John Wick spin-off Ballerina sees Ana de Armas take up Keanu Reeves' search for revenge
Having finally laid its haggard hero to rest in 2023's John Wick: Chapter 4 (at least until John Wick 5 presumably picks up in hell), the franchise has now spun off into a new revenge saga led by Ana de Armas's fresh-faced assassin, Eve Macarro.
What: A John Wick spin-off featuring a young ballerina-assassin on a quest for revenge
Directed by: Len Wiseman
Starring: Ana de Armas, Anjelica Huston, Norman Reedus, Keanu Reeves
Where: In cinemas now
Likely to make you feel: Modestly thrilled
Ballerina is a film that should've come out last decade — and not just because its bisexual lighting and trite "fight like a girl" sloganeering feels more at home in 2016.
Alongside the series' four entries, its tidal wave of imitators (the best being Atomic Blonde, Nobody and Monkey Man) have already served up countless different flavours of Wick, often recapturing the same fluid style (if not the virtuosic choreography) of its genre-redefining action scenes.
The idea of a female ballerina assassin has also become an oddly specific trope in recent years, featuring in films like The Villainess, Red Sparrow and Black Widow. (Confusingly, the Wick-inspired Netflix movie Ballerina bucked this trend, with the lead being a former bodyguard.)
In fairness, the first John Wick was itself a grab-bag of genre conventions and borrowed archetypes — but it was nonetheless a clean slate. Rather than thread a new path through the assassin underworld of The High Table, Ballerina tunnels deeper into its laborious mythology — to disjointed ends.
Eve's tragic backstory is quickly dispatched. As the young daughter of a renegade assassin, she witnesses the execution of her father at the hands of his former tribe, though not before shooting one of the assailants dead.
Like Wick before her, she's taken in by the Ruska Roma, a formidable crime syndicate presided over by Anjelica Huston's cigar-chomping Director (previously seen in John Wick: Chapter 3 — Parabellum), who sees in the traumatised orphan the makings of a stone-cold contract killer.
The film's prolonged opening stretch traces her years-long training in the cutthroat world of ballet (the front-facing business of the organisation), as well as the comparatively tame art of assassination. There's a brief, entirely perfunctory cameo from Wick, mostly to sync up Ballerina's timeline with his third outing, and to confirm Keanu Reeves' stamp of approval.
Eve's graduation ceremony takes the form of one of the series' recurring delights: a shoot-out at an ultra-exclusive club, this one a sub-zero fortress that could easily double as a Mr Freeze hideout.
As soon as the EDM kicks in (this time a Vivaldi remix, to class things up) and the firearm acrobatics start — with Eve gracefully launching herself onto henchmen and making judicious use of a decorative pick-axe — any misgivings begin to wane.
The film finally begins when the emerging assassin catches wind of the cult that ensnared her dad — and her professional duties take a back seat to her own personal vendetta.
Four years ago, de Armas shook up the staid thrills of Daniel Craig's Bond era as a glamorous CIA agent with a deadly high kick in No Time to Die — a performance that even sparked her own Bond casting rumours.
As Eve, however, much of her charisma is strangely toned down. The film initially suggests a new type of hero: a fledgling killer in opposition to Wick's feared legend. But it then writes its lead as both inexperienced and jaded, and primarily defines her by her tragic backstory.
For a franchise that's leaned heavily on its distinct characters and adroit casting — Halle Berry and Rina Sawayama instantly shone on screen in past instalments — there's little for de Armas, nor any other cast member, to work with.
Both Gabriel Byrne (Miller's Crossing) and Norman Reedus (The Walking Dead) are visibly phoning it in as a fatalistic mastermind and another errant cult member, respectively.
At least de Armas acquits herself well with the complex set-pieces, offering a more elegant physicality than Reeves.
The action feels much closer to the lower stakes of the first film than the epic high-concept showdowns of its sequels, but director Len Wiseman (the Underworld series) still faithfully replicates the series' tight rhythms. He finds unpredictable, often comic ways to escalate close-quarters scuffles, and knows when to embellish a fight with cartoonish splatter.
As always, the creative weaponry offers no shortage of novelty. Drink glasses in the John Wick films solely exist to be smashed over faces. Ice skates slit necks in a pinch. Claymores? Say less.
By the time Eve discovers an alpine village populated entirely by assassins (children included) and becomes embroiled in a flamethrower duel, the film never lets up as a rollicking good time.
Ballerina was first announced eight years ago, and its creative difficulties, exemplified by its extensive reshoots, are all too apparent. The prior films always had a built-in cheat by making a point of Wick's Sisyphean quest to escape the criminal world, allowing the character to more-or-less end up where each sequel began.
