![[Lim Woong] Instagram's missing ‘dislike' button](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F07%2Fnews-p.v1.20250707.f693cad2c93b4aaa9eb1f4b9f261d46a_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Lim Woong] Instagram's missing ‘dislike' button
In an age where smartphones practically live in our hands, digital addiction is far from hyperbole. It covers everything from endless scrolling on Instagram and compulsively watching YouTube Shorts to binge gaming and obsessively checking notifications. Addictive behavior isn't new — we've battled gambling, smoking and even coffee dependence — but our flickering digital world makes it worse. Why? Because digital space is always on, always connected and hard to escape. It hijacks our psychology; our brains crave quick dopamine hits, triggered by every buzz, swipe and glowing heart.
This constant stimulation is especially harmful for teenagers. Adolescence is a time of major brain construction, especially in areas like impulse control, decision-making and delayed gratification — all functions governed by the prefrontal cortex. During this period, the limbic system — which drives emotion and reward-seeking — often develops faster than the cortical areas responsible for regulation, creating a neurological imbalance that makes teens more susceptible to impulsive behavior. That fragile system is easily overwhelmed by dopamine-spiking digital temptations. Teens are wired to seek novelty and approval, and Big Tech knows exactly how to exploit that.
Picture this: You're a 15-year-old faced with algebra homework — tedious, stressful and hardly satisfying. Meanwhile, your phone offers instant relief. Just one more video. Just one more like. That tiny dopamine hit feels irresistible. And here lies the sinister brilliance of digital addiction: It offers a fast escape from discomfort while dulling the brain's ability to regulate impulses. The result? A vicious cycle of compulsive escape. This isn't just a personal failing — it's a structural problem, engineered into the very platforms we use.
Which brings us back to the original question: Why no dislike button on Instagram?
Facebook (now Meta), Instagram's parent company, uses behavioral psychology to maximize engagement. Negative feedback causes discomfort. Discomfort drives people away. And that's bad for business. So, no public 'dislike' button. Instagram has reportedly tested a private 'downvote' for comments — but let's be honest, that does little to address the deeper problem of addiction by design.
Research by Kaitlin Woolley and Marissa Sharif in Harvard Business Review explains why these designs are so effective. Watching several short videos in a row increases the urge to keep watching. Labeling content as 'similar' drives up engagement. And uninterrupted viewing? Even more addictive. These patterns increase what psychologists call 'cognitive accessibility' — our brains find the content easier to process, making it feel more rewarding. Platforms exploit this by feeding us seamless flows of content designed to keep us watching.
It's clear that these features aren't about authentic feedback or real connection. They're 'dark patterns' that trap users — especially teens — in loops of envy, anxiety, validation-seeking and disengagement from reality.
But here's the good news: Digital addiction is something we can overcome — if we take it seriously. A study led by Noah Castelo at the University of Alberta found that blocking smartphone internet access for just two weeks significantly improved mental health, well-being and attention span. Why? Because without constant mobile internet, people spent more time socializing in person, exercising and going outdoors. What this means is that reducing constant connectivity can lead to real, measurable psychological benefits.
Simple strategies can help: stop watching more than two videos without a break, intentionally choose unrelated content and use timers or reminders to break the binge. Small actions can go a long way.
Historically, we've regulated addictive substances and behaviors — tobacco, gambling, narcotics — because willpower alone wasn't enough. The same goes for digital addiction. We need institutional action. Schools should consider phone-free zones and digital literacy education, even in the face of protests about 'student rights' or hypothetical emergencies. And if school shootings are being used to justify unrestricted smartphone access in classrooms, then we face a much deeper societal crisis. Thank God, we're not there yet.
When we let tools like ChatGPT do the thinking, we risk turning off the very parts of our brain that make us human. But digital addiction — precisely because it's manageable — is the fight we can take on now, especially for teenagers, whose minds are still under construction.
So, dear tech billionaires: You've made your billions, changed the world and redefined connection. Isn't that enough? Maybe it's time to curb the greed and rethink the design choices that keep us hooked. Do it for humanity. Do it for the future. Or at the very least — do it for your own kids.
