The 50+1 rule in German football: What you need to know – DW – 06/18/2025
In Germany, the 50+1 rule protects professional football clubs from complete control by investors – a unique feature in the sport. It has many supporters internationally, but also attracts criticism.
What is the 50+1 rule?
The 50+1 rule is a central pillar of German professional football, which is intended to ensure that the club members retain control over the professional part of a football club.
The rule, in place since 1999, stipulates that the parent club, for example Bayern Munich, must hold at least 50 percent plus one vote in its spun-off professional football company—in this case, FC Bayern München Fußball AG. This ensures that the majority of voting rights always lie with the club and its members.
Compliance with the rule in German professional football is primarily monitored by the German Football League (DFL). The DFL is the league association responsible for the organization and regulation of the Bundesliga and the second tier, Bundesliga 2.
The Federal Cartel Office, Germany's central competition authority, also plays an important role. Since 2018, the office has been reviewing the 50+1 rule for possible violations of competition law.
What is the purpose of the rule?
The rule prevents external investors from taking complete control of a club and managing it solely on financial grounds—potentially disregarding the interests of the fans.
50+1 also ensures a certain level of equality, as it is not possible for a club to invest disproportionately more money than other clubs thanks to its powerful investor with a controlling stake.
Fan culture, which is very strong in Germany, is also a key component that is protected. Fans in Germany are not just paying spectators, but active club members who can, for example, have a say in important club decisions at the annual general meeting. The vast majority of organized fans in Germany oppose the commercialization of football. The 50+1 rule is therefore of great importance to them.
Fans protest against the entry of investors at the DLF Image: Frank Hoermann/Sven Simon/IMAGO
Are there exceptions to the rule?
A special rule allows investors to acquire a majority stake in a professional football division after 20 years of investment. Bundesliga clubs Bayer Leverkusen and VfL Wolfsburg are currently allowed to be controlled by companies because they have received continuous and significant support from them for over 20 years.
Bayer 04 Leverkusen Fußball GmbH is wholly owned by the chemical company Bayer AG , and VfL Wolfsburg-Fußball GmbH is wholly owned by the Volkswagen Group.
Until 2023, the exemption also applied to TSG Hoffenheim, which was financially supported by patron Dietmar Hopp, one of the co-founders of the software company SAP. Hopp held the majority of the voting rights.
However, in June 2023, Hopp waived his majority rights and returned the voting rights to the parent club. This means that TSG is once again a normal 50+1 club.
RB Leipzig is a special case. Although the club formally adheres to the rule, it is criticized because it has only 23 voting members, most of whom have close ties to sponsor Red Bull. Critics therefore accuse the club of circumventing the rule without breaking it.
The Federal Cartel Office is currently calling for improvements and more open access to membership for Leipzig. With regard to Leverkusen and Wolfsburg, after checking recent changes to the sports antitrust law from the European Court of Justice (ECJ), they recommend amending the exemptions that apply to the pair.
Is there any criticism of the rule?
Critics argue that the 50+1 system puts German football clubs at a financial disadvantage compared to other countries. While teams in England, France, or Saudi Arabia can access enormous sums of money thanks to their investors, German clubs are restricted in raising capital by the rule. Potential investors are discouraged because they invest (a lot of) money but do not gain control over the club in return.
Newcastle were bought by Saudi Arabia's wealth fund in 2021 Image: Owen Humphreys/dpa/picture alliance
Another point of criticism is that the rule can be circumvented in practice (RB Leipzig, for example), making it ineffective. Others who want more investor involvement generally see it as an obstacle to structural reforms in football and entrepreneurial flexibility.
Do fans from other countries also want a 50+1 rule?
Many fans from other countries would like to see a model like the 50+1 rule —especially in response to controversial investor takeovers and the growing influence of big investors and nation states. Some voices were raised in England after the Saudi sovereign wealth fund PIF took over Premier League club Newcastle United in 2021 though not with the same conviction as fans in Germany.
The briefly mooted creation of a Super League in 2021, in which six English clubs originally wanted to participate, also fueled the discussions.
In France, criticism is growing of the dominance of investor-owned clubs like Paris Saint-Germain, which is controlled by the Qatari sovereign wealth fund. Nice, Olympique Lyon, Olympique Marseille, Monaco, and Toulouse are also majority-owned by foreign investors. Many fans want more say and a stronger connection between clubs and their membership base.
