PRsM Ballistic Missiles Loaded With Coyote Drones, Hatchet Mini Smart Bombs Eyed By Army
Becky Withrow, director of strategy and business development at Lockheed Martin, talked about future payload and other aspects of the PrSM program with TWZ's Howard Altman on the floor of the annual Modern Day Marine exposition yesterday. The Army is currently in the process of fielding PrSM, but versions of the missile could also be of interest to the Marine Corps.
The Army has so far outlined plans for four incremental PrSM developments on top of the baseline Increment 1 missiles. Increment 2 is centered on the development of a new dual seeker system that enables the engagement of moving targets on land or at sea. Increment 4 is about increasing PrSM's range from just under 310 miles (500 kilometers) to 620 miles (1,000 kilometers), and Increment 5 aims to extend that reach even further. Increment 3, which the Army now envisions as coming after Increment 4, is about 'enhanced lethality.'
For Increment 3, the Army 'will put a different warhead in there,' Lockheed Martin's Withrow explained. 'They have yet to decide. It's still in the S&T [science and technology] community. So they're looking at various warhead options.'
'I know they've looked at things like Coyote, they've looked at Hatchet, things like that,' Withrow added, stressing that she was not aware of any final decision having been made.
Withrow did not specify what version of Coyote might go into a future Increment 3 PrSM. Manufacturer Raytheon has publicly shown three members of the Coyote family to date: the original electric motor-driven pusher propeller design with its pop-out wings and tails (now known as Block 1), the jet-powered Block 2 counter-drone interceptor, and the Coyote LE SR (Launched Effect, Short-Range), another jet-powered type previously known as Block 3. Block 1 and 3 Coyotes are modular in design and can be configured in multiple ways, including as loitering munitions, as well as to perform reconnaissance and surveillance, electronic warfare, and other missions.
The Army has previously released a graphic, seen below, depicting a PrSM releasing drones with some broad visual similarities to the Coyote Block 1. Earlier this year, Raytheon announced successful tests of Coyote LE SRs from a Bell 407 helicopter and a Bradley Fighting Vehicle – the latter of which TWZ was first to report on – and has described that version as being designed to be 'platform and payload-agnostic.'
Hatchet is a roughly six-pound precision glide bomb that can be fitted with a dual-mode GPS-assisted inertial navigation system (INS) and semi-active laser guidance package. Laser guidance allows for the engagement of moving targets as long as they can be lazed either by the launching platform or another offboard source. Manufacturer Northrop Grumman has said that other terminal guidance options, including electro-optical/infrared seekers with automated target recognition capability, could also be in Hatchet's future.
Northrop Grumman also claims that the advanced design of Hatchet's three-pound warhead makes it 50 to 80 percent as lethal as a 500-pound-class bomb, depending on the target type. Point-detonating, delayed, and air-bursting fuze options are available.
A single PrSM carrying a load of small precision munitions like Hatchet would give the Army the ability to strike multiple targets by launching just one missile. If the missile could release its submunitions at multiple points along its flight trajectory, it would expand the total area in which targets could be prosecuted. A group of GPS/INS-guided munitions like Hatchet could be pre-programmed to hit specific points over a wide area, but at a set distance apart in a grid, offering coverage akin to that a cluster munitions.
The functional range of any version of PrSM could be extended by loading it with powered submunitions like Coyote, which could then fly further on their target areas after release. Swarms of loitering munitions could also use their endurance hunt targets autonomously after being launched into areas where enemy forces are broadly known to exist, but their exact positions are unknown. An Increment 3 PrSM might be used to rapidly 'seed' parts of the battlefield with loitering munitions as an area denial tactic, as well. A swarm could include drones configured for other missions, including electronic warfare and reconnaissance.
Increment 3 PrSMs carrying various types of precision munitions could be particularly useful in suppressing or destroying enemy air defenses, especially mobile systems that might otherwise be hard to find and fix. The idea of using ground-based artillery and other indirect fire capabilities as tools to help clear paths for friendly aircraft is hardly new to the Army. The service has also put forward the idea of using high-altitude balloons to deploy swarms of loitering munitions deep inside enemy-controlled territory.
