Why China's $100 billion AI investment is raising urgent questions for US schools and innovation policies
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The move has raised questions about how the US education system might need to respond to maintain its competitive edge in the global tech landscape.
Over the past decade, China has adopted an industrial policy approach to bolster its AI industry, using government funding to build manufacturing capabilities, develop high-tech infrastructure, and cultivate engineering talent. This approach has previously helped China dominate in industries such as electric vehicles and solar power, and now it is being applied aggressively to AI.
China's comprehensive industrial policy for AI
The Chinese government's support spans the entire AI tech stack, from semiconductors and data centers to software and energy resources, as noted by Kyle Chan, an adjunct researcher at the RAND Corporation, as quoted by the New York Times. This has included a $100 billion fund established since 2014 to grow the semiconductor industry and an $8.5 billion allocation to support young AI start-ups announced in April.
Local governments have also played a role by creating start-up incubators and offering subsidies to attract companies. For example, the Dream Town incubator in Hangzhou, home to major firms like Alibaba and DeepSeek, offers substantial financial incentives and support to emerging AI companies. Deep Principle, a start-up focused on AI applications in chemical research, received a $2.5 million subsidy from a Hangzhou district, along with assistance in securing office and housing space, as reported by the New York Times.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
China's focus on open-source AI systems has accelerated its progress. Companies like Alibaba, ByteDance, Huawei, and Baidu have released open-source AI models to foster broader development and innovation. ByteDance alone invested $11 billion last year in AI infrastructure, including data centers.
US companies invest heavily, but government support differs
While US technology giants such as Google, Meta, and OpenAI have spent billions on AI research and data centers, the US government has not matched China's level of direct industrial policy support.
US restrictions on chip sales to China, including products from Nvidia, aim to limit Beijing's ability to access advanced technology. However, Nvidia recently announced government approval to sell a China-specific chip, the H20, under license.
Chinese chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) produces chips for Huawei and others, striving to provide alternatives to Nvidia's technology.
According to the New York Times, these chips do not yet match Nvidia's full capabilities but serve as a viable backup in the event of US export restrictions.
Data control and censorship shape Chinese AI development
Chinese AI companies must operate under government guidelines that restrict access to certain global internet sources. Instead, Beijing provides data resources like the 'mainstream values corpus,' a dataset based on state media content approved for AI training.
Companies like ByteDance benefit from vast amounts of user data collected within China to train their systems.
Implications for US education and technology leadership
The rapid development of China's AI ecosystem has led to concerns about the readiness of the US education system to produce skilled engineers and researchers capable of maintaining American leadership in technology. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, framed the competition as ideological, stressing the importance of democratic AI over authoritarian approaches, as quoted by the New York Times.
Kevin Xu, founder of Interconnected Capital, described open-source technology as a form of 'technological soft power,' akin to 'the Hollywood movie or the Big Mac of technology,' highlighting the influence China's approach might have on global engineering communities, according to the New York Times.
As China's state-backed investments reshape the global AI landscape, questions remain about how US educational institutions will adapt to prepare the next generation of technology innovators.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Microsoft joins $4 trillion club
NEW YORK: Microsoft soared past $4 trillion in market valuation on Thursday, becoming the second publicly traded company after Nvidia to surpass the milestone following a blockbuster earnings technology behemoth forecast a record $30 billion in capital spending for the first quarter of the current fiscal year to meet soaring AI demand and reported booming sales in its Azure cloud computing business on Wednesday. Shares of Microsoft were up 6.6% at $546.33 in morning trading. "It is in the process of becoming more of a cloud infrastructure business and a leader in enterprise AI, doing so very profitably and cash generatively despite the heavy AI capital expenditures," said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager, Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity Fund. Redmond, Washington-headquartered Microsoft first cracked the $1-trillion mark in April 2019. Its move to $3 trillion was more measured than technology giants Nvidia and Apple, with AI-bellwether Nvidia tripling its value in just about a year and clinching the $4-trillion milestone before any other company on July 9. Apple was last valued at $3.11 trillion.
