US tax challenges for Bitcoin miners: A call for commodity-style reform
In the high-octane world of Bitcoin mining, where hash rate dominance and operational efficiency drive shareholder value, U.S. miners face a formidable obstacle: an antiquated tax regime that squeezes margins and threatens market stability. Publicly traded heavyweights like MARA Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA), Riot Platforms (NASDAQ: RIOT), and CleanSpark (NASDAQ: CLSK) are sounding the alarm on IRS policies that impose immediate taxation on newly mined Bitcoin as ordinary income, followed by capital gains tax upon sale—a double-taxation burden not faced by traditional commodity industries like gold or oil.
This structure forces miners to liquidate Bitcoin prematurely to cover tax liabilities, potentially flooding the market and destabilizing prices. As miners rally for tax alignment with commodities, the outcome could redefine their capex strategies, hash rate scalability, and competitive edge in a post-halving environment where every joule and dollar counts.
The crux of the issue lies in the IRS's classification of Bitcoin as property rather than a commodity. When miners like Bitdeer (NASDAQ: BTDR) or Core Scientific (NASDAQ: CORZ) validate a block and earn Bitcoin rewards, the fair market value of those coins is taxed immediately as ordinary income, often at rates exceeding 37% for high-earning corporations. If the Bitcoin is later sold—whether to fund fleet upgrades or cover opex (operating expenses)—miners face capital gains tax on any price appreciation, effectively taxing the same asset twice. This contrasts sharply with commodities like gold, where miners incur no tax liability until the asset is sold. For MARA Holdings, which reported a record-breaking Q1 2025 with 23 joules per terahash (J/TH) efficiency and 49,179 BTC in treasury reserves, this tax structure creates a liquidity crunch, forcing sales that erode their HODL (hold on for dear life) strategy and limit reinvestment in next-generation ASICs like Bitmain's Antminer S21 Pro (17 J/TH).
The financial strain is acute in today's mining environment, where costs have surged 34% to over $70,000 per BTC due to rising energy prices and network difficulty hovering at 126.4 trillion. Post-halving economics, with block rewards slashed to 3.125 Bitcoin, amplify the pressure. Riot Platforms, operating one of North America's largest mining facilities, has highlighted how premature BTC sales to cover taxes disrupt long-term value creation, particularly as global hash rate nears 1,000 EH/s (exahashes per second). CleanSpark, targeting 32 EH/s by year-end, relies on modular infrastructure and low-cost power to maintain margins, but tax-driven liquidations divert capital from scaling operations. As Abundant Mines CEO noted, 'Aligning Bitcoin taxation with commodities would reduce forced selling, stabilize market dynamics, and unlock investor confidence.'
The market implications are significant. Forced liquidations by U.S. miners, who control over 31.6% of global hash rate, could flood the market with BTC supply, depressing prices and rattling investor sentiment. Core Scientific, which has diversified into high-performance computing (HPC) to hedge mining volatility, warns that excessive sell pressure undermines BTC's store-of-value narrative. The Bitcoin Mining Council estimates that U.S. miners' HODL strategies, with reserves surpassing many ETF holdings, make their tax treatment a linchpin for price stability. A commodity-style tax framework—deferring taxation until sale—would allow miners to retain Bitcoin on their balance sheets, enhancing financial flexibility and reducing market-disrupting liquidations. Achieving reform, however, is no small feat. The IRS has long resisted reclassifying digital assets, citing concerns over tax evasion and regulatory complexity. Political gridlock in Washington, especially amid broader digital currency policy debates, further complicates the path forward. Miners like Hut 8 (NASDAQ: HUT), with low-cost operations in Canada achieving sub-3-cent-per-kWh power costs, are exploring cross-border strategies to mitigate U.S. tax burdens, signaling the risk of capital flight. Jurisdictions like Canada and Brazil, with favorable energy profiles and regulatory climates, could siphon investment if U.S. policies remain punitive.
Publicly traded miners are adapting through operational ingenuity. Bitdeer, with 11.4 EH/s in hash rate, has leaned into yield strategies like staking to offset cash flow constraints. Riot Platforms has secured power purchase agreements at sub-4-cent-per-kWh rates to preserve margins, while MARA's disciplined fleet management drives efficiency gains. Yet, these are stopgap measures. As MARA's CEO Fred Thiel stated in a recent earnings call, 'A fair tax structure is critical to scaling our operations and competing globally.' The Financial Accounting Standards Board's 2024 shift to fair value accounting for digital assets offers a precedent, but legislative action is needed to align taxation with commodities.