Overall, an Increment 3 would offer a highly survivable delivery system for deploying swarming payloads deep into contested or denied areas. Multiple wargames, including ones conducted under the auspices of the U.S. military, have offered significant evidence that swarms of relatively cheap networked drones with high degrees of autonomy, including ones configured as loitering munitions, could have game-changing impacts in future high-end conflicts.
With all this in mind, it is also interesting to note that China's Guangdong Aerodynamic Research Academy (GARA) unveiled a concept for an unpowered hypersonic boost-glide weapon loaded with different types of submunitions, including supersonic missiles and drones, at last year's Zhuhai Airshow. You can read more about the GDF-600 here.
GDF-600 hypersonic vehicle with cluster submunitions from Gara. Launch mass 5000 kg, payload 1200 kg. Speed up to Mach 7, range 200-600 km, maximum trajectory altitude up to 40 km. 1/n#ChinaAirshow2024 pic.twitter.com/BLlKdcYZoi
— Michael Jerdev (@MuxelAero) November 10, 2024
At the same time, it is important to note that launching submunitions from a ballistic missile that could be traveling at high supersonic, if not hypersonic speeds (defined as anything above Mach 5), presents challenges. This is primarily due to physical and thermal stresses, especially at the time of separation. More fragile payloads designed to travel at subsonic speeds, like drones, would also require some means of safely slowing down after their initial release. Maneuvers that bleed off energy prior to release could help mitigate these issues, as well. This all may help explain why PrSM's Increment 3 now comes after Increment 4.
Regardless, the Army is clearly still interested in the additional capabilities that a PrSM loaded with precision munitions or drones could offer, and we now know the service has been looking at Coyote and Hatchet specifically as potential options.
Contact the author: joe@twz.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
41 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Lockheed Martin awarded $2.97B Missile Defense Agency contract
Lockheed Martin (LMT) was awarded a sole-source, 10-year indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a ceiling of $2,97B. Under this follow-on contract, LM RMS will provide continuation of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Combat Systems Engineering Agent in order to maintain operational relevancy in support of the Missile Defense System. The Aegis BMD CSEA is the responsible Aegis BMD Weapon System design, development, integration, sustainment, and computer program source for Aegis cruisers, guided-missile destroyers, Aegis ashore variants, Aegis Guam System, and Glide Phase Intercept. LM RMS will provide execution of future studies, concepts, and computer program development to achieve capability improvements across all phases of the fire control loop (plan, detect, control, engage, and assess) in accordance with government provided interface requirements that can be delivered to the CSEA or other government designated agents for integration into the Common Source Library, and/or Integrated Combat Systems software architecture The anticipated period of performance is July 2025 to June 2035. Research, development, test and evaluation; defense wide procurement; and operations and maintenance funds, will be utilized to execute the proposed scope. The work will be performed in Moorestown, New Jersey. The Missile Defense Agency is the contracting activity. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale

Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tech execs from companies chasing defense contracts are now Army officers. A watchdog is calling for an investigation.
A watchdog group has called on the Defense Department's Inspector General office to probe whether the recent commissioning of four tech executives as part-time Army officers is in keeping with laws and practices against self-dealing. The Democracy Defenders Fund sent the letter on Tuesday, requesting that investigators determine "whether the assignment of these officials to the Army Reserve is consistent with the Federal conflict of interest laws" and whether their appointments qualify as "misuse of position and nonpublic information." The executives — Shyam Sankar, chief technology officer of Palantir; Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer of Meta; Kevin Weil, chief product officer at OpenAI; and Bob McGrew, an advisor at Thinking Machines Lab who was the chief research officer for OpenAI — joined the Army Reserve just weeks ago. The men will forego traditional three-month boot camp for a two-week crash course on Army history and basic military knowledge. These executives may be in a position to influence Army and Defense Department contracts as newly minted lieutenant colonels or share vital inside information to benefit their companies, which could increase the value of compensation like stock options. It is not unusual for civilians with expertise to bypass the most junior officer ranks for mid-level appointments. Historically that has most often included chaplains, veterinarians, and medical providers, career fields that