
Arctic Wolf celebrates top ANZ partners as channel network doubles
Arctic Wolf has named REDD, CSW-IT, and Ethan Global as the recipients of its 2025 Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) Partner of the Year Awards.
The awards were presented to acknowledge the contribution of partner organisations in delivering security operations and supporting efforts to reduce cyber risk for businesses across the region.
Channel growth
Arctic Wolf reported that its ANZ channel partner community has doubled in size, reflecting the company's continued investment in its partner-led strategy. The firm's global partner network now numbers more than 2,250, including resellers, solution providers, managed service providers (MSPs), cyber insurance collaborators, and technology alliances, spanning more than 100 countries.
Alongside the growth in partner numbers, Arctic Wolf said it serves over 10,000 customers and supports more than 1,000 security engineers worldwide.
Security landscape
The company outlined that organisations in the ANZ region are facing a constantly shifting risk environment, influenced by the adoption of new technologies and increased geopolitical uncertainty. To address these challenges, Arctic Wolf has continued to focus on its partner-first approach and has introduced enhancements to its security platforms and MSP Partner Program.
Following Arctic Wolf's acquisition of Cylance earlier this year, the company's partners in ANZ now have access to expanded go-to-market opportunities, including the latest Security Operations Centre (SOC) offerings and endpoint security solutions.
Partner recognition
The Alpha Partner of the Year award was presented to REDD. Brad Ferris, Chief Executive Officer at REDD, said, "At REDD, we're deeply honoured to be named Arctic Wolf's APAC Alpha Partner of the Year. This recognition reflects our team's relentless commitment to excellence, our customer-obsessed culture, and our focus on delivering world-class security outcomes across Australia and New Zealand. Together with Arctic Wolf, we're helping organisations face today's cybersecurity challenges with clarity, confidence, and resilience."
CSW-IT received the Pack Hunter Partner of the Year award. Callum McDonald, Director at CSW-IT, commented, "We are so excited to be Arctic Wolf's Pack Hunter Partner of the year in Australia. This award reflects the dedication of our team, the strength of our strategic alignment with Arctic Wolf, and our shared commitment to helping customers stay ahead of evolving cyber threats."
Ethan Global was named Rising Star Partner of the Year. Tony Geagea, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer at Ethan Global, said, "There's a reason why Australian organisations choose to work with us. We're more than just a security provider – we're AI, we're managed services, we're cloud, telco, and IT. To get security right, you need to have a holistic understanding of the environment, and that's our speciality. Thank you, Arctic Wolf for this year's Rising Star award - we are very excited about this strategic partnership."
Commitment to the partner ecosystem
David Hayes, Regional Director ANZ at Arctic Wolf, highlighted the importance of the company's partner relationships, stating, "By integrating Arctic Wolf's turnkey solutions, our open XDR platform, and the expertise of our partner teams, we serve as trusted advisors throughout the customer security journey." "As a 100% partner-based company, Arctic Wolf's entire portfolio of services is offered exclusively through our partners. Our local partner community is critical to bringing these innovations to the ANZ market, and we are committed to strengthening these relationships and delivering better outcomes for our customers."
