
‘It's a plague': Advocates renew calls for renoviction bylaw in Kitchener
Known as a 'renoviction,' the term refers to the practice of forcing a tenant out of a building, citing the need for extensive renovations or repairs in the unit.
On Monday, more than a dozen people took their fight to Kitchener City Hall, hoping to grab the attention of councillors and city staff.
'People need a renoviction bylaw passed,' said Ryan Murdock, secretary of the Waterloo chapter of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). 'They need it passed now. They needed it passed yesterday.'
Linda Vos is one of several tenants at 250 Frederick St., who received a renoviction notice earlier this year. While her case was dismissed by the Landlord Tenant Board last week, she said other people in her building aren't as lucky.
ACORN RALLY
Local housing advocates are renewing their calls for a bylaw in Kitchener that would prevent renters from losing their homes and protect them from bad landlords. (Alexandra Holyk/CTV News)
'(The landlords) seem to be targeting the individuals that have lower rents, that have been living in my building for decades,' said Vos.
To put the problem into perspective, ACORN said it surveyed 160 tenants in Waterloo Region, with 28 per cent saying they received one or more eviction notices in the last five years. Of those, 54 per cent were notices to vacate for renovations or demolition.
'It's a plague that's really going across the country,' said Murdock. 'And that's why you see other municipalities, other regions stepping up and protecting their citizens, protecting their tenants, and that's what we need Kitchener to do here.'
Back in February, city staff told council they needed time to review how similar bylaws worked in other jurisdictions like Hamilton, London and Toronto. They're expected to share their findings in a report at a committee meeting on June 16.
'There's no reason that Kitchener can't do it,' said ACORN's Ken Vogelpohl. 'All we've been hearing is excuses. What we want is some action.'
But according to one city councillor, action requires resources – something the city doesn't have.
'The province hasn't provided the tools to us to do that,' said Ward 9 Councillor Debbie Chapman in an interview with CTV News. 'But the fact that these other cities are doing it, I'd love to see Kitchener follow suit.'
It's still not clear when a renoviction bylaw could come into force, but advocates say they're not going anywhere until something is done.
'It's time to actually do something,' said Vogepohl. 'We're going to be here. We're going to be at the mics. We're going to be putting more pressure on council to make sure that this happens.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
15 minutes ago
- CTV News
Here's how Canada's LNG exports could make your heating bill go up
The LNG Canada industrial energy project is seen under construction in Kitimat, B.C., on Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck Flames as high as a 30-storey building, ships nearly as long as the Eiffel Tower is tall, $40 billion dollars. Everything about LNG Canada is big — including its promises. Often referred to as the largest private investment in Canadian history, the megaproject connects B.C. shale gas reserves near the Alberta border to marine shipping routes on the northwest coast. More than a decade after the project was first approved, Canada's liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector is finally up and running: LNG Canada sent its first shipment to Asia on June 30. As exports start flowing overseas from the Kitimat, B.C., facility, two more liquefaction plants are under construction — Woodfibre LNG and Cedar LNG. Another, Ksi Lisims LNG, could be approved any day. The promise around all this industrial buildout has always been prosperity, but whether the industry can deliver, and for how long, is up for debate. 'An oversupply of LNG is widely expected, potentially starting as early as next year, with a massive wave of new projects coming online around the world, especially in the U.S. and Qatar,' Steven Haig, a policy advisor with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, told The Narwhal. 'When it comes to the economic benefits of LNG, Canada is really late to the party — and that party is almost over.' Haig and his colleagues recently penned a deep dive into the risks of locking in more LNG infrastructure, reporting that Canadian exports are unlikely to achieve 'energy security for importers or economic resilience for exporters.' 'What we explain in our analysis is that we are very likely moving into a period of oversupply with lower prices — and those lower prices may well be below what projects need to break even,' Haig told The Narwhal. 'If they run at a loss for too long, then they can become stranded assets, with economic implications for the people who work for these facilities or for communities that might become economically associated with them.' 'Higher domestic prices for Canadian consumers' are a possibility As Canadian LNG — the liquid form of natural gas, which is mostly composed of methane and in B.C. is extracted primarily through fracking — starts making its way into international markets, British Columbians and Albertans could also see a spike in their heating bills, according to Deloitte Canada. As the Financial Post recently reported, domestic natural gas prices could jump up by 60 per cent this year, and climb even higher next year. Haig said if the price a company can get from exporting LNG is higher than it can get selling natural gas domestically, prices in places like B.C. and Alberta will go up. This happened in Australia, where domestic prices tripled as Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine sent shockwaves through the supply chain. 'LNG links regional gas markets together in the global LNG market,' Haig explained. 'So a local supply disruption in one place can lead to skyrocketing LNG prices elsewhere.' 'When those high prices are in effect, then it can become more profitable for a gas producer in Canada, for example, to export that gas to the international LNG market than to use that gas in Canada's domestic gas market.' That, he said, can lead to higher domestic prices for Canadian consumers. LNG Canada is now operating its first phase, which will produce up to 14 million tonnes of supercooled gas per year. It's already approved and permitted to double production. Teresa Waddington, LNG Canada's vice-president of corporate relations, told The Narwhal earlier this month that talks are underway about whether or not to go ahead with the expansion. She said a final decision depends on a number of factors including 'overall competitiveness [and] affordability.' LNG Canada did not respond to new questions from The Narwhal by publication time. When the international consortium of oil and gas companies behind LNG Canada (Shell, Petronas, Korea Gas, PetroChina and Mitsubishi) first started courting Canada to develop an LNG export industry in B.C. in the early 2010s, they said it would boost the economy locally, provincially and federally. With recent trade threats from the U.S. government, that narrative is gaining traction again and politicians like B.C. Premier David Eby and Prime Minister Mark Carney are celebrating the sector as an economic saviour. Haig cautioned the narrative should be taken with a grain of salt. 'We're seeing this big push towards LNG expansion to diversify Canada's exports beyond the United States, but these are multi-billion dollar and multi-decade projects,' he explained. 'Their long-term viability is a serious concern as global markets shift towards cleaner and more reliable energy sources, like renewables. Investing in LNG as a supposed transition fuel in the meantime would be a long, costly detour.' 'It's not too late': Canada can reduce economic and climate risks by putting the brakes on LNG exports, expert says Alongside promises of prosperity, LNG Canada and other proponents of the sector maintain the gas is a so-called 'bridge' or transition fuel — a climate solution. The argument goes like this: burning gas to generate power is less harmful than burning coal, and B.C. exports will help countries like China substantially reduce their reliance on the 'dirtier' fossil fuel. The first part is the subject of much debate, especially when the entire lifecycle of LNG is taken into consideration. The second — that Canadian LNG will displace coal — Haig said simply isn't true. 'Coal is cheap, renewables are cheap and LNG is not,' he said. 'If we look at China's power sector, for example, it's renewables — not LNG imports — that are eating into coal's market share. This is mostly because renewables are cheaper than LNG and because LNG requires expensive new infrastructure, such as re-gasification plants and pipelines, to connect consumers with supply.' China, while still responsible for about one third of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, is outpacing the rest of the world by leaps and bounds in building renewables. In May this year, the country added the equivalent of 100 solar panels per second. As the Guardian reported in June, 'China's installed solar photovoltaic capacity has now surpassed 1,000 gigawatts for the first time, equivalent to half of the world's total installed solar capacity.' Haig said Canada is at a crossroads as it decides whether or not to approve more LNG projects, but added, 'it's not too late.' 'LNG exports can delay investments in renewables and generally increase global fossil fuel use, increasing global greenhouse gas emissions,' he said. 'Doubling down on LNG projects would likely expose Canadians to more risk and volatility, not less.' By Matt Simmons, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Narwhal


CBC
44 minutes ago
- CBC
Rent and housing prices send Thunder Bay's inflation rate to 7th highest in Canada
Social Sharing Thunder Bay, Ont., has the seventh highest rate of inflation in Canada, according to Statistics Canada. This week, the national data agency released its report for June. Overall, the country experienced an annual inflation rate of 1.9 per cent, an increase from 1.7 per cent in May. The report, broken down by cities and regions, indicates Thunder Bay's inflation rate has more than doubled, from 0.9 per cent to 2.1 per cent. Mehdi Arzandeh, an assistant professor at Lakehead University's faculty of business administration, said Thunder Bay's inflation situation stands apart from other major cities in the country. "There are some underlying factors that make things that we consume everywhere in Canada more expensive... the price of cars went up, price of footwear [and] furniture," Arzandeh said. But, Arzandeh noted, what sets Thunder Bay apart from other cities in Canada is the state of its rental market. "In the last month, to put it in perspective, the rent on average in Canada went up by about 0.3 per cent, [and] in Toronto 0.9 per cent — in Thunder Bay it went up by 3.8 per cent." Unsteady atmosphere Nationwide, the continuing rise in inflation is in line with current trade disputes with the United States. Doug Porter, chief economist at BMO Financial Group, said inflation showed no real improvement in June, in part because the trade war is pushing up some prices. The high cost of housing is also a contributing factor that's keeping inflation up, Porter said. Feeling the pinch from high grocery bills? A group in Thunder Bay has an interesting way to help 2 years ago The Boreal Museum in Thunder Bay is doing foragers walks until the end of September. The goal is to teach people how to search for wild vegetation in and around the city's forests and elevate your cooking to new heights. CBC's Taylor O'Brien trekked through Thunder Bay trails with founder and creative director, Jason Feller, to learn how to forage. However, Thunder Bay stands in contrast to the rest of the country in its resilience to the impacts of the current trade dispute, Arzandeh argued. "Part of a good thing about the Thunder Bay economy is the fact that it proves to be resilient actually in the face of some of the trade disputes," he said. Because of our location, because of the port of Thunder Bay, we see more activity in our economy due to some of these trade disputes - Mehdi Arzandeh, Lakehead University, assistant professor But if the increase in the price of housing in Thunder Bay persists, Arzandeh argued, it could have some long-term consequences on the city's affordability. "Thunder Bay has become more popular with international students and newcomer international students," he said. "If you see newcomers because we have a growing economy, in the face of trade issues and geopolitical risk, you might not be ready to accommodate all those rental unit demands in Thunder Bay." Growing economy Thunder Bay has the potential for economic growth in the near future, according to Arzandeh. As exports to the U.S. begin to dwindle due to ongoing trade disputes, companies may be looking toward Thunder Bay. "Consumer goods are going to go up unfortunately due to the tariffs," he said. "Because of our location, because of the port of Thunder Bay, we see more activity in our economy due to some of these trade disputes." According to Arzandeh, as Canadian companies look for markets in Europe and South America in the wake of tariffs, Thunder Bay is primed to facilitate those changes. "If chemicals and minerals are to be exported to new European markets and Latin American markets, they're going to happen through the port of Thunder Bay."


