Alternative for Germany tries to tone down to cut further into mainstream
Bundestag
debate on Wednesday morning in a tone as mild as her cream blazer.
For eight years, the co-leader of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has used the Bundestag as a launch pad for countless social media-friendly zingers. In her party, she is far from alone: in the last parliamentary period, AfD politicians accounted for 11 per cent of seats and two-thirds of the calls to order.
Germany is in a new political reality with chancellor
Friedrich Merz
and his ruling centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU). The 46-year-old Weidel, a consultant-turned-politician, has sensed her parliamentary party should change with the times.
Last weekend, the AfD's Bundestag MPs backed a new 'moderate' approach in parliament. When Weidel spoke on Wednesday, her 27-minute parliamentary address contained familiar accusatory vocabulary – 'impudent', 'cheek' – but without the familiar hail of verbal outrage.
Instead, Weidel's tone was more disappointed regret, a schoolteacher chastising the new German leader for the country's decline and fall: a three-year recession with rising company insolvencies, sinking industrial jobs and – contrary to Merz election promises – a new €500 billion debt pile.
'People want a state that spends and intervenes less, with less bureaucracy, taxes and deductions, one that focuses on its core tasks of security, rule of law, public order, infrastructure, education and working institutions,' said Weidel. 'There's enough money for all this. But instead you need this monstrous mountain of debt because you don't have the courage to apply the red pen to migration costs and climate nonsense.'
Gaining volume – and forgetting the AfD's new vow of moderation – Weidel turned to Merz on her right. She called him a 'liar-chancellor' over claims that, as Merz ran an election campaign last February promising to defend Germany's debt rules, he used the time between campaign appearances to study documents on how to loosen those same rules to allow multibillion investment in infrastructure and defence.
The AfD's political origin story for the new coalition is 'election fraud'. Merz only won over the centre-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) for his coalition, it argues, through a drastic U-turn that betrayed CDU voters and the party tradition of fiscal responsibility.
The CDU could have an alternative coalition with fewer compromises, Weidel added with a smile, if it dismantled its 'firewall' that blocks co-operation with the AfD.
'Come out of your dead end,' she said. 'The further you run in the wrong direction, the more difficult will be the inevitable reversal.'
Squeezing this pressure point in the Bundestag debate produced instant results on Wednesday. Unlike his predecessors, Merz opened his first major speech as chancellor by addressing directly the AfD using its political framing.
The populist party started life attacking EU bailouts, then surged to popularity a decade ago with a populist, anti-migration line. It was shifting again, Merz argued, because his government's tough new line on irregular arrivals and lower asylum applications meant the AfD was 'losing the battleground to which you owe your existence'.
Just two months in office, Merz's own long-term political existence – and that of his coalition – is uncertain, hinging on reforms that are either in the works or on a long to-do list.
In the Bundestag, the CDU leader insisted his party's philosophy – peace and freedom in Europe with an 'open, liberal and tolerant Germany' at its heart – made it fundamentally incompatible with the AfD.
'We will not allow ourselves depart this path,' he said, with a nod to Weidel, 'by people who spread bad mood and embrace resentment.'
In his Bundestag office, AfD backbencher Ronald Gläser thinks provocation is no longer needed to attract attention as 'everyone recognises the AfD now'.
'It's not us who radicalised, though, but the circumstances in the fatherland,' he said. 'People don't recognise their country any more.'
In February's election, the AfD finished in second place with nearly 21 per cent support. Of its 10 million voters, one in 10 previously backed the CDU. Up two points in polls on its record result in February, Gläser sees potential for further inroads into Germany's mainstream voter base.
'We want to win over voters furious with the CDU but who might have been turned off by our more radical image,' he said. 'This new approach is not about different content but a different tone.'
Sometimes tone and content go hand in hand. A weekend AfD policy paper made no mention of 'remigration' – an ambiguous term that, depending on who you ask in the party, means everything from removing criminal foreign nationals to deporting non-ethnic Germans.
'The AfD have disrupted the symmetry in the German party system and there is a longing in the party for executive power,' said Gero Neugebauer, a political analyst in Berlin. 'But to make further progress it would have to change its way of doing things completely.'
