These Speed Cameras Are Sending People Notices in the Mail, But They're Not Tickets
Speeding is a real problem, and jurisdictions around the country have taken different tactics in their attempts to curb it. Many have installed those digital signs and big boards to broadcast your speed to fellow drivers, to shame you. Others are using speed cameras, causing those unaware to quietly rack up serious fines. And then there's that town near me that painted squiggly lines down a residential road before ultimately removing them a month later. There's no right answer, which brings us to the Washington Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) pilot program. It's using cameras, but not in the way you'd expect.
Since the beginning of April, pairs of speed cameras have been installed in two locations associated with serious and fatal high-speed crashes in the state of Washington: 'One on I-5 southbound between Bow Hill Road and Cook Road in Skagit County, and one on I-90 eastbound by Liberty Lake outside of Spokane,' per The Bellingham Herald . They measure speed and snap a photo of the offending vehicle, and WSDOT sends a notice of the infraction to the proper residence. Only, these notices aren't tickets with fines—they're reminders to slow down.
Roughly 8,300 drivers have received such 'courtesy notices' in the mail since the program began nearly two months ago, the publication reported this week. This study is set to run only through June, at which point the department will determine whether these cameras will stay up. As it stands, there are no plans to build additional camera zones or start using the I-5 and I-90 ones to issue real tickets. The speed cameras hanging above I-5 in Skagit County. WSDOT
In a single month, the program tracked 47 drivers traveling at 100 mph or above on both highways, WSDOT said earlier in May. The mail notice doesn't appear to show the vehicle's exact speed at the time it was recorded, but it does include a list of fines for each tier over the limit. It starts with 6-10 mph over, resulting in a $135 fine, all the way up to a $432 fine for traveling more than 40 over.
Will it work? I'm skeptical. If the goal of this exercise is to collect data, then I'm sure it'll at least serve that purpose. If it's to send 'reminders' to speeders in the hopes of discouraging them from speeding, that seems like a doubtful outcome. Speeders already have reminders—they're called speed limits, and they make a conscious decision to ignore them. And I'm not trying to shame everyone who's ever received a ticket; lord knows I've had my share. But if you have any common sense, you know that every road has its limit, and getting caught exceeding it is probably expensive. That's the risk you take when you speed, and hopefully, you do it as safely as possible.
I suppose the letter does at least communicate that authorities are watching, and they may even start charging for infractions on those particularly dangerous stretches of road, which could result in the desired chilling effect. We won't know if any of this actually influenced the behavior of Washington drivers until the program is over, and WSDOT pores over the data. In the meantime, has your town ever tried anything like this speed camera warning-by-mail experiment? And what, if anything, happened next?
Got tips? Send 'em to tips@thedrive.com
Adam Ismail is the News Editor at The Drive, coordinating the site's slate of daily stories as well as reporting his own and contributing the occasional car or racing game review. He lives in the suburbs outside Philly, where there's ample road for his hot hatch to stretch its legs, and ample space in his condo for his dusty retro game consoles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
13 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Ford's Recall Affects Almost Every Cool Car They Make, and There's No Fix Yet
If you've recently bought one of Ford's best-selling vehicles, like the wildly popular Bronco, the workhorse F-150, or the family-hauling Explorer, the company has some unsettling news for you. Ford is recalling a staggering 850,318 of its most iconic models worldwide, including 844,098 in the U.S. alone, from the 2021-2023 model years due to a defect that can cause the engine to suddenly stall while driving. But the real kicker in this massive safety recall isn't just the danger of your engine cutting out on the highway. It's that Ford has admitted it doesn't have a solution yet, and has ordered its dealers to immediately stop selling or even demonstrating the affected vehicles. 'The remedy is under development,' the company plainly states in several documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). According to an urgent 'DELIVERY HOLD' notice sent on July 8 to all U.S. dealers, the problem lies with a faulty low-pressure fuel pump that can fail unexpectedly. The consequence is blunt and dangerous: 'An engine stall while driving increases the risk of a crash.' The notice warns dealers they could face civil penalties of up to $27,168 per vehicle if they deliver an unremedied car. The list of affected vehicles, now frozen on dealership lots, reads like a who's who of Ford's modern lineup: For current owners, the new documents provide critical information about what to watch for. Ford says that before a total failure, a driver might experience poor engine performance (like misfiring or running rough), a check engine light, or a sudden reduction in engine power. The failure is reportedly more likely to occur in 'warm weather' or when the vehicle has a low level of fuel. For the nearly one million owners of these vehicles, the path forward is frustratingly unclear. Ford plans to send out initial notification letters to owners around July 14, 2025, to inform them of the safety risk. However, a second letter will have to be sent once an actual fix is engineered and available. This leaves hundreds of thousands of drivers in a state of limbo, aware that their vehicle has a potentially critical flaw but with no immediate action to take. This recall represents a significant blow to the automaker, highlighting a critical failure in a component used across its most profitable and popular vehicles. For now, concerned owners can contact Ford's customer service at 1-866-436-7332 or visit the NHTSA website for updates, but the only real answer they're looking for—how to fix it—is one Ford can't yet provide.