National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Michael Higgins: Locking Tamara Lich up for 7 years would be shameful retribution
It is to be hoped that the judge in the case of Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, key organizers of the notorious Freedom Convoy, has more common sense and respect for justice than the prosecution which seems intent on nothing more than revenge and retribution. Article content Whatever one's view of the Freedom Convoy and its actions during a three-week period in early 2022, a prison sentence of seven years for Lich and eight years for Barber would throw the administration of justice into disrepute. Article content Article content Article content That the Crown is asking for these sentences is shameful and ignores some of the other issues in this country that is making Canadians doubt that the legal system is fair, balanced, impartial and beyond reproach. Article content Article content Most of the prosecution case has been demolished. Lich was facing six charges and Barber seven for a variety of accusations including mischief, intimidation, counselling others to break the law, obstructing police and counselling others to obstruct police. Article content At the end of a 45-day trial the organizers of the convoy were both found guilty of mischief and Barber was also found guilty of counselling others to disobey a judge's order to stop honking horns. Article content They were found not guilty of the majority of the charges and yet the Crown demands a penalty that is entirely unjustified. Article content This week they will be sentenced by Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey but at the weekend Lich tweeted that the Crown was asking for seven years imprisonment for her and eight for Barber. Article content Article content Their fate will be decided three years and five months after they were first arrested. An old adage says justice delayed is justice denied. Article content Article content But it is interesting to note that in her April 3 judgement finding the pair guilty, the judge said she accepted that Lich and Barber came to Ottawa 'with the noblest of intentions to simply protest their wish for the government and Prime Minister (at the time) Trudeau to end COVID mandate.' Article content Further, 'The Crown agrees that the accused came to Ottawa to advance a noble cause and had the right to protest against COVID mandates, but argues they crossed the line with the means used to achieve their ends.' Article content The Freedom Convoy was certainly a nuisance. It caused inconvenience and hardship for citizens for some three weeks. The honking of horns was particularly annoying until stopped by a court order. Article content The judge said in her ruling, 'Persons testified that the noise from the truck horns made it difficult for downtown residents to sleep and focus on work. Others testified that the egress from their buildings was blocked or that because of the streets being blocked that it was difficult or impossible to get to work and appointments. Generally, the central core of the city came to a standstill. Article content 'The downtown residents who testified including persons and their families who lived in the downtown core, owners and employees of small businesses and other institutions such as churches suffered significant interferences in the use and enjoyment of their property and in their daily activities because of the protest.' Article content But the Freedom Convoy was not violent. Article content The line that Lich and Barber crossed is one written in sand, shifting, defined only after the fact by the courts and only after a contest between competing rights. Article content The judge said that there is a 'delicate balance between law enforcement concerns for public safety and order and individual rights and freedoms on the other.' Article content There was 'tension' between those rights, she said. Article content Judge Perkins-McVey quoted a judge in another case who said, 'in a free and democratic society such as Canada, we welcome and encourage people to hold demonstrations if such is necessary to exercise their right of freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and their right to freedom of association as guaranteed by section two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Article content Article content 'However, society also expects demonstrators to exercise these rights to do so without violating the rights of others to move about freely or to engage in activities which they have a perfect legal right to do so.' Article content Here is the nub of the case. The judge had to balance the tension between Lich's and Barber's perfect right to protest with the rights of people to go about enjoying their daily lives. Article content 'At the heart of the competing interests in this case lies the question to what extent does the exercise of the right to protest protects those from criminal liability when the rights of other citizens to enjoy their property have been impacted by their actions. Even Charter-protected rights are not absolute,' said the judge. Article content The defence argued the pair were 'engaged in and encouraged a lawful and constitutionally protected peaceful protest.' Article content The judge has found them guilty, but clearly from her ruling there has been, and will be going forward, much more debate and cases involving protests and citizens' rights. Article content Article content Since October 7, 2023, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and other Canadian cities, have seen constant anti-Israel protests (along with demonstrations in support of the terror group Hamas) that have blocked streets, traffic, led to emergency vehicles being diverted, and caused much annoyance, nuisance, fear and alarm to citizens. Article content Yet they are continuing and more are planned. Article content Who decides that the rights of citizens have been impacted to such an extent that the protests are unlawful? The protesters won't do it. As is the case with protests, they push boundaries until they cross lines they don't see. Article content As for the citizens of Toronto, Montreal, et al, they aren't being listened to. Article content Regularly blocking intersections and causing distress to citizens in downtown Toronto for 21 months doesn't appear to be a crime. And yet honking horns and, yes, causing annoyance to the citizens of Ottawa for three weeks, is deemed worthy by the Crown of sending people to jail for seven and eight years. Article content