Tulsa's new Black mayor proposes $100M trust to ‘repair' impact of 1921 Race Massacre
The plan by Mayor Monroe Nichols, the first Black mayor of Oklahoma's second-largest city, would not provide direct cash payments to descendants or the last two centenarian survivors of the attack that killed as many as 300 Black people. He made the announcement at the Greenwood Cultural Center, located in the once-thriving district that was destroyed by a white mob.
Nichols said he does not use the term reparations, which he calls politically charged, characterizing his sweeping plan instead as a 'road to repair.'
'This is, I think, a very significant first step,' Nichols said. 'And it's something we can all unite around. I think we can unite around housing specifically for affected populations. I think we can unite around investing in the Greenwood district and making sure that we're able to revitalize it to be an economic power again.'
Nichols said the proposal would not require city council approval, although the council would need to authorize the transfer of any city property to the trust.
The private charitable trust would be created with a goal to secure $105 million in assets, with most of the funding either secured or committed by June 1, 2026. Although details of the trust programs would be developed over the next year by an executive director and a board of managers, the plan calls for the bulk of the funding, $60 million, to go toward improving buildings and revitalizing the city's north side.
'The Greenwood District at its height was a center of commerce,' Nichols said. 'So what was lost was not just something from North Tulsa or the Black community. It actually robbed Tulsa of an economic future that would have rivaled anywhere else in the world.'
Nichols' proposal comes on the heels of an executive order he signed earlier this year recognizing June 1 as Tulsa Race Massacre Observance Day, an official holiday for the city.
Nichols also realizes the current national political climate, particularly President Trump's sweeping assault on diversity, equity and inclusion programs, provides challenging political crosswinds.
'The fact that this lines up with a broader national conversation is a tough environment,' Nichols admitted, 'but it doesn't change the work we have to do.'
Jacqueline Weary, is a granddaughter of massacre survivor John R. Emerson, Sr., who owned a hotel and cab company in Greenwood that were destroyed. She acknowledged the political difficulty of giving cash payments to descendants. But at the same time, she wondered how much of her family's wealth was lost as a result of the massacre.
'If Greenwood was still there, my grandfather would still have his hotel,' said Weary, 65. 'It rightfully was our inheritance, and it was literally taken away.'
Tulsa is not the first U.S. city to explore the idea of reparations. The Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, was the first U.S. city to make reparations available to its Black residents for past discrimination, offering qualifying households $25,000 for home repairs, down payments on property, and interest or late penalties on property in the city. The funding for the program came from taxes on the sale of recreational marijuana.
Other communities and organizations that have considered providing reparations range from the state of California to cities like Amherst, Massachusetts; Providence, Rhode Island; Asheville, North Carolina; and Iowa City, Iowa; religious denominations like the Episcopal Church; and prominent colleges like Georgetown University in Washington.
In Tulsa, there are only two living survivors of the Race Massacre, both of whom are 110 years old: Leslie Benningfield Randle and Viola Fletcher. Both received direct financial compensation from both a Tulsa-based nonprofitand a New York-based philanthropic organization, but have not received any recompense from the city or state.
Damario Solomon-Simmons, an attorney for the survivors and the founder of the Justice for Greenwood Foundation, could not be reached for comment on the mayor's plan, but said earlier this year that any reparations plan should include direct payments to Randle and Fletcher and a victims' compensation fund for outstanding claims.
