Failure to Pay Protest Fines to Lead to Detention for Repeat Acts
These offenses are among the most commonly cited against demonstrators participating in anti–Georgian Dream protests.
The rule changes are part of
amendments
to Georgia's Code of Administrative Offenses, passed by the Georgian Dream parliament on July 2, following two days of accelerated deliberations during extraordinary sessions.
Fines for these offenses vary and increase with repeated violations, but generally range around GEL 5,000 (about USD 1,800). If an individual fails to pay a previous fine and is found guilty of the same offense again, the court will no longer have the option to impose another fine and will be required to order detention.
The maximum administrative detention period in Georgia is 60 days,
extended
from 15 days in February.
The amendments also change the appeals process for fines. Instead of appealing to the Interior Ministry, individuals must now appeal directly to the courts. Some say the change will ease the ministry's workload — particularly the large number of appeals over road blockage fines — but will add pressure on the judiciary.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs was given authority to impose fines for administrative offenses in February. Since then, citizens have been appealing these fines directly to the ministry.
'If the accounting and backlog of fines was the MIA's job before, now the review of administrative offenses will fall to seven judges,' lawyer Saba Brachveli
wrote
on Facebook, suggesting the state system is shifting the burden onto the courts to handle a growing caseload.
'Those of you who have appealed to the Interior Ministry and have not yet received a response, this new rule will apply to your cases as well,' lawyer Nika Simonishvili
said
in a Facebook post. He added, 'The Interior Ministry will no longer review your appeal, and all these cases will be sent to the court 10 days after the law comes into force.'
Although the exact number is unknown, media estimates suggest hundreds have been fined for blocking roads since protests began on November 28, 2024, after the Georgian Dream government announced it was abandoning the country's EU accession process. The ongoing
resistance
has since blocked Tbilisi's main Rustaveli Avenue in front of the parliament building daily for more than seven months now.
The fine for road blockage was GEL 500 before December, until the Georgian Dream parliament
increased
it tenfold to GEL 5,000 (about USD 1,800), more than twice the average monthly income in Georgia.
In mid-March, the Georgian Young Lawyers Association, a human rights group,
said
road blockage fines since November 28 stood at GEL 2 million (about USD 715,000). Watchdog groups have widely
criticized
the hefty fines as a repressive tool used by the government to suppress protests.
Also Read:
This post is also available in:
ქართული
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
OC Media
an hour ago
- OC Media
Georgian media regulator says opposition TV channels violated law by using anti-government language
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member The Georgian Communications Commission has found two opposition TV channels to be in violation of the law after complaints from Georgian Dream accused them of breaching coverage standards due to anti-government statements. According to TV Pirveli and Formula, the commission announced its decision on Thursday. However, despite finding the two outlets at fault, it did not penalise the TV companies. This announcement set a precedent for the enforcement of yet another restrictive law adopted on 1 April by Georgian Dream and its allies. The legislation regulates coverage standards for broadcasters both on air and on their social media platforms. In the complaints filed in June, Georgian Dream objected to specific terms used on air by journalists and on the channels' social media pages to describe the government, its representatives, and the Georgian judiciary. These included phrases such as 'illegitimate parliament', 'so-called parliament speaker', 'oligarch's MP', 'regime's city court', and 'regime prisoners'. 'The journalist's phrases [...] are personal assessments/accusations that are not separated from facts. Distinguishing between fact and opinion is an important standard in journalism', the complaint stated. The commission has not yet published the reasoning behind its decision. Another opposition broadcaster, Mtavari Arkhi, which was also sued by Georgian Dream, has not yet released any information regarding the commission's decision. The channel ceased broadcasting in May and has continued only with online content. Advertisement Representatives of Georgia's civil society have emphasised that many of the regulations presented in the newly-passed law are drawn from the currently existing code of conduct for broadcasters. Under the previous legislation, the authority to respond to violations of broadcasting standards lies with self-regulatory bodies within the broadcasters themselves. However, according to the new amendments, the same authority was also granted to a state body — the National Communications Commission. This means that any interested party can file a complaint directly with the state body against a specific TV channel — as Georgian Dream has done against the opposition-aligned broadcasters. The punitive measures the commission can take against a broadcaster are varied, and include warnings, orders to correct content, financial penalties, and, in certain cases, suspension of the broadcasting license. Georgian Dream fast-tracked their adoption of restrictive legislation after the start of anti-government protests in late November 2024, which were sparked by the ruling party's announcement that it was halting the country's EU membership bid. The restrictive laws are being passed in a parliament where opposition is virtually nonexistent, having vowed to boycott the elections following the disputed 2024 parliamentary elections, before being expelled en masse from parliament by Georgian Dream. Since then, the ruling party has been initiating and passing new restrictive legislations without any obstacles, targeting the media, civil society, and other critics.
