
How Trump's New Indonesia Pact and EU Retaliation Could Reshape Supply Chains
U.S. posted a nearly $18 billion trade deficit with Indonesia in 2024
Deal mirrors pact with Vietnam: higher export tariffs, no reciprocal duties
Penalties for Chinese transshipments embedded in the agreement
Indonesia pledges $15 billion energy, $4.5 billion agriculture, 50 Boeing jets
Key Points:
Arrives ahead of August 1 tariff escalation on most imports
Trump's tariff regime has driven average U.S. rates toward 20.6%
Framework deals also inked with UK and Vietnam; India talks progressing
EU readies €72 billion in retaliatory tariffs if U.S. talks with Europe fail
Looking Ahead:
Monitor Indonesia's implementation and enforcement of the 19% rate
Watch for EU countermeasures following the August 1 deadline
Assess impact on U.S. consumer prices and Indonesian export volumes
Track parallel negotiations with India, China and other key partners
Bull Case:
The 19% tariff pact with Indonesia marks a concrete step by the U.S. to address its nearly $18 billion trade deficit, leveraging American demand to secure reciprocal purchases of $15 billion in U.S. energy, $4.5 billion in agriculture, and 50 Boeing jets—potentially boosting American manufacturing, farming, and aerospace sectors.
By fully removing U.S. tariffs on American exports to Indonesia, the agreement opens up access to Southeast Asia's populous market for U.S. goods, providing a new growth channel for American exporters.
The inclusion of strict penalties on Chinese transshipments via Indonesia helps close loopholes, supporting the effectiveness of the administration's broader trade strategy and defending against tariff circumvention.
The deal, mirroring the earlier Vietnam pact, could serve as a playbook for future agreements with other trade partners, potentially creating leverage in ongoing talks with India and reinforcing America's position in global supply chain reshuffling.
Targeted agreements like this bring clarity and predictability for U.S. companies compared to sweeping global tariffs, helping the market to plan more effectively and encouraging investment in compliant supply chains.
Securing high-profile purchases of Boeing jets and U.S. commodities provides headline wins for American industries at a time of global economic uncertainty and competitive pressure from China and Europe.
Bear Case:
The imposition of a 19% flat tariff on all Indonesian exports and similar actions elsewhere risks significantly increasing U.S. input costs, fueling inflation, and reducing consumer and business purchasing power.
Without clear timelines or enforcement guarantees, Indonesia's commitments to buy U.S. energy, agriculture, and aircraft may be delayed, underdelivered, or dependent on favorable market conditions, limiting near-term benefits for American producers.
Elevated U.S. tariffs—now averaging more than 20%—could provoke widespread retaliation from key partners like the EU, which is preparing €72 billion in countermeasures, potentially harming U.S. exporters and jobs in affected sectors.
Supply chains may become more fragmented and expensive as companies scramble to adapt to shifting tariff landscapes and rules, creating operational headaches and long-term uncertainty for both U.S. and global businesses.
The risk of trade wars spreading—especially with the EU, China, and other major partners—could further diminish global growth, heighten volatility across markets, and undermine confidence in the international trading system.
The focus on bilateral over multilateral deals weakens historic alliances, may isolate the U.S. diplomatically, and leaves global companies navigating a patchwork of competing and unpredictable trade regimes.
