Greenpeace hails Italy court ruling allowing climate lawsuit against energy company ENI to go ahead
In an ordinance released on Monday, the Court of Cassation rejected ENI's motions to dismiss the lawsuit on jurisdictional grounds and ordered the case to be heard on its merits by a Rome tribunal.
ENI, for its part, said that it was greatly satisfied with the decision, and it expected that the Rome court would ultimately 'dismantle' the climate activists' claims of responsibility.
Greenpeace, environmental group ReCommon and a dozen Italian citizens had sued ENI and its two main government shareholders, the Italian finance ministry and development bank, in 2023 seeking damages for what they said were the effects of climate change.
The plaintiffs cited their fundamental rights enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights, as well as Italy's ratification of various international climate accords and ENI's stated commitment to reaching climate reduction targets.
ENI and the government sought to dismiss the suit on jurisdictional and other grounds, but the Cassation court ruled that the case could go ahead.
For more than a century, scientists have known that large quantities of greenhouse gases, released from the burning of fossil fuels, go up into the atmosphere and heat the planet, leading to higher temperatures, rising sea levels and extreme weather events that are both more frequent and more intense.
Around the world in recent years, individuals, climate activist groups and local governments have sued energy companies and governments to try to force them to take concrete action to curb greenhouse gas emissions and compensate for losses associated with climate change.
Greenpeace and ReCommon called the ruling historic, saying it would impact current and future climate-related litigation in Italy. They say it brings Italian courts in line with other European countries that have recognized the rights of people to try to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for global warming through lawsuits, and called the ruling itself one of the most significant in climate change litigation internationally.
'No one, not even a colossus like ENI, can escape its responsibilities anymore,' the two groups said in a statement. 'Judges will finally be able to examine the merits of our case: those who pollute and contribute to the climate crisis must answer for their actions.'
ENI said that it welcomed the ruling.
'The proceedings can finally resume before the Court of Rome, where the unfounded theories put forward by Greenpeace and ReCommon regarding the alleged responsibility of Eni for climate change-related damages will be dismantled, in a context that is rigorous and respectful of the law, rather than driven by the instrumental, unfounded, and often misleading slogans of the two associations,' ENI said in a statement.
While the ruling doesn't enter into the merits of the case, Greenpeace and Recommon highlighted the judges' determination that Italian courts can have jurisdiction over claims about emissions by ENI subsidiaries in foreign countries, since in this case, harm allegedly occurred in Italy and decisions were made by the Italy-based parent company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Faroe Islands introduce self-navigating cars to take tourists off the beaten track
The Faroe Islands have introduced a fleet of self-navigating, speaking cars in a bid to tackle 'predictable experiences' and expose visitors to undiscovered destinations on the archipelago. A video introducing the scheme shows visitors hiring a car before following navigation instructions to lesser-known places. Along the way, the car 'narrates' information about the surprise route. A statement from the Faroe Islands explains that tourists' tendency to gather around 'the same iconic hotspots' creates a 'closed ecosystem where images from popular places attract even more people to those very locations.' It adds that the result is overtourism and 'predictable experiences'. After booking with 62N car rental, a partner of Visit Faroe Islands, travellers scan a QR code which activates one of 30 itineraries curated from a locals' perspective. These include a visit to Europe's tallest sea cliffs, hikes to breathtaking fjords and a trip to a roadside fish-and-chips stand. 'There's just one catch: you have to surrender control,' reads the statement. 'When you rent one of these cars, you sign an agreement to follow its directions, with no clue where you're headed.' Visit Faroe Islands CEO Guðrið Højgaard said: 'We set out to explore how technology and creativity could offer a new way for travellers to discover the Faroes – one that leads them into places they might never find on their own. 'This is a more thoughtful kind of journey, designed to both protect what's most beloved and reveal spots often overlooked. 'With this initiative, we hope to lead by example, demonstrating how destinations can embrace innovation to spread tourism more responsibly and meaningfully.' The new fleet of cars can be booked on the Visit Faroe Islands website, with rates starting from around £74 per day.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK facing ‘very significant' volume of cyber attacks, security minister warns