Meanwhile traditional Italian clubs like AC Milan and Inter have changed ownership several times in recent years – usually with little consideration for the interests of the fans. Calls for regulations that limit the influence of investors and protect the identity of the clubs are therefore growing louder.
Real Madrid and Barcelona in Spain remain member-owned, but some smaller clubs are owned by foreign investors. Here, too, there are movements pushing for a return to a member-led structure.
And in Brazil, where the football market was only opened to investors in 2021, concerns about clubs losing their identity are growing. Therefore, there are initiatives there, too, from fans as well as sports economists, lawyers, and politicians, advocating for the introduction of legal protection mechanisms based on the German model.
This article was originally written in German.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
17 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Germany Warns Apple, Google on DeepSeek App Over Privacy Breaches Tied to China
Germany's top data protection office is raising the alarm over DeepSeek, a Chinese AI chatbot app, for allegedly breaking European privacy laws. On Friday, Berlin's data commissioner Meike Kamp urged Apple and Google to consider removing the app from their stores, accusing DeepSeek of unlawfully transferring German user data to China. "DeepSeek's transfer of user data to China is unlawful," Kamp said in a public statement, warning that Chinese authorities may have full access to user information once it reaches servers in China, EuroNews said. Kamp also noted that DeepSeek failed to prove that it provides the same level of data protection required under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). GDPR rules strictly limit how companies move personal data outside the EU. Any transfer must have proper safeguards in place, such as legal agreements and data handling standards equal to Europe's. Kamp claims DeepSeek hasn't shown that it meets those requirements. DeepSeek Faces EU Scrutiny for Sending User Data to China The app, created by Chinese companies Hangzhou DeepSeek and Beijing DeepSeek, gained popularity for offering a cheaper AI chatbot alternative using fewer high-end chips. However, its growing presence in Europe has sparked privacy concerns. According to CNBC , Kamp's office notified Apple and Google and expects both tech giants to perform a "timely review" of whether the app should remain available. If both platforms remove it, the result could be a de facto ban across the entire European Union and potentially the UK as well. "It is certainly possible that this incident could lead to an EU-wide ban," said Matt Holman, an AI and data lawyer at Cripps, in an email. "But regulators across the EU would need to agree before making that move official." For now, Apple and Google have not publicly responded to the request. CNBC has reached out to both companies and DeepSeek's privacy team but has not received a reply. This is not DeepSeek's first clash with European regulators. Earlier this year, Italy ordered DeepSeek to block its app after the company refused to comply with an official data request. Ireland also launched a separate investigation into how the app processes user information. Originally published on
Local Germany
2 days ago
- Local Germany
'System feels unfair': The struggle of getting German citizenship as a freelancer
Kathryn, an American citizen who works as a freelancer, moved to Germany more than 15 years ago. Since then, she's faced years of bureaucratic challenges: paying for tax audits and lawyers, receiving incomplete or unhelpful information from immigration authorities and navigating a system that feels stacked against her. Staying in Germany as a freelancer, she said, has never been easy – or cheap. Now, she's beginning her application for German citizenship, a process that's proving to be just as burdensome. Marcelo, a freelance artist from Brazil, has faced similar challenges. After living in Germany for seven years, Marcelo began the process of applying for German citizenship in October last year and has been going back and forth with the immigration authorities ever since. 'I would say that there is quite a discriminatory practice between freelancers and people who have a regular nine-to-five job,' Marcelo said. Both Kathryn and Marcelo have asked to be identified only by their first names because they are still in the process of applying for citizenship. Working as a freelancer does not disqualify you from becoming a German citizen, but as Kathryn and Marcelo have both found, it can make the process slower, more expensive and more confusing. Advertisement Freiberufler visa makes freelance work possible for expats The Freiberufler visa allows non-EU citizens to be self-employed or work as freelancers in Germany for three years at a time. It's an attractive option for many foreign residents, as the visa offers a way to work in Germany without a full-time employment contract. To receive this visa, applicants must show letters of intent from clients and evidence they can support themselves financially. READ ALSO: The compete guide to getting a freelance visa in Germany As a reminder to become a German citizen, all applicants are generally required to have been living in Germany for at least five years, have a long-term residence permit or permanent right of residence, pass a citizenship test and speak German