Gorsuch, Thomas dissent as Supreme Court declines to take up Apache challenge to copper mine
A 2014 law enabled a land transfer between mining company Resolution Copper and the federal government, allowing the miner to take control of a site called Oak Flat in Arizona, which is sacred to the Western Apache.
A group called Apache Stronghold, which says it represents Apaches, other Native peoples, and non-Native allies, appealed the case to the Supreme Court, asking it to reverse a 9th Circuit decision on religious freedom grounds.
The high court declined to take up the case Tuesday without explaining its decision. However, Gorsuch issued a dissent, joined by Thomas.
'For centuries, Western Apaches have worshipped at Chí'chil Biłdagoteel, or Oak Flat. They consider the site a sacred and 'direct corridor to the Creator,'' Gorsuch wrote. ' Now, the government and a mining conglomerate want to turn Oak Flat into a massive hole in the ground.'
'Before allowing the government to destroy the Apaches' sacred site, this Court should at least have troubled itself to hear their case,' he added.
Apache Stronghold said in its petition that Oak Flat 'is the site of religious ceremonies that cannot take place elsewhere,' including ceremonies for boys entering manhood and girls entering womanhood.
For the court to take up a case, it needs at least four votes in favor of doing so. It's not clear whether any other justices voted with Gorsuch and Thomas. Justice Samuel Alito recused himself.
In its own filing, Resolution Copper argued the court should not have taken up the case because the land exchange was authorized by Congress and because Apache Stronghold is a nonprofit 'with no religious claim of its own and thus no standing' to bring the case.
Resolution Copper is a joint venture between mining companies Rio Tinto and BHP.
Zach Schonfeld contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Lia Thomas records erasure illustrates NCAA transgender policy change
The federal investigation into the University of Pennsylvania surrounding transgender athletes reached a resolution that will wipe out the school records of Lia Thomas. The U.S. Department of Education announced the resolution on July 1, stating the university will comply with Title IX after it allowed Thomas, a transgender athlete, to be part of the women's swimming team. Now, the university must not allow transgender athletes to compete in female athletic programs, in addition to erasing Thomas' achievements. The agreement comes as President Donald Trump has made it a point of his presidency to ban transgender athletes from competing female sports. He's passed executive orders and threatened legal action regarding the issue, and it's resulted in changes to college sports. Did NCAA allow transgender athletes in women's sports? Yes. Thomas began transitioning in 2019 with hormone replacement therapy and followed the then-established NCAA and Ivy League rules. In 2022, the NCAA updated its transgender athlete policy. The update took a sport-by-sport approach that "preserves opportunity for transgender student-athletes while balancing fairness, inclusion and safety for all who compete." At the time, it aligned with decisions by United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, as well as International Olympic Committee. Under the policy, at the start of the 2022-23 academic year sports calendar, transgender student-athletes had to document sport-specific testosterone levels at the beginning of their season, six months after the first and four weeks before championship selections. Thomas won the NCAA Division I title in the women's 500-yard freestyle event in the spring of 2022 before the policy went into place. How Trump Administration impacted transgender athletes Trump had emphasized during his president campaign his goal of blocking transgender athletes from competing in women's sports. On Feb. 5, less than a month into his presidency, Trump signed an executive order that bars transgender women and girls from playing on school sports, and it would cut off federal money for schools that don't comply. The executive order directs the Department of Education to pursue "enforcement actions" under Title IX, the federal law prohibiting discrimination based on sex at educational institutions that receive federal funding. In April, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced legal action against Maine for refusing to ban transgender athletes from participating in women's sports. In June, Trump threatened fines in California and the Justice Department threatened to sue the state's public high schools after a transgender athlete was allowed to compete and won two medals at the track and field state championship. Did NCAA transgender athlete policy change? Yes. One day after Trump's executive order, the NCAA changed it's policy to only allow student-athletes assigned female at birth could compete in women's sports. The policy was "effective immediately and applies to all student-athletes regardless of previous eligibility reviews under the NCAA's prior transgender participation policy." The updated policy states a student-athlete assigned female at birth "who has begun hormone therapy' may not compete on a women's team, and if they participated in any NCAA competition, the team would not be eligible for NCAA championships. The organization did state individual schools have the autonomy to determine athletic participation on their campus. 'We strongly believe that clear, consistent, and uniform eligibility standards would best serve today's student-athletes instead of a patchwork of conflicting state laws and court decisions. To that end, President Trump's order provides a clear, national standard," NCAA President Charlie Baker said in a statement. How many transgender athletes are in the NCAA? Less than 10, according to what Baker told a Senate panel in December. There are about 510,000 men and women who compete in the NCAA. The number reflects a similar percentage to how many transgender athletes compete in sports, starting at youth sports. According to the UCLA Williams Institute, transgender youth make up only 1.4% of American teenagers. A 2017 study of 17,000 young people found that about 1 in 10 transgender boys said they played sports, and it is roughly the same figure for transgender girls. Lia Thomas records: What happens to them? What happens to Thomas' NCAA records is unclear. The NCAA did not respond to a request for comment. Thomas won the women's 500-yard freestyle event in 2022, and she tied for fifth in the women's 200-yard freestyle and eighth in the 100-yard freestyle. However, Thomas' records at Penn will be erased. She currently holds the records for:
