MoD in massive £7bn data breach after bungling Royal Marine accidentally sent secret email to wrong people
The email contained the details of 20,000 Afghans who were desperate to flee the Taliban after helping British forces between 2001 and 2021.
The list also included names of their individual UK sponsors including SAS and MI6 spies and at least one Royal Marine Major General.
The clumsy click has potential to be the most expensive data breach in history.
It put countless lives at risk as Afghanistan's ruthless Taliban rulers tried to hunt and kill anyone who had helped UK forces.
A number of named individuals have been killed since the leak. Others were tortured and beaten.
But sources insited it was impossible to prove conclusively whether it was a direct result of the data breach.
The epic MoD blunder was kept Top Secret for almost three years by a legal super injunction but can finally be made public today.
And the MoD only wrote to those affected to warn them today.
A source said: 'The MoD kept this secret and denied these people the chance to change their numbers, emails, locations or take any measures to protect themselves.'
The Sun understands that a serving member of UK Special Forces, who was originally a Royal Marine, accidentally emailed the database to a group of applicants who were named on the list.
An MoD source said it was 'human error and not a cyber hack or hostile state actor'.
I lived with Taliban for year secretly filming bloodthirsty terrorists' horror secrets… then orders were sent to kill me
One of the individuals later published the database online when his application was turned down.
Critics also accused the MoD of hiding the leak from the British public in bid to conceal the potential costs.
Defence Secretary John Healey is expected to say the cost of relocating the Afghans and their families will cost £400 million.
It includes £100 million in compensation for the data breach and £300 million to relocate them to Britain.
But government sources have estimated that the lifetime cost of supporting the 20,000 individuals and their families could hit £7bn.
Lawyer Adnan Malik, who represented around 1,000 victims, blasted the MoD for 'careless handling of sensitive information' which he warned had put lives at risk.
Mr Malik, from the Manchester based law firm Barings Law, added: 'This is an incredibly serious data breach, which the Ministry of Defence has repeatedly tried to hide from the British public.'
He added: 'A total of around 20,000 individuals have been affected, putting them and their loved ones at serious risk of violence from opponents and armed groups.
'Through its careless handling of such sensitive information, the Ministry of Defence has put multiple lives at risk, damaged its own reputation, and put the success of future operations in jeopardy by eroding trust in its data security measures.'
He accused the MoD of using a High Court injunction to try and keep the breach a 'national secret' in order to 'hide the failings of the MoD'.
Only around 10 to 15 per cent of the individuals on the list would have qualified for relocation under the emergency Afghan Relocation and Assistance Programme, known as ARAP, opened as Kabul fell to the Taliban.
But the leak means many more now have a valid claim for assistance and relocation.
The list included Afghans who worked hand-in-glove with Britain's special forces and intelligence services, as well as those who performed more menial tasks including such as cleaners on bases and embassies.
Mr added: 'Our claimants continue to live with the fear of reprisal against them and their families, when they should have been met with gratitude and discretion for their service.
'We would expect substantial financial payments for each claimant in any future legal action.
"While this will not fully undo the harm they have been exposed to, it will enable them to move forward and rebuild their lives.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on talking in class: the writers speaking up for oracy education are right
Two years ago, Sir Keir Starmer enthused about teaching speaking skills. So schools campaigners were understandably dismayed when oracy – otherwise known as speaking and listening – did not appear in the interim report of the curriculum review for England headed by Prof Becky Francis. Peter Hyman, the former New Labour adviser who became a headteacher, has been a key figure behind the revival, over the past decade, of an idea developed in the 1960s. Steps to embed the importance of verbal communication in education have already been taken, with more than 1,000 schools working with the charity Voice 21, and a parallel project in Scotland. The hope expressed by children's authors and others last week is that its absence from the draft report was an oversight which will soon be rectified. The task before Prof Francis's commission is a daunting one, with reformers of all kinds looking to it for solutions. An evidence call attracted 7,000 responses, with the future of special educational needs provision, and a wish to reduce exams, among key issues raised. But it should be clear to the panel, and to ministers, that oral learning also matters. One reason is the rising number of children arriving in primary school with speech and language skills below the expected level. While some pupils catch up later, others need specialist help. Communication difficulties are one reason for the increase in the number of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), which set out what such support entails. The reasons for such complex changes are not yet fully understood, although the pandemic has had an impact. The challenge of artificial intelligence, in relation to university studies as well as schools, is another factor behind a renewed emphasis on talking. Given the easy availability of technological tools to aid writing, it is arguably more important than ever that people are equipped to share ideas and knowledge through speech as well. In many European countries oral examinations are far more common, in schools as well as universities, whereas in the UK 'vivas' are mostly reserved for postgraduate studies. In foreign language learning, the importance of speaking is taken for granted. But while oracy already features in the maths and science curriculum, as well as in English, it is often marginalised. The tricky task of reformers is to alter teaching practice so that more weight is placed on verbal communication, without making this yet another assessment hurdle to be cleared. For its champions, the core of oracy education is the ability to make connections. They want young people to be able to express themselves, and point out that this is a vital life skill – for example, in job interviews and the kinds of public‑facing work that seem least likely to be taken over by machines – for which school should prepare them. Big gaps in confidence about public speaking have long been recognised among the most glaring social inequalities. This doesn't mean that everyone should aspire to be a debating champion. Different accents, personalities and ways of relating should be valued, not ironed out. But if our schools are to keep pace with our frenetically changing world, it is surely right that they should maximise the facility for language, which is part of what makes us human.
