logo
Superintendents: Loss of federal funding would hit students most in need of support

Superintendents: Loss of federal funding would hit students most in need of support

Yahoo16-04-2025
Apr. 16—Maine school superintendents are concerned that the potential loss of hundreds of millions in federal funding would require cuts to critical services like math and reading intervention, as well as support for homeless students and those with disabilities.
The announcement from the Department of Education on Friday that it is starting the process of halting all federal dollars going to Maine schools follows a monthslong battle between President Donald Trump and Gov. Janet Mills over the participation of transgender athletes in high school sports, which Maine allows.
The Office of the Maine Attorney General said in a letter that it would not sign an agreement proposed by the Trump administration to comply with its interpretation of Title IX and described the situation as an "impasse." Within an hour, the Department of Education announced that it was referring Maine to the Department of Justice over its "noncompliance" and said it was initiating plans to revoke all of the state's K-12 funding.
That number amounted to around $250 million this year. Two of the largest sources of federal funding for schools are Title I, which supports economically disadvantaged students, and the Individuals with Disabilities Act or IDEA, which provides funding for students with disabilities.
Superintendents across Maine said this week that the loss of that money would be felt by the students most in need of support services and the staff that work with them. In many cases, federal funds cover the cost of staff positions in early literacy, intervention and special education.
FUNDING THE 'MOST VULNERABLE LEARNERS'
Lewiston Public Schools receives the greatest amount of Title I funding out of any other school district in Maine — more than $3.5 million annually — and also gets $1.6 million through IDEA. Superintendent Jake Langlais said Lewiston uses Title funds to improve literacy and math skills, which happens both in the classroom and through interventionists who work with students on specific skills. And, he said, if there are any changes to those funds at the federal level, it will mean reductions in those efforts.
"Locally, there are no funds allocated to maintain the efforts currently supported by federal funds," Langlais said. "Lewiston property taxpayers already do so much to support education. We cannot add the expenses paid by federal dollars to our local budget."
In neighboring Auburn, Superintendent Sue Dorris said federal funding is vital, especially for those who depend the most on school-based services.
"Areas such as academic intervention, special education, professional development, multilingual learner programs, and support for students experiencing homelessness would all be deeply affected," Dorris said.
Auburn gets $1.25 million annually though Title I and another $1 million through IDEA. Dorris said Title I funding supports the district's McKinney-Vento liaison, who oversees support for homeless students, and IDEA covers everything from special equipment to social work services to out-of-district tuition for students with special needs.
"Without this funding, our ability to meet federally mandated services and ensure appropriate support for our most vulnerable learners would be severely compromised," she said. She said her district is monitoring the situation closely and hoping it gets resolved without any disruption to districts.
It still isn't clear how soon the federal money could be frozen. In a separate case involving Maine and Title IX, a judge ruled Friday that the USDA improperly cut off federal funding to the state and ordered the agency to restore it. And last month, the USDA froze around $56 million in funding to the University of Maine System before quickly reversing course.
The Department of Education did not respond to questions about the exact nature of the process the federal government plans to use to revoke funding. Instead, a department spokesperson pointed to the Friday statement, which described it as "an administrative proceeding to adjudicate termination" of the state's federal K-12 funding, which would include both "formula and discretionary grants." It's unclear how quickly the proceeding would begin.
A 'TREMENDOUSLY NEGATIVE IMPACT'
The Bonny Eagle School Department, based in Buxton, receives more than $1.5 million in federal funding. Superintendent Clay Gleason said any loss of those dollars would have a negative impact on both students and staff.
"It would be unfortunate if this were to happen because students who would be impacted have nothing to do with the dispute that is leading to the potential withholding of funds, as far as I can tell," Gleason said. "It is my hope it won't come to this."
Augusta School District Superintendent Michael Tracy said his district receives nearly $3 million each year in federal funding to support early literacy, math and special education costs.
"Much of this support is provided through staffing, particularly educational technicians," Tracy said in an email. "Approximately 30+ positions would be affected by cuts to these federally funded positions, which would have a tremendously negative impact on students."
Deborah Alden, superintendent of Rumford-based RSU 10, also said many positions in her district are supported by more than $1 million through Title I and $650,000 through IDEA.
Alden said Title funding supports all of the district's intervention staff and math and literacy coaches, and accounts for at least four staff members in each elementary and middle school.
"It also provides for nearly all of our professional development monies to support staff with implementing new programs especially in the areas of literacy and math," she said.
And she said IDEA funding covers some ed techs, out-of-district tuition costs, supplies and contracts with therapists.
"IDEA funding is especially important in our district where nearly 24% of all incoming kindergarten students are identified with special needs," she said.
Kennebec Journal Staff Writer Emily Duggan contributed to this report.
Copy the Story Link
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Cuts Deal With Rupert Murdoch Related To WSJ Lawsuit Over Epstein Story
Trump Cuts Deal With Rupert Murdoch Related To WSJ Lawsuit Over Epstein Story