Forbes
17 hours ago
- Forbes
24M Technologies Could Make Electric Vehicle Battery Fires Less Likely
Electric vehicle fires are less likely, but they can happen in more dangerous places like garages. The media war against electric vehicles goes through phases, with different attack strategies coming to the fore and others receding. But one fear that continually enflames enragement is the possibility of EV battery fires. Despite the statistics showing that these are far less likely to happen than with cars powered by fossil fuel, they do tend to last longer and are harder for firemen to extinguish. But 24M Technologies reckons it can significantly reduce the incidence of EV battery fires. I talked to the company's CEO Naoki Ota and President Ulrik Grape about how their technologies could improve battery safety, as well as delivering better performance and recyclability. Battling EV Fire Disinformation With 24M Technologies There is a lot of disinformation about EV battery fires, or at least misleading framing. One British publication noted that in the UK electric car fires had grown from 131 in 2022 to 232 in 2024 – a rise of 77%. However, the number of EVs on British roads had risen from 664,148 in 2022 to 1.3 million in 2024 – a 96% increase. So overall EVs have become safer. There were 18,313 fossil fuel vehicle fires in the UK in the UK in 2024, 79x more than EVs fires, but there were only 26x more fossil fuel cars, so combustion cars were nearly three times as likely to catch fire. Nevertheless, any vehicle fires are problematic. Just one incident can endanger life and necessitate an expensive manufacturer recall even if nobody got hurt. 'EVs are safe, but there are incidents happening, and as you get more and more vehicles on the road, there's going to be more and more fires,' says Grape. 'In today's social media, it's going to get escalated. EV fires are much less frequent than combustion engine vehicle fires, but they are more volatile. They also tend to happen when you're charging the vehicle, so then you have a risk to garages and being close to your home.' Dendrite formation is the big danger for battery fires as cells age This is where the design of the cell becomes important. 'The more cycles a battery has, the more dendrites grow, and the more likely it is to be dangerous,' says Ota. This is like combustion engines, which are also more likely to catch fire when older. 'EVs have been around less time, with even the oldest just ten years old. But people drive cars for 15 or 20 years. Also, as you put more energy density in a battery, it becomes more dangerous.' However, more manufacturers are switching from Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) battery chemistry to Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), which is already safer due to lower susceptibility to thermal runaway. BYD, for example, exclusively uses this technology. However, the safety still decreases as energy density increases, and the roadmap is steep particularly from Chinese companies. The classic demonstration of LFP battery safety involves driving a nail through a pack, which can cause immediate conflagration with NMC batteries, but this is less likely with LFP. However, 24M doesn't see this as a realistic scenario. 'This doesn't represent a real internal short circuit,' says Ota. 'An internal short circuit is a very narrow area than a thick nail, producing a much higher temperature.' Enter Impervio: 24M Technologies' Battery Safety Superhero The technology 24M offers to combat this is called Impervio. 'Impervio is a three-layer separator,' says Ota. The separator is the membrane between the anode and cathode, which allows lithium ions to pass through but prevents a short circuit. The short circuit problem comes when dendrites form from the anode side. If they reach the cathode, they cause an internal short circuit that can lead to a battery fire. Impervio's third layer actively blocks dendrite formation and detects potential short circuits so they can be dealt with before they become dangerous, via cell replacement. 'When a dendrite reaches the impervious layer, it doesn't grow vertically from anode to cathode. It grows horizontally and in the end is dissolved, so it never gets to the cathode. This doesn't add a lot of cost. We can utilize the existing separator. It's like ceramic coating.' The extra middle layer of Impervio prevents dendrites growing from the anode to the cathode Just a few car fires can cause a company to recall all potentially affected vehicles, costing billions, because they can't detect which cars will fail. Ota likens Impervio to an airbag – you might never have to use it, but it's worth having just in case. 'When an internal short circuit happens, it goes in milliseconds,' says Grape. 