require advanced degrees to join. The Army has made efforts to recruit more Americans with cyber and tech experience, though the four executives are the highest-profile enlistments to date. The Democracy Defenders Fund outlined special concerns regarding ongoing contract work Palantir and OpenAI have undertaken with the DoD recently. It's common for military reservists to have civilian careers in the DoD. The problem with these tech execs, the group says, are the profound amounts of lucrative government contracts at stake for their companies. "Some of these individuals have significant personal financial stakes in their outside employers, including stock, stock options, restricted stock units, and performance-based bonuses, which they seem unlikely to divest for a part-time government position," the letter read. "Given the ongoing and clear financial interest these appointees have in the adoption of Artificial Intelligence by the Department of Defense, there is a real risk that these individuals may engage in self-dealing or use their positions or nonpublic government information to benefit their outside employers in violation of federal law," it continued. The executives' commissions are part of a larger Army effort to rapidly modernize to better harness Silicon Valley's tech for future battlefields. Some experts have previously noted that the expertise such executives have is likely to be an imperative for future peer-level conflicts. Business Insider asked Army officials if concerns regarding executives' potential conflicts of interest have already been addressed, but did not receive a response before Tuesday afternoon. Officials have previously said the executives will be held to the same ethical standard as other service members. "Palantir, Meta, OpenAI, and Thinking Machines each have a significant financial interest in DoD adopting AI," the letter read, adding that the DoD has already awarded over $1 billion worth of contracts to Palantir and its subsidiaries while OpenAI has a $200 million AI contract with the military.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Railgun Installed On Japanese Warship Seen In New Photos
New pictures have emerged showing work being done on the Japan Self-Defense Forces' prototype electromagnetic railgun currently installed on the test warship JS Asuka. An at-sea test of the weapon in this configuration is expected to come before the end of the month, if it has not occurred already. Japan's continued developments in this realm stand in notable contrast to the U.S. Navy's shelving of its promising pursuit of this category of weapons in the early 2020s after major technical hurdles emerged. The images of Asuka and its railgun in port in Yokosuka, seen at the top of this story and below, come from @HNlEHupY4Nr6hRM on X who originally posted online. All of the images were taken on June 30. Additional photos of the ship taken recently are also circulating online. Asuka, a 6,200-ton-displacement dedicated testbed with a warship-like design, first emerged with the turreted railgun on its stern flight deck in April. The pictures show the shroud around the railgun removed so that work can be performed on the weapon inside. This confirms that the railgun installed in the turret on Asuka is extremely similar, if not identical, to a prototype that the Japanese Ministry of Defense's Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency (ATLA) has been testing on land and sea for a number of years now. TWZ had posited that this was likely the case based on what was visible in previous available imagery. How exactly the design may have evolved over the years is unclear. Also visible are what look to be several containerized generators and/or capacitors, as well as other shipping containers that could contain additional systems or workspaces. Railguns, which use electromagnets instead of chemical propellants to fire projectiles at very high velocities, have historically had significant power generation and cooling requirements. These demands mean that complete railgun weapon systems are typically physically very bulky. 06/30/2025 試験艦 あすか 搭載しているレールガン整備中でした。砲身カバーも外して砲身本体も見えました — (´・(ェ)・`) (@Gov_Vessel_fan) June 30, 2025 With all this in mind, TWZ previously noted that installing the railgun turret Asuka's flight deck made good sense from a testing perspective, given the ample open space it offered. Integrating the weapon onto an operational warship in a traditional manner would require meeting the power and cooling demands, as well as finding sufficient space below deck for the various components, in addition to the time and resources for those more extensive modifications. Railguns present additional challenges when it comes to the wear and tear of sustained firing of projectiles at very high speeds. As barrels quickly wear out from extreme friction, the weapon's range and accuracy are degraded, and the potential risk of a catastrophic failure can emerge. In past testing, ATLA has reportedly demonstrated the ability to fire rounds at a velocity of around 4,988 miles per hour (2,230 meters per second; Mach 6.5) while using five megajoules (MJ), or 5 million joules (J), of charge energy. As of April, prior testing goals had included a muzzle