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India must build a stronger framework for scientific talent
Last December, China unveiled images of its prototype sixth-generation fighter jets, sending ripples across global defence circles. Weeks later, its home-grown DeepSeek AI matched OpenAI's GPT-4 on international benchmarks. These milestones are not isolated achievements. They represent the momentum of a country that has been investing deeply and consistently in scientific talent and ecosystems. Among the early accelerators of this momentum was its 'Thousand Talents Plan', launched in 2008 to bring leading global researchers into Chinese institutions, though it later drew scrutiny, particularly from the West on issues of transparency and intellectual property. However, it demonstrated how talent strategies, when backed by long-term vision, can influence a nation's scientific trajectory. China's progress is also the result of parallel investments in research infrastructure and coordinated doctoral training. Its leading universities now routinely appear higher in global rankings. India, too, has reason for confidence. Its scientists are globally respected. Our institutions have trained generations of high-impact researchers, many of whom now lead labs, departments, and innovation hubs across the world. National missions in artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and biotechnology reflect India's growing strategic focus on frontier science. Yet to translate this momentum into long-term leadership, the country needs a sharper framework for scientific talent, one that helps India not just retain but also actively attract and integrate the world's best minds. This cannot be achieved through incremental initiatives or those in silos. It calls for distributed ambition and the ability to act decisively, across institutions, disciplines, and borders. Talent zones A good starting point could be to designate select cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, and Kolkata, having a high density of research and industrial institutions, as science talent zones. Within these zones, participating universities and research centres could be enabled to hire global faculty, initiate joint labs, and offer co-supervised Ph.D.s with international partners, using fast-track, peer-reviewed processes. Institutions such as Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and Seoul National University in South Korea have demonstrated how institutional agility and targeted hiring can rapidly elevate research output and visibility. India needs to rethink how long-term scientific careers are structured. Institutions should be encouraged to establish global tenure tracks, open to both Indian-origin and international scientists. These could be evaluated through international peer review and tied to performance in research, mentorship, or innovation. Models such as Tel Aviv University's diaspora-led faculty recruitment drive could be looked for inspiration. Talent relocation, particularly at the mid-career or senior level, depends on much more than funding. Institutions would need to be supported through outcome-linked incentives to build their own onboarding systems for housing, schooling, lab infrastructure, and spousal employment. This is essential to encourage relocation. To sustain momentum, the existing national missions could go further by embedding convergence science tracks within their architecture. The future of innovation lies at the interface of disciplines. AI for new materials, quantum sensing for climate resilience, or genomics for agricultural adaptation all require teams that span traditional departments and even institutions. Internationally, convergence institutes are being created that assemble such teams by design. India's missions can support similar efforts by enabling proposals that cross scientific domains and are reviewed by interdisciplinary panels. The private sector could also be encouraged to jointly co-invest in specific projects, with the incentive architectures built-in for them to also reap benefits. India must also streamline entry. A global science residency card, tied to institutional affiliation and academic review, could offer five-year residency with the option of permanent settlement. Authorised institutions, especially those participating in national missions, could be given the discretion to fast-track eligible candidates and remove procedural delays. Finally, engagement with India's vast scientific diaspora must evolve from episodic outreach to structured collaboration. Peer networks, virtual sabbaticals, co-supervised doctoral programmes, and shared research infrastructure can keep overseas scientists meaningfully connected to India's knowledge ecosystem, without necessarily requiring relocation. Countries such as Israel have shown how alumni-driven platforms can support returning researchers with professional and personal transitions, building long-term loyalty and exchange. None of these steps require large new structures. What they demand is coordination, clarity, and a shift in posture, specifically institutional empowerment. India already has the raw ingredients, including good scientists, increasingly capable universities, and national missions aligned with long-term goals. What we now need is a system that makes it easy for talent to arrive, thrive, and lead. The global race for scientific leadership is no longer just about infrastructure or capital. It is about people. Nations that succeed will be those that build environments where the most ambitious minds want to belong. India has the opportunity to be one, however it must act with clarity, ambition as well as urgency. Swapan Bhattacharya is the Director of TCG CREST (Deemed to be University), Kolkata; views expressed are personal.
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Democratic senator proposes new safeguards to keep TikTok online
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Democratic Senator Ed Markey on Thursday proposed new national security safeguards that would ensure TikTok could remain online as the fate of the short video app used by 170 million Americans remains last year passed legislation to force China's ByteDance to divest TikTok by January 19 or face a ban, but President Donald Trump has directed the Justice Department not to enforce the proposal would eliminate the requirement that ByteDance sell TikTok's US operations if it establishes transparency requirements about content and limits foreign access to the data of TikTok's American month, Trump extended by 90 days to September 17 a deadline for ByteDance to divest the US assets of Democratic lawmakers including Markey argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and have suggested the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements."For months, I have been urging my colleagues to find an alternative path to the TikTok ban that keeps TikTok online without jeopardizing national security," Markey said. "With Trump continuing to illegally extend the divestment deadline, it's time for Congress to reassert its legislative power, fix its mistake, and consider a new approach to TikTok."A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese Secretary Howard Lutnick said last week TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday said the future of TikTok did not come up in recent trade talks with has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January.
