No bathroom for students who skip Pledge of Allegiance has May River teacher in hot water
In a 40-second video that has been posted multiple times on social media, a student can be heard pleading to be allowed to go to the bathroom, but the teacher refuses.
A student can then be heard asking, 'So if we don't stand for the pledge, we can't use the restroom?' The teacher responds, 'Right.'
When the student again pleads she needs to go to the restroom, the teacher says, 'Then stand for the pledge.'
Social media users identify the teacher in the video as Lawrence Scandone, who is listed as a math teacher in the high school's directory. Multiple sources granted anonymity also confirmed to The Island Packet that Scandone is the teacher in the video.
Candace Bruder, the school district's communications offer, confirmed that Scandone has been placed on administrative leave but would not confirm Scandone was the teacher in question or address why he is on leave. Calls made to a number believed to be Scandone's were not immediately returned Monday.
Bruder said that the district cannot comment on personnel matters, but bathroom policy complaint is being addressed. A teacher placed on administrative leave is removed from campus while an investigation is conducted, Bruder confirmed.
Dr. Chad Cox, the executive director of schools with the school district, said that students use an electronic hall pass system. Students are able to use their school-issued devices to complete a request to a teacher, and teachers, from their own device, would have to approve the request with a code. Typically, kids verbally ask a teacher before submitting the online request, he said, but they do not have to. There are not limits on the number of times a student can use the bathroom, he said.
Bruder confirmed that each school within the district does the Pledge of Allegiance. According to the district's policy manual, 'Any person not wishing to recite or otherwise participate in the Pledge of Allegiance shall be exempt from recitation and/or participation and shall not be penalized for failing to participate in a manner which does not materially infringe upon the rights of others or disrupt school activities.'
A student posted the video on Tuesday, April 1. It collected more than 187,000 views and 33,000 likes in the following six days. The video can be found on TikTok.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
DHS Responds to 'Cartel-Tok' Videos of Drug Smuggling Going Viral
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has responded to viral videos glamorizing cartel activity and drug smuggling, with officials emphasizing the ongoing efforts to crack down on what they call "depraved" criminal networks. The content, some of which shows what appears to be cocaine being processed and transported, includes footage of what seem to be dismembered limbs, allegedly belonging to a cartel-affiliated smuggler. The videos have drawn widespread attention and alarm, contributing to what online users have dubbed the "Cartel-Tok" trend, where criminal groups glorify cartel life and showcase violent or illegal activity. "While DHS has not verified the authenticity of the content this particular account has shared, our brave ICE officers, CBP agents and U.S. Coast Guard are working day-in and day-out to protect Americans from the threat of these depraved cartel members who glorify violence," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Newsweek. File photo shows cocaine. File photo shows cocaine. AP Why It Matters President Donald Trump signed an executive order designating Mexican drug cartels and other Latin American groups as terrorist organizations. Trump's order says that these groups "threaten the safety of the American people, the security of the United States, and the stability of the international order in the Western Hemisphere." What To Know "On day one of his presidency, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. These depraved thugs rape, maim, torture and poison Americans," McLaughlin said. Dubbed "Cartel-Tok" by social media users, a growing number of videos posted to platforms like TikTok depict people allegedly affiliated with Latin American drug cartels showcasing large drug shipments. Some videos have racked up millions of views. A TikTok account under the username @$rugcoin has shared several videos depicting what appears to be a drug smuggler with a video caption that reads "POV: You Work for the cartel." The videos often portray illegal smuggling as daring or heroic, raising fears that they may be influencing young viewers or aiding recruitment efforts by cartels. One video text caption reads: "Family business on Colombia," and another says: "We are hiring more people." The account under $RUGCOIN is also promoting a new memecoin project. DHS has not confirmed whether the people shown in the viral content are actual cartel members. Arturo Fontes, a retired FBI agent, told Newsweek that the social media videos can "entice" young people. What People Are Saying Arturo Fontes, a retired FBI agent, told Newsweek: "These videos glamorize the role of drug dealers and violent crime, particularly appealing to young people—often referred to as "fresas," or middle-class youths—who lack motivation for education or employment. Unfortunately, many of these individuals are disillusioned with the traditional path and are enticed by the allure of fast money, luxurious lifestyles, and superficial beauty without any effort or hard work." DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Newsweek: "Under Secretary Noem's leadership, DHS has near complete operational control of the border that the Biden administration recklessly left wide-open for cartels to exploit by trafficking humans and drugs into the U.S. Our personnel will continue to dismantle and disrupt nefarious criminals who pose a threat to the safety of our country."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gabby Thomas Turns Surprise Drug-Tester Visit Into TikTok Gold