The pact underscores Trump's unorthodox approach to trade, which has upended decades of falling tariffs and roiled global markets. Yale Budget Lab analysis suggests the effective U.S. tariff rate could spike to its highest level since 1933, reshaping supply chains and purchasing patterns. In Brussels, the European Commission accelerated plans to retaliate against $84 billion of U.S. exports—ranging from Boeing aircraft to bourbon—if negotiations falter. EU Trade Chief Maroš Šefčovič warned that 'it takes two hands to clap' and expressed unprecedented resolve to defend European industry.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trade top of mind as Canada's premiers are set to hold three-day meeting in Ontario
Premier of Saskatchewan Scott Moe, left too right, Prime Minister Mark Carney, Premier Dough Ford speak to media following the First Minister's Meeting in Saskatoon, Sask., Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards TORONTO — Tariffs and trade are top of the agenda as the country's premiers arrive in Ontario's cottage country for a three-day meeting that comes at a pivotal time for both Canada-U.S. and domestic relations. The premiers' summer gathering in Muskoka will also feature a Tuesday meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney, as trade talks with the United States are expected to intensify. Most of what the premiers are likely to discuss stems from U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs: trade negotiations, the direct impact on industries such as steel and aluminum, the increased pushes to remove interprovincial trade barriers and speed up major infrastructure and natural resource projects to counteract the effects of tariffs, as well as Indigenous communities' concerns about them. Day 1 of the premiers' meeting involves discussions with Indigenous leaders including the Assembly of First Nations, the Métis National Council and the Native Women's Association of Canada. Carney himself is fresh off a meeting with hundreds of First Nations chiefs, many of whom have expressed concerns about their rights being sidelined as the prime minister looks to accelerate projects in the 'national interest.' Some of the top priorities premiers are pushing include pipelines and mining in Ontario's Ring of Fire region, and chiefs have said that must not happen by governments skirting their duty to consult. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has served for the past year as head of the Council of the Federation, is host of the meeting and said in a statement that protecting national interests will be top of mind. 'This meeting will be an opportunity to work together on how to respond to President Trump's latest threat and how we can unleash the full potential of Canada's economy,' Ford wrote. Trump and Carney agreed in June at the G7 summit to try and reach a trade deal by July 21 but Trump recently moved that deadline to Aug. 1, while telling Carney he intends to impose 35 per cent across-the-board tariffs on Canada that same day. Carney has said Canada is trying to get an agreement on softwood lumber exports included in the negotiations with the United States. British Columbia Premier David Eby said he intends to raise the issue and others of particular importance to B.C. at the meeting. '(We want to) get access to the same level of attention, for example, on the softwood lumber as Ontario gets on the auto parts sector, (and) that we get the same amount of attention on capital projects as Alberta is currently getting in relation to their proposals,' Eby said last week in Victoria. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has been making a big push for new pipelines, but said during a press conference Friday that her focus would also be on premiers working together to address the tariff threat, including interprovincial trade. 'I was really pleased to sign (a memorandum of understanding) with Doug Ford during the time he was here in during Stampede, and other provinces are working on those same kind of collaborative agreements,' she said. 'We need to do more to trade with each other, and I hope that that's the spirit of the discussion.' Smith and Ford signed an MOU earlier this month to study new pipelines and rail lines between provinces, and both premiers also talked about wanting Carney to repeal a number of energy regulations like net-zero targets, the West Coast tanker ban and a proposed emissions cap. Ford has also taken a lead role on increasing interprovincial trade, signing MOUs with several provinces and enacting a law to remove all of Ontario's exceptions to free trade between the provinces and territories. Nova Scotia's Tim Houston is another premier banging the drum of interprovincial trade, saying the trade war is forcing action on it. 'We're seeing the benefit of working together to respond to economic threats from the U.S. by breaking down internal trade barriers and opportunities to expand in other international markets,' he wrote in a statement. Ford has said the premiers will also talk about emergency management, energy security, sovereignty and national security, health, and public safety. The premiers have also been pushing the federal government to reform bail laws and Carney said last week that legislation will be introduced in the fall and he expects to discuss the issue with the premiers on Tuesday. The premiers' summer meeting also signals a changing of the guard, with the role of chair of Council of the Federation moving between provinces annually. But after Ford is no longer chair, he's not expected to take too much of a back seat on all of the aforementioned issues. He is still premier of the most populous province, has built a strong relationship with Carney, often singing the prime minister's praises, and has done frequent American TV interviews making the case for increased trade over tariffs. Those network appearances, in part, earned him a nickname of 'Captain Canada' — a persona he used to massive political benefit. Ford made the fight against tariffs and Trump the central part of his re-election campaign and voters returned him to government with a third consecutive majority. Allison Jones, The Canadian Press — With files from Wolfgang Depner in Victoria, Keith Doucette in Halifax and Lisa Johnson in Edmonton


