MSNBC's Jen Psaki sees 47 per cent dip in ratings last month compared to Alex Wagner, Rachel Maddow: Nielsen
The embattled cable news network — which is expected to be spun off by parent company Comcast later this year — has seen ratings plunge nearly 50% in the pivotal 9 p.m. slot since Jen Psaki took over full-time hosting duties from Rachel Maddow last month.
The 46-year-old anchor, who made a name for herself with her quick-witted 'Psaki bombs' while serving as former President Joe Biden's press secretary — but has since insisted she never saw signs of his mental decline — has drawn an average of 971,000 viewers since 'The Briefing with Jen Psaki' debuted on May 6 through May 28, according to the latest Nielsen ratings.
That's a staggering 47% falloff from the eyeballs attracted by Maddow and Alex Wagner in the timeslot.
The drop-off is even more pronounced in the critical 25–54 age demographic prized by advertisers, where she drew just 78,000 viewers — a 52% decline compared to the 161,000 that Maddow and Wagner drew during their shows this year.
'She's kinda boring. She's not a great broadcaster,' one media insider told The Post on Tuesday
Maddow, the network's highest paid star, returned to the anchor chair five days a week for the first 100 days of the Trump administration before going back to hosting her show just on Mondays at the beginning of last month. Wagner was pushed out for Psaki.
Psaki's promotion from her weekend gig was part of a sweeping lineup shakeup at MSNBC aimed at injecting new energy into prime time and broadening its appeal.
But early signs suggest the overhaul by new MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler, who took over from Rashida Jones in January, has backfired.
Kutler quickly canceled Joy Reid's program 'The ReidOut' and replaced it with 'The Weeknight,' a rip-off of Fox's ratings champ 'The Five.'
The roundtable show, co-hosted by Symone Sanders-Townsend, Alicia Menendez and Michael Steele, averaged 772,000 viewers in May — a 19% drop from the 955,000 'The ReidOut' pulled in during its final month in February, according to Nielsen.
Among the 25–54 demographic, the new crew averaged just 72,000 viewers, down 20% from what the Trump-bashing Reid garnered.
Overall in primetime for May, MSNBC averaged 877,000 viewers, down 24% from the rest of the year. In the 25–54 demo, MSNBC averaged 73,000 viewers in primetime, a 34% drop.
Across the full broadcast day last month, the network drew 545,000 viewers, down 33%, and just 49,000 in the key demo, a 41% decline.
MSNBC declined to comment.
'In May, four months into the presidency, survey data shows rising news fatigue across all networks,' said a source close to the situation.
The source added that Psaki has shown some signs of progress despite the overall downturn.
''The Briefing' builds on the audience of its 8 p.m. lead-in, which is a major improvement,' the insider said.
News fatigue has apparently not affected Fox News' stranglehold in the ratings race. The conservative network, which shares common ownership with The Post, averaged 2.46 million viewers in prime time — up 23% — and 1.56 million across total day programming.
In the demo, Fox pulled 262,000 viewers in prime time (up 32%) and 180,000 during the day (up 22%), according to Nielsen.
Last-place CNN, meanwhile, continued to limp along, averaging just 426,000 total primetime viewers and 353,000 across the day, down 18% and 24%, respectively.
The most-watched cable news show in May was Fox News' 'The Five' with 3.77 million viewers, followed by 'Jesse Watters Primetime' at 3.23 million. Fox also dominated with other top programs including 'Gutfield!' (2.92 million), 'Special Report with Brett Baier' (2.81 million), and 'Hannity' (2.73 million), who competes against Psaki.
'Since the election, Fox News has delivered the top 1,013 cable news telecasts,' the company said during an earnings call last month.
'This combination of an engaged audience and a dynamic news cycle led to record audience share in the quarter.'
Originally published as MSNBC's Jen Psaki sees 47 per cent dip in ratings last month compared to Alex Wagner, Rachel Maddow: Nielsen
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
25 minutes ago
- The Age
US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war
Washington: The Pentagon has confirmed it is asking Australia for undertakings on how its AUKUS submarines would be used in the event of US military conflicts and for 'substantial increases' in defence spending as part of its review of the $368 billion agreement. A senior US defence official, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said the Trump administration wanted a clear idea of how Australia would deploy the nuclear-powered boats in the event of a contingency, though this was much broader than conflict with China over Taiwan. 'There's a conversation about command structure, about alignment of assets. We would want, in any scenario, a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia,' he told this masthead in an interview. 'There seems to be a hyper-emphasis on Taiwan in public reporting. But this is broader than any one particular contingency. It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets to be allocated across different scenarios.' This masthead can also reveal that the Pentagon's AUKUS review focuses on four areas: command structure, the US's capacity to produce the boats, posture (positioning) of the assets and Australian defence spending. Meanwhile, US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, who is heading the review, publicly confirmed reports that the US wanted its allies such as Australia and Japan to 'step up' and make commitments about how they would act in the event of a conflict. Loading Colby said the Pentagon was implementing US President Donald Trump's commonsense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength. 'That includes by urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence,' he said, noting it applied in both Europe and Asia.