Arctic Wolf indicated that it will continue to build on its partner network in ANZ, aiming to meet expanding customer requirements while supporting efforts to address increasing security threats faced by organisations in the region.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Business confidence rises for first time in three months as firms look past tariff turmoil
ANZ's business outlook survey showed headline confidence rising nine points in June to a net 46 percent, expecting better business conditions in the year ahead. Photo: Unsplash/ Li Rezaei Business sentiment has improved for the first time in three months as firms begin to look past tariff turmoil . ANZ's business outlook survey showed headline confidence rising nine points in June to a net 46 percent, expecting better business conditions in the year ahead. The more closely followed measure of businesses' own outlooks rose six points to 41 percent. However, in another sign of slow economic recovery, past activity fell three points, while past employment was flat and at subdued levels. Inflation expectations remained steady at 2.71 percent. "It continues to be a difficult business environment for many," ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner said. ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner. Photo: ABC / Luke Bowden "Costs are still going up and margins are being squeezed, with low turnover and a highly competitive environment making it very difficult to recoup margins." Zollner said forward-looking activity indicators were generally better as tariff noise subsided. "However, in terms of what firms are experiencing, things remain pretty soft," she said. "Economy-wide reported past activity fell marginally." Zollner said pricing and cost expectations remained too high to be in line with the Reserve Bank's inflation forecasts, but said firms' own inflation expectations were "well-behaved". ANZ also asked firms what drove their investment decisions - a question asked every three months. "Since we last asked the question in March, amongst firms planning to invest, central government policy has increased as a driver and is now the second most important reason for investing (presumably related to the Investment Boost in the May Budget)," Zollner said. ANZ said competition and low turnover continued to be the main problems for firms, with the agriculture sector faring better than others - thanks to strong prices for key export commodities. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
'Pretty damn average': Google's AI Overviews underwhelm
Photo: JAAP ARRIENS Most searches online are done using Google. Traditionally, they've returned long lists of links to websites carrying relevant information. Depending on the topic, there can be thousands of entries to pick from or scroll through. Last year Google started incorporating its Gemini AI tech into its searches . Google's Overviews now inserts Google's own summary of what it's scraped from the internet ahead of the usual list of links to sources in many searches. Some sources say Google's now working towards replacing the lists of links with its own AI-driven search summaries. RNZ's Kathryn Ryan's not a fan. "Pretty damn average I have to say, for the most part," she said on Nine to Noon last Monday during a chat about AI upending the business of digital marketing. But Kathryn Ryan is not the only one underwhelmed by Google's Overviews. Recently, online tech writers discovered you can trick it into thinking that made up sayings are actually idioms in common usage that are meaningful. The Sydney Morning Herald 's puzzle compiler David Astle - under the headline 'Idiom or Idiot?' reckoned Google's AI wasn't about to take his job making cryptic crosswords anytime soon. "There is a strange bit of human psychology which says that we expect a very high bar from machines in a way that we don't from humans," the BBC's head of technology forecasting Laura Ellis told Mediawatch last month. "But if you've got a machine making a mistake, where does that accountability fall? We've just not tested this out yet." UK Sky News deputy political editor Sam Coates tried to make ChatGPT accountable after it made up an entire episode of his own politics podcast when he used it to help archive transcripts of it recently. "AI had told a lie that it had got the transcript. And rather than back down it invented an entire fake episode without flagging that it's fake." When challenged on this, the technology insisted Coates had created the episode himself. When ChatGPT can't find an answer or the right data to draw on, it can 'hallucinate' or just make up a misleading response. "Chat GTP is gaslighting me. No such thing exists. It's all a complete fake," Coates spluttered. After turning ChatGPT off and on again in 'conversation mode', it did eventually own up. "It said; 'Look, you're absolutely right to challenge that. I can't remember the exact time that you uploaded.' And then: 'What I can confirm is that I did it and you're holding me to account,'" Coates told viewers. He went on to challenge ChatGPT about its hallucinations getting worse. "The technology is always improving, and newer versions tend to do a better job at staying accurate," ChatGPT replied. But Coates - armed with data that suggested the opposite - asked ChatGPT for