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Could Thrive Despite U.S.-China Trade Pressures
Key Points The U.S. and China are at odds over a range of issues, including trade imbalances and AI competition. The Trump administration tightened AI regulations related to China this year, and that's affected many companies. Nvidia is among the businesses impacted by AI sales restrictions to China, but it looks positioned to continue its success despite the challenges. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › The U.S. government's current trade tensions with China stretch back to President Donald Trump's first term. But the situation isn't about tariffs alone. The U.S. is competing with its trading partner for supremacy in artificial intelligence. This led to new export restrictions on the sale of AI chips to China on April 9. The updated regulations affect many tech businesses, including AI leader Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). The company's sales of its popular graphics processing units (GPUs), powerful computer processors that have brought Nvidia success in the AI era, have been hurt by the federal government's export policies around such tech. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Even so, several signs suggest Nvidia can continue to thrive despite the trade conflicts between the U.S. and China. Here is a look into Nvidia's potential for ongoing success despite the hurdles. The impact of China restrictions on Nvidia The frosty relations between the U.S. and China adversely affected Nvidia. The new export restrictions meant the company couldn't sell its AI chips earmarked for China, resulting in a $4.5 billion write-off for this unsold inventory in its fiscal first quarter, which ended April 27. China was responsible for $5.5 billion of Nvidia's $44.1 billion in Q1 revenue. This figure could have been higher, since the company was barred from shipping an additional $2.5 billion in AI products in Q1. Lost revenue isn't the only consequence. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang declared, "The AI race is not just about chips. It's about which stack the world runs on. As that stack grows to include 6G and quantum, U.S. global infrastructure leadership is at stake." In other words, strengthening American leadership in AI depends on organizations around the world building AI infrastructure with U.S. technology platforms, such as Nvidia's proprietary compute unified device architecture (CUDA) software for customizing GPUs. The current trade restrictions limit this from happening, according to Huang. Nvidia's resilient business These hurdles are significant, yet Nvidia demonstrated that its business remains strong in the face of such challenges. For instance, despite the loss of sales in China, its $44.1 billion in Q1 revenue represented impressive 69% year-over-year growth. Its perseverance amid China sales setbacks is mirrored in Nvidia stock, which is up nearly 30% in 2025 through July 15, as shares hit a 52-week high of $172.40 on that date. Its soaring shares helped the company become the first to achieve a $4 trillion market cap. Trump congratulated Nvidia on its stock's performance. Huang has visited the White House several times, and the positive relationship he has cultivated with Trump gives Nvidia an edge amid trade pressures. In fact, the company recently announced plans to resume selling its AI chips to China, stating, "The U.S. government has assured Nvidia that licenses will be granted, and Nvidia hopes to start deliveries soon." Factors in Nvidia's favor Huang noted Nvidia's tenacity amid trade tensions, asserting, "Every single year there were rules and taxes and tariffs and policies and regulations, and we survived... and whatever it turns out to be, we'll make the best of it." The company's confidence in its future is illustrated in its fiscal Q2 outlook, which estimates $45 billion in revenue. This is a strong increase from the $30 billion made in the previous year. Nvidia's success to date is poised to continue even if its sales to China remain tepid. The U.S. is its largest source of revenue, contributing $20.7 billion of Q1's $44.1 billion. Moreover, the company's current AI platform, Blackwell, will soon make way for next-generation technology, Vera Rubin, due out in 2026. Vera Rubin is a superchip designed to transform how AI is integrated into supercomputers. Many organizations are rushing to build data centers for their AI systems with Nvidia's products. For example, European manufacturers are building an AI facility focused on boosting industrial manufacturing. This installation will require 10,000 Nvidia GPUs. And Facebook parent Meta Platforms is constructing several data centers reportedly using over 1 million Nvidia GPUs. This kind of hunger for Nvidia's AI products will continue to fuel the company's success for years to come. After all, industry forecasts estimate the AI market will expand from $244 billion in 2025 to $1 trillion by 2031. Although the extent to which its China business eventually recovers is uncertain, Nvidia is poised to remain a key AI player on the global stage, thanks to innovations such as CUDA and Vera Rubin. Its stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 55 is getting up there but is still significantly lower than major rival Advanced Micro Devices 's 114. With many factors propelling Nvidia's business growth, its stock looks like a great long-term investment. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025


National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Letters: Throw Hockey Canada in the penalty box