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida tribe fights new 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant facility near Everglades homes
A Florida Native American leader spoke out against a new migrant detention facility in the Florida Everglades, nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz," raising environmental and safety concerns for local tribal communities. President Trump, visiting the site Tuesday, said the facility will hold "some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet." The detention center, built on a remote airstrip in the Everglades, can hold up to 5,000 migrants in tents and trailers. Talbert Cypress, chairman of the Miccosukee Business Council, said some tribal villages are located within 900 feet of the facility's entrance. "This proposed facility is surrounded on all sides by the Big Cypress National Preserve, and the tribe has been at home in the Big Cypress for centuries," Cypress told ABC News. Cypress pointed to the lack of environmental studies on what creating the detention center could mean for the local ecosystem. MORE: Trump falsely questions Zohran Mamdani's citizenship, threatens to arrest him over ICE operations "There's been no environmental impact study done. The environmental impact study that was done back in 1974 pretty much suggested that putting any kind of airship in the area was going to have significant impacts on the Everglades," he said. The facility's closeness to traditional Native camps, where Miccosukee and Seminole members live and teach both American and Native education, has raised more concerns. "We're concerned about safety... CBP, also just in general, all the traffic that's going to be coming through there, and flights coming in and out," Cypress said. During the tour with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Trump highlighted the facility's remote location. "It's very appropriate, because I looked outside and it's not a place I want to go hiking anytime soon," Trump said. "We're surrounded by miles of treacherous swamp land, and the only way out is really deportation." ABC News correspondent Victor Oquendo reported that the administration sees the surrounding wildlife, including alligators and pythons, as a natural barrier for the detention center, stopping migrants from being able to escape. The facility might become a model for similar centers planned in Louisiana and Alabama, Trump told ABC News. New data studied by ABC News shows a shift in enforcement priorities, with more arrests of migrants with no criminal record. DHS responded that 70% of ICE arrests were migrants with a criminal record. Cypress ended with a message to Trump and DeSantis: "President Trump and DeSantis have been very good to the Everglades, and we feel like [this is a] step backwards in their effort."
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Why Mamdani's rent freeze means disaster for NYC tenants
New York City's rental housing market is teetering on the edge of disaster — with a Mamdani mayoralty poised to push it off the cliff. His success running as a 'freeze the rent' candidate has already moved the Rent Guidelines Board to OK dangerously low hikes for rent-stabilized units: 3% for one-year lease renewals, 4.5% for two-year ones — far less than what RGB staff report those landlords' costs are rising at. Zero and near-zero rent hikes in the de Blasio years — RGB rents are up just 20% these last 12 years, vs. overall inflation of 36% — followed by widespread rent nonpayment during COVID (plus state 'reforms' that make it unaffordable to renovate units vacated by longtime tenants), already has many rent-stabilized landlords, especially smaller ones, on the brink of having to abandon their buildings altogether. Others have no choice but to stint on maintenance, letting buildings and units deteriorate; everyone loses as these apartments grow shabbier and more scarce. If Mamdani wins and sticks to his vow to appoint RGB members who'll freeze rents, the bottom is all too likely to fall out. And the new mayor's fans will have a far tougher time finding a decent apartment in New York. By the way, how many Zohran supporters realize that he can't freeze most rents? The rent-stabilized units that the RGB governs are less than half the city's formal rental market, and at most a third of the full city housing supply, once you count coops and condos (even if sublet) and actual houses. And a shrinking of the rent-controlled market is sure to push up prices of market-rate units, big time, because even more people will be chasing a smaller total supply. Incidentally, this effect explains the 'record landlord profits' that Mamdani ally Brad Lander has been thundering about: It's landlord income from rents the city doesn't control. Small, mom-and-pop landlords, who own about two-thirds of city's rent-stabilized units, are the ones who'll get reamed by the freeze (even though they're the little people that lefties claim to care about). Tens of thousands of units are in dire shape in The Bronx alone. Economists almost universally acknowledge that rent control is ruinous to housing markets; ones on the left mostly just don't talk about it, lest it make it harder for 'their side' to win elections. The rent-freeze advocates have no idea how they're destroying New York's housing market — for the very people most desperate for apartments. They're also likely ignorant about who benefits from below-market rents — i.e., folks who, like Mamdani, scored a rent-stabilized apartment, which is actually easier if you're wealthy (as he is). One more irony here: The Supreme Court last year nixed New York landlords' claim that the rent laws violate the Constitution's 'takings' clause. Thing is, that ruling relied on the assumption that the RGB has real independence — a fiction that will collapse if Mamdani wins on promises platform of 0% hikes and then delivers.