But should the cinematic universe of John Wick continue to expand — and de Armas truly does deserve to lead her own action series — it needs new ideas, fast.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Lucille Ball's daughter reignites controversy surrounding the star's biopic starring Nicole Kidman
Everybody loves Lucy. Aaron Sorkin's 2021 film about Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz, not so much. Speaking at a Hollywood event earlier in June, the couple's daughter Lucie Arnaz reignited controversy about Sorkin's award-winning biopic Being The Ricardos, labelling some scenes as 'a crock of poop.' The 73-year-old complained Sorkin misrepresented her mother's relationship with her I Love Lucy writing team, and wrongly inflated tensions between Ball's co-stars Vivian Vance and William Frawley. Set during a tense week of rehearsals for their famous show – when Ball was strained by Communist rumours and fears Arnaz was cheating – Being The Ricardos (now streaming on Tubi) explores the couple's tumultuous partnership. Premiering in 1951, I Love Lucy transformed Ball from B-list movie actor to comedy legend. And yet Ball always insisted she wasn't naturally funny. Crediting her writing team for her famous scatterbrain schtick, Ball told Rolling Stone in 1983: 'What I am is brave. I have never been scared. And there was a lot to be scared about. We were innovators.' Always a shrewd businesswoman, Ball had to fight nervous network executives to have Arnaz cast as Ricky, and later include her real-life pregnancy in the show. Far from being a turn-off, more than 44 million viewers tuned in to watch the fictional Lucy and Ricky welcome their first child (in reality it was the couple's second, having already welcomed daughter Lucie two years earlier). That episode also became Ball's happiest moment on the show. 'Because I was really having a baby [son Desi Arnaz Jr] and it was my last show before I had the baby, so it was real and it was the most exciting thing in my life,' Ball told Entertainment Tonight in 1984, five years before her death. These events are detailed in Being The Ricardos, with Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem starring as the famously bickering couple. Despite being an executive producer on the Amazon Prime biopic, Lucie complained that Sorkin dismissed her concerns about factual inaccuracies in his script, telling her: 'Well, what do you know? You were 15 months old.' 'You can't talk to Aaron. He's Aaron Sorkin,' Lucie said. 'I tried to work on it and correct the incorrect parts, especially [my mother's] relationship with the writers. '[It was] totally wrong. She adored those people. They got along so well; none of that backstabbing, crazy, insulting stuff.' Despite reservations about the script, Lucie has always been glowing in her praise of Kidman and Bardem (who each gained Oscar nods for their performances), who initially faced criticism for their casting. Some questioned why the Spanish actor had been cast to play the Cuban bandleader, prompting Bardem to argue that nobody had complained when American actor Meryl Streep played British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, or Marlon Brando – an American with no Italian heritage – transformed into The Godfather's Vito Corleone. 'But me, with my Spanish accent, being Cuban? What I mean is, if we want to open that can of worms, let's open it for everyone … we should all start not allowing anybody to play Hamlet unless they were born in Denmark,' an exasperated Bardem told The Hollywood Reporter. There was also backlash against Kidman because she isn't typically a comedic actress. 'There seems to be a lot of discussion about Nicole Kidman [and people saying] it should be Debra Messing … I don't know, but here's the deal and what you should understand: We're not doing a remake of I Love Lucy,' Lucie posted on Facebook ahead of the film's release. 'No one has to impersonate Lucy Ricardo [or do] any of the silly things. It's the story of Lucille Ball, my actual mother – not Lucy Ricardo – and her husband, Desi Arnaz, my dad – not Ricky Ricardo.' The fuss knocked Kidman's confidence. And, during an appearance on Live With Kelly And Ryan, she confessed: 'When the reality of playing her hit me, I went, 'What I have said yes to?' To which I then went, 'Oh no, I'm not right. Everyone thinks I'm not right, so I'm going to try to sidestep this.'' To nail the role, Kidman watched re-runs, took dialect lessons and worked with a movement coach to capture Ball's physicality, particularly when recreating the famous I Love Lucy grape squashing scene. In conversation with Chris Rock for Variety, Kidman admitted Ball was a tough act for anyone to follow, and that she was 'way out of my comfort zone'. 'She's Mount Everest. Just one of the most talented people to ever roam the earth.' Rock agrees. 'She could learn anything in a weekend. So, they would, like, write something on the show where she plays the tuba, and she would go, 'I can't play the tuba. Give me two days.' But mostly, Kidman told the comedian, the toughest part of the gig was unleashing her own silly side. 'I'd like to be funny,' she said. 'I'm never cast funny.' Celebrate Lucille Ball's incredible legacy with these shows, streaming now on Tubi. The Lucy Show: In this follow-up to I Love Lucy (after Ball's divorce from Arnaz), the red-haired star plays a widow who goes to live with her divorced pal, Vivian. Funny World Of Lucy: Broken into two chapters – the early and later years – this documentary is a deep-dive into Ball's life and career.