Article content Next, the article only touched indirectly on the fact that an estimated 30,000 Canadians voluntarily joined the U.S. Army to fight in Vietnam. Sure, some were just looking for excitement, but most Canadian Vietnam vets I've met believed they had to help stop the spread of communism. Article content One such Canadian returned and joined the Canadian Forces and passed on valuable lessons about the warrior profession. He was my Course Officer in training and was highly respected. Another was the son of Gen. Jacques Dextraze, Canada's Chief of the Defence Staff from 1972 to 1975. Richard Paul Dextraze, who volunteered for the U.S. Marines and was killed in action in Vietnam, was the posthumous recipient of the Gold Star, the Silver Star Medal and the Purple Heart. Article content Did the draft dodgers affect Canada? I am sure they did. They were generally left-leaning and many stayed in Canada and took jobs in education and local government — thus infecting a generation of impressionable Canadians. Although I had a draft-dodger teacher in high school whom I liked, I certainly did not agree with his politics. Article content Article content I've asked this question of many Jewish and non-Jewish citizens of this great country of Canada. To quote the '80s pop band The Clash: 'Should I stay or should I go now? If I go, there will be trouble. And if I stay, it will be double …' Article content Many Canadians and all of its Jews have been put into the situation of making the difficult decision precisely for the reasons Michael Sachs outlined in his column. Article content Like many other Jewish Canadians, I, too, feel betrayed by the social contract breakdown. There has been an obvious lack of agency by law enforcement, policy-makers and legislators to shut down the hate. The result has been both an overt display of shameless pro-terror demonstrations and a malignant subversive antisemitic bias that is seeding deeply into the far corners of public and corporate services. I need not look further than the continued allowance of online incitement for violence against Israeli Defence Forces soldiers from Canada. Article content I lived in the U.S. for a brief time and left because I did not want my children growing up with what I found to be a self-centred 'me-first' American ideology. So I am not sure that the United States will offer the respite Mr. Sachs is after. Article content The problem we face is that the Marxist-rooted Liberal wokeism in Canada has teamed up with global jihadism, with the common goal of Jew hate. Losing to another Liberal term was a big step backward into the abyss. Article content Canada is one of the best versions of democracy I have known and with it comes the opportunity to speak up, get involved and fight the beast that threatens our safety and future. Hopefully we are not too late to reverse the rhetoric and noise of hate and stupidity. It is time for the silent majority to speak up and challenge the status quo. Once again we can become proud Canadians, but not without the will to find our voices. Please get involved in the political process, no matter how demoralizing it has become. Article content In our extreme leftist-dominated public school system, the social justice warriors have had the power to decide which students and staff are the true victims deserving of protection. Our public school system does not treat all students equally and promotes a tribal politics that is teaching our children that antisemitism can be justified and excused. Article content We have all been awakened from our slumber. The federal survey confirms what we already know and experience as Jews living in Canada today. The progressives in power are not concerned about antisemitism because of their illiberal, anti-western ideology. As long as they remain in charge of our public school system, the double standards will continue. Article content In 1970, a KGB agent named Yuri Bezmenov defected to the United States, eventually settling in Canada. In interviews and lectures, Bezmenov described the process of ideological subversion that the then-Soviet Union was conducting in the West, a process that takes many years to take root. The four stages of ideological subversion, according to Bezmenov, are demoralization, destabilization, crisis and normalization. Article content One of the key targets of ideological subversion is education. If we were to apply Bezmenov's four stages to education, we have seen demoralization taking root over the past several years. As Ari Blaff's article indicated, we are now at the destabilization stage and fast approaching crisis. The recent decision by the Ontario government to take over several boards of education is indicative of a system in crisis. Article content Our public school system long ago lost its way. Merit has been replaced by identity, teaching has given way to propagandizing and indoctrinating. Political correctness now determines curriculum decisions, and the purveyors of 'anti-racism' are enriching themselves on the public purse, sometimes with tragic results. Popular narratives have replaced historical facts. Moral clarity has been upended by moral relativism. Article content Jewish children are harassed and assaulted on their way to school. Administrators, fearing a backlash from students and the community, allow other students to drape themselves in keffiyehs, buying into the fiction that these are a 'cultural' symbol, rather than emblems of terrorism popularized by the late, unlamented Yasser Arafat. Article content Article content As a former teacher and teacher-educator, I am often asked by parents and grandparents about the advisability of sending their children and grandchildren to the local public school. My response is to seriously consider Jewish or private schools, if they can afford it. Students will receive a better education and will be safe, emotionally and physically, something that is increasingly rare in the public schools. Article content Article content Article content