Legal action over changes to resource teaching roles 'possible'
The country's largest teaching union is considering legal action against the government's decision to cut resource teachers in primary schools, confirmed last month as part of the Budget.
Ministry of Education documents from February show that 84 schools employed resource teachers for literacy support, 40 employed resource teachers for Māori and three schools employed both. Nationally, there are a maximum of 121 full-time positions for Resource Teachers of Literacy (RTL) and 53 for Resource Teachers of Māori (RTM).
Minister for Education Erica Stanford said that was a small number of teachers for the country's 2000 primary schools, and, during a consultation process in March, schools had told her the current system was "not equitable".
Stanford said funding was now in place for 349 structured literacy teachers, who would provide support within classrooms - rather than driving from school to school as was the case under the current system - and she encouraged literacy resource teachers "who are amazingly well-qualified and passionate people" to consider applying for those roles.
NZEI national secretary Stephanie Mills said the union was waiting on more information from Stanford about how she came to the decision, and then it would decide next steps.
"We've said from the beginning of the consultation process that we will explore all options to keep those resources intact. It's not about getting rid of a certain number of positions, it's a service that's been built up over time." 'Disrespected and gaslit'
Mills said NZEI had requested details about how Stanford reached her decision via an official information request. The union had asked to see the consultation document prior to the announcement and was told that would be provided a fortnight in advance, but confirmation the roles would be defunded came as part of the Budget.
Teachers felt "really disrespected and gaslit" as a result, she added.
"These teachers are some of our most experienced and skilled, and they're not being treated in a good way."
Mills said many of the current resource teachers were working in rural places and she feared those schools would no longer get the same support.
"It will be quite a different role in the new system. The [same] service won't exist and the jobs won't exist."
Mills said it was an "irony" the literacy resource roles were being cut, "when the government wants structured literacy". Meanwhile RTMs were, in many situations, the only frontline support for kaiako and tamariki Māori. "Māori RTs are like a taonga." Not a cut but 'a reinvestment'
Stanford said she would not be commenting on what action the resource teachers might take.
The move was about schools and students, not the teachers, she said.
"It's about the way we deliver the service, and this advice was given to me by the sector itself, by schools saying 'the way the model is being delivered it's not equitable and many schools are missing out' ... The ones who are getting the service may not have the greatest need, so it's very inequitable.
"What we are doing is shifting that model to an in-class delivery - small groups, intervention teachers, in school."
Stanford said the NZ Resource Teachers Literary Association had had "clear information and met multiple times with ministry officials" and they had been "very clear about the reasons, about the opportunities for them in other roles, and they've met a number of times and they have been given that information".
The move was not a cut but a "reinvestment", Stanford insisted.
"We've already resourced 349 Tier 2 structured literacy intervention roles, over and above the 100 literacy positions that there currently are, so it is not a cut, it is a reinvestment into a better delivery model."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
New Zealanders don't tend to talk about pay. What would happen if we did?
