Osprey came back from the brink once. Now chicks are dying in nests, and some blame overfishing
'The birds never laid here this year,' said Watts, near the mouth of Virginia's Chesapeake Bay. 'And that's a pattern we've been seeing these last couple of years.'
Watts has a more intimate relationship with ospreys than most people have with a bird — he has climbed to their nests to free them from plastic bags, fed them by hand and monitored their eggs with telescopic mirrors.
The fish-eating raptor known for gymnastic dives and whistle-like chirps is an American conservation success story. After pesticides and other hazards nearly eliminated the species from much of the country, the hawk-like bird rebounded after the banning of DDT in 1972 and now numbers in the thousands in the U.S.
But Watts has documented an alarming trend. The birds, which breed in many parts of the U.S., are failing to successfully fledge enough chicks around their key population center of the Chesapeake Bay. The longtime biologist blames the decline of menhaden, a small schooling fish critical to the osprey diet. Without menhaden to eat, chicks are starving and dying in nests, Watts said.
Osprey are an environmental indicator
Watts's claim has put him and environmental groups at odds with the fishing industry, trade unions and sometimes government regulators. Menhaden is valuable for fish oil, fish meal and agricultural food as well as bait.
U.S. fishermen have caught at least 1.1 billion pounds of menhaden every year since 1951. Members of the industry tout its sustainability and said the decline in osprey may have nothing to do with fishing.
But without help, the osprey population could tumble to levels not seen since the dark days of DDT, said Watts, director of the Center for Conservation Biology at The College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia.
'The osprey are yelling pretty loudly that, hey, there's not enough menhaden for us to reproduce successfully,' Watts said. 'And we should be listening to them to be more informed fully on the fisheries side, and we should take precaution on the fisheries management side. But that hasn't won the day at this point.'
Decline linked to menhaden in studies
Watts, who has studied osprey on the Chesapeake for decades, has backed his claims of population decline by publishing studies in scientific journals. He said it boils down to a simple statistic — to maintain population, osprey pairs need to average 1.15 chicks per year.
Osprey were reproducing at that level in the 1980s, but today in some areas around the main stem of the Chesapeake, it's less than half of that, Watts said. In particularly distressed areas, they aren't even reproducing at one-tenth that level, he said. And the decline in available menhaden matches the areas of nesting failure, Watts said.
Also called pogies or bunkers, the oily menhaden are especially important for young birds because they are more nutritious than other fish in the sea. Osprey 'reproductive performance is inextricably linked to the availability and abundance' of menhaden, Watts wrote in a 2023 study published in Frontiers in Marine Science.
Conservationists have been concerned for years, saying too many menhaden have been removed to maintain their crucial role in the ocean food chain. Historian H. Bruce Franklin went so far as to title his 2007 book on menhaden 'The Most Important Fish In The Sea.'
Fishing industry pushes back
Menhaden help sustain one of the world's largest fisheries, worth more than $200 million at the docks in 2023. Used as bait, the fish are critical for valuable commercial targets such as Maine lobster. They're also beloved by sportfishermen.
The modern industry is dominated by Omega Protein, a Reedville, Virginia, company that is a subsidiary of Canadian aquaculture giant Cooke. The company pushed back at the idea that fishing is the cause of osprey decline, although it did acknowledge that fewer menhaden are showing up in some parts of the bay.
Federal data show osprey breeding is in decline in many parts of the country, including where menhaden is not harvested at all, said Ben Landry, an Omega spokesperson. Climate change, pollution and development could be playing a role, said Landry and others with the company.
Blaming fishing 'just reeks of environmental special interest groups having an influence over the process,' Landry said.
New rules could be on the way
The menhaden fishery is managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, an interstate body that crafts rules and sets fishing quotas. Prompted by questions about ospreys, it created a work group to address precautionary management of the species in the Chesapeake Bay.
In April, this group proposed several potential management approaches, including seasonal closures, restrictions on quotas or days at sea, and limitations on kinds of fishing gear. The process of creating new rules could begin this summer, said James Boyle, fishery management plan coordinator with the commission.
The osprey population has indeed shown declines in some areas since 2012, but it's important to remember the bird's population is much larger than it was before DDT was banned, Boyle said.
'There are big increases in osprey population since the DDT era,' Boyle said, citing federal data showing a six-fold increase in osprey populations along the Atlantic Coast since the 1960s.
Environmentalists says bird's decline could worsen
To a number of environmental groups, any decline is too much. This irritates some labor leaders who worry about losing more jobs as the fishing industry declines.
Kenny Pinkard, retired vice president of UFCW Local 400's executive board and a longtime Virginia fishermen, said he feels the industry is being scapegoated.
'There are some people who just don't want to see us in business at all,' he said.
But Chris Moore, Virginia executive director for Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said the country risks losing an iconic bird if no action is taken. He said Watts's studies show that the osprey will fail without access to menhaden.
'Osprey have been a success story,' Moore said. 'We're in a situation where they're not replacing their numbers. We'll actually be in a situation where we're in a steep decline.'
___
Whittle reported from Portland, Maine.
___ This story was supported by funding from the Walton Family Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
'Tweaking Your Resume: What Absurd Thing To Do.
The concept of employment and job interviews. Young woman during job interview, main focus on CV. It's the most common request I get as a career coach. I'm talking about 'tweaking' resumes. Being in the career coaching business, I deal with thousands of resumes, not to mention all other facets of career coaching, and as a hiring manager most of my career, I've read probably 10,000 resumes or more (imagine how many I received that I didn't read). With my background in mind, it should come as no surprise to you when I say (and I have said it many times) that your resume is the most important piece of communication you'll ever write. It is the way the world sees you before it meets you, the critical first impression you make, your declaration of self, the case you make for inclusion in someone else's future. It is a sacred document. So why do so many people think that something this important should be 'tweaked' rather than seriously written? 'Tweaked,' not revised? 'Tweaked,' not updated? 'Tweaked,' rather than modified? 'Tweaked' – OMG! Sorry I overused that word, but the best way to point out an absurdity is to exaggerate it. And that's exactly what I intend to do – until I make my point. I'm not done. 'Tweaking' implies a casual approach. It implies improvisation, lack of gravity, simplicity, and lack of consequence. I really don't believe anyone thinks a resume is a thing to take casually, but then everyone wants to 'tweak' their resumes. Ridiculous! Not only is 'tweaking' the wrong approach, even the word 'tweak' itself is a silly word, like 'Twitter' and 'Tweet,' but don't get me started on that. That's for another day soon. I promise. To further emphasize the absurdity of 'tweaking' let me ask: Did Michelangelo 'tweak' David? I doubt it. Did Leonardo 'tweak' the Mona Lisa? Not a chance. Did Jefferson 'tweak' the Declaration of Independence? Ha! These questions are relevant. Writing, you see, is an art, and what you write can have anywhere from no effect to high impact – just like the examples above. It's not for nothing that I do a whole unit in my communication class on revision alone. It's a serious, disciplined effort. It's not 'tweaking.' Let's take the Declaration of Independence, for example. The second paragraph begins with the immortal sentence, 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.' Most of us know this by heart since childhood. But what you may not know is that Jefferson, unanimously chosen by his peers to write the Declaration despite being only 33 years old, actually wrote something different. 'We hold these truths to be sacred,' he began. But sitting on what amounted to the editorial review board was wise old Benjamin Franklin, more than twice Jefferson's age at the time. Old Ben suggested to young Thom, 'If we say sacred, that is arguable. If we say self-evident, we shall make the King look the fool he is.' The rest is history. The point is that Franklin didn't send Jefferson's draft back to him with a suggestion to 'tweak' it, for God sake. Although the change he suggested was only one word, we see deep reflection, we see concentration on the effect of just one word, we see a major reconstruction in one word, and we see the result of just one word. It was not 'tweaked Your resume is much too important to 'tweak.' It is your declaration, and even the smallest of revisions is major. The slightest change in one word, let alone bigger changes, can make all the difference in the world. You need to take your resume more seriously than thinking of it as something to be 'tweaked' on a whim or a fancy. Even the placement of one word – and the variations of emphasis on that word – can create influence on the reader. Imagine, if you will, the question, 'What are you doing?' Now, repeat the question aloud four times, each time emphasizing a different word in the question, like this: 'WHAT are you doing?' 'What ARE you doing?' 'What are YOU doing?' and 'What are you DOING?' See? You heard a different implication each time, no? The written word comes across that way, too – so thought, care, and consideration are in order – not 'tweaking.' I know I've been whipping this horse down the stretch, but that's exactly my intent. And while I'm at it (and not out of room yet, either), I'll give you one more way of looking at this. If you had a contractor doing the addition of a room or your roof or your floors, would you settle for a 'tweak' or would you be more insistent on a total job and careful workmanship? Or if you were going in for surgery, would it be OK if your doctor said, 'I think I'll just 'tweak' your coronary arteries' or if your plastic surgeon said, 'I'll just 'tweak' your face lift?' So OK, if I had to get a little absurd to make the point, then so be it. But I hope you get the point. No more 'tweaking' resumes.


CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
10 rescued after boat crashes into jetty in Avalon, New Jersey, beach patrol says
Ten people are OK after a boat they were on crashed into a jetty in Avalon, New Jersey, Wednesday morning, officials said. The boat's motor died, causing the sailboat to crash into the 8th Street jetty around 11 a.m., Avalon Beach Patrol said. Avalon Beach Patrol rescued the people, and they were taken to Avalon Yacht Club.


Washington Post
39 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Can a parking ticket from a vacation abroad follow you home?
We and our third-party partners process personal data including through the use of cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to provide, analyze, and improve our services; personalize your experience (including content); and personalize ads on and off the services. Learn more and manage your preferences at our Privacy Policy