News.com.au
7 hours ago
- News.com.au
Kate Hudson confesses she nearly sought emancipation from famous mum Goldie Hawn
Kate Hudson considered being emancipated from her parents, Goldie Hawn and Bill Hudson, to better her Hollywood career. At the Newport Beach TV Fest, Hudson revealed she was offered a small part in an unnamed project and almost 'divorced' her parents before landing her breakout role in Party of Five. 'I had gotten this part that they wanted me to basically divorce my parents so that I could work as an adult. My mum was like, 'No, never happening,' but then I got the Party of Five and it was so great,' Hudson said during The Hollywood Reporter's Awards Chatter podcast panel. The teen drama series aired in 1994 and followed the Salinger siblings after their parents died in a car crash, leaving the oldest brother Charlie, played by Matthew Fox, to be their caretaker. Hudson was a guest star during the second season as the character Cory. 'I was 16 and obsessed with P arty of Five, so walking onto that set was like, I couldn't believe that I was going to have a guest role on it, a day player role,' she said. 'I was like, oh. It was so fun.' Hudson did not become emancipated from her parents, but has since become estranged from her father. Hawn and Bill divorced in 1982, and she began dating Kurt Russell shortly after that. Russell was a vital part of Kate's upbringing. During the event, Hudson revealed that she turned down an opportunity to star in one of Russell's films because she didn't want to be 'defined' by her parents. Hawn addressed her daughter's struggles at the beginning of her career. Last year, the actress was a guest on Kelly Ripa's Let's Talk Off Camera podcast and recalled Hudson complaining about her parents being the focus of all her interviews. 'I told her, 'The truth of the matter is we have to embrace each other. I mean, yes, you're gonna talk about me, and one day I'm going to talk about you. And I'm gonna be Katie's mother, and that could be pretty cool,'' she told Ripa. Hawn and Hudson have maintained a close relationship over the years. In February, Hudson told the Los Angeles Times, 'I live seven blocks from my mum now, and she comes over every day.'

News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Absurd': Prince William ‘won't let Prince Harry's kids become working royals'
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's two young children won't have royal roles once Prince William becomes king. The claim is being made by several royal experts who noted that the Prince of Wales has been preparing for his future role as monarch while supporting his father, King Charles, who has cancer. 'It's utterly absurd for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to believe their children might one day choose to become working royals,' Kinsey Schofield, host of the To Di for Daily podcast, told Fox News Digital. 'That kind of entitlement isn't just wishful thinking — it borders on delusion,' she claimed. 'These are American children who've been raised oceans away from the monarchy, with no exposure to the customs, culture, or continuity that define royal life.' 'Harry closed that door himself the moment he boarded Tyler Perry's private jet and handed over his life story to a ghostwriter for Spare,' Schofield added. Schofield's statements came shortly after it was suggested in recent reports that Harry, 40, wanted to keep HRH titles for his children – or His and Her Royal Highness – so that they can decide for themselves whether they want to be working royals when they grow up. However, The Times U.K. reported that 'under the next reign, roles for Archie and Lili as working royals are unlikely.' Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, are raising their children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4, in California. Fox News Digital reached out to Kensington Palace and Archewell, which handles the offices for the duke and duchess, for comment. 'Prince William will not be thinking of giving the Sussex children formal future royal roles — ludicrous!' British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard told Fox News Digital. 'The children are being raised in America and, as I understand, do not have any understanding of the British royal family,' she explained. 'They will not have received the guidance to fit into royal life and royal expectations should not even be a thought … And why would Harry and Meghan want this for their children anyway? They stepped down as working royals, painted the British royal family in the most aberrant light, and ran as far away from them as possible!' Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that Harry and William are not on speaking terms. Their relationship deteriorated following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's decision to step back as senior royals in 2020 and move to California. Since their royal exit, the couple has aired their grievances in interviews and documentaries. Harry's explosive 2023 memoir 'Spare,' featuring embarrassing details about the House of Windsor, only made things worse. In May, Harry told the BBC that he wanted to reconcile with his family but his father, 76, wouldn't speak to him. According to The Times, Harry's pleas 'did little to thaw the family freeze.' Sources told the outlet that William's attitude towards his brother had shifted significantly – to 'indifference.' 'Where he once raged at his brother's outbursts — after the publication of Spare, a friend told me that though he was determined not to publicly respond even though 'inside he's burning' — the anger has subsided to indifference,' wrote royal editor Roya Nikkhah. 'A friend tells me: 'What has struck me the most recently is that he just doesn't mention it at all. It used to be that the family stuff was taking up a lot of space in his head, it was a very close relationship and he was very upset. But he's not letting it get to him at all anymore. It is a change. It's sad, but it's a much healthier space for him to be at,'' she shared.