
Woman who claims brother is ‘trying to get mother diagnosed with dementia' granted restraining order
A judge has granted a woman a 200 metre exclusion order at her home against two of her brothers arising from 'some shenanigans going on over land'.
At Ennis District Court, Judge Alec Gabbett has granted the woman the interim restraining order against the two after hearing evidence of an alleged minor assault carried out on the woman by one of her brothers.
After viewing photos of marks from the alleged assault on the woman's phone, Judge Gabbett told her: 'You were assaulted. You were badly bruised.'
The woman said that the assault arose in circumstances where her brother was trying to get their mother to get her into a nursing home to get her tested for memory.
As part of her ex-parte application, when only one side is present in court, she said: 'He is trying to get her diagnosed with dementia."
The woman told the court that her mother, now in her mid-80s, owns all of the land and the house.
Judge Gabbett said that it was his understanding that the woman, from a rural area of Co Clare, was seeking the restraining order as there are 'some shenanigans going on regarding land'.
Explaining the background, the adult daughter said her mother was recently at home in bed with a chest infection.
She said that her brother came the night before to stay and he wanted to get her into a nursing home.
She said: 'I knew my mother was too sick that morning."
Judge Gabbett asked: 'What does he want out of all of this? Why is he trying to get her tested?'
The woman said that 'he is trying to take her rights away' so she will have appointed a Decision Making Representative (DMR).
The woman said: 'I think the DMR can over-ride her will.'
Judge Gabbett said that this wasn't the case and said her view was an example of 'barstool lawyering'.
The woman said: 'I am frightened of my brothers.'
She said that she has cared for her mother for years and when her brother was trying to get her to leave the house to go to a nursing home for tests, 'he kept going on and on and trying to bully her to get up'.
The woman recalled: 'I knew she was too sick and I said 'she is not going and that's it' and he grabbed hold of me and dragged me from the bedroom into another bedroom across the hallway'.
Judge Gabbett said that he was putting in place a 200 metre exclusion order from the house against her two brothers and directed service by An Garda Síochána to serve the order because of the assault.
Judge Gabbett adjourned the case to this Friday "where your brothers will be able to put their side of the story to the court'.
He told the woman: 'You will all be here together so that might be problematic for you. Sometimes that is difficult when there is a family row. I would suggest that you have someone with you.'
Judge Gabbett said that he was granting the interim restraining order due to the alleged assaultive behaviour.
Civil restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a measure for people seeking protection.
The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can run for up to five years but may be shorter.
Breaking it could mean jail for up to a year and a maximum of €4,000 fine.
Judge Gabbett adjourned the case to July 11th.
Ennis courthouse
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 7th

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Former bride weeps in court over failure to get back 'priceless' wedding flowers
A Co Louth woman has wept in court over not being able to get back her 'priceless' and 'irreplaceable' wedding flowers from a woman who was hired to preserve and frame the flowers. At the Small Claims Court at Ennis District Court, former bride, Michelle Markey became visibly upset after telling Judge Alec Gabbett of her failed efforts to obtain the return of her wedding flowers from Co Clare woman, Charlotte Roche. Ms Markey of Oriel Rd, Collon, Co Louth told Judge Gabbett: "My priceless flowers. I gave them away - I would have kept them if I had known I would never get my wedding flowers back." Judge Gabbett said that "wedding flowers hold sentimental value, some people put them on their mother's graves". He told Ms Markey: "I get that sentimentality aspect." The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Ms Markey told Judge Gabbett: "I gave away my - I'm sorry..." and momentarily began to cry before quickly recomposing herself. In response, Judge Gabbett said: "You are okay. It is fine. Take your time. You find the whole thing upsetting because the lack of communication is the biggest issue?" Ms Markey agreed. She said that the flowers are 'irreplaceable'. She said: "I do have evidence to show that this is not an isolated incident and reviews on a website show that this has happened to other brides." There was no appearance in court by Charlotte Roche of Laghtagoona, Corofin, Co Clare who agreed to provide the floral service to Ms Markey. Ms Markey was claiming €350 for the loss of her wedding flowers and Judge Gabbett granted her a decree of €200 for the replacement of the flowers against Ms Roche. He said: "That is the best I can do for you." Ms Markey told Judge Gabbett that she entered a service agreement on October 9, 2023 with Ms Roche when a €50 deposit was paid to Ms Roche for drying, preserving, artwork and framing of wedding day flowers. Ms Markey said that Ms Roche set up a new company, Lush Flower Art Ltd, in 2024. She said that the flowers were received by Ms Roche on November 7, 2023 and Ms Markey said that she was told that 16 weeks would be allowed for the completion of the artworks. She said that after multiple emails and texts between December 2023 and November 2024, including several requests to return the flowers, on November 23, 2024 she was informed via email by Ms Roche that she would not be progressing with the piece. She said: "I requested a return of deposit and flowers and neither was received at this time." Ms Markey said that Ms Roche cancelled the service over a review she had left on a weddings website. Ms Markey said that the deposit was returned on January 4 but no return of flowers and subsequent requests for return of flowers were ignored. Representing herself, Ms Markey told Judge Gabbett she travelled 200km to be in court in Ennis on a six-hour round trip from Co Louth "and had to organise childcare and take a day off work". After seeing that the next Small Claims case on the list was a Kerrie Horgan vs Charlotte Roche (Bradley), Judge Gabbett remarked 'Oh dear'. There was no appearance by either party in that case and Judge Gabbett adjourned that case to September. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

The Journal
8 hours ago
- The Journal
Man arrested after ecstasy tablets worth €235,000 seized in Co Monaghan
A MAN IN his 20s has been arrested after ecstasy tablets worth €235,000 were seized in Co Monaghan. The seizure was the result of a targeted joint operation involving An Garda Síochána and Revenue's Customs Service. In the course of the joint operation, a residential property in Monaghan was searched today. Advertisement This led to MDMA (ecstasy) tablets with an estimated street value of €235,000 being seized. The drugs seized will be sent to Forensic Science Ireland for analysis. A man in his 20s was arrested at the scene and is currently being detained at a station in the Garda North Western Region. A garda spokesperson said investigations are ongoing. Meanwhile, a Revenue spokesperson said that if businesses or members of the public have any information, they can contact Revenue in confidence on Confidential Phone Number 1800 295 295. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
First static speed camera in Dublin city to become operational next week
THE FIRST STATIC safety speed camera in Dublin city will become operational next week. It's going to be located on Dolphin's Barn in Dublin 12 and will be placed alongside the Maxol garage on the Crumlin Road. Location of where the new speed camera will be Google Maps Google Maps It will commence operation from Friday 1, August. A garda spokesperson said Dolphin's Barn was identified as part of a wider national analysis as being a road 'which could benefit from the implementation of a safety camera'. Advertisement The spokesperson added that the location was selected based on fatal and serious injury collision data from the last seven years, as well as speed data and feedback from stakeholders. Vehicles detected driving in excess of the speed limit will be subject to prosecution from 12pm on Friday, 1 August. Prosecution of speeding offences takes place by Fixed Charge Notice (FCN) and the current FCN is a €160 fine accompanied by three penalty points. Meanwhile, Dublin City Council said it is 'pleased to see the introduction of the first ever static speed camera within the Council area'. A spokesperson said the Council worked closely with An Garda Síochána to facilitate the installation and initial operation of the camera. 'Dublin City Council will continue to work together with An Garda Síochána on road safety and measures which can help to improve road safety for all,' added the spokesperson. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal