logo
Murdoch-Trump rift opens over Epstein – but don't expect a decisive break

Murdoch-Trump rift opens over Epstein – but don't expect a decisive break

The Guardian18-07-2025
Threats to sue. Angry calls to editors. Public denunciations. In the wake of the Wall Street Journal's story claiming Donald Trump contributed to a 'bawdy' letter to the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – featuring a drawing of a naked woman's silhouette around a typewritten personal message – the president's relationship with the outlet's proprietor, Rupert Murdoch, appears on the surface to have deteriorated from temperamental to terminal.
Just a few days ago, the 94-year-old mogul was spotted among the president's high-profile guests at the Fifa Club World Cup final. Following the publication of the article, however, Murdoch now finds himself on the president's lengthy list of media opponents threatened with court action.
In an unprecedented environment in which a sitting president regularly takes direct aim at the media, there have been numerous claims of big outlets making decisions that make life easier for their billionaire owners. Yet the Journal published the Epstein allegations even after Trump picked up the phone to its British editor, Emma Tucker, to demand that she ditch the story. Trump also claims Murdoch himself was approached to stop the article, to no avail.
According to some media watchers, it is the latest sign that Murdoch is taking a different approach to Trump's return than some of his fellow billionaire moguls. Even before the Epstein story dropped on Thursday, Murdoch's Journal continued to criticise Trump from the right over some of his early decisions.
In January, its editorial page took aim at his unconditional pardon for many of those who stormed the US Capitol on 6 January 2021. It also accused Trump of 'pleasing China's Xi Jinping above a law passed by Congress' with what it described as the 'illegal' suspension of a law forcing TikTok to break from ByteDance, its Chinese owner. It has also criticised Trump for launching new family crypto tokens.
It wasn't that long ago, either, that Murdoch was Trump's guest in the Oval office. Even then, however, tensions were on display. Trump brought up his disagreements with the Journal, which had recently dubbed his tariff battle with Canada and Mexico as 'the dumbest trade war in history'.
It has led some to regard Murdoch's Journal as representing a political band on the right aware of Trump's political draw, but sceptical about his economic effects – particularly around the use of tariffs as a constant weapon in his international dealings.
Yet the Journal's critical stance on aspects of Trump's presidency is far from proof of a decisive break between Murdoch and the president. Murdoch's Fox News – the cash cow of his media businesses and a powerhouse in the Maga world – continues to provide supportive content. The Epstein letter story was relegated to an opinion piece low down on the network's online homepage on Friday morning.
And those who have watched Murdoch's career closely over the decades tend to conclude that, ultimately, his decisions are driven by business. With the Journal appealing to economically hawkish Trump sceptics on the right and Fox News continuing to serve up content for Trump supporters, Murdoch finds himself at the helm of a media empire on the right with all bases covered.
The episode also highlights that, just a few months into Trump's second coming, internal pressures are pulling at the threads of big players in the Maga media. Already, influential pro-Trump personalities – most notably Tucker Carlson and Laura Loomer - have protested at the lack of action around releasing all documentation relating to Epstein. Others stick to Trump's line that the existence of extensive files related to the disgraced financier is a 'hoax'.
The saga appears to confirm Murdoch's status as a different beast from some of the more recent arrivals to media ownership, developing a skin as thick as rhinoceros hide in his decades making and breaking political careers. As the veteran media writer Ben Smith has put it: 'If you want to be a mogul, as the Murdochs have learned over the decades, you can't make yourself quite that easy to bully.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Founder of iconic 90s band makes shocking sex abuse allegations against Christian rock star Michael Tait
Founder of iconic 90s band makes shocking sex abuse allegations against Christian rock star Michael Tait

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Founder of iconic 90s band makes shocking sex abuse allegations against Christian rock star Michael Tait