A note to myself: Let's stop blindly clicking (and counting) hearts and start confronting the reality behind the glowing screen. Look out the window — the sun, the clouds, the trees, even the people on the street. They're just as fleeting as a TikTok video, but far more real. And the best part? You'll never get addicted to them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Lim Woong] Instagram's missing ‘dislike' button](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F07%2Fnews-p.v1.20250707.f693cad2c93b4aaa9eb1f4b9f261d46a_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Lim Woong] Instagram's missing ‘dislike' button](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
07-07-2025
- Korea Herald
[Lim Woong] Instagram's missing ‘dislike' button
Ever wonder why Instagram has no 'dislike' button? You're not alone. Maybe you've asked yourself why it's all hearts, thumbs-up and smiley faces — but never a simple 'your-post-is-no-fun-at-all.' It's not a glitch. It's a design. Welcome to the dark side of digital addiction. In an age where smartphones practically live in our hands, digital addiction is far from hyperbole. It covers everything from endless scrolling on Instagram and compulsively watching YouTube Shorts to binge gaming and obsessively checking notifications. Addictive behavior isn't new — we've battled gambling, smoking and even coffee dependence — but our flickering digital world makes it worse. Why? Because digital space is always on, always connected and hard to escape. It hijacks our psychology; our brains crave quick dopamine hits, triggered by every buzz, swipe and glowing heart. This constant stimulation is especially harmful for teenagers. Adolescence is a time of major brain construction, especially in areas like impulse control, decision-making and delayed gratification — all functions governed by the prefrontal cortex. During this period, the limbic system — which drives emotion and reward-seeking — often develops faster than the cortical areas responsible for regulation, creating a neurological imbalance that makes teens more susceptible to impulsive behavior. That fragile system is easily overwhelmed by dopamine-spiking digital temptations. Teens are wired to seek novelty and approval, and Big Tech knows exactly how to exploit that. Picture this: You're a 15-year-old faced with algebra homework — tedious, stressful and hardly satisfying. Meanwhile, your phone offers instant relief. Just one more video. Just one more like. That tiny dopamine hit feels irresistible. And here lies the sinister brilliance of digital addiction: It offers a fast escape from discomfort while dulling the brain's ability to regulate impulses. The result? A vicious cycle of compulsive escape. This isn't just a personal failing — it's a structural problem, engineered into the very platforms we use. Which brings us back to the original question: Why no dislike button on Instagram? Facebook (now Meta), Instagram's parent company, uses behavioral psychology to maximize engagement. Negative feedback causes discomfort. Discomfort drives people away. And that's bad for business. So, no public 'dislike' button. Instagram has reportedly tested a private 'downvote' for comments — but let's be honest, that does little to address the deeper problem of addiction by design. Research by Kaitlin Woolley and Marissa Sharif in Harvard Business Review explains why these designs are so effective. Watching several short videos in a row increases the urge to keep watching. Labeling content as 'similar' drives up engagement. And uninterrupted viewing? Even more addictive. These patterns increase what psychologists call 'cognitive accessibility' — our brains find the content easier to process, making it feel more rewarding. Platforms exploit this by feeding us seamless flows of content designed to keep us watching. It's clear that these features aren't about authentic feedback or real connection. They're 'dark patterns' that trap users — especially teens — in loops of envy, anxiety, validation-seeking and disengagement from reality. But here's the good news: Digital addiction is something we can overcome — if we take it seriously. A study led by Noah Castelo at the University of Alberta found that blocking smartphone internet access for just two weeks significantly improved mental health, well-being and attention span. Why? Because without constant mobile internet, people spent more time socializing in person, exercising and going outdoors. What this means is that reducing constant connectivity can lead to real, measurable psychological benefits. Simple strategies can help: stop watching more than two videos without a break, intentionally choose unrelated content and use timers or reminders to break the binge. Small actions can go a long way. Historically, we've regulated addictive substances and behaviors — tobacco, gambling, narcotics — because willpower alone wasn't enough. The same goes for digital addiction. We need institutional action. Schools should consider phone-free zones and digital literacy education, even in the face of protests about 'student rights' or hypothetical emergencies. And if school shootings are being used to justify unrestricted smartphone access in classrooms, then we face a much deeper societal crisis. Thank God, we're not there yet. When we let tools like ChatGPT do the thinking, we risk turning off the very parts of our brain that make us human. But digital addiction — precisely because it's manageable — is the fight we can take on now, especially for teenagers, whose minds are still under construction. So, dear tech billionaires: You've made your billions, changed the world and redefined connection. Isn't that enough? Maybe it's time to curb the greed and rethink the design choices that keep us hooked. Do it for humanity. Do it for the future. Or at the very least — do it for your own kids. A note to myself: Let's stop blindly clicking (and counting) hearts and start confronting the reality behind the glowing screen. Look out the window — the sun, the clouds, the trees, even the people on the street. They're just as fleeting as a TikTok video, but far more real. And the best part? You'll never get addicted to them.