at a B1 level. But for foreign freelancers who hope to one day become naturalised, it's important to understand how working as a freelancer can complicate the process of attaining citizenship. Advertisement Additional paperwork, additional expenses Because most freelancers have several employers, rather than just one, documenting taxes and income can get complicated. Freelancers applying for citizenship in Berlin must submit a Prüfungsbericht , or an audit report conducted by a tax professional, according to the ServicePortal Berlin website . Freelancers must also submit their last Steuerbescheid , or tax assessment, and a tax clearance certificate, or Steuerunbedenklichkeitsbescheinigung. In contrast employees with salaried jobs need only to submit their employment contract, their last six months of salary statements and a statement from their employer concerning the duration of the employment, the ServicePortal website says. German immigration authorities can be quite meticulous when reviewing freelancers' financial documents, and even minor discrepancies between invoices and bank statements can raise red flags. In the more than 15 years Kathryn has spent as a freelancer, she said she's run into all kinds of issues reporting her taxes and income. As an example she once received a €23 refund on a Deutsche Bahn ticket. When she later submitted a bank statement that included that refund, the clerk reviewing her documents accused her of receiving compensation for unreported freelance work with Deutsche Bahn. Advertisement Citizenship comes at a cost Another challenge freelancers face when applying for citizenship is the heavy cost burden. Just getting a Prüfungsbericht can sometimes cost upwards of €1,000. Over the course of the application process, Marcelo has already paid around €2,000 for lawyers and tax professionals, as well as for official translations of documents. 'I had to ask for help from my parents, because I couldn't do it myself,' Marcelo said. 'So I do feel like it's something that is quite prohibitive.' Kathryn estimated she'd spent between €5,000 and €10,000 annually on freelance-related expenses since moving to Germany. That includes lawyers, tax professionals, document translations and insurance, not to mention all the hours of income she's lost. 'Honestly, it's not felt worth it. I mean, I kept fighting for it. I kept staying here,' she said. 'But I would say altogether, it has not been worth it.' Freelancers say German bureaucracy isn't made for them A lack of transparency and clarity from immigration authorities is another complaint foreign freelancers have voiced. Kathryn said she has never been told exactly how much money she needs to make in order to prove she can support herself. Even though options like the Freiberufler visa make freelancing a viable path for international residents, some freelancers still say the system doesn't feel like it's set up for them. 'German society is not really geared towards being a freelancer,' Marcelo said. 'You are supposed to be here really in a like nine-to-five job contract…that's what they want.' READ ALSO: Five hard truths about starting out as a freelancer in Germany Kathryn said she and her husband, a German national who also freelances, have considered leaving Germany altogether because of these bureaucratic challenges. Kathryn has looked into relocating to countries including the Netherlands, New Zealand and Senegal – all of which were friendlier to freelancers than Germany is, she said. 'Why is it so hard here?' Kathryn said. 'I just find there's not a lot of clarity here.' Have you had similar experiences applying for German citizenship as a freelancer. We want to hear from you. Share your story in the comments section or email us at news@
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
World Leaders Conspire to Form Trade Org Without US As Trump Keeps Threatening Countries With Tariffs
As President Donald Trump threatens to hit European imports with tariffs as high as 50%, world leaders are quietly working to form a new global trade order that excludes the U.S. With a July 9 deadline looming for a new EU-U.S. deal, Trump has warned that punitive tariffs will return if the bloc doesn't agree to his terms. In response, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has proposed a bold counter. The proposal would mean uniting the EU's 27 countries with the 12-nation Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which includes the UK, to launch a new trade alliance without the United States, according to Politico. "CPTPP and the European Union is mighty," von der Leyen said at the EU leaders' summit, adding that the bloc could replace the WTO and decide later whether to admit the U.S. The idea has public backing from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who likened the approach to Trump's own erratic style. "We need to be similar to our partners in some sense," Tusk said. Privately, EU leaders reportedly admit they are now scrambling to craft a face-saving deal with the U.S. before the deadline to avoid sweeping tariffs. Negotiations are expected to continue into next week. However, the bloc remains divided. Some leaders want to secure a basic agreement quickly to shield vulnerable industries like chemicals and steel, while others remain reluctant to concede to Trump's demands. French President Emmanuel Macron, once defiant, now concedes, "10% [tariffs] will be 10%." Originally published on Latin Times
