logo
Want safer communities? Protect and expand Medicaid

Want safer communities? Protect and expand Medicaid

The Hill3 days ago
The debate around public safety is overly focused on policing, prosecution and punishment. One of the most effective tools for building safer communities — Medicaid, known as Medi-Cal in California — is on the chopping block in Congress's proposed budget.
Medicaid isn't just a health care program; it funds mental health and substance use treatment. Accordingly, it's a cornerstone of public safety infrastructure.
Research shows that when people have access to health coverage through Medicaid, communities experience fewer crimes, fewer incarcerations and less strain on emergency systems. The reverse is also true: Cuts to Medicaid have negative consequences for public safety.
So, a Senate-passed budget that puts nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid funding on the chopping block doesn't just threaten health care, it also jeopardizes progress on public safety.
As two people with experience in criminal justice reform, we see the connection between health care access and safer communities. When people reentering society receive addiction treatment services, mental health services and even basic health care, they can focus on completing their education, securing a job and reuniting with their families. These are all key strategies for reducing recidivism — ensuring people don't end up back in the prison system after they are released.
Our friend Alex is a formerly incarcerated man who now works to help others like him sign up for Medicaid. For him, it's more than a job — it's a lifeline. Alex's employment reinforces his own stability, while helping others access the health care they need to stay out of crisis and out of prison. If Congress enacts deep Medicaid cuts, Alex loses his job, and we lose a proven strategy for public safety. We shouldn't dismantle programs that help people rebuild their lives and keep communities safer.
History is full of warnings about the impact of health care cuts on public safety. In 2005, Tennessee rolled back Medicaid coverage for over 170,000 low-income residents. Within two years, those counties saw a nearly 17 percent increase in crime. When people lose access to stabilizing care, the risks of crisis — including contact with the justice system — skyrocket.
This matters because more than 70 percent of people in jails and prisons today have at least one diagnosed mental health condition or substance use disorder. That's not a coincidence — it's a warning. Without access to care, individuals often end up in emergency rooms, shelters or jail cells. That's our broken health care system manifesting as a public safety failure.
Fortunately, we know what works. Under California's CalAIM initiative, Medi-Cal now offers Enhanced Care Management and Community Supports — services designed to stabilize housing, provide mental health and addiction services, and meet people where they are before a crisis occurs. These programs are compassionate, cost-effective and reduce reliance on emergency interventions.
This model supports reentry and stabilizes families. When parents have access to health care and the support they need to heal from addiction, trauma or incarceration, their children are less likely to enter the justice system or the foster care systems.
To foster an ecosystem of care for those reentering society, the Amity Foundation integrates health care with education programs, group therapy services and employment services — all of which depend on Medicaid to operate. If the proposed cuts become law, Amity's clinics will shut down, jeopardizing the stability their students need to succeed after years of incarceration. Amity's clinics are not unique — millions nationwide could lose care if clinics close their doors.
Medicaid is public safety. It is prevention. It's de-escalation. It's treatment instead of incarceration. And when designed thoughtfully and implemented intentionally, it gives people a fair shot at stability, health and dignity.
But we must protect it. Proposals to scale back Medicaid or impose barriers like work requirements threaten to reverse progress. These policies may sound sensible or tough on wasteful spending, but they make communities less safe by stripping away the supports that prevent crime. If we're serious about safety, we have to be serious about Medicaid. We must see it for what it is: an effective public safety strategy.
Handcuffs, courtrooms and prisons can only take public safety so far. Safe communities start with prevention — and that means protecting and investing in Medicaid.
Sydney Kamlager-Dove, a Democrat, represents California's 37th Congressional District (in Los Angeles) in the U.S. House of Representatives. Doug Bond is CEO of Amity Foundation, with locations in the 37th District. Together, they have collaborated on justice reform efforts focused on reducing incarceration and improving reentry outcomes in California.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk claims he has ‘formed' his own political party after fallout with Trump: ‘Give you back your freedom'
Elon Musk claims he has ‘formed' his own political party after fallout with Trump: ‘Give you back your freedom'

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk claims he has ‘formed' his own political party after fallout with Trump: ‘Give you back your freedom'