The industry's push for reform is gaining momentum, intensifying lobbying efforts through groups like the Bitcoin Mining Council. A successful outcome could unlock significant value, enabling miners to reinvest in infrastructure, optimize energy efficiency (e.g., sub-20 J/TH rigs), and scale hash rate to capture block rewards. Failure to reform risks eroding the U.S.'s position as a mining hub, potentially redirecting capital to more favorable jurisdictions. Tax equity will be a defining battle for long-term sustainability as miners navigate rising difficulty and energy costs.
In conclusion, the U.S.'s outdated tax regime poses a critical challenge for Bitcoin miners, forcing premature sales that threaten financial stability and market dynamics. Aligning Bitcoin's tax treatment with commodities could empower miners to scale operations, strengthen balance sheets, and maintain global competitiveness. For publicly traded miners, the fight for reform is not just about margins—it's about securing the future of U.S. Bitcoin mining.
Watch | Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
When does Amazon Prime Day end in the U.S.? Everything you need to know
Amazon Prime Day is underway. And, as a shopping editor who has covered the retailer's sales for more than five years, it's safe to say I know how to spot a good deal from a dud. I'd always recommend using price comparison tools to make sure you're getting the best possible price, but I can confidently say some of the best deals see big-ticket products plummet to their lowest-ever price. Apple's AirPods Pro 2, for example, have been reduced by $100 to just $149, making them cheaper than their Black Friday price. And both Dyson's top-rated air purifier and Yeti's tumbler are now cheaper than ever. There are also impressive savings on Ninja air fryers, robot vacuums, CeraVe beauty products, and gaming devices. For the first ever year, the summer sale is running for four full days, but when will it end? Keep scrolling for answers to all of your burning questions, as well as a handpicked selection of the best deals across tech, appliances, beauty, and more. When did Amazon Prime Day 2024 start in the US? Amazon kicked off its Prime Day sale on July 8 at midnight. For the first year, the Amazon Prime Day sale will run for four days. Amazon Prime Day ends on July 11. From experience, the deals tend to stay the same for the duration of the event. But big-ticket items such as AirPods or games consoles do have a tendency to sell out before the end of the sales event. Is Prime Day only for Prime members? Yes, Prime Day is a celebration of Amazon's Prime members, so you'll actually need to be a Prime member to secure all the deals. Amazon Prime costs $14.99 per month or $139 per year. But there is a way around paying for the subscription. If you're not already a Prime member, you might be eligible for a free 30-day trial of Prime. It's only available to Amazon customers who have never been a Prime member before or haven't been a Prime member in the last 12 months. If you're between the ages of 18 and 22, you can also get an even longer six-month free trial, as well as half-price memberships, meaning you'll pay just $7.49 instead of $14.99 per month. Sign up now before the deals end on Friday. Tech Home Beauty
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Growing number of homeowners who bought in pandemic boomtowns owe more than homes are worth
A growing number of homeowners who bought in pandemic boomtowns owe more than their homes are worth, according to a new report. During the Covid-19 pandemic, people with substantial savings who wanted a larger living space were driven to buy homes while mortgage rates were low, the Wall Street Journal explained in a recent article. They moved to towns such as Austin, Texas and Cape Coral, Florida, but now they are underwater, the Journal reported. An underwater mortgage occurs when a home loan has a higher principal than the market value of the property. More than half a million homeowners were underwater in April, Andy Walden, head of mortgage and housing market research at Intercontinental Exchange, told the Journal. The Journal reported a quick rise in home prices in these boomtowns was followed by a nearly 20 percent price drop in some of them after mortgage rates began to spike in 2022. This, along with the construction of more houses to meet demand, means a more balanced market between buyers and sellers, according to the Journal. While this is good news for potential homebuyers, it's unfortunate for homeowners looking to sell their houses. Now that their homes are worth less than they owe on their mortgages, if they want to sell, they'd have to pay their mortgage company the remaining balance once they sell at a lower price, the Journal reported. There is a surplus of unsold houses sitting on the market for weeks in these boomtowns, Bloomberg reported last Tuesday. The initial increase in home prices caused by pandemic-era demand can be described as a housing bubble. When the demand decreases as home supply increases, prices will drop, and the bubble will burst.