In the AfD, however, old habits die hard. In Wednesday's Bundestag debate, an AfD backbencher was called to order for using the word 'bullshit'. And, three hours after her mild start, Weidel was warned to stop heckling speakers or leave the chamber.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Soothers with choking-hazards, sunglasses with no UV filters, raincoats with toxic chemicals: McGrath shocked by dangers of some Shein, Temu goods
The EU justice commissioner has expressed shock at the toxicity and dangers of some goods being sold by Shein and Temu , amid a crackdown on the popular Chinese retail platforms. With 12m low-value parcels each day coming into the EU from online retailers outside the bloc, Michael McGrath has vowed to crack down on the sale of goods that blatantly break the law. He is waiting for the imminent results of an EU-wide secret shopper operation to further test evidence already gathered that Chinese retailers are bypassing EU laws. Among the worst examples Mr McGrath came across were baby soothers with beads that fall off easily, which pose a choking hazard because they did not have the regulation size hole to enable a baby who did swallow one accidentally to continue to get air. READ MORE Among other goods cited by MEPs in a report released this month include children's raincoats with toxic chemicals, sunglasses with no UV filter and kids' shorts with draw strings longer than regulation length that cause a trip hazard. They also found cosmetics containing butylphenyl methylpropional, also known as Lillal, which is listed as a chemical of 'very high concern' by the EU and has been banned since 2022 over concerns that it affects fertility and foetal development. Last year, the UK government told consumers to dispose of any products containing the ingredient. 'I am shocked by it, and I think we have a duty to protect European consumers,' Mr McGrath told the Guardian. National consumer protection authorities send out rapid alerts across the EU warning of unsafe non-food products as part of a service, Safety Gate, which is also open to consumer complaints. Last year, Safety Gate received a record high of 4,137 alerts with more than a third relating to cosmetics, ahead of toys, electrical appliances, auto and chemical products. While consumer groups are concerned about safety, Mr McGrath is also worried that the platforms that have exploded in popularity in the last two years are damaging local businesses through unfair competition. 'The growth is extraordinary, and it has placed enormous pressure on the systems at member state level,' he said. 'I am determined that we step up our enforcement of our product safety laws and our consumer protection rules. It's not only about protecting consumers, but there is a very serious level playing field issue here for European businesses, because they are expected to compete with sellers who are not complying with our rules,' he said. 'They are incurring significant costs in Europe to comply with our requirements, and they should not be expected to compete with those who are not doing the same.' EU figures show 12m low-value items coming into the bloc a day, amounting to 4.6bn consignments under €150 for 2024 – double that of 2023 and three times as many as 2022. Among the moves the EU is considering is an abolition of the €150 duty-free threshold and the introduction of a handling fee for each package which may deter low-value purchases and help pay the cost of extra customs investigations. The move would echo the situation in the US, where Donald Trump signed an executive order to end the $800 duty-free threshold in an assault on the Chinese sellers. American buyers have had to pay an additional 30 per cent tax or a minimum of $50 an item after June 1st this year. Also possible is the creation of an EU-wide customs authority to cope with the systemic issues. Mr McGrath said it 'remains to be seen' if the subject will be raised at an EU-China summit in Beijing on July 25th, but he plans to address it directly himself. 'I will certainly be engaging directly with Chinese authorities and we will [be] visiting later on this year,' he said. Shein said it was investing $15m this year in compliance and safety initiatives including $2.5m toward product and safety quality tests and has partnerships with 15 testing centres, including operations in the UK and Germany. It said it had removed 500 vendors since the launch of its marketplace. A spokesperson said: 'Earning and maintaining the trust of our consumers is paramount, and we are fully committed to ensuring the products we offer are safe and compliant. 'All of our vendors are required to comply with Shein's code of conduct and stringent safety standards, and must also abide by the relevant laws and regulations of the markets where we operate.' Temu has been approached for comment. – Guardian
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
We need to face up to the fact that not all middle-earners are squeezed
While we have all been focusing endlessly on the latest Truth Social post from Donald Trump, the Coalition has been having backroom rows about its budget plans . Serious ones. A key document which sets the framework for the budget – the Summer Economic Statement – will be published next Tuesday. And alongside it will be the Government 's updated investment spending plans in the revised National Development Plan (NDP) . The game, in other words, is on. When you see the Independents who support the Government being filmed for the RTÉ News going to talk to senior ministers, you realise there is some good news coming and kudos to be sought for a new road or rail upgrade. But there will be tough calls, too. And it is no exaggeration to say that Tuesday will be a key moment for the Government as it signals a change of budgetary direction. The Coalition is going to go all in on State investment – energy, water and housing in particular. The catch is that to afford this, it is going to have to keep much tighter control on day-to-day spending and also end the once-off giveaways which have been a feature of the last few budgets. It will sell the message of restraint now allowing for investment for the future. Bread tomorrow is never an easy strategy to sell to voters – but that is what the Coalition is going to try to do. There will still be some extra cash in the budget for State services and welfare and – probably – a modest tax package. Talk of a 'tough budget' is nonsense – look at France where spending cuts, tax hikes and cutting two bank holidays were put on the table this week. But Irish voters have become accustomed to their budget day goodies – and there is going to be one heck of a political row when the penny drops that they are not going to feature this October. READ MORE Given the risks ahead and the State's reliance on tax payments from a few multinationals, the brakes do need to be put on. Spending has soared and