
WestJet suspends, reduces flights between Winnipeg and three U.S. cities
The flights between Winnipeg and Los Angeles will be suspended beginning June 1, while flights between Winnipeg and Las Vegas will be suspended as of July, Winnipeg Airports Authority spokesperson Kerilee Falloon confirmed Thursday.
The frequency of flights between Winnipeg and Atlanta will be reduced from five per week to two, Falloon said.
'These shifts are part of WestJet's broader network adjustments and they are largely connected to a weaker demand for U.S. travel tied to the ongoing tariff conditions,' Falloon said by phone.
WestJet spokeswoman Jen Booth said in April that the Calgary-based company would make adjustments to its trans-border routes ahead of the summer season. It announced a new Winnipeg-to-St. John's route and increased the frequency of its flights between Winnipeg and Halifax.
Falloon said those changes are a sign WestJet is 'reinvesting in connectivity from Winnipeg, but more focused on Canadian destinations.'
The new route will also improve connectivity to Europe, through St. John's, she said.
The WAA is tracking a dip in U.S. travel, she said.
'It's a situation where the economic conditions are changing daily. We're working really closely with WestJet to monitor the situation and to look at market demand,' Falloon said.
'We haven't seen a significant decline yet, but are starting to see more of a decline now.'
It is unclear whether the Los Angeles flights will return for the winter season. The WAA is advocating for its reinstatement with WestJet's network planning team, Falloon said. The future of direct flights to Las Vegas through Winnipeg is also unclear, she said.
The province ended a subsidy fund last month for flights connecting Winnipeg to Hollywood and Atlanta. Finance Minister Adrien Sala said the fund paid out $4.8 million since it was launched by the previous Progressive Conservative government in 2022.
Manitoba's film industry was supported by the Los Angeles connection, which brought more production to Manitoba after its launch, CEO and film commissioner Lynne Skromeda said previously. Winnipeg-based HVAC manufacturer Price Industries operates a facility in Atlanta.
Winpak is another Winnipeg company with a sizable operation in Georgia, just south of Atlanta. Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport is the busiest air terminal in the world.
Former premier Heather Stefanson, who brokered the funding agreement with the WAA in 2022, now sits on WestJet Group's board of directors.
Her appointment was announced shortly after her party lost the last provincial election and she resigned as the MLA for Tuxedo.
The Free Press has reached out to WestJet for comment.
tyler.searle@freepress.mb.ca
Tyler SearleReporter
Tyler Searle is a multimedia producer who writes for the Free Press's city desk. A graduate of Red River College Polytechnic's creative communications program, he wrote for the Stonewall Teulon Tribune, Selkirk Record and Express Weekly News before joining the paper in 2022. Read more about Tyler.
Every piece of reporting Tyler produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
26 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
This woman claims Air Canada discriminated against her in a case of ‘flying while Black.' Now her human rights complaint could set a precedent
Months after a knee surgery, June Francis booked a business-class flight from Vancouver for a conference in Toronto, the first leg of a work trip that would also include the U.S. and Peru. Having waited in the 'exceptionally long line' at check-in for business passengers, the 62-year-old Jamaican Canadian said she approached the economy area and attempted to ask an Air Canada staffer for help, out of concern about standing too long on her replaced knees.


Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
How Trump could complicate Canada's 2026 World Cup hosting plans
Article content A spokesperson for the Canada Border Services Agency said the agency is working closely with federal government departments, host cities and FIFA 'in the safety and security planning for this international event.' Article content Matheson said fans — particularly those from countries that have found themselves in Trump's crosshairs — have good reasons to be worried. Article content 'I would be very concerned about planning a vacation that has you travelling from Mexico or from Canada into the United States and back. I don't think that you can guarantee that vacation of a lifetime is actually going to be there for you to actually take,' he said. Article content He said it's one thing to be denied entry, another to end up in jail and deported — potentially to a prison in El Salvador. Article content 'No one wants to go to the World Cup to watch some soccer games and then end up in jail,' he said. Article content Article content Trump's moves to impose tariffs on much of the world, including Canada, could also affect the World Cup. Article content Matheson offered the example of someone who makes jerseys for a country's team who would want to ship those jerseys across the border with the team. Article content 'Tariffs make that type of inventory management pretty challenging,' he said. Article content Tim Elcombe is a professor at Wilfrid Laurier University whose areas of expertise include sports, politics and international affairs. He said 'there was a sense that having the event in Canada, the United States and Mexico would almost be a bit of a calming of the political waters,' as the cup returned to Western countries. Article content Article content Canada is co-hosting one of world's biggest sporting events with a country whose president has instigated a trade war and threatened annexation. Canadians have cut travel to the U.S. and stopped buying American products — and it's not clear what all of that might mean for the World Cup. Article content Article content While Vancouver and Toronto will host some games, 'really this is an American-centric competition,' Elcombe said. Article content 'So how will Canadians feel about this? Will we get behind it? Will it become the event I think they were hoping it would be?' Article content In early July, labour and human rights groups, including Human Rights Watch, wrote to FIFA president Gianni Infantino to say U.S. policies under Trump pose a 'serious threat' to individuals, especially non-citizens. Article content The letter accused FIFA of ignoring 'the clear evidence of the significant deterioration of the rights climate in the United States.' Article content Elcombe said while the United States is likely to take the brunt of scrutiny, Canada is not immune. Article content 'Canada is going to have to be prepared for a very critical eye in terms of focus on some of the issues in Canada from a human rights perspective, because I think they will be exposed,' he said, citing Canada's relationship with Indigenous Peoples as one example. Article content MacIntosh Ross, a fellow at the Scott McCain and Leslie McLean Centre for Sport, Business and Health at Saint Mary's University, said Canada should put pressure on the U.S. government 'to make sure that things happen in a safe or as safe a manner as possible.' Article content 'The Canadian organizers and the Canadian government need to be very clear about their expectations for their partners in this World Cup and reiterate them and state them over and over again,' he said. Article content Elcombe noted Infantino, who has 'very much established himself as a friend and supporter of President Trump,' could be a key player in determining how the coming months unfold. Article content Article content It's difficult to predict what Trump might do, Zimbalist said. If there are political issues in the United States that he wants to distract people from, 'you can see him doing crazier and crazier things internationally to get people's minds off of what's actually happening.' Article content Article content But Trump also has shown that he cares about the World Cup and looking good as he hosts the tournament. Article content 'I think he does care about image and he does care about being on the world stage,' Zimbalist said. 'So I can see that being a significant deterrent, actually.'


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Story continues below advertisement Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. Story continues below advertisement George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Story continues below advertisement Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.