Korea Herald
01-07-2025
- Korea Herald
No camera, just a prompt: AI video creators are taking over social media
Text-to-video AI video tools fuel artistic freedom, while also raising red flags over fake news, sexual content "Create a video of a young Korean girl playing at a beach." From the way the girl cautiously steps into the water to the sunlight glimmering on the ocean surface, it was remarkable how much detail the video managed to capture from such a simple prompt. This prompt-based AI video also features realistic sound effects, such as crashing waves and the gentle splash of water with each step she takes. Amid rapid advances in artificial intelligence, including the May 20 release of Google's Veo 3, content created using AI tools has taken over social media, ranging from "mukbang" eating shows to autonomous sensory meridian response, or ASMR, videos. On TikTok, for example, AI-generated videos of glass fruits and vegetables being sliced or eaten have gone viral at a rapid pace, inspiring a wave of similar content from other creators. A video uploaded by the channel WildWhispersASMR on June 13, showing a glass kiwi being sliced, received 68 million views in just eight days. The crisp, satisfying sound of a knife or teeth hitting the glass surface delivers a unique sensory satisfaction that keeps viewers hooked. AI video generation tools like Veo 3 and OpenAI's Sora, which was released late last year, are now widely used not only by video professionals but also by ordinary users, with more people branding themselves as AI video creators. Son Min-yeong used to be an ordinary office worker with no experience in video editing. but thanks to AI tools, she has recently become a digital creator with over 20,000 followers on Instagram. "Because of health issues, I started looking for ways to earn money online. But I wasn't confident about showing my face or producing high-quality videos. It was AI video tools that helped me to enter the digital content market," she told The Korea Herald. "Generating high-quality videos with AI requires detailed prompts that include specific examples — it's like having a deep conversation with the AI." 'Too real' What draws people to AI-created videos is the challenge of determining whether they're real or not, fueling intrigue and fascination among viewers. Yu Ha-seong, a 21-year-old university student in Daegu who follows creators of virtual mukbang content on Instagram, said, 'I was shocked by how realistic it looked. One video even showed oil dripping from a chicken drumstick as a female creator took a bite.' 'When she was shown in close-up, even her skin, double eyelids, and stray baby hairs looked completely real,' he added. The realistic reproduction of human speech makes the experience even more immersive. AI video generation tools have long struggled to synchronize lip movements with audio, but the recently launched Veo 3 has made notable improvements in this area, producing visuals so convincing they can easily fool viewers. In one video, a YouTuber appears to be interviewing a passerby on the street. From the YouTuber's subtle facial expressions to the interviewee's natural pauses before responding, every gesture closely mimics real human behavior. Even the outfits and the urban backdrop resemble a typical day in Seoul. Yet none of it is real. It's all generated by AI. Thrill of fakeness Beyond replicating real-life scenarios like mukbang shows or street interviews, AI-generated clips portraying what would be impossible situations in reality have also captured viewers with moments of intense visual pleasure. A recent viral video on Instagram features a middle-aged man from the Joseon era eating a bowl of freshly cooked rice topped with kimchi, mimicking the style of a modern mukbang YouTuber. The creative blend of historical settings and contemporary internet culture quickly drew widespread attention. Among other quirky, surreal examples are slides flowing with tteokbokki (spicy rice cakes), reporters interviewing dogs that speak Korean, and swimmers gliding through lava. Creators often exchange ideas and tips for writing prompts via comment sections or private messages, helping one another produce more lifelike videos using AI video generation tools. As AI video creation emerges as a new form of online play culture, concerns are also growing over its