The UK faces a 'very significant' volume of cyber attacks every year, the security minister has warned as new laws aim to deter hackers from 'extorting' businesses amid a spate of recent incidents. Dan Jarvis said new measures send a signal to cyber criminals that ransom demands will not be tolerated. Proposals from the Home Office would ban public sector bodies and operators of critical national infrastructure from paying hackers. It would also mean private sector companies not covered by the ban would be required to notify the Government if they intended to pay a ransom. 'The UK is not alone in this regard, along with our international allies, we are subjected to a very significant number of cyber attacks every year,' Mr Jarvis told the PA news agency. 'But from a UK Government perspective we are crystal clear that these attacks are completely unacceptable. 'There's more that we need to do to guard against them and that's why we're introducing these measures.' Mr Jarvis said the measures mean cyber criminals will be 'less incentivised' to target UK institutions because of the clarity the ban on ransom payments brings. 'We think these proposals will provide a powerful deterrent, and what we're wanting to do is break the business model of the cyber criminals who think that they can get away with extorting money from UK-based institutions,' he told PA. He stressed the Government would ensure 'cyber criminals, whether they're in Russia or wherever they might be, face the full weight of the UK law'. Ransomware refers to software used by cyber criminals to access the computer systems of its victims, which can then be encrypted or data stolen until a ransom is paid. It comes after four young people were arrested for their suspected involvement in damaging cyber attacks against Marks & Spencer, the Co-op and Harrods in recent months. Microsoft also said on Tuesday night that Chinese hackers had breached its SharePoint document software servers in a bid to target major corporations and government agencies. Furthermore, under the proposals, a mandatory reporting regime would mean companies and institutions that are targeted by ransomware attacks are required to report it. Mr Jarvis said the Government was going to 'look very carefully at the precise details' of the regime but that it would provide more clarity and intelligence to government agencies. M&S chairman Archie Norman told MPs earlier this month that UK businesses should be legally required to report major cyber attacks as he claimed two recent hacks involving 'large British companies' had gone unreported. Mr Norman said the retailer believed an Asia-based ransomware operation, DragonForce, had been involved in the attack – but refused to say whether or not a ransom was paid.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Heathrow fire cost airport tens of millions of pounds, says CEO
The substation fire that closed Heathrow for almost a day in March cost the airport 'tens of millions' of pounds, its chief executive has said. Giving the hub's first public estimate on the bill from the blaze, Thomas Woldbye said Heathrow had yet to decide whether to pursue National Grid for damages, as it awaited the findings of the energy regulator Ofgem into the incident. Heathrow was criticised for its lack of resilienceafter more than 270,000 passenger journeys were disrupted when an overnight fire and power outage stopped flights landing or taking off on 21 March. Woldbye, who slept through the night with his phone on silent, said he 'would have liked to see my personal role play out differently'. A report by the National Energy System Operator found that the fire was due to a known, preventable fault at the North Hyde substation, and that insufficient action was taken to remedy problems detected in 2018. Ofgem has launched an investigation. Woldbye said that Heathrow would also be 'investing in agreement with the airlines to improve the physical resilience' of the airport. The comments came as Heathrow revealed that profits fell by a third in the first half of the year despite passenger numbers reaching a record high, with 39.9m journeys in the six months to 30 June. Woldbye said the fall in pre-tax profits to £203m was down to higher costs, 'primarily finance costs, as the consequence of higher interest rates'. Heathrow this month submitted a five-year investment plan to the Civil Aviation Authority to improve its facilities and raise charges by about £5 per passenger. The airport is due to submit further plans next week to the government for a third runway, after the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, signalled support to restart the controversial scheme. Woldbye said: 'If we are to meet customers' requirements, and I think we should, particularly on capacity, that will cost money. Heathrow is a very space constrained airport. We already have two or three times as many passengers per square metre of airport as our competitors in Europe. Creating additional capacity is not easy, and hence it's costly.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion He said the runway would not be in operation until 2035 at the earliest and indicated that the airport would be pursuing it with caution. 'The government has asked for input. If customers are not clear, they want it, if the country is not clear they want it, why would we do this?' The submission is expected to spell out the need for action on new flight paths and planning reform before Heathrow commits major investment, but it will include a 'baseline plan' for the runway, which in its last iteration required major work and diversions to the UK''s busiest motorway, the M25, and would increase the number of flights at Heathrow by up to 50%. However, he added: 'I think it is very important for the country, because I think we are already lagging behind on aviation capacity in the London area, and we'll continue to do that for a while. We need to create the right conditions for both airlines and airport to make sure that it's a success. Will Heathrow survive without a third runway? Yes.'