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Woman, 18, is left with life-changing injuries after 'her hair got stuck in fun fair ride'
A woman, 18, has been left with life-changing injuries after her hair got stuck in a fun fair ride. The horrifying incident happened at Netley Marsh Steam and Craft Show in the village of Netley Marsh, Hampshire, just before 11pm yesterday. It came after the woman reportedly got her hair trapped in a set of moving rollers on the floor of the Fun House ride, a witness said, according to The Standard. Nurse Emma Perry luckily happened to be on hand to help when the girl's friend rushed off the ride desperate for assistance with attending to her terrible injuries. The practitioner, 51, who works at nearby Southampton General Hospital, said the woman was bleeding, 'screaming' and 'clearly very distressed' after 'three-quarters' of her scalp had been 'ripped off', The Echo reports. This is known as a 'degloving incident', when skin and soft tissue are torn from the muscle, connective tissue or bone underneath them. The highly serious injury often causes massive blood loss and tissue death - and can be fatal. Emergency services rushed the teen to hospital, after a section of the ride had to be cut by firefighters to extract her. Event organiser Charles Cole dubbed it a 'freak accident', which is under investigation. He continued: 'Nobody wants to hurt anyone, and we are a family business. Last night was very upsetting, especially for the man who owns the ride. 'Safety is our priority, and we sympathise with the girl and her parents.' The ride was closed for the rest of the three-day fair, which ended today. But a post on the fair's Facebook page said today: 'Good morning from day three of the show. 'Despite what you may have read or seen online, we are open and look forward to seeing you all!' Nurse Ms Perry, who had been a visitor at the funfair with her 17-year-old daughter, recalled she 'cradled' the girl's head and talked to her as first responders worked. She described the incident as 'traumatic', adding: 'I stayed with her, that is all I did really. I really feel for her and her family, they are the main priority.' The nurse questioned if funfairs like this are safe in the wake of the incident and hoped the woman made a full recovery, emphasising this should never happen again. Netley Marsh Steam and Craft Show, held on Meadow Mead Farm in the New Forest, near the town of Totton, has been held annually since 1971. It offers a range of attractions, including shows of steam engines, classic cars, motorcycles, horses and commercial, farm and works vehicles. There are also steam engine models, jousting tournaments, children's entertainers, dog agility courses, falconry shows and more. Hampshire county councillor David Harrison said he is 'shocked and saddened' by the incident. The Marchwood and Totton South representative added: 'I am sure it will be properly investigated and any necessary action taken. 'My thoughts are with the injured person, family and friends.' A Hampshire Police spokesperson said: 'We were called at 10.53pm on July 26 with reports that an 18-year-old woman had sustained potentially life-changing injuries to her head while on a ride at Netley Marsh Steam and Craft Show. 'She was taken to hospital for treatment. 'Police attended and have liaised with the Health and Safety Executive.' Netley Marsh Steam and Craft Show has been approached for comment.
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
Remembering victims of historical injustice
Campaigners are right to say that the miners' strike, which saw the violent repression of strikers at Orgreave in 1984, remains an enduring source of injustice (Government launches Orgreave inquiry, 40 years after clashes at miners' strike, 20 July). And Pete Wilcox, the bishop of Sheffield, who is to chair the Orgreave inquiry, is right to recognise that the acknowledgment of truth is essential for long-term community healing. Sadly, Orgreave is not the only example of where truth and justice have been forsaken when excessive violence has been used against people on strike. Two hundred years ago, on 3 August 1825, six people were seriously wounded and seven killed by soldiers at North Sands, Sunderland, during the 1825 seamen's strike. The killings were met with anger and outrage, with many local people believing that those who died had been wilfully murdered. Soldiers had fired like target practice into a crowd of 100 from a boat on the River Wear. The threat posed by the crowd, made up of a combination of women, children, strikers, workers and bystanders, was greatly exaggerated. The only inquiries were two short inquests into just two of the seven deaths. At the time, the killings were reported in national newspapers and were undoubtedly one of the most significant events of 1825. What happened at Sunderland is not so different from that six years earlier at Peterloo, on 16 August 1819, yet knowledge and awareness of these two massacres are vastly different. The Sunderland seafarers' union, the Seamen's Loyal Standard Association, stated that 3 August 1825 should 'ever be remembered', but over time, the North Sands Massacre has been virtually forgotten. The denial of truth and justice at Orgreave is unfortunately just one of several incidents where those policing industrial action have used unnecessary violence and then placed the blame on their victims. All victims of historical injustice should be remembered and their communities allowed to David Gordon ScottThe Open University Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