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Cuts Deal With Rupert Murdoch Related To WSJ Lawsuit Over Epstein Story

Donald Trump and Wall Street Journal owner Rupert Murdoch on Monday struck a deal related to the president's lawsuit against the paper over its publication of a story detailing a 'bawdy' birthday message Trump allegedly wrote to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. While Trump had initially sought to have Murdoch deposed swiftly, citing, in part, his advanced age and long-standing health issues, the president has now agreed to remove that request, according to a Monday court filing first reported by Politico's Josh Gerstein. Trump sued Murdoch, the Journal's publisher and the reporters who authored an article the newspaper published last month reporting that the president wrote a lewd message to Epstein as part of an album British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for the disgraced financier's 50th birthday in 2003. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump has denied writing the letter, attacking the newspaper for publishing its story and taking legal action over the report. Monday's agreement stipulates that until the 'Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is adjudicated, the Parties agree not to engage in discovery.' The filing, though, notes that if the defendants' motion fails, Murdoch shall be deposed in person within 30 days of that decision. The document states that Murdoch has three days from when the court approves the agreement to provide Trump with a sworn declaration describing his current health status. 'Defendant Murdoch has further agreed to provide regularly scheduled updates to [Trump] regarding his health, including a mechanism for him to alert [Trump] if there is a material change in his health,' the document states. 'Failure to provide updates in the agreed-upon manner as set forth in the Abatement Agreement shall result in an expedited deposition of Defendant Murdoch.' Trump last week told reporters Murdoch wanted to settle the case. 'They are talking to us about doing something but we'll see what happens,' Trump said. 'Maybe they would like us to drop that, so we'll see ... yeah, they're having, they want to settle it.' 'When I get treated unfairly, I do things about it,' he added. Related... Trump Wants Murdoch Swiftly Deposed Over Epstein Story Because Of Age And Health Trump Sues WSJ Reporters, Murdoch For Libel After Epstein Birthday Card Story Trump Lashes Out At Rupert Murdoch Over WSJ Epstein Bombshell

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Jumps With Liberals
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Jumps With Liberals

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Jumps With Liberals

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has increased among liberals in the past month. According to polling by I&I/TIPP released on August 4, the proportion of liberals who said they approved of Trump's job performance increased by 4 percentage points from 19 percent at the end of June to 23 percent in early August. Why It Matters Approval ratings are a good way of measuring the temperature of the nation and Trump's popularity has fluctuated in the first six-plus months of his term in the Oval Office. Liberals do not generally have a positive view of the president or his policies so an uptick in approval rating is noteworthy. It remains to be seen whether this will sustain and ultimately affect the 2026 midterm elections. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025, in Allentown, Pa. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025, in Allentown, Pa. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What To Know While the proportion of liberals who said they approved of Trump has increased, the majority of liberals (72 percent) still see him in an unfavorable light. The proportion of liberals with a favorable view of the president increased from 18 percent at the end of June to 23 percent in August—an increase of 5 percentage points. Overall, Trump's favorability rating among all voters was net -1 percent in July and net 0 percent in August. The June poll was conducted between June 25 and 27 had a sample size of 1,421 adults. In August, 1,362 adults were polled from July 30 to August 1. Both polls had a margin of error of +/- 2.7 percentage points. Polling elsewhere has been less positive. A survey conducted by Quantus Insights from July 21 to July 23 among 1,123 registered voters showed his rating stands at 47 percent, while 50 percent disapproved. According to the YouGov polling for British newspaper The Times, the proportion of people who disapprove of Trump's job performance has increased from 52 percent in April to 57 percent in July. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the U.K, previously said: "Trump's second term has been less of a honeymoon, but more of a divorce from half the country: one where he's got to keep the house, the kids and just about all of the assets. From day one of his rule by Executive Order he has never sought to bring the USA together and, indeed, has exploited differences to highlight how he's delivering on his campaign commitments, not least through DOGE [Department of Government Efficiency], through his clampdown on immigration and through his America First foreign policy." "Public services are already beginning to creak thanks to the actions of Musk and his cohort, and tariffs are driving up prices at home, while the economic benefits of the One Big Beautiful act have yet to be felt. And around all this, the whiff of Epstein is tainting the president's achievements." What Happens Next The midterms are scheduled to take place in November 2026 where Trump's popularity will be tested in earnest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store