Sprint star Gabby Thomas is also quick on her feet when it comes to awkward situations. In a TikTok video she shared Monday, the Paris Olympic triple-gold medalist was having a drink with friends at an event when a drug-tester showed up. Anti-doping agents take their unannounced visits seriously to catch cheats. Instead of fuming over the intrusion, Thomas played it for laughs and set it to the comic song 'Me, You and Steve' ― which is basically about an unwelcome third wheel named Steve. The video quickly panned to the smiling tester and back to Thomas going on with her socializing. 'I can't believe that it's finally me and you, and you and me/ Just us/ And your friend Steve,' the song goes. Thomas captioned the footage 'When antidoping surprises you but you had plans.' Click to watch it here. The clip appears to be on the up and up. The doping control official was recognized by former Olympic swimmer Erica Sullivan, a 1500-meter silver medalist at the Beijing Games in 2021. 'Wait she's tested me before,' Sullivan wrote. 'She's the best, loved gabbing to her about her kids drama.' Another commenter, who might have been aware of Thomas' whereabouts last fall, asked: 'What happens if you leave the country, or spending time in private areas? Like if you went to a resort in the Maldives where the island is owned by the hotel and can only be reached was sea plane transfer (you wouldn't be able to drive up and walk in without questions) for a week or two, would they come find you?' Replied Thomas: 'If you're out of the country, they use that country's doping control officers to find you. But yeah if you go to a diff country, less likely to be tested as frequently. And I actually did vacation in the Maldives last year and I wasn't tested, so I guess they can't find you there 😂.' Drug-testing has not always been a laughing matter for Thomas. She ran afoul of the Athletics Integrity Unit in 2020 for allegedly missing three tests and got provisionally suspended. But Thomas was able to prove her innocence in one instance and the ban was lifted. Related... Olympian Gabby Thomas Claims She's Being Stalked While Traveling Olympic Sprint Champ Gabby Thomas Swears She Doesn't Have It All. Here's Why. Olympian Gabby Thomas Shuts Down Racist Comments Accusing Her Of Faking Harvard Degree
Buzz Feed
8 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
The Internet Loves Getting 'Cheaters' Fired – But I Worry We're Missing The Point
I still remember the backlash when it turned out that Ned Fulmer, the ex-BuzzFeeder who had been dubbed the 'wife guy' of online group Try Guys, had cheated on his partner with a colleague. He was let go from his Try Guys role amidst public outrage. And now, Astronomer's CEO Andy Bryon has stepped down from his role following a TikTok clip which some online sleuths say shows him cheating with his HR lead at a Coldplay concert. Though the company have not confirmed Andy was the person in the viral video, they have written in a statement that 'Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met.' I have already shared that I'm not the biggest fan of how some people are engaging with the 'Coldplay affair.' Nor do I think that public reaction should influence a person's professional status before an official investigation. For instance, the company's Senior Director of People, 'identified' by TikTok detectives, has had her LinkedIn profile bombarded by commenters who think she got her promotion by hiding her boss' romance. The comments came through, despite there being absolutely no evidence that this was the case (the company has since revealed she 'was not there. This is a rumour started on Twitter'). This is wrong. A likely innocent woman's professional page is now littered with potentially career-disrupting claims due to almost certainly baseless delusions of online 'accountability.' That's the sort of perversely gleeful dogpiling I'm sure Jon Ronson's So You've Been Publicly Shamed would have a field day with. Lawyer Eric Kingsley, firm partner at Kingsley Szamet Employment Lawyers, told us: 'Legally, the private life of an individual usually will not be cause for termination unless the private life somehow overlaps the professional environment or threatens the organisation.' But in the case of both Fulmer and, if true, Bryon, there's more to the story than just 'bad vibes.' 'If the conduct in question involves other staff members or directly affects the workplace environment, the rationale for termination greatly changes,' the lawyer said. Fulmer's relationship was with a relatively junior employee, while Bryon's suspected 'affair' was alleged to be with his HR lead. 'A Chief Executive Officer being involved in a romantic relationship with an employee, even more so if there exists a position of power, creates huge potential for problems of favouritism, coercion, and the risk of legal action based upon harassment or retribution,' Kingsley added. 'Even if the relationship remains voluntary, the potential can damage the morale of employees, cause intra-company disputes, or violate stated policies of the company. Some companies place explicit policies regarding intra-company relations in place in order to avoid complications.' Meanwhile, Thomas Roulet, a fellow and director of studies in psychology and behavioural science at King's College, Cambridge, says that 'If someone's personal life affects their professional performance and engagement, yes, we could definitely consider HR interventions (it could be a warning, or go as far as getting fired).' The same goes if their performance and judgement are affected by the relationship, he added. But I don't think unfairly prying and overly moralistic internet commenters keep those rules in mind in their hunt for a perceived 'bad guy' – Astronomer's Senior Director of People is proof that many of us make the court of public opinion far too punishing, despite using inconsistent 'laws.' That misses the point; it's all about power dynamics. As it happens, piling on an (again, likely innocent) woman who you believe to have gotten her promotion based solely on hiding an affair without any evidence whatsoever is not exactly the best use of our collective power. I fear the 'reward' of firing a person armchair warriors believe to have cheated has left some to believe that their beliefs about adultery, whether grounded or not, ought to result in indiscriminate real-life action. Personally, I don't think that unkind quest has anything to do with accountability; we are confusing our own amateur sleuthing for genuine, professional investigation. Just because the two might sometimes have the same result, though, does not mean it's fair to equate them.