The founding manager of rock group Evanescence has accused the Christian rock singer Michael Tait of sexual assault. Jason Jones, accused the 59-year-old singer as he recalled a harrowing night where Jones believed he was drugged and assaulted by Tait. 'It destroyed me,' Jones told The Guardian. 'I was achieving my dreams at an early age, and Tait changed all that.' The latest accusations bring the total number of his alleged victims up to eight. Tait had become a famed rockstar in the Christian mega-bands DC Talk and Newsboys, both well known for encouraging sexual abstinence and sobriety along with religious rhetoric. The singer admitted truth to the string of accusations of sexual assault following a two and a half year investigation by The Roys Report detailing the 20 years of grooming, substance abuse and sexual assault. In June, he wrote a lengthy confession in which he said: 'Recent reports of my reckless and destructive behavior, including drug and alcohol abuse and sexual activity, are sadly, largely, true.' He made an abrupt departure from Newsboys in January so he could 'get help', adding he was not healthy, 'physically or spiritually,' adding he was, 'tired of living a double life.' One of Jones's biggest dreams was to meet DC Talk, which he achieved in 1994 in Nashville, but he found a different man that he expected. Jones recalled to the outlet that he was shocked by Tait's tendencies to grab other men's genitals at random before he learned Tait was living as a closeted gay man. As a Christian, Jones was sober and a virgin at in 1995 as he collaborated with Ben Moody to co-produce the first Evanescence demo. Yet, he found himself in Tait's party world, where he would smoke cigarettes and marijuana or drinking the night away with Tait. 'I had this band that I was trying to take places,' Jones said, recalling his discomfort with the party scene he found himself in. 'And [Tait] had the power to open doors for us in the industry. So I went along with whatever, but didn't know what it would cost me.' Jones recalled to the outlet how Tait did help open doors for the band and connecting him to record labels, venue owners, producers as well as musicians. Sources alleged to The Guardian that Tait had many attractive young men through his home in Nashville, some of which were underage. They added that Tait had a 'no clothes allowed' rule in his hot tub. 'He would put his penis against one of the jets, and tell us to do the same, saying, "see, it feels good!",' one source told the outlet. It was a night in 1998 that Jones recalled feeling suddenly tired one night, and he was offered to fall asleep in Tait's bed. 'I felt honored that he felt that close to me, that he trusted me enough to let me sleep in his bed,' Jones said. But he remembered waking up with his pants missing and Tait performing oral sex on him. 'I said "no" and pushed him off, but then, somehow, I passed out again. I woke back up and he was still doing it. I said "no" again, then nodded out. And then I woke up a third time, aggressively shouted "no!" and pushed him harder. It was then that he left me alone,' Jones told The Guardian. Jones said that in hindsight, he believed that he had been drugged by Tait. Moody said he noticed a change in Jones's behavior almost immediately, including mood swings, depression, rage and paranoia. 'Looking back I would've been a bit more attentive, but I was a typical 18-year-old who wanted to be a rockstar,' Moody said. Jones said he struggled with a meth addiction through a five-year spiral following the assault. Tait released a lengthy statement on Instagram in June, entitled My Confession, where he all but confirmed the allegations Tait posted on Instagram in June, after a six-week stay at a treatment center in Utah, about his struggle with addiction to drugs and alcohol and admitted to having 'at times, touched men in an unwanted, sensual way.' The star's growing list of accusers also included one woman who claimed Tait supplied a date-rape drug to a crew member who then allegedly raped her during a Newsboys tour, Christian Post reported. Randall Crawford also came forward publicly and claimed Tait drugged and sexually assaulted him in 2000. Crawford had worked with Tait and other members in DC Talk, and one night found himself blacked out after one shot of whiskey offered by Tait and awoke to find the star performing a sex act on him. 'I believe we'd both be in the music industry today if it weren't for Michael Tait,' Crawford said. 'The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench,' Jones added. 'And that's true for the Christian music industry as well. Even more so, in my case.'

Breakingviews - US tariff keeps India in China plus one, for now
Breakingviews - US tariff keeps India in China plus one, for now

Reuters

time29 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - US tariff keeps India in China plus one, for now

HONG KONG, July 31 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump's shake-up of the world's China-plus-one trade is not creating any decisive winners or losers. The U.S. president's decision on Wednesday to impose a 25% tariff on imports from India is a blow to the South Asian country, but the rate, if it sticks, could still allow it to remain a desirable manufacturing destination for global companies like Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab. Unlike other world leaders, Narendra Modi did not secure a reduction on Trump's threatened tariff rate for his country, which sent $87 billion of goods to the U.S. last year. The prime minister's apparent refusal to open up India's agriculture and dairy markets to U.S. imports may be why. Doing so would have risked another showdown with millions of poor and politically powerful farmers. Whether India wins or loses, though, will depend on other factors. The $4 trillion economy has sought to court companies that want to diversify their supply chains away from the People's Republic. Here India's rivals include Bangladesh, Vietnam and the rest of Southeast Asia, and to some extent, Mexico. These competitors currently face U.S. import tariffs ranging from 19% to 40%. On the face of it, India will now be less competitive as a manufacturing destination than Vietnam, which Trump slapped with a 20% tariff. India's weighted average tariff rate would be five to 10 percentage points higher than Asian peers, Citi economists estimate. Its status as a top buyer of Russian energy and weapons is also a negative, with Trump now threatening an unspecified penalty for participating in such trade. Russia accounts for up to 40% of India's crude oil imports and offers it an implied discount of up to $4 per barrel. Giving up that benefit would be economically and politically disadvantageous for India. But Southeast Asia's deep links to Chinese exporters and investment mean the bloc faces stiff penalty tariffs, too, if the U.S. president follows through on his threat to crack down on tariff evasion, or transshipment, by Chinese exporters. In this scenario, Trump would double the levy for goods they send through Vietnam, for example. This risk will only increase with any deterioration of the Sino-American relationship. Some companies may ignore the tariff differential and stick with India because it offers access to a large domestic consumer market, and it is less exposed to China. Whether Trump cares more about brokering peace in Ukraine or containing the world's second-largest economy is anyone's guess. The upshot is that he has negotiated or unilaterally declared trade pacts that set diverging tariffs on all the major China-plus-one countries. Ideally, that ought to have provided some clarity for companies currently stuck in limbo to resume capital expenditure. But the U.S. president's outstanding promises to penalise transshipment and those who deal with Russia will leave global companies in no better position to decide how, if at all, to reconfigure their supply chains. Follow Una Galani on Linkedin, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

Arrest made after parents slaughtered in front of their children at Arkansas Devil's Den State Park
Arrest made after parents slaughtered in front of their children at Arkansas Devil's Den State Park

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Arrest made after parents slaughtered in front of their children at Arkansas Devil's Den State Park

A 28-year-old Arkansas man was arrested on Wednesday in the killings of a married couple in front of their children at Devil´s Den State Park over the weekend, officials said. Arkansas State Police arrested James Andrew McGann, 28, from Springdale and charged him with two counts of capital murder. Police did not mention a possible motive. Clinton David Brink, 43, and Cristen Amanda Brink, 41, were found dead Saturday on a walking trail at Devil´s Den. Their daughters, who are 7 and 9, were not hurt and are being cared for by family members, authorities have said. The search for the man who killed the hikers at a state park in northwest Arkansas had entered its fifth day Wednesday. Many details about the attack remain unclear. The Brinks were found dead Saturday on a walking trail at Devil's Den. Their daughters, who are 7 and 9, were not hurt and are being cared for by family members, authorities have said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store