OC Media
an hour ago
- OC Media
Armenian Parliament adopts bill allowing state to take over energy company
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member The Armenian Parliament has adopted legislative amendments virtually allowing the state to take over the country's sole electricity company — Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA) — from Russian–Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, who was recently detained on charges of making calls to overthrow the government. The bill was adopted on Thursday afternoon. While it does not necessarily directly allow the state to nationalise ENA, its provisions would allow the state to 'intervene' and oversee its administration should the company fail to meet its obligations. Specifically, the amendments would allow the authorities to launch proceedings against the ENA should it fail to properly fulfill its obligations. During these proceedings, the authorities would be able to temporarily appoint an administrator to oversee the company. If, during the process, the authorities decide to revoke the ENA's license, the government would offer its owners the opportunity to forfeit their shares within three months. If the ENA is not sold during this period, the government would be able to force Karapetyan to forfeit the company in accordance with article 60 of the constitution, which allows the state to seize assets in the interest of the public. According to RFE/RL, the bill would allow the legislation to be retroactively applied to previous violations. Armenpress, a state-owned news outlet, has framed the amendments as providing the authorities with the ability to intervene in the country's energy sector in case of violations. Advertisement According to Civilnet, critics of the move warn that it could have consequences for the 'country's investment climate, legislative clarity, and foreign economic relations'. The bill was passed amidst some conflict in parliament, following remarks made by Hovik Aghazaryan, a former member of the ruling Civil Contract party, who implied that the amendments were an attempt to deepen anti-Russian sentiments in order to turn Armenia to the West, which he claimed, began with Turkey. 'With these steps, there is an attempt to deepen anti-Russian sentiments so that, [eventually], we turn toward the West, supposedly falling out with Russia. The West begins with Turkey', Aghazaryan said, claiming that in exchange for a path to the EU, Turkey would demand that displaced Azerbaijanis be returned to Armenia. 'You all know what will happen then. Therefore, I ask and urge the Russian side not to give in to our provocations', Aghazaryan concluded. This caused immediate outrage among members of the ruling party, with Arman Yeghoyan being heard shaming Aghazaryan, along with other reactions coming from MPs. Subsequently, Aghazaryan threw a bottle in the direction of Civil Contract's seats. In a comment to RFE/RL, Aghazaryan suggested that he threw the bottle in response to the verbal insults uttered by ruling party MP Tigran Parsilyan. As tensions in parliament subsided, Deputy Parliamentary Speaker Hakob Arshakyan asked Aghazaryan to leave the hall and prohibited him from participating in the session. Arshakyan gave a warning to Yeghoyan, adding that he also did not like Aghazaaryan's speech — 'it's clear that the speech represented foreign interests more than Armenian ones'. The ruling Civil Contract party fast-tracked the nationalisation of the ENA following the arrest of its owner, Karapetyan, a Russian–Armenian billionaire. He was arrested on 18 June during a raid of his home in Yerevan after he had made statements in defence of the Armenian Apostolic Church amidst ongoing tensions between it and the government. Following the arrest, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan vowed to 'swiftly' nationalise ENA, which is run by Karapetyan's Tashir Group, and also launched inspections into his popular Tashir Pizza chain, closing down some branches over violations. Pashinyan claimed the move was not related to statements Karapetyan had made in support of the church, but instead cited public discontent with the company's services and frequent power outages in Armenia, which Pashinyan alleged were intentionally used 'to generate internal public discontent in Armenia'.