A new bill that aims to facilitate colleagues talking about what they're paid is well on its way to becoming law, having passed its second reading last week. But is it law or culture that silences chats about pay? 'One night, at a work farewell, a few of us started talking about how no one knew what the others earned,' says Sandra. It was 2015. The group all worked in marketing and communications at a large bank which used a banding system to determine salary ranges – but some of the bands were $40,000 deep. Inhibitions shrugged off with the help of a few drinks, the colleagues divulged their salaries. Despite having a larger team and same-sized budget to manage, Sandra was earning $30,000 less than her colleagues. It took years, chance and wine for her to find out. These kinds of stories filter through as tales of the importance of talking about pay, but they're relatively rare. There's a culture in New Zealand of not discussing pay with colleagues or friends. In my experience, it's seen as a little uncouth and confrontational. A new member's bill, the Employee Remuneration Disclosure Amendment Bill, aims to remove some barriers people face in talking about pay – namely the fear of retaliation from employers. When Labour MP Camilla Belich introduced her bill at its first reading in parliament in November 2024, she noted 'persistent and unexplained' pay gaps for Māori and Pacific workers and women. Her hope is that by bringing increased pay transparency, discrimination can be eliminated, she said. During the select committee process the bill received 225 public submissions – almost 90% were in support of the bill and 4% were opposed. Last Wednesday, the bill passed its second reading with support from all parties apart from Act and NZ First. While fear of retaliation from employers may be a reason for colleagues not talking about what they're paid, only three cases related to dismissal following remuneration disclosure have been brought to the Employment Relations Authority or the Employment Court since 2000. People are free to discuss pay unless there is a pay secrecy clause in their contract. It's not known how common these clauses are in New Zealand – this week experts have told me 'not that common' and 'potentially more common than people thought'. What they have agreed on is that regardless, people in New Zealand don't tend to discuss pay with their colleagues or friends. Jarrod Haar, professor of management and Māori business at Massey University, says that 'we have a culture of secrecy' around pay, while Amy Ross, an independent expert in employment relations and investigations, describes pay as a 'taboo subject'. It seems, then, that the legal issues the bill deals with aren't the biggest barrier to pay transparency. The mystery surrounding pay rates is a fairly recent phenomenon. For most of New Zealand's history, wages were set by the national awards system. The system, run by the state, set minimum pay and conditions across industries and jobs, made them public and reviewed them yearly with feedback from workers. That system was 'much more open and more public' in terms of wages, says Ben Peterson, assistant secretary at Unite Union. And so, even if money wasn't discussed at the pub or around the dinner table, workers knew roughly what was considered appropriate and fair for their industry and their neighbours'. The awards system ended with the neoliberal reforms of the 1980s, replaced by the Employment Contracts Act 1991, which instead focuses on individual contracts and basic minimum conditions (minimum wage, 15-minute tea breaks, 10 days of sick leave, etc) set out for all. 'It's very individualised, and then that becomes an incentive for employers to discourage people talking about stuff,' says Peterson. Quite simply, if an employer is paying someone $26 an hour and others doing the same job $24 an hour, they don't want those workers knowing and then requesting $26. Individualising contracts also puts the burden of negotiating pay onto individuals, which can further reinforce bias on gendered and ethnic lines. It can be a 'don't ask, don't get' situation, and some people have been brought up not to ask. In folding wages into individual contracts, companies have been able to treat them as confidential information, even without secrecy clauses. Simon Schofield from Auckland University's law school says that while there may have always been a cultural 'modesty' in New Zealand about pay rates, the neoliberal system has allowed businesses to 'play into that cultural norm' to keep people quiet about their pay in order to suppress wages. After the reforms, the share of GDP that goes to wages dropped away. 'At the end of the day, the companies are making substantial money out of that,' he says. Unions and collective agreements work against this, but in March last year only 14.5% of employees in New Zealand were part of a union. Ross says another problem is a lack of understanding of employment rights and pay in New Zealand. 'It's not taught at school. It's not really taught anywhere.' Ross was once contracted to give advice to students on moving from universities into the workplace. She was working with a group of students in their fourth and final year of studies – 'highly intelligent people', she says – when one of them put their hand up to ask a question. 'What's a union?' they asked. Ross was shocked. 'This is where we are, actually,' she says. 'People don't even know how to access the fundamental rights at work here.' She says that this allows for people, particularly more vulnerable people, to be exploited in the workplace. But it's not only the people on low wages who don't want to talk about pay. People who suspect, or know, their pay is higher than their colleagues' are often uncomfortable or embarrassed to talk about it, says Ross. 'People who are on huge, big, fat salaries – they feel like they don't want to talk about that. Maybe it's time to start asking why.' Peterson has found that some employers aren't great at talking about pay either. 'Every employer likes to think of themselves as a good employer,' he says, but evidence to the contrary – like low wages – often emerges during negotiations between the union and employers. 'People get very personally confronted,' he says. Instead of focusing on the numbers and facts in front of them, some employers can get offended by a perceived attack on their character. Peterson says this is 'unhelpful' during negotiations. For Sandra, knowing that her colleagues earned more gave her the onus to ask for a pay rise and know she was justified. 'I did and got it,' she says. 'It definitely helps to have a sense of what others are earning and some sense of solidarity.'
