Ungku Aziz And His Sarong Index
An Inspiration for Social Transformation
Ungku Aziz, also known as Ungku Abdul Aziz bin Ungku Abdul Hamid, was born in London in 1922 and studied in Malaysia. From the beginning, his adventure was extraordinary. After deciding to pursue an academic career, Ungku Aziz immediately gained recognition for his compassion and progressive viewpoints. He advocated for the economic advancement of Malaysians, paying special attention to the rural populace, who comprised a large portion of the country's population in the early years of independence. In addition to being respected as an academic, he was a social reform pioneer whose influence lasted long after his death in December 2020.
In addition to studying textbook economics, Ungku Aziz also examined the local and cultural markers that characterised Malaysian life to comprehend the extent of rural poverty. In Malaysian development economics, he became a legend because his work laid the groundwork for socioeconomic policies that influenced government programmes and provided genuine insight into rural poverty.
The Sarong Index: A Creative Metric
Ungku Aziz's 'Sarong Index' is among his most famous works. On the surface, it appears pretty straightforward. The number of sarongs, a traditional Malaysian garment frequently worn in rural families, in a family is divided by the number of household members to determine the Sarong Index. According to Ungku Aziz, the sarong was a concrete representation of material stability for rural people and an indication that went beyond simple income levels. This index was quite valuable, particularly since Malaysia lacked sophisticated measures for assessing poverty and a robust infrastructure for collecting data.
According to Ungku Aziz, the quantity of sarongs in a home gauges the general well-being of Malaysians living in rural areas rather than just a measure of apparel. A basic degree of comfort and stability was indicated when households had enough sarongs, which signified they had money to spend on things other than food. On the other hand, the lack of several sarongs spoke to a lifestyle that failed to adhere to even the most fundamental cultural standards, suggesting a deprivation beyond mere material poverty.
Transcending Data: Cultural Perspective on Poverty
The distinctive feature of Ungku Aziz's method was its consideration of cultural background. Given that the sarong is more than simply clothing, the Sarong Index captured the social subtleties of Malay living, whereas many other poverty indices are quantitative. When worn in the house, sarongs convey warmth, cosiness, and cultural identity. By examining sarongs, Ungku Aziz could quantify cultural values, self-respect, and dignity in ways that traditional economic indices could not.
Since it reduced poverty to a straightforward yet relatable visual, this unusual indication struck a deep chord with decision-makers. It spoke to those who recognised the importance of the sarong in daily Malay living without using complicated economic terms. The capacity of Ungku Aziz to innovate in both economic theory and the real-world applications of social research was demonstrated by this method.
Developing National Initiatives to Reduce Poverty
The Sarong Index may show Ungku Aziz's wider contributions to Malaysia's socioeconomic policies. His efforts to reduce poverty greatly influenced Malaysia's development initiatives. The Second Malaysia Plan, a governmental blueprint containing goals for economic growth, better education, and rural development, was formulated in the 1960s, largely thanks to Ungku Aziz's views.
Through the Sarong Index, Ungku Aziz emphasised the significance of comprehending rural poverty in a comprehensive and context-sensitive manner, arguing that national development initiatives need to consider the cultural context of the areas they were intended to assist. Additionally, his idea paved the way for rural cooperatives, which gave farmers in rural areas better economic possibilities, financial stability, and collective bargaining strength. Ungku Aziz tackled structural poverty by encouraging cooperatives, which made it possible for the impoverished in rural areas to engage in the country's economy more fully.
Ungku Aziz's Lasting Influence
The Sarong Index illustrates how Ungku Aziz's theories questioned conventional notions of poverty. He measured poverty by considering cultural significance, dignity, and quality of life in addition to economic data. Even today, the Sarong Index reminds us that poverty impacts every facet of human existence, not just a lack of money.
In this regard, generations of economists and politicians have been motivated by Ungku Aziz's groundbreaking work to embrace cultural settings and think imaginatively about poverty. His theories, which strongly emphasised social cohesiveness and local identity as key components of sustainable development, were innovative for their time. As Malaysia continues to address poverty and injustice, Ungku Aziz's teachings serve as a reminder of the importance of careful, context-driven social policymaking.
Future Prospects: The Sarong Index's Current Significance
Today, with Malaysia and other nations dealing with fast-changing socio-economic issues, the Sarong Index's guiding principles are still applicable. Given the growing cost of living, economic inequality, and the gap between rural and urban areas, Ungku Aziz's analysis of poverty still has relevance for modern policymaking. Using culturally relevant measures and locally relevant approaches, policymakers today may learn from Ungku Aziz's approach to effectively measuring and addressing poverty.
Poverty is still closely linked to social conventions and cultural identity in rural communities, like those where Ungku Aziz spent his youth. Despite its symbolic nature, the Sarong Index promotes a comprehensive approach to well-being that considers cultural continuity and community belonging. Ungku Aziz's observations serve as a timely reminder of the significance of culturally sensitive development planning at a time when local customs are under danger from globalisation and quick economic change.
Conclusion
In addition to being an economist, Ungku Aziz was a humanitarian who valued human dignity in the struggle against poverty. His creation, the Sarong Index, offers a novel approach to gauging rural poverty while maintaining cultural sensitivity and demonstrates his profound knowledge of Malay society. Through the Sarong Index, Ungku Aziz provided Malaysia with a cutting-edge instrument to view and combat poverty, which is still applicable despite the difficulties of today.
As Malaysia progresses, Ungku Aziz's work serves as a lighthouse, reminding politicians, economists, and social activists that the development road must honour the cultures and identities it aims to elevate. His legacy reminds us that reducing poverty concerns more than just statistics; it also concerns the community, humanity, and respect.
— The author is the Director of the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
Satay, roti canai and kuey teow
DIFFERENCES between races, cultures and religions have not stopped