OC Media
an hour ago
- OC Media
Former Georgian Defence Minister Okruashvili sentenced to 8 months
Sign in or or Become a member to unlock the audio version of this article Join the voices Aliyev wants to silence. For over eight years, OC Media has worked with fearless journalists from Azerbaijan — some of whom now face decades behind bars — to bring you the stories the regime is afraid will get out. Help us fuel Aliyev's fears — become an OC Media member today Become a member Tbilisi City Court has sentenced former Georgian Defence Minister Irakli Okruashvili to eight months in jail for failing to appear before a parliamentary commission created to investigate the opposition. The verdict also included a two-year ban on holding public office. Okruashvili was already in pretrial detention at the time of his sentencing for refusing to pay the bail set by the court in the same case. A total of eight people, including a number of opposition leaders, have been detained for failing to appear before Georgian Dream's parliamentary commission. Seven of them have already been sentenced — Okruashvili was the last to be handed down his verdict. Okruashvili has a long and eventful history in Georgian politics, though he has struggled to remain politically relevant in recent years. He served in a variety of roles during the tenure of former President Mikheil Saakashvili and his United National Movement (UNM) party, including as Interior Minister and Minister of Defence until 2006. In 2007 he went into the opposition and subsequently faced criminal charges, before going into exile in France. He returned to Georgia in 2012. Okruashvili was again arrested in 2019 and sentenced to five years in prison for 'organising group violence' during the Gavrilov's Night protests. He was pardoned by Georgia's fifth president Salome Zourabichvili in 2020. While already in pre-trial detention for boycotting the commission, new charges brought against Okruashvili. According to his lawyer Mamuka Chabashvili, the case is related to an incident that occurred years ago — he did not provide any further details. Advertisement A co-leader of the opposition Ahali party, Nika Gvaramia, was the latest to be sentenced prior to Okruashvili on 1 July, receiving eight months. On 27 June, another leader of the Ahali party, Nika Melia, and former MP Givi Targamadze were arrested and sentenced to eight and seven months, respectively. Giorgi Vashadze, leader of the Strategy Aghmashenebeli party, was sentenced to seven months on 24 June. The day before, on 23 June, the court sentenced Girchi — More Freedom leader Zurab Japaridze to seven months in prison on the same charges. Just a few hours later, Lelo leaders Mamuka Khazaradze and Badri Japaridze were given eight months each. The sentences also included a ban from holding public office for two years. The anti-UNM commission The commission was set up in February ostensibly to investigate the UNM's time in power, following repeated pledges by Georgian Dream to punish the formerly ruling party. Initially, its mandate was limited to the UNM's years in government (2003–2012), but was later expanded to cover the period up to the present day — effectively giving Georgian Dream free reign to target virtually any opposition figure. Numerous opposition figures have boycotted the commission, refusing to recognise its legitimacy, as well as that of the current parliament, which has also been boycotted by major opposition parties following the disputed 2024 parliamentary elections. Criminal cases were launched against those who refused to attend the commission's hearings — if found guilty, those charged could be fined or sentenced to up to a year in prison. They could also be banned from holding public office or engaging in certain activities for up to three years. On Monday, it was announced that the commission will once again refer the cases of politicians — Gvaramia, Khazaradze, and Vashadze — to the Prosecutor General's Office. Those three were summoned to appear before the commission again after their arrests but refused to participate, this time from prison. Georgian Dream has openly declared that it intends to use the findings of the parliamentary commission to file a case with the Constitutional Court seeking to ban the country's main opposition parties — a promise the ruling party made to its voters ahead of the 2024 elections. The ruling party has maintained that all major opposition groups operating in the country are satellites of the UNM and should no longer be allowed to exist.