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's tariff deadline delay brings hope, confusion to trade partners, businesses
WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's latest tariff delay provided some hope to major trade partners Japan, South Korea and the European Union that deals to ease duties could still be reached, while bewildering some smaller exporters such as South Africa and leaving companies with no clarity on the path forward. Trump's form letters to 14 countries informing them of planned tariff rates of 25% to 40% provided what he called a final warning on his "reciprocal" tariffs, while pushing back Wednesday's previous deadline to August 1, a date he said on Tuesday was final, declaring: "No extensions will be granted." The move reflects Trump's frustration with trade negotiations that are proving lengthier and more complicated than the "90 deals in 90 days" that he expected, trade experts and administration officials say. The president, who announced on Tuesday a 50% tariff on imported copper and said long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals were coming soon, said he has long favored simple tariffs over tedious trade talks that often involve red lines for some countries and their own requests for U.S. concessions. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba focused on the positive, saying his government would press ahead with negotiations toward a deal that "benefits both countries, while protecting Japan's national interest." Facing a 25% general U.S. tariff, Japan wants relief for its export-dependent auto industry from Trump's separate 25% automotive tariffs. It also has resisted demands for increased purchases of American rice. Japan, once viewed as an early favorite for a deal, faces an upper house election on July 20 and too many concessions could put Ishiba's ruling Liberal Democratic Party at risk. "These countries are not folding. They're not giving him what he wants, so he's added another threat," said William Reinsch, a former U.S. Commerce Department official who is a senior trade adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "He's put a new number to it and extended the deadline." South Korea, where President Lee Jae Myung has been in office less than a month, also pledged to intensify talks for "a mutually beneficial result" while analysts warned he would not be "a pushover" for Trump or put South Korea at a disadvantage to Japan. Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, told Fox News on Tuesday more deals were possible even before the end of this week, as long as countries made concessions deemed worthy by Trump. India, in particular, looked close to a deal, but prospects were less clear for smaller countries such as South Africa, Thailand and Malaysia, which face tariffs of 30%, 36% and 25%, respectively. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa pushed back on Trump's 30% tariff rate, calling it out of sync with an average 7.6% South African tariff rate. But he instructed his negotiators to "urgently engage" with Trump's team on a framework first submitted by the South African side on May 20. The Trump administration's negotiating time may be eaten up with larger partners, such as the EU, which did not get a warning letter or a change to its prescribed 20% tariff rate, double the 10% baseline. Sources familiar with the EU talks have told Reuters a deal could involve carve-outs for aircraft and parts, medical equipment and alcoholic spirits. They say the EU also wants certain automakers to export to the U.S. at rates below the 25% auto tariff. Such a deal would be similar to a framework agreement with the United Kingdom that had carve-outs for autos, steel and aircraft engines. After announcing his global "Liberation Day" tariffs of 11%-50% in early April, Trump quickly dialed them back to 10% for most countries amid bond market turmoil to buy time for negotiations to lower foreign tariffs and trade barriers. Ryan Majerus, another former U.S. Commerce official, said Trump's three-month pause had not produced the desired results, and now the president was seeking to maximize his negotiating leverage. "They're going to pressure-test things and see how far they can go, particularly for countries where there hasn't been any movement in the talks," said Majerus, who is a partner at Washington's King and Spalding law firm. Steadier markets and strong economic data give Trump some room to maneuver, but time is short and "the more granular you get in negotiating these things, the tougher the sledding gets," he added. The deadline extension provides no relief to companies that are trying to keep up with Trump's tariffs. Executives say the rapidly shifting tariff landscape has paralyzed decision-making as they try to adjust their supply chains and cost structures to avoid tariff-induced price hikes. "No company can really prepare for this," said Hubertus Breier, chief technology officer for Germany's Lapp Holdings, a family-owned maker of cables, wires and robotics for factories. "We are already incurring losses simply because of the uncertainty of the daily changing situation." Lapp has difficult choices - absorb additional costs or pass them on to customers. Assuming permanently higher prices and costs, however, could threaten its long-term existence, Breier added. DeMejico, a family business in Valencia, California with a plant in Mexico that builds traditional Spanish and Mexican-style furniture, is struggling to adapt to Trump's 50% tariffs on imported steel. Robert Luna, the company's president, said the firm is importing heavy steel latches, hinges and trim parts separately to simplify the tariff calculation process and installing them at its Los Angeles-area showroom. The tariffs and higher U.S. wage costs are already inflating prices, and DeMejico faces further cost increases on furniture if Trump hits Mexico with a reciprocal tariff, Luna said. "It's hard to do anything about this as a small business owner, so I just try to be stoic and see what happens," Luna said, adding: "My biggest worry is just keeping the company alive." Luna said he thought the Trump administration was "setting up the foundation to train people to pay tariffs."