specific stats. The response: "According to recent internal tests from OpenAI, the newer models have shown higher hallucination rates. For instance, the model known as o3 had about a 33 percent hallucination rate, while the 04 mini model had around 48 percent." "I get where you're coming from, and I'm sorry for the mixed messages. The performance of these models can vary." When Coates aired his experience as a warning for journalists, some reacted with alarm. "The hallucination rate of advanced models... is increasing. As journos, we really should avoid it," said Sunday Times writer and former BBC diplomatic editor Mark Urban. But some tech experts accused Coates of misunderstanding and misusing the technology. "The issues Sam runs into here will be familiar to experienced users, but it illustrates how weird and alien Large Language Model (LLM) behaviour can seem for the wider public," said Cambridge University AI ethicist Henry Shevlin. "We need to communicate that these are generative simulators rather than conventional programmes," he added. Others were less accommodating on social media. "All I am seeing here is somebody working in the media who believes they understand how technology works - but [he] doesn't - and highlighting the dangers of someone insufficiently trained in technology trying to use it." "It's like Joey from Friends using the thesaurus function on Word." Mark Honeychurch is a programmer and long serving stalwart of the NZ Skeptics, a non profit body promoting critical thinking and calling out pseudoscience. The Skeptics' website said they confront practices that exploit a lack of specialist knowledge among people. That's what many people use Google for - answers to things they don't know or things they don't understand. Mark Honeychurch described putting overviews to the test in a recent edition of the Skeptics' podcast Yeah, Nah . "The AI looked like it was bending over backwards to please people. It's trying to give an answer that it knows that the customer wants," Honeychurch told Mediawatch . Honeychurch asked Google for the meaning of: 'Better a skeptic than two geese.' "It's trying to do pattern-matching and come out with something plausible. It does this so much that when it sees something that looks like an idiom that it's never heard before, it sees a bunch of idioms that have been explained and it just follows that pattern." "It told me a skeptic is handy to have around because they're always questioning - but two geese could be a handful and it's quite hard to deal with two geese." "With some of them, it did give me a caveat that this doesn't appear to be a popular saying. Then it would launch straight into explaining it. Even if it doesn't make sense, it still gives it its best go because that's what it's meant to do." In time, would AI and Google detect the recent articles pointing out this flaw - and learn from them? "There's a whole bunch of base training where (AI) just gets fed data from the Internet as base material. But on top of that, there's human feedback. "They run it through a battery of tests and humans can basically mark the quality of answers. So you end up refining the model and making it better. "By the time I tested this, it was warning me that a few of my fake idioms don't appear to be popular phrases. But then it would still launch into trying to explain it to me anyway, even though it wasn't real." Things got more interesting - and alarming - when Honeychurch tested Google Overviews with real questions about religion, alternative medicine and skepticism. "I asked why you shouldn't be a skeptic. I got a whole bunch of reasons that sounded plausible about losing all your friends and being the boring person at the party that's always ruining stories." "When I asked it why you should be a skeptic, all I got was a message saying it cannot answer my question." He also asked why one should be religious - and why not. And what reasons we should trust alternative medicines - and why we shouldn't. "The skeptical, the rational, the scientific answer was the answer that Google's AI just refused to give." "For the flip side of why I should be religious, I got a whole bunch of answers about community and a feeling of warmth and connecting to my spiritual dimension. "I also got a whole bunch about how sometimes alternative medicine may have turned out to be true and so you can't just dismiss it." "But we know why we shouldn't trust alternative medicine. It's alternative so it's not been proven to work. There's a very easy answer." But not one Overview was willing or able to give, it seems. Google does answer the neutral question 'Should I trust alternative medicine?' by saying there is "no simple answer" and "it's crucial to approach alternative medicine with caution and prioritise evidence-based conventional treatments." So is Google trying not to upset people with answers that might concern them? "I don't want to guess too much about that. It's not just Google but also OpenAI and other companies doing human feedback to try and make sure that it doesn't give horrific answers or say things that are objectionable." "But it's always conflicting with the fact that this AI is just trained to give you that plausible answer. It's trying to match the pattern that you've given in the question." Journalists use Google, just like anyone who's in a hurry and needs information quickly. Do journalists need to ensure they don't rely on the Overviews summary right at the top of the search page? "Absolutely. This is AI use 101. If you're asking something of a technical question, you really need to be well enough versed in what you're asking that you can judge whether the answer is good or not." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Prospectors flock to WA Goldfields after large nugget unearthed