unintended side effects. Some criticize digital creators for generating AI videos that feature women in bikinis or lingerie presenting news or mukbang content. "With deepfakes already being such a big problem, I'm worried that these AI video tools will just make it worse," an X user wrote. Hwang Ji-yeon, 26, a freelance illustrator based in Seoul, said, 'I once watched an AI-generated clip that presented false information about major political issues in the form of interviews, seemingly intended to promote the creator's personal views. What scared me was how real the people looked. I felt that older people might easily be fooled." Lee Se-young, a professor of media communications at Sungkyunkwan University, echoed Hwang's concerns, warning that the lower barriers to creating AI-generated videos could further entrench the 'post-truth society,' where facts become less influential than emotions. "The growing accessibility of AI tools to the general public brings about fresh creative possibilities, but also raises serious concerns over the spread of misinformation, such as fabricated interviews, altered quotes and reputational harm to public figures," Lee told The Korea Herald. "These developments not only mislead audiences but also threaten the credibility of the media itself, ultimately deepening the 'post-truth' society, where facts matter less than emotions." The professor stressed that clearly labeling AI content is essential for ensuring users can make informed choices. "It reminds content creators of their ethical obligations and pushes platforms to be more cautious in handling AI-based material," he explained. Under Korea's Basic Act on Artificial Intelligence, set to take effect in January, all content created using generative AI, including films and TV dramas, must carry a clear label indicating its AI origin. Media users, the professor added, now require what he called a new form of media literacy: AI discernment. 'With technology advancing rapidly, viewers can no longer rely on visuals alone to assess videos' authenticity. That's why they need sharper analytical skills, from verifying the sources of videos and understanding how they were created using AI tools, to evaluating the cultural and social context behind the content.'


Korea Herald
20-06-2025
- Korea Herald
Ottai Unveils Revolutionary AI-Powered Biosensor Set to Transform Chronic Disease Care
Groundbreaking Technology Empowers Patients to Take Control of Their Health HONG KONG, June 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ottai, an Oxford-originated pioneer in AI digital health innovation, today announced the launch of its next-generation AI-powered wearable designed to revolutionize chronic disease management. This breakthrough device continuously monitors key biomarkers, leverages AI for real-time analysis and health log input, enhances patient-device interaction, and delivers personalized lifestyle recommendations. The Ottai biosensor disrupts the paradigm of traditional chronic disease monitoring—characterized by manual input, periodic lab tests, and reactive symptom management—by offering continuous monitoring paired with AI-driven automated and personalized inputs. It integrates deep learning algorithms to analyze vast amounts of real-time biomarker data and health logs, delivering actionable, tailored recommendations. The biosensor also supports intuitive voice-activated commands, allowing users to ask questions and add inputs while receiving real-time, personalized advice. "The Ottai biosensor represents a critical step toward scalable, patient-centric care," said Dr. Calvin Wang, Research Scientist at Ottai. "It represents a new era in healthcare—where we combine biosensing with AI to provide a dynamic and adaptive tool that evolves with patients' health needs and supports long-term disease management." The biosensor uses AI to power a smart health companion that supports users in real time: About Ottai Ottai is a leader in empowering individuals with actionable insights to prevent and manage chronic conditions. With a mission to make chronic disease management more accessible, personalized, and proactive, Ottai aims to revolutionize the healthcare landscape with advanced, user-friendly solutions. For more information and pricing and availability of Ottai sensors, visit and connect with Ottai on Instagram, and Facebook.