Sydney Morning Herald
25 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war
Washington: The Pentagon has confirmed it is asking Australia for undertakings on how its AUKUS submarines would be used in the event of US military conflicts and for 'substantial increases' in defence spending as part of its review of the $368 billion agreement. A senior US defence official, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said the Trump administration wanted a clear idea of how Australia would deploy the nuclear-powered boats in the event of a contingency, though this was much broader than conflict with China over Taiwan. 'There's a conversation about command structure, about alignment of assets. We would want, in any scenario, a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia,' he told this masthead in an interview. 'There seems to be a hyper-emphasis on Taiwan in public reporting. But this is broader than any one particular contingency. It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets to be allocated across different scenarios.' This masthead can also reveal that the Pentagon's AUKUS review focuses on four areas: command structure, the US's capacity to produce the boats, posture (positioning) of the assets and Australian defence spending. Meanwhile, US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, who is heading the review, publicly confirmed reports that the US wanted its allies such as Australia and Japan to 'step up' and make commitments about how they would act in the event of a conflict. Loading Colby said the Pentagon was implementing US President Donald Trump's commonsense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength. 'That includes by urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence,' he said, noting it applied in both Europe and Asia.
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
US review of AUKUS incomplete as cost of defence boost revealed
The Trump administration's review of the AUKUS partnership is unfinished as its slated deadline arrives, according to Australia's acting defence minister. Patrick Conroy told the ABC's Insiders the Australian government was "engaging at the most senior levels" and was optimistic the US review would endorse the military pact. "I'm confident it will support AUKUS just as our review of AUKUS [and] the UK review found," he said. "There's been lots of speculation about what the timeframe is of the review … My last information is that the review has not been completed yet." The review, led by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby whose public statements about AUKUS have been mixed, was slated to be finished within 30 days, a timeframe reached this weekend which coincides with Anthony Albanese's visit to China. Despite the statements of confidence, the government is bracing for the likelihood that the Trump administration will press harder on Australia to lift its defence spending, as it did with European partners. The ABC can reveal new figures laying out the colossal budget impact of agreeing to such a request. During the election campaign, the Parliamentary Budget Office estimated the short-term boost to defence spending needed to achieve 3 per cent of GDP by 2035, as was Coalition policy, would cost $20.6 billion over the first five years and $156.4 billion over a decade. Those figures, prepared in consultation with Treasury and Defence, can be extended to suggest the even larger cost of a 3.5 per cent spend of $45.2 over five years or $287.1 billion over a decade. The government currently intends to increase defence spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2035. To get to 3.5 per cent instead, the extra funding alone would triple Australia's entire foreign aid budget by the year 2029-30. Mr Conroy told the ABC the government would seek to emphasise that its aid and diplomatic spending, especially in the Pacific region, was also contributing to security. "We're making the point to everyone that both [defence and aid spending] are incredibly important," he said. "We're investing in our relationships in the region, as well as our military capability and we are increasing our defence budget significantly, $57 billion above the previous trajectory," he said. "We've made it clear that if a case is made for more capability, we'll increase more. We're not going to pluck a figure out of the air and work out how to spend it. That's what the Coalition took to the election." Mr Conroy, who is acting for Richard Marles in the defence portfolio but whose regular portfolio is defence industry, said Australia was also trying to get more value for money from defence procurement processes. "It's a challenging area for every country around the world [and] it was problematic under the last government … We've made significant reforms to how we do defence procurement," he said. "It is important that taxpayers have confidence that every single dollar goes to improving capability of the Australian Defence Force as well as supporting the 100,000 Australians who work in that industry." Mr Conroy said Australia would not "engage in hypotheticals" after a report in the Financial Times that Mr Colby was also pressing both Australia and Japan to give assurances about how they would respond in the event of a war with China over Taiwan, but emphasised Australia would make its own decisions about any conflict. "The sole power to commit Australia to war or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict is the elected government of the day," he said. "Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position." Officials have also emphasised Australia's strategic focus on deterrence and opposition to the use of force. "We are being very clear that we want a balanced region where no-one is dominated and no-one dominates," he said.