1News
11 hours ago
- 1News
Seymour's response to UN 'quite alarming'
Thousands have signed an open letter following Regulations Minister David Seymour's scathing response to the United Nation raising concerns over the impact of Government legislation and policies on Māori. The letter to Albert Barume, UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, invites him to 'remain engaged' with Māori following Seymour's intervention last week. Indigenous rights advocate Tina Ngata, an author of the open letter, said Seymour's response was 'quite alarming' considering no conclusion from Barume's work has been made. She said on TVNZ's Marae: 'It is [Barume's] job, where concerns are repeatedly raised to him, to inquire more deeply and it's the first stage of that inquiry where he basically comes to us and says to our government… 'well, there are these issues that have been raised to me, can you please explain what this is about?'' Watch the full discussion panel on TVNZ+ ADVERTISEMENT Barume had written to the Government outlining concerns over the alleged 'persistent erosion' of Māori rights through 'regressive legislations and policies' that breached New Zealand's international obligations. He included a reference to the Regulatory Standards Bill. Seymour responded to his concerns saying they were 'presumptive, condescending, and wholly misplaced'. Quotes pulled from Regulations Minister David Seymour's response to UN (Source: 1News) He also stated: 'As an indigenous New Zealander myself, I am deeply aggrieved by your audacity in presuming to speak on my behalf and that of my fellow Māori regarding legislation that aims solely at ensuring clarity, consistency, and accountability in regulatory processes." He eventually withdrew the letter after he was pulled up by his coalition partner and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters for overstepping. 'Shed some light' Indigenous governance partner at the Human Rights Commission Dayle Takitimu said indigenous advocates 'from across the United Nations framework', which included the Human Rights Commission, called on the UN to 'shed some light' on the Government's obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, that needed to be upheld. ADVERTISEMENT 'There's been a lot of advocacies saying – from various quarters – that people think that's not up to scratch at the moment, and the United Nations, through this special rapporteur, has responded to that, as Tina [Ngata] said, in a very initial way, prompting that discussion,' she said on Marae. Tina Ngata and Dayle Takitimu on Marae (Source: Marae) She acknowledged there was tension between human rights and domestic sovereignty that exists across all international law. 'But at the end of the day, the United Nations, in fact, exist to assist to resolve that tension and that conflict by viewing and monitoring human rights, so they are seen as universal and paramount across the global order.' Last week's incident prompted Ngata, alongside fellow Māori rights advocates Leonie Pihama and Tania Waikato, a lawyer for the Toitū Te Tiriti movement, to draft an open letter to Barume that invites him to Aotearoa amidst 'deepening political and constitutional crisis'. Ngata said the open letter reaffirms Māori have a right to international protection. 'It reaffirms that we will continue to be our own voice which called out to the United Nations for their oversight, and it invites them to continue that oversight, to remain in dialogue with us throughout this political crisis - and it is a political crisis. It might be a crisis of idiots and egos, but it's a crisis nonetheless and so we've called upon them to remain in contact with us and to maintain their oversight over what's happening in Aotearoa.' ADVERTISEMENT Quote pulled from UN Special Rapporteur Albert K. Barume's letter to New Zealand government (Source: 1News) When asked if the UN had the power to hold Aotearoa to account over indigenous rights, Takitimu said that because New Zealand subscribes to the 'international framework', and has sought legitimacy from it on occasion, it has to take the support with the criticism. 'Indigenous peoples have always utilised that framework, and so has New Zealand as a state party, and so that, again, comes back to the very foundations of the United Nations to set some sort of global standards, and they have, in regards to indigenous rights and human rights, and they are holding the New Zealand Government to account for that. That's exactly what they are set up to do.'