A lawsuit filed by Solomon-Simmons on behalf of the survivors was rejected by the Oklahoma Supreme Court last year, dampening racial justice advocates' hopes that the city would ever make financial amends.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
a minute ago
- Fast Company
New Maui legislation passes, aims to boost housing supply after destructive Lahaina wildfire
Lawmakers on Maui passed legislation Thursday aimed at eliminating a large percentage of the Hawaiian island's vacation rentals to address a housing shortage exacerbated by the wildfire that destroyed most of Lahaina two years ago. It's the latest action by a top global tourist destination to push back against the infiltration of vacationers into residential neighborhoods and tourism overwhelming their communities. In May, Spain ordered Airbnb to block more than 65,000 holiday listings on its platform for having violated rules. Last month, thousands of protesters in European cities like Barcelona and Venice, Italy, marched against the ills of overtourism. The Maui County Council's housing committee voted 6-3 to pass the bill, which would close a loophole that has allowed owners of condos in apartment zones to rent their units for days or weeks at a time instead of a minimum of 180 days. The mandate would take effect in the West Maui district that includes Lahaina in 2028. The rest of the county would have until 2030 to comply. The council still needs to vote on the bill, but the committee's result is a strong indication of the final outcome because all nine council members sit on the housing panel. The mayor is expected to sign the bill, which he proposed. 'Bill 9 is a critical first step in restoring our commitment to prioritize housing for local residents — and securing a future where our keiki can live, grow, and thrive in the place they call home,' Maui Mayor Richard Bissen said in a statement, using the Hawaiian word for children. Vacation rentals take up one-fifth of Maui's housing Vacation rentals currently account for 21% of all housing in the county, which has a population of about 165,000 people. An analysis by University of Hawaii economists predicted the measure would add 6,127 units to Maui's long-term housing stock, increasing supply by 13%. Opponents questioned whether local residents could afford the condos in question, noting that many of the buildings they are in are aging and their units come with high mortgages, insurance payments, maintenance and special assessment costs. Alicia Humiston said her condo is in a hotel zone so it won't be affected. But she predicted the measure will hurt housekeepers, plumbers, electricians and other small business owners who help maintain vacation rentals. 'It's not what's best for the the community,' said Humiston, who is president of the Rentals by Owner Awareness Association. Bissen proposed the legislation last year after wildfire survivors and activists camped out on a beach popular with tourists to demand change. Mayor says tourism will continue but must not 'hollow out our neighborhoods' The University of Hawaii study said only about 600 new housing units are built in the county each year so converting the vacation rentals would be equivalent to a decade's worth of new housing development. Condo prices would drop 20-40%, the study estimated. The report also predicted one-quarter of Maui County's visitor accommodations would vanish and visitor spending would sink 15%. It estimated gross domestic product would contract by 4%. The mayor said such economic analysis failed to tell a full story, noting families are torn apart when high housing costs drive out relatives and that cultural knowledge disappears when generations leave Maui. The mayor told the council the bill was one part of a broader housing strategy that would include building new housing, investing in infrastructure and stopping illegally operated vacation rentals. He said there were limits to how much new housing could be built because of constraints on water supplies and sewer infrastructure. Tourism would continue on Maui but must do so in a way 'that doesn't hollow out our neighborhoods,' the mayor said. The mayor's staff told council members that visitor spending would decline with the measure but most of the drop would be on lodging. Because 94% of those who own vacation rentals in apartment zones don't live on Maui, they said much of this income already flows off-island. They predicted the county budget could withstand an estimated $61 million decline in annual tax revenue resulting from the measure. —Audrey McAvoy, Associated Press The super-early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is tonight, July 25, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
The Verge
2 minutes ago
- The Verge
Breaking down Trump's big gift to the AI industry
President Donald Trump's plan to promote America's AI dominance involves discouraging 'woke AI,' slashing state and federal regulations, and laying the groundwork to rapidly expand AI development and adoption. Trump's proposal, released on July 23rd, is a sweeping endorsement of the technology, full of guidance that ranges from specific executive actions to directions for future research. Some of the new plan's provisions (like promoting open-source AI) have garnered praise from organizations that are often broadly critical of Trump, but the loudest acclaim has come from tech and business groups, whose members stand to gain from fewer restrictions on AI. 'The difference between the Trump administration and Biden's is effectively night and day,' says Patrick Hedger, director of policy at tech industry group NetChoice. 'The Biden administration did everything it could to command and control the fledgling but critical sector … The Trump AI Action Plan, by contrast, is focused on asking where the government can help the private sector, but otherwise, get out of the way.' Others are far more ambivalent. Future of Life Institute, which led an Elon Musk-backed push for an AI pause in 2023, said it was heartened to see the Trump administration acknowledge serious risks, like bioweapons or cyberattacks, could be exacerbated by AI. 'However, the White House must go much further to safeguard American families, workers, and lives,' says Anthony Aguirre, FLI's executive director. 'By continuing to rely on voluntary safety commitments from frontier AI corporations, it leaves the United States at risk of serious accidents, massive job losses, extreme concentrations of power, and the loss of human control. We know from experience that Big Tech promises alone are simply not enough.' For now, here are the ways that Trump aims to promote AI. Congress failed to pass a moratorium on states enforcing their own AI laws as part of a recent legislative package. But a version of that plan was resurrected in this document. 'AI is far too important to smother in bureaucracy at this early stage, whether at the state or Federal level,' the plan says. 