A large gold nugget like this one has been found in Western Australia, about 500km north of Kalgoorlie. Photo: Dave Craw / University of Otago By Macey Turner and Katrina Tap, ABC Veteran prospector Chris MacGregor had one thought when he heard about a chunk of gold that weighed nearly a kilogram being found near a historical West Australian gold mine town recently - "you lucky people". The 895-gram nugget found by prospectors near Sandstone, 513 kilometres north of Kalgoorlie, is worth about $165,000. "I'm sure they put in the hours, which is what it's all about, and good luck to them," MacGregor said. The Perth resident is one of many visitors making the most of a booming prospecting season in the region. Amalgamated Prospectors and Leaseholders Association of WA president James Allison said the discovery of the large nugget showed "the big gold" was "still out there". "With the technology now, there's a lot of people going over old ground and still finding gold - that's why all the caravan parks - they're all full," he said. "It's just the allure. If you find an ounce of gold - that's about the size of a 10-cent piece - that's worth $5000." Gold was first found in the region by prospectors Arthur Bayley and William Ford in 1892. Australia's Golden Outback chief executive Marcus Falconer said finds such as the Sandstone nugget were "important" in keeping the mystique of the Goldfields alive. "People decide to - like back in the gold rush days - come to seek these things out," he said. City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder mayor Glenn Wilson said the current record high gold prices had certainly excited people. "There's gold fever getting around at the moment," he said. "It's great to see that people are making the most of what is a very buoyant gold price." Prospectors have been flocking to the region for 130 years but Wilson said gold tourism was a largely untapped market. "Prospectors might spend up to three or four months out on the land looking for that elusive nugget," he said. "I think there's a massive opportunity - to harness and to further understand what that prospecting community does deliver." Greg and Liz Watson own a company that operates guided prospecting camps about 60km north of Leonora. Greg and Liz Watson thought the pandemic would ruin their gold tourism business but say demand has skyrocketed since. Photo: ABC Goldfields: Macey Turner Liz Watson said the demand for their tours was insatiable this season. "We've had to expand the amount of people we have on the tours," she said. "This year I'm turning away six to 10 people a day, at least." Despite the obvious demand, the pair said running a gold tourism business involved more than just teaching people how to find the shiny stuff. "They have to be cut out for it, because you're dealing with so many people," Greg Watson said. "Anyone coming into it needs to really have a serious look at it. "You need to have full insurance. You need to be accredited in some way." Vicky Smith went on her first tour with the Watsons in 2023 and said she enjoyed the isolation and open landscape more than the idea of finding gold. So when the Watsons needed an assistant she traded in her child protection job for a six-month stint in the red dirt. "It's lovely to be out here," she said. "This is just a completely different world." Despite an almost lifelong commitment to combing through the scrub in WA's gold country, MacGregor and his detector - affectionately dubbed the "Wailing Wand" - are yet to hit the jackpot. "It's a very rare thing to come by - you've got to put in the time," he said. Chris MacGregor has been prospecting on and off for more than 40 years after picking up his first piece of gold at the age of 11. Photo: ABC Goldfields: Katrina Tap MacGregor said finding gold was only part of the joy of prospecting. He said he would keep sleeping in his swag under the stars for as long as he was able. "Don't do it for the gold - come for everything else that's out there," MacGregor said. "If you get some gold, it's a bonus." Allison said tourists hoping to strike it lucky were welcome in the region, but stressed that safety should be the number one priority. "We've seen many, many cases over the years of prospectors getting lost and perishing, and they're found within 50 metres of their vehicle," he said. Last year the bodies of a father and son were found after they went missing while prospecting in the Murchison region. The body of Vietnam veteran William Wadsworth was also found last year, months after he went missing while prospecting near Norseman. Allison said water, food, shelter and a personal locator beacon were indispensable for prospectors, who should also let people know of their plans. "It doesn't matter if you're over-prepared," he said. "You should be always looking at the 'what if'." - ABC