Elon Musk says he has formed a new political party amid his ongoing feud with President Donald Trump. Musk asked his 221.7 million X followers to vote in a poll deciding whether he should form the new 'America Party' on Friday. The tech mogul first threatened for form a new political party earlier this week if Congress passed Trump's sweeping tax and spending legislation, which he calls the 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' The billionaire has argued that the legislation, which the president signed into law on Friday, will increase the deficit by trillions. After 65 percent of respondents voted 'yes' on his poll, Musk says he's following through. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it,' Musk wrote Saturday afternoon. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.' 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' he added. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passed in the Senate with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday. The House passed the bill on Thursday, and Trump signed it into law during a Military Family Picnic celebration for Independence Day. The bill provides sweeping tax cuts — particularly to wealthy Americans — while curbing access to Medicaid and food assistance programs for millions of people. The legislation also provides billions more for defense and immigration enforcement. Musk, once known as Trump's 'First Buddy,' sparked a public feud with the president last month over the bill, arguing it will increase the budget deficit by $2.5 trillion. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote of Trump's bill on June 3. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' Musk spent several months this year leading the Department of Government Efficiency's efforts to slash government spending. Under his leadership, DOGE laid off hundreds of thousands of federal employees, hollowed out several agencies and terminated thousands of government contracts and grants. Musk doubled down on June 5, calling the legislation the 'Big Ugly Bill.' The billionaire also flirted with the idea of forming a new political party, but didn't offer specifics. Musk wrote: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Trump hit back on Truth Social, accusing Musk of going 'crazy' because he 'took away his [electric vehicle] mandate.' Less than an hour later, Musk escalated the feud and alleged that Trump appears in the unreleased Epstein Files. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The pair exchanged a few more jabs until June 6, when tensions seemed to ease. Musk expressed 'regret' on June 11 for the posts he made about the president, while Trump revealed he had 'no hard feelings' toward Musk. The peace didn't last long, though. This week, Musk pledged to fund primary challengers running against Republicans who supported the bill. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' the billionaire wrote on Monday. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he added. Nearly every Republican in Congress voted to pass the bill, with just three senators and two representatives joining Democrats in voting against it. Trump responded by threatening to cut of the billions of dollars in federal subsidies Musk's companies receive. The president also threatened to 'take a look at' deporting Elon Musk to South Africa, where he was born and raised for several years.

Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'
Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'

Elon Musk said Saturday that he has formed a new political party, the "America Party," which he claims will give Americans "back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" Musk wrote on X, one day after he posted a poll on the platform asking his followers if they support creating the "America Party." Musk, the world's richest man, suggested Friday that the new party could focus "on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts." "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," Musk said Friday. Musk did not say where the party may be registered. It did not appear to be registered with the Federal Election Committee. He also said that the party would caucus independently and that "legislative discussions would be had with both parties," according to a reply to a user on X. Musk was the largest donor during the 2024 presidential campaign, giving more than $280 million throughout the cycle, predominantly to presidential candidate Donald Trump, although he also supported other Republican candidates. If Musk chooses to get involved in any competitive congressional races in 2026, it could make a significant difference in a close contest. The Tesla CEO's post comes after a public feud with Trump erupted. It was a dramatic turnaround for the two men, who had been close allies during the early days of the second Trump administration. But their relationship deteriorated as the two men exchanged barbs on social media, mainly due to Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill," CNBC has reported. Musk had previously spearheaded Trump's efforts to slash the federal government through the controversial "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), but stepped back from his role in May after his involvement with the program began to negatively impact his business. Since feuding with Trump, Musk has publicly floated the idea of a new political party, particularly amid his continued strong opposition to Trump's sweeping domestic policy package, which passed last week. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" Musk said Monday. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said.

MTG Wants to Make ‘Deadly' Weather Manipulation a Felony
MTG Wants to Make ‘Deadly' Weather Manipulation a Felony

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

MTG Wants to Make ‘Deadly' Weather Manipulation a Felony

Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has a new top priority after doing her part to shuffle President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' across the finish line. Greene announced in a Saturday tweet that she intends to wage war on the 'deadly' practice of 'climate modification' and 'geoengineering' with a bill that would make any such efforts a felony offense. Greene said the bill will prohibit 'the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity.' According to Greene, she's been 'researching weather modification' and now she is ready to take action after spending months 'writing this bill' with her legislative counsel. She added, 'It will be similar to Florida's Senate Bill 56. We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering.' Greene did not go into how or why such a bill is a priority for the state of Georgia and her constituents, yet even the far-right MAGA congresswoman's most casual followers would know that her gripes with the sky have been a long time coming. In a since-deleted 2018 Facebook post, multiple news outlets reported that Greene suggested that 'lasers or blue beams of light' from 'space solar generators' in the sky, controlled by Jewish people, may have caused a spate of wildfires—including the 150,000-acre Camp Fire in California that killed 85 people. She has denied she made such a claim in a later interview. On the heels of the devastating 2024 Hurricane Helene, Greene, seemingly provoked, took to X with a message. 'Yes they can control the weather,' she wrote, 'it's ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can't be done.' Greene's tweet prompted a community fact-check note on X to clarify that 'hurricanes and other large storms cannot be created artificially with modern technology.' Yet that hasn't stopped her from going after 'they' who 'can control the weather.' Early this year, as fires ripped through Southern California, Greene seemed to call on 'they' again to control the weather and put the fires out. 'Why don't they use geoengineering like cloud seeding to bring rain down on the wildfires in California?' she tweeted on Jan. 15, prompting another fact-check note to explain why such a practice would be ineffective. She added, 'They know how to do it.' Now that Republicans control the three branches of government, Greene's plan to introduce a bill appears to be her latest effort to bring 'they' out of the clouds and back down to Earth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store