'Once it starts, you can't stop it from the outside. The only other method being tried is containment, packaging something around the cell. The uniqueness of the Impervio separator is that it can tell you this cell has to be shut down because it's approaching a dangerous level. Back in the 60s, the seatbelt was introduced that made car passengers safe. Then we added the airbag to make them even safer. That is the message with Impervio. We're getting to such a high energy density in the cells that there are risks of contaminations. Impervio provides protection that allows you to do more targeted recalls versus all the cars of a particular model.' Portfolio Of 24M Technologies For Batteries In 2010, 24M Technologies was spun off from MIT by its founder, professor Yet-Min Chang. The lithium-ion flow battery was his original technology. Kyocera has been a strategic investment partner for five years, helping this to develop into a SemiSolid battery cell. Since then, Volkswagen took a 25% stake in 24M Technologies in 2022, leading to the development of more new technologies such as Impervio, addressing areas of energy density, low temperature performance, rapid charging, recyclability and safety. One technology is called ETOP, standing for Electrode to Pack. This bypasses the traditional cell-to-module-to-pack assembly. Instead, the pack is built from the electrodes directly. This provides a significant increase in energy density and goes further than the cell-to-pack systems being developed by Tesla, BYD and CATL. 'We're taking it one step further by making a unit cell, which is basically two or three electrodes, so the anode and the cathode are packaged in a unique way, and then we can build the pack from there,' says Grape. 'We eliminate the module stage.' This increases packaging efficiency from 60% to 70-80%. 'You can either pack more energy into the same volume or make a smaller pack that contains the same driving range.' Eternalyte makes lithium ion flow 4x faster at -10C Another 24M technology is called Eternalyte, which is a new electrolyte that improves battery performance. Using Eternalyte, Lithium ions in a battery can move twice as fast at room temperature and four times as fast at -10C, dramatically improving battery charging times and enabling six-minute recharging from zero to 80%. 'Zero to 60% would probably take two to three minutes,' says Ota. 'If the car can drive 600 kilometers, within two minutes you can add 360 kilometers, so it's very close to gasoline.' Eternalyte also remains liquid at -40C, unlike traditional electrolytes, so poor cold weather EV performance and range would be a thing of the past too. Lithium Forever is a little different. This is about the end of life for batteries and their recycling, particularly LFP, which can be so cheap to manufacture that recycling them isn't cost effective. 'Traditional recycling takes the old battery and melts it or uses chemicals to create a big 'black mass'', says Ota. 'Then they try to extract expensive metal only. Iron is a cheap material, and they don't want to even extract aluminum.' This is why LFP batteries are less likely to be recycled. Many batteries are too cheap to manufacture for recycling to be cost effective 'They only recycle 10 to 20% at the moment,' says Grape. 'That's why we need to think of avoiding the black mass process.' Batteries must be designed with recycling in mind so their component elements can be separated again. No polymer binder is used with Lithium Forever, enabling over 90% of materials, including active substances from the anode and cathode, to be recovered without the costly and energy-intensive black mass process. This makes LFP economically viable to recycle, too, and the materials recovered pure enough for reuse in new batteries. The process can reduce active material recovery costs from $20-30 per kg to $2-3. 'Now we can recycle very pure copper and aluminum,' adds Ota. The 24M Technologies SemiSolid batteries are already being manufactured by Kyocera, currently aimed at its Enerezza residential storage system. Kyocera has also commercialized Lithium Forever. There are 24M partnerships in China and India. Some big names that Ota and Grape couldn't mention are testing Impervio and Eternalyte. The 24M Technologies' systems have potential to improve the experience of battery electric vehicle ownership in many areas, but Impervio is the one that is likely to help combat public perception of BEVs and the ongoing misinformation. 'LG and Samsung had big recalls,' says Ota. 'If they used Impervio, they wouldn't have had to recall because they could just replace the failed cell. They could save lots of money.' If battery fires almost never happened, this would also mean one less argument for the anti-BEV media war.
Washington Post
18 hours ago
- Washington Post
Delivery apps broke our streets. New tech might fix it.
Double-parked DoorDashers. Loading trucks blocking bike lanes. Mopeds zipping through traffic. Some of the biggest stressors on city streets have a single source — everyone is getting things delivered all the time. Now D.C. is following other cities in trying to introduce some sanity to a system that exploded during the pandemic and continues to grow. The ideas involve a mix of charging for curb space and encouraging the use of smaller and safer vehicles.
