Two Chinese scientists charged by FBI for smuggling ‘dangerous biological weapon into US' with ‘agroterrorism fungus'
Authorities have claimed this fungus could be used as a "potential agroterrorism weapon".
3
3
3
Researchers Jian Yunqing, 33, and Liu Zunyong, 34 face charges of smuggling goods, conspiracy, visa fraud and providing false statements, the US Attorney's Office for the eastern district of Michigan announced on Tuesday.
Prosecutors claim Liu tried to smuggle the fungus through Detroit Airport so he could study it at a University of Michigan laboratory.
Jian, Liu's girlfriend, works at this lab, the prosecutors added.
The FBI says the Fusarium graminearum is classified as a "potential agroterrorism weapon" that can cause vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive defects in humans and livestock.
This fungus causes billions of dollars worth of damage to livestock and crops globally each year.
Officials have also alleged that Jian's research on the fungus in China got Chinese government funding - and that she is a member of the Chinese Communist Party.
FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X: "This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply, which would have grave consequences... putting American lives and our economy at serious risk.
"Your FBI will continue working tirelessly to be on guard against it."
Liu is alleged to have initially lied about attempting to bring the pathogen into the country in July 2024 before admitting it.
The complaint claims that Jian and Liu had previously studied the fungus in China.
Trump doubles steel and aluminium tariffs and threatens China and its 'shoddy' exports in latest trade war escalation
A scientific article was found on Liu's phone titled "Plant-Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions", according to the FBI.
Messages between the couple suggest Jian was already studying the pathogen prior to Liu's arrival at the airport, the authority added.
The university does not have the required federal permits to handle the pathogen.
A statement from the university says the institution as not received "funding from the Chinese government in relation to research conducted by the accused individuals".
It adds: "We strongly condemn any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university's critical public mission."
What is Fusarium graminearum?
Fusarium graminearum is a fungal pathogen that can be devastating to livestock and crops.
It can ruin a large number of crops, and can cause bight in wheat and barley - making it a major cause for concern.
The pathogen is understood to lead to billions of dollars in losses worldwide each year.
It can also cause vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive defects in both humans and livestock.
The potential for large scale crop losses is why is is deemed to be a potential "agroterrorism" agent.
Jian appeared in court yesterday and was returned to jail to await a bond hearing - which is set for Thursday.
The attorney who was assigned only for her initial appearance declined to comment, according to the Associated Press.
But as the US does not have an extradition treaty with China, Liu's arrest is seen as unlikely unless he returns.
US Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr called the allegations a "national security" concern.
He said: "These two aliens have been charged with smuggling a fungus that has been described as a 'potential agroterrorism weapon' into the heartland of America, where they apparently intended to use a University of Michigan laboratory to further their scheme."
It comes after Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged to "aggressively" revoke the visas of Chinese students in the US.
This move, which is part of a broad crackdown on immigration by the Trump administration, has been condemned as "discriminatory" by the Chinese government.
China makes up the second largest number of foreign students in the United States, only after India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Attorneys: 'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees held without charges, barred from legal access
Lawyers seeking a temporary restraining order against an immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades say that 'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees have been barred from meeting attorneys, are being held without any charges and that a federal immigration court has canceled bond hearings. A virtual hearing in federal court in Miami was being held Monday on a lawsuit that was filed July 16. A new motion on the case was filed Friday. Lawyers who have shown up for bond hearings for 'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees have been told that the immigration court doesn't have jurisdiction over their clients, the attorneys wrote in court papers. The immigration attorneys demanded that federal and state officials identify an immigration court that has jurisdiction over the detainees and start accepting petitions for bond, claiming the detainees constitutional rights to due process are being violated. 'This is an unprecedented situation where hundreds of detainees are held incommunicado, with no ability to access the courts, under legal authority that has never been explained and may not exist,' the immigration attorneys wrote. 'This is an unprecedented and disturbing situation.' The lawsuit is the second one challenging 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Environmental groups last month sued federal and state officials asking that the project built on an airstrip in the heart of the Florida Everglades be halted because the process didn't follow state and federal environmental laws. Critics have condemned the facility as a cruel and inhumane threat to the ecologically sensitive wetlands, while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other Republican state officials have defended it as part of the state's aggressive push to support President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has praised Florida for coming forward with the idea, as the department looks to significantly expand its immigration detention capacity. ___
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Pretty substantial distraction': Trump annoyed Epstein is dominating agenda but won't create ‘spectacle' with firings
President Donald Trump is frustrated that the Jeffrey Epstein uproar has overshadowed his agenda, but he doesn't want to 'create a bigger spectacle by firing anyone,' according to a report. Trump is said to be 'exasperated' by the scandal and is growing 'increasingly frustrated' with how his administration has handled the Epstein files saga and media attention on the president's ties to the sex offender, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial. 'This is a pretty substantial distraction,' one person close to the situation told The Washington Post. 'While many are trying to keep the unity, in many ways, the DOJ and the FBI are breaking at the seams. Many are wondering how sustainable this is going to be for all the parties involved — be it the FBI director or attorney general.' Trump is reportedly hesitant to fire anyone over the scandal. 'He does not want to create a bigger spectacle by firing anyone,' a person close to the president told the Post. The president's exasperation was evident this weekend in Scotland after Trump was asked about Epstein at a press conference touting his latest trade deal with the European Union. A reporter asked the president whether 'part of the rush to get this deal done was to knock Jeffrey Epstein's story out.' 'Oh, you've got to be kidding with that,' said Trump. 'No, it had nothing to do with it.' Attorney General Pam Bondi for months pledged to release the Epstein files and claimed they were sitting on her desk. On July 6, the Justice Department and FBI issued a memo that poured cold water on the theory that Epstein kept a 'client list' and the departments would not be sharing any further documents in the case. The memo ignited outrage among Trump's MAGA base and shows few signs of abating. Bondi was not directly involved in writing the memo, according to the Post, but officials told the outlet that she did participate in conversations that led to its publication. Trump, who has regularly indulged in conspiracy theories, also complained over the weekend that Democrats are too focused on conspiracy theories. 'All they know how to do is talk and think about conspiracy theories and nonsense,' Trump said during the meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. 'If they'd waste their time talking about America being great again, it would be so much nicer.' Critics said the fallout is one of the administration's own making. 'They completely miscalculated the fever pitch to which they built this up,' said Stephen A. Salzburg, a former Justice Department official who teaches at George Washington University's law school. 'Now, they seem to be in full-bore panic mode, trying to change the subject and flailing in an effort to make sense of what makes no sense.' The Trump administration has tried to distract with other conspiracy theories. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been pushing claims that top Obama administration officials should be prosecuted for leading a 'coup' against the president in 2016 by investigating Russian efforts to help his campaign. 'She has turned herself into a weapon of mass distraction, is what I've been calling it,' Democratic Rep. Jason Crow told Fox News on Sunday. The controversy has refused to die down after a Wall Street Journal report revealed the alleged existence of a 'bawdy' 50th birthday card from Trump to Epstein. The president has denied the validity of the letter and has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch, the Journal's parent company Dow Jones and the two journalists whose bylines appear on the story. Trump encouraged the media Friday to 'talk about Clinton, not Trump,' after the former president was also mentioned in the birthday book. A Clinton spokesman declined to comment to the Journal and instead referred to a previous statement saying the former president's association with Epstein ended more than a decade before he was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. The statement also said Clinton didn't know about Epstein's crimes, the Journal reports.
Daily Mirror
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Four tragic theories on what REALLY happened to Amy Bradley after she vanished on cruise
In March 1998, Amy Lynn Bradley vanished in the middle of the night while on a cruise ship with her family and was never found. A new Netflix documentary has explored the main theories behind the case, from sex slave fears to a website riddle and last sighting The sad disappearance of Amy Lynn Bradley, a 23-year-old from Virginia who vanished from the cruise ship Rhapsody of the Seas, remains one of the most perplexing unsolved cases in true crime history. Despite being last seen on her cabin's balcony aboard a ship filled with potential eyewitnesses, Amy's trail went cold almost instantly. Now, a new Netflix docuseries explores the leading theories in the 1998 case that continues to grapple the world. "There are no easy answers in this story," producer Phil Lott admits. "Getting to meet [the people on the ship] and interview them at length just made the stories that much more interesting, rich, deep - and raised more questions." Here, we take a look at four theories that have been suggested in the years following her mysterious disappearance. Theory 1: Amy fell or jumped overboard One of the earliest and most contested theories is that Amy may have accidentally fallen or intentionally jumped overboard. Her shoes were left on the balcony, and a table had been moved, suggesting she may have leaned over the railing. However, no physical evidence was ever recovered from the sea, and her family firmly rejected the notion she would have died by suicide or put herself in danger. Officials insisted if she had of fell overboard, remains would have washed up on shore due to the tide that evening. Theory 2: Involvement of cruise entertainer A significant portion of the docuseries revisits the theory involving Alister "Yellow" Douglas, a cruise ship entertainer seen dancing with Amy the night she vanished. Their interaction was captured on video inside the ship's nightclub. Lori Thompson, another passenger, told investigators she also saw Amy with Douglas earlier that night. Though the FBI questioned Douglas and he voluntarily took a polygraph test, the results were inconclusive. He was released without charge and has consistently maintained his innocence. "Every single person who worked on this was conflicted about what happened to Amy... that sort of whiplash made this particularly surprising," says producer Ari Mark. Theory 3: Human trafficking One of the most chilling theories comes from retired US Navy officer Bill Hefner, who believes he encountered Amy in January 1999 - ten months after she vanished. Hefner claims he met a distressed young woman in a Curaçao bar who told him, "My name is Amy Bradley. I'm from Virginia." The woman was quickly taken away by unidentified men. Hefner's tip circulated in true crime circles for years but was never explored on camera until now. The possibility that Amy was abducted and trafficked has gained traction as similar reports and unverified sightings surfaced over the years. Theory 4: Amy left the ship voluntarily A more recently considered theory is that Amy chose to leave the ship of her own accord. Though once dismissed, the documentary highlights a surprising new piece of evidence: a pattern of IP addresses traced to Barbados repeatedly logged into a forum on during family anniversaries and holidays. The site, founded by online investigator Anthony Willis in 2018, was designed to centralize tips. The IP activity has led some to speculate that Amy could be alive and living in secrecy. "I don't think the notion of her willingly walking off the ship was ever presented as a possibility until the [documentary]," says Mark. "And I don't believe that the eyewitness testimony or the IP information was really ever presented in any way to anyone." "It's very uncommon to have that many scenarios that feel possible," Mark said. "I dare anybody to look at those scenarios and argue me off one of them because there's enough information to suggest that any of those scenarios could be possible. It drove us nuts." In 1999, Amy's family filed a lawsuit against Royal Caribbean, alleging negligence in the handling of her disappearance. The company maintained that it had acted appropriately at all times. The lawsuit was ultimately dismissed, and no charges have ever been filed in connection with the case. For Amy's relatives, the pain of her disappearance remains raw. Through interviews with friends and loved ones, the series paints a portrait of a young woman whose presence is still deeply missed. "It's one thing to talk about the void of Amy, and it's another thing to experience it," adds Mark. "This is a family who really deeply believes in what they're saying, and what they're saying is, 'She's out there, we're going to find her, and we're ready.'' Amy Bradley Is Missing is now streaming on Netflix.
