kabesha says the family 'reneged' on the agreement a few days later. '(Esther Lungu's) catastrophic about-turn led to a flurry of diplomatic activities from 18 June to 23 June 2025 and (the Zambian government) sent numerous delegations to (Mrs Lungu) to implore her and the other family members to revert to the initial arrangements and to permit the late President's body to be repatriated and thereafter for the Zambian established customs and protocols to be followed,' Kabesha said. He added that Mrs Lungu raised several issues including 'general mistrust of the present regime and an objection to the current sitting head of state being allowed to receive the body'. 'Even though discussions between officials of the government of Zambia were ongoing, (the government) was notified through social media at 12:15 on 23 June 2025 of that (Mrs Lungu) and other family members have resolved to bury the late president Lungu in Johannesburg on 25 June in a private ceremony.' In court papers, the Lungu family admit that they met representatives from the government but deny Kabesha's version of the outcome. 'It was proposed that the current President only be allowed to receive foreign dignitaries and could be present at the funeral where foreign heads of state would be present. The current President was not to play any further role in the burial,' Esther Lungu says. The South African burial was interdicted by the government and Lungu's remains are being kept at the Two Mountains funeral home in Midrand. Benefits Kabesha argues that the Zambian government has a clear right to dictate the terms of burial of a head of state, based on the country's Benefits Act, which specifies the benefits allocated to former heads of state including pension and state burial. However, the Lungu family challenges this, saying the current administration had terminated Lungu's benefits in October 2023, after Lungu announced plans to return to active politics. According to the family, Lungu's benefits had been 'revoked prior to his passing, rendering him a private citizen at the time of his death'. 'During the period his benefits were revoked, he was compelled to seek financial support from family and friends and was forced to leave Zambia to receive medical treatment in South Africa, fearing politically motivated medical negligence in his home country,' Esther Lungu says in the affidavit. She adds that the removal of the benefits was 'a deliberate act' by the government aimed at 'weakening' Lungu. The government has another view, saying Lungu's benefits were not terminated but suspended. 'His entitlement to benefits was suspended when he became engaged in active politics and upon his passing on, the impediment that existed fell away,' Kabesha said. Feud Lungu served as president of Zambia from January 2015 to August 2021 under the banner of the Patriotic Front. He was succeeded by Hichilema, the rival leader of the United Party for National Development, who remains president today. During Lungu's term Hichilema was arrested on treason charges but was released after 100 days in custody. Since leaving office, Lungu and his family have been accused of corruption and theft of government motor vehicles and property. Esther Lungu alleges these accusations are politically motivated. Kabesha, on behalf of the Zambian government, says the cases against Lungu's family should not have a bearing on the case involving his burial. The Lungu family say they plan to remain in South Africa due to the conditions they have faced in Zambia. They also allege that they incurred up to R1-million in costs for the aborted burial and funeral which was interdicted by the government. Esther Lungu says the halting of the funeral 'caused great harm and embarrassment to the family'.