velocity of at least 4,473 miles-per-hour (2,000 meters-per-second) and a barrel life of 120 rounds, according to Naval News. Reports say that ATLA has also been working to reduce the weapon's power requirements. In May, Aviation Week reported that at least one at-sea test of Asuka's railgun installation was set to occur sometime in June. Yahoo Japan subsequently published a story saying that the testing window would span from June 9 to July 25. That same piece said that the test ship had been observed departing Yokosuka on June 9, but it is unclear whether or not any live-fire testing has yet taken place. Speaking through an interpreter at a panel discussion at DSEI Japan 2025, Kazumi Ito, principal director of the equipment policy division at ATLA, said Japan's railgun efforts were 'progressing,' but acknowledged 'various challenges,' according to National Defense Magazine. Despite the challenges, Japanese authorities have made clear they are looking toward an operational naval railgun capability in the future. Starting at the DSEI Japan 2025 exposition earlier this year, the Japanese Ministry of Defense has been publicly showing a model of a railgun in a turret with a much more streamlined design than the one currently on Asuka. Railgun GUNDAMのビームライフルみたいなモノらしい!やべー #防衛省#防衛省・自衛隊#レールガン — TAC✩FIGHTER. NJ 7/6札幌SGGM (@Tacforce_japan) July 1, 2025 In a public presentation in 2024, JMSDF Vice Adm. Imayoshi Shinichi, ATLA's director general of Naval Systems, had also highlighted plans to integrate a railgun on future 13DDX destroyers, which are expected to begin entering service in 2024. ATLA has previously shown an artist's conception of a Maya class destroyer, also known as the 27DDG class, armed with a railgun, as well. Japan's future Destroyers and Submarines at CNE 2024 @YouTubeより 13DDX!!!!!!!!レーザー!A-SAM!レールガン!あとなにげにFutureAEGISがASEVに近くない!? — Yasuおすぎ @C106 日曜 東キ-05b (@yasu_osugi) May 28, 2024 The video below, which ATLA put out last year, also depicts ground-based railguns mounted on trucks. As terms of potential operational applications of either naval or ground-based railguns, these weapons hold the promise of being potent anti-air assets, in addition to being able to engage targets at sea and on land. As TWZ has previously written: 'In principle, a practical electromagnetic railgun would offer a highly capable and flexible weapon system that can rapidly engage a wide array of targets at sea, on land, and even in the air, and at considerable ranges. Japan has previously expressed interest in this capability explicitly to help protect against incoming hypersonic threats. Such a weapon would also offer benefits in terms of magazine depth and cost compared to traditional surface-to-air and surface-to-surface missiles, given the small size and lower unit price of the individual rounds.' 'When it comes to warships, in particular, where physical space is at a premium and where options for reloading missiles at sea can be at best extremely limited, having a weapon system firing lower-cost munitions from a large magazine and that can engage a broad swath of target sets would be a clear boon.' Japan is certainly not alone in trying to turn the capabilities that a railgun could offer into a reality. The U.S. Navy and the U.S. Army have experimented with railgun designs in the past two decades or so. The Navy was particularly active on this front from 2005 to 2022, but ultimately shelved that work in the face of persistent technical issues. Planned at-sea testing was never conducted after being repeatedly set back. Interestingly, ATLA has reportedly met with U.S. Navy representatives about potentially leveraging the service's past railgun work. 'In getting closer to the deployment, I believe the scope of collaboration [with the United States] will be expanded,' ATLA's Ito had also said during the DSEI Japan 2025 panel discussion, per National Defense Magazine. In the meantime, the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Army have already continued to leverage hypervelocity projectiles previously developed for the railgun for use in conventional naval and ground-based guns. Using the fast-flying projectiles for air defense applications, including knocking down incoming cruise missiles and drones, remains a particular area of interest. China, a major competitor for Japan on both regional and global levels, has been notably active in developing naval railguns, as well. A turreted railgun first emerged on a People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) ship back in 2018. How that development of that design or other Chinese railguns has progressed since then is unclear. Other countries, most notably Turkey, are also now actively pursuing railguns, including for naval use. In 2024, Japanese authorities themselves signed a deal to cooperate on future railgun developments with their counterparts in France and Germany. New details about Japan's progress toward fielding an operational naval railgun may begin to emerge soon based on the results of the testing of the prototype installed on Asuka. Special thanks again to @HNlEHupY4Nr6hRM for sharing the pictures of Asuka with its railgun with us. Howard Altman contributed to this story. Contact the author: joe@