Departmental targets set in the budget are regularly exceeded. Central Bank researchers estimated in June that permanent Government spending has risen by a hefty 37 per cent since 2021. Had the 'rule' to limit State spending growth to 5 per cent been adhered to, the increase would have been 16 per cent. There has simply been little culture of spending control and reinstating it is not going to be easy at a time when demands on public services are growing. Meanwhile, 'once-off payments' – repeated so often now that the term is an offence to the English language – have a serious budget price, costing more than €2 billion in the last package, which was a reduction on earlier years. The most expensive elements have been the universal payments to all households in areas like energy credits in the annual cost-of-living packages. Budget ministers Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers have been saying there will be no cost-of-living package this year ; for now, at least, it seems that the rest of the Cabinet are signed up to this. Ministers will spot the political dangers. Households have started to get used to the annual boost and will feel a bit less well-off. The Opposition will scream. But continuing to throw out the universal once-off payments would be a poor use of money, benefiting many for whom the cash is nice, but not necessary. Better to use what funds are available to build up permanent supports and improved services, focused on those who need them. The cost of living is high , for sure, but it is a farce to portray all households as 'hard-pressed', or everyone in the middle ground as 'squeezed'. Effective policy should help those who genuinely are – like many younger families – through better services in areas like childcare and health, rather than repeating the annual cash giveaways. [ Government 'feckless' with public money, Social Democrats claim in budget row Opens in new window ] Meanwhile, with the sums tightening considerably , the Coalition's 'solemn promise' – as Simon Harris put it – to cut the hospitality VAT rate back to 9 per cent is looking like a 'repent at leisure' moment. Even if this is restricted just to food businesses, it will cost €550 million a year. When other demands are being turned down and 'restraint' is the message , this is not going to be an easy sell for the Coalition. The all-in bet on State investment is driven by a view in Cabinet that housing, water and energy provision have all reached a crisis point – an argument being hammered home to them by big investors. Tariffs and Trump are the most discussed threat to future investment – and do indeed pose fundamental questions. But if Ireland does not put forward a plan to develop infrastructure, then investment is going to drift away, whatever happens in the White House. [ Focus in Budget 2026 has to be on transforming infrastructure, Martin says Opens in new window ] This will be mightily expensive. As well as controlling spending elsewhere, the Government will have to run down its annual budget surplus – and there are some risks here. However, it is still legally obliged – barring a downturn – to keep putting cash away in two funds designed to support future spending and investment. As well as finding the cash, the Coalition has to show it can actually deliver big projects – and more housing – an area where the previous administration performed poorly. And it needs to heed the warnings from the Central Bank and the Fiscal Council that if the State keeps pumping out cash across the board, then it will just add fuel to an economy already at full capacity, making it even harder to deliver on the infrastructure programme. Having had a stumbling and slow start, the Government is about to roll the dice for the rest of its term. Its more serious players will know that threats from across the Atlantic could damage the favourable economic position and budget outlook, and might require mid-flight adjustments in these plans. There will be some reassurance that there is €30 billion in cash and liquid assets down the back of the State couch, but also a realisation that if the trends change fundamentally this only goes so far. But sitting and doing nothing does not look like a clever strategy. Investment is the right direction for the Government to take. It will all come down to delivery. And to a bit of luck that Trump's policies, while inevitably damaging, do not upend things completely.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Planners just cannot win at Dublin Airport
Who'd be a planning commissioner – resigned forever to being pilloried by one side of an application or another? Or in some cases, as with Dublin Airport , both. A decision this week to allow 50 per cent more night-time flights in a shorter 'night-time' window at Dublin Airport alongside a new quota system for noise seemed tailor-made for airlines that have been concerned about maintaining current levels of service at the airport, never mind expansion. But no, they were not happy at all, at least not with the new, higher limit on flights, characterising it as a new, second, passenger cap. They are particularly concerned about limits on flights in the generally busy 5am-7am morning window. Airlines are already fighting a separate 32-million-a-year limit on the number of passengers than can use the airport. Both it and the now-modified night-time limit on flights date back to conditions on the original planning permission for the airport's new north runway. That permission dates back more than 15 years and yet in all that time no one, not the airport operator (the DAA ) nor any of the airlines – especially Ryanair and Aer Lingus for which it is a critical hub – conducted a concerted campaign to address what were always likely to be severely limiting conditions. Only when the runway opened was there any realistic effort to address the new realities of passenger and traffic numbers at the airport. And so here we are. For their part, residents around the airport – or at least one of the residents' associations – were also dissatisfied with the latest decision, saying it will only increase pollution and noise, making their lives more difficult. It's hard to see what would satisfy local residents. The airport authority is already investing millions of euro buying the worst-affected homes and funding increased noise insulation and is, in any case, restricted in its flight paths. And the truth remains that many, if not most, of those living under those flight paths have bought their homes long after the airport was well established as Ireland's big point of entry for air passengers. For now, everyone is threatening to challenge the latest decision in the courts. Meanwhile, in the absence of any political leadership n the issue, the reconstituted planning appeals board, An Coimisiún Pleanála , must resign itself to the view that whatever it decides, the whole mess will be its fault.