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
What You Need To Know About Recent Changes To Schools And Education
Explainer – It's been a busy year so far for education policy, with a series of announcements by the government and curriculum changes. Here's the biggest changes so far. RNZ Online Explainer – It's been a year full of changes in the educational system, with announcements and new initiatives coming nearly every week from the coalition government. What has been announced and what's coming up soon? Here is a roundup of just some of the major announcements we've seen in 2025 that will affect students and educators: New curriculum changes kick off The new maths curriculum and English curriculum for primary school-aged students began this year. It's all part of the first steps in the government's long-term push for what it's calling a 'knowledge-rich' curriculum. The government also previously announced moves towards teaching structured literacy skills to students. The drafts of the secondary English and maths curriculums are also out for feedback. Open plan classrooms on the way out The government announced it would no longer build open-plan classrooms, moving away from the policy which Education Minister Erica Stanford called too noisy and distracting for children. While there has been negative feedback from schools on open-plan learning, Stanford said, surveys by the Council for Educational Research showed most teachers who worked in the structures liked them and believed their students benefited from learning in that kind of environment. New classrooms will be built using standard designs that prioritise flexibility, like glass sliding doors that can open a class when it is time to collaborate and close it for focused learning. New school attendance service announced The government is also allocating $140 million to tackle truancy with a new school attendance service. The funding boost is aimed at supporting more schools and reaching double the number of students over the next four years, according to Associate Education Minister David Seymour. He said the new attendance service would address chronic absence and focus on keeping students in school when they return. Transitioning to the new attendance service would start at the end of the year and be fully in place from early 2026. The return of charter schools Charter schools have returned to New Zealand this year under the coalition government. They were previously shut down by former Education Minister Chris Hipkins in 2018. Seven of the publicly-funded, private schools opened in Term 1. The Charter School Agency said the charter school authorisation board was considering 52 applications from organisations wanting to set up new charter schools next year, as well as two applications from state or state integrated schools wanting to convert. New school property entity set up A new school property entity is being set up to manage building, maintaining, and administering the school property portfolio. Stanford said the new Crown agent will sit separate from the Ministry of Education, which will keep responsibility for education policy and network decisions. Announcing the launch of the New Zealand School Property Agency, Stanford said schools had been kept waiting for classrooms and refurbishments they badly needed. A new 600-student primary school was also announced for Massey in Auckland. Funding for more Māori immersion school classrooms The government announced $28 million will be spent on building more 'safe, warm and dry classrooms' for tamariki in Māori full immersion schools. Twenty new classrooms will be built across four providers, and work will begin on the first stage of a new school north of Auckland. The new development, for Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Ngāringaomatariki in Kaiwaka, will eventually have 19 classrooms. Kāhui Ako education scheme ends It was announced in this year's budget that the Kāhui Ako – Communities of Learning – scheme was to be disestablished. The scheme grouped schools together to work on common problems with extra pay for one principal to oversee each group and for select teachers to share good practice between and within schools. A report said there were 220 Kāhui Ako, involving 1958 schools and 1506 early learning centres, and more than 4000 teachers received extra pay for Kāhui Ako roles. Changes to international student work rights From November, eligible student-visa holders will be able to work more hours a week, from 20 to 25 hours, and work rights will be extended to all tertiary students in approved exchange programmes. The government will also consider introducing a short-duration work visa of up to six months to allow international graduates who do not qualify for post-study work rights time to seek jobs under the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) pathway. It would also look at updates to make it easier for students to apply for multi-year visas. The goal was to boost tertiary education's annual economic contribution to $7.2 billion, by lifting enrolments from 83,700 in 2024 to 119,000 in 2034. May's budget sees major changes There were several big spending announcements in this year's budget. Stanford said new education initiatives in the Budget totalled $2.5 billion over four years, though about $614m of that total was reprioritised from 'underperforming' initiatives. The government's total spend on early childhood and school education would grow by roughly $400m to $19.85b in 2025-26, but drop to $19b and $18.9b in subsequent years. There was also a $720m increase for learning support. The increase included $266m to extend the early intervention service from early childhood through to the end of Year 1 of primary school, including employing 560 more early intervention teachers and specialists and helping an additional 4000 children. It also included $192m over three years to provide learning support coordinators in 1250 more primary schools, $122m to meet increased demand for the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme for students with the highest needs, and $90m to build 25 new satellite classrooms for specialist schools. Stanford said the government was building up to adding 2 million extra teacher aide hours by 2028. The other big education initiative in the Budget was $298m for curriculum, nearly half of it targeted to maths and literacy, and about $76m for a new standardised reading, writing and maths test for schools.