'The Federal government should not allow AI-related Federal funding to be directed toward states with burdensome AI regulations that waste these funds, but should also not interfere with states' rights to pass prudent laws that are not unduly restrictive to innovation.' To do this, it suggests federal agencies that dole out 'AI-related discretionary funding' should 'limit funding if the state's AI regulatory regimes may hinder the effectiveness of that funding or award.' It also suggests the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 'evaluate whether state AI regulations interfere with the agency's ability to carry out its obligations and authorities under the Communications Act of 1934.' The Trump administration also wants the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to take a hard look at existing AI regulations and agreements to see what it can scale back. It recommends the agency reevaluate investigations launched during the Biden administration 'to ensure that they do not advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation,' and suggests it could throw out burdensome aspects of existing FTC agreements. Some AI-related actions taken during the Biden administration that the FTC might now reconsider include banning Rite Aid's use of AI facial recognition that allegedly falsely identified shoplifters, and taking action against AI-related claims the agency previously found to be deceptive. Trump's plan includes policies designed to help encode his preferred politics in the world of AI. He's ordered a revision of the Biden-era National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework — a voluntary set of best practices for designing safe AI systems — removing 'references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change.' (The words 'misinformation' and 'climate change' don't actually appear in the framework, though misinformation is discussed in a supplementary file.) In addition to that, a new executive order bans federal agencies from procuring what Trump deems 'woke AI' or large language models 'that sacrifice truthfulness and accuracy to ideological agendas,' including things like racial equity. This section of the plan 'seems to be motivated by a desire to control what information is available through AI tools and may propose actions that would violate the First Amendment,' says Kit Walsh, director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EEF). 'The plan seeks to require that 'the government only contracts with' developers who meet the administration's ideological criteria. While the government can choose to purchase only services that meet such criteria, it cannot require that developers refrain from also providing non-government users other services conveying other ideas.' The administration describes the slow uptake of AI tools across the economy, including in sensitive areas like healthcare, as a 'bottleneck to harnessing AI's full potential.' The plan describes this cautious approach as one fueled by 'distrust or lack of understanding of the technology, a complex regulatory landscape, and a lack of clear governance and risk mitigation standards.' To promote the use of AI, the White House encourages a ''try-first' culture for AI across American industry.' This includes creating domain-specific standards for adopting AI systems and measuring productivity increases, as well as regularly monitoring how US adoption of AI compares to international competitors. The White House also wants to integrate AI tools throughout the government itself, including by detailing staff with AI expertise at various agencies to other departments in need of that talent, training government employees on AI tools, and giving agencies ample access to AI models. The plan also specifically calls out the need to 'aggressively adopt AI within its Armed Forces,' including by introducing AI curricula at military colleges and using AI to automate some work. All this AI adoption will profoundly change the demand for human labor, the plan says, likely eliminating or fundamentally changing some jobs. The plan acknowledges that the government will need to help workers prepare for this transition period by retraining people for more in-demand roles in the new economy and providing tax benefits for certain AI training courses. On top of preparing to transition workers from traditional jobs that might be upended by AI, the plan discusses the need to train workers for the additional roles that might be created by it. Among the jobs that might be needed for this new reality are 'electricians, advanced HVAC technicians, and a host of other high-paying occupations,' the plan says. The administration says it wants to 'create a supportive environment for open models,' or AI models that allow users to modify the code that underpins them. Open models have certain 'pros,' like being more accessible to startups and independent developers. Groups like EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), which were critical of many other aspects of the plan, applauded this part. EFF's Walsh called it a 'positive proposal' to promote 'the development of open models and making it possible for a wider range of people to participate in shaping AI research and development. If implemented well, this could lead to a greater diversity of viewpoints and values reflected in AI technologies, compared to a world where only the largest companies and agencies are able to develop AI.' That said, there are also serious 'cons' to the approach that the AI Action Plan didn't seem to get into. For instance, the nature of open models makes them easier to trick and misalign for purposes like creating misinformation on a large scale, or chemical or biological weapons. It's easier to get past built-in safeguards with such models, and it's important to think critically about the tradeoffs before taking steps to drive open-source and open-weight model adoption at scale. Trump signed an executive order on July 23rd meant to fast track permitting for data center projects. The EO directs the commerce secretary to 'launch an initiative to provide financial support' that could include loans, grants, and tax incentives for data centers and related infrastructure projects. Following a similar move by former President Joe Biden, Trump's plan directs agencies to identify federal lands suitable for the 'large-scale development' of data centers and power generation. The EO tells the Department of Defense to identify suitable sites on military installations and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to identify polluted Superfund and Brownfield sites that could be reused for these projects. The Trump administration is hellbent on dismantling environmental regulations, and the EO now directs the EPA to modify rules under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act to expedite permitting for data center projects. The EO and the AI plan, similar to a Biden-era proposal, direct agencies to create 'categorical exclusions' for federally supported data center projects that would exclude them from detailed environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act. And they argue for using new AI tools to speed environmental assessments and applying the 'Fast-41 process' to data center projects to streamline federal permitting. The Trump administration is basically using the AI arms race as an excuse to slash environmental regulations for data centers, energy infrastructure, and computer chip factories. Last week, the administration exempted coal-fired power plants and facilities that make chemicals for semiconductor manufacturing from Biden-era air pollution regulations. The plan admits that AI is a big factor 'increasing pressures on the [power] grid.' Electricity demand is rising for the first time in more than a decade in the US, thanks in large part to data centers — a trend that could trigger blackouts and raise Americans' electricity bills. Trump's AI plan lists some much-needed fixes to stabilize the grid, including upgrading power lines and managing how much electricity consumers use when demand spikes. But the administration is saying that the US needs to generate more electricity to power AI just as it's stopping renewable energy growth, which is like trying to win a race in a vehicle with no front wheels. It wants to meet growing demand with fossil fuels and nuclear energy. 'We will continue to reject radical climate dogma,' the plan says. It argues for keeping existing, mostly fossil-fueled power plants online for longer and limiting environmental reviews to get data centers and new power plants online faster. The lower cost of gas generation has been killing coal power plants for years, but now a shortage of gas turbines could stymie Trump's plans. New nuclear technologies that tech companies are investing in for their data centers probably won't be ready for commercial deployment until the 2030s at the earliest. Republicans, meanwhile, have passed legislation to hobble the solar and wind industries that have been the fastest-growing sources of new electricity in the US. 'Prioritize fundamental advancements in AI interpretability' The Trump administration accurately notes that while developers and engineers know how today's advanced AI models work in a big-picture way, they 'often cannot explain why a model produced a specific output. This can make it hard to predict the behavior of any specific AI system.' It's aiming to fix that, at least when it comes to some high-stakes use cases. The plan states that the lack of AI explainability and predictability can lead to issues in defense, national security, and 'other applications where lives are at stake,' and it aims to promote 'fundamental breakthroughs on these research problems.' The plan's recommended policy actions include launching a tech development program led by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to advance AI interpretability, control systems, and security. It also said the government should prioritize fundamental advancements in such areas in its upcoming National AI R&D Strategic Plan and, perhaps most specifically, that the DOD and other agencies should coordinate an AI hackathon to allow academics to test AI systems for transparency, effectiveness, and vulnerabilities. It's true that explainability and unpredictability are big issues with advanced AI. Elon Musk's xAI, which recently scored a large-scale contract with the DOD, recently struggled to stop its Grok chatbot from spouting pro-Hitler takes — so what happens in a higher-stakes situation? But the government seems unwilling to slow down while this problem is addressed. The plan states that since 'AI has the potential to transform both the warfighting and back-office operations of the DOD,' the US 'must aggressively adopt AI within its Armed Forces if it is to maintain its global military preeminence.' The plan also discusses how to better evaluate AI models for performance and reliability, like publishing guidelines for federal agencies to conduct their own AI system evaluations for compliance and other reasons. That's something most industry leaders and activists support greatly, but it's clear what the Trump administration has in mind will lack a lot of the elements they have been pushing for. Evaluations likely will focus on efficiency and operations, according to the plan, and not instances of racism, sexism, bias, and downstream harms. Courtrooms and AI tools mix in strange ways, from lawyers using hallucinated legal citations to an AI-generated appearance of a deceased victim. The plan says that 'AI-generated media' like fake evidence 'may present novel challenges to the legal system,' and it briefly recommends the Department of Justice and other agencies issue guidance on how to evaluate and deal with deepfakes in federal evidence rules. Finally, the plan recommends creating new ways for the research and academic community to access AI models and compute. The way the industry works right now, many companies, and even academic institutions, can't access or pay for the amount of compute they need on their own, and they often have to partner with hyperscalers — providers of large-scale cloud computing infrastructure, like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft — to access it. The plan wants to fix that issue, saying that the US 'has solved this problem before with other goods through financial markets, such as spot and forward markets for commodities.' It recommends collaborating with the private sector, as well as government departments and the National Science Foundation's National AI Research Resource pilot to 'accelerate the maturation of a healthy financial market for compute.' It didn't offer any specifics or additional plans for that. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Lauren Feiner Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Justine Calma Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Hayden Field Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Adi Robertson Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Regulation
Wall Street Journal
2 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Why It Actually Makes Sense to Pay $40 for an Omelet—Occasionally
Cascades of moonlit bougainvillea tumble from the columns of the Main Conservatory at Longwood Gardens in Kennett Square, Penn. At 1906, the newly reimagined 250-seat restaurant on the lower level, guests in their finery gather under barreled ceilings for chef George Murkowicz's haute-American cuisine. It's the sort of place you go to celebrate an anniversary. There's blue oyster mushroom with sweet corn agnolotti, Rohan duck breast with smoked black raspberry, a bone-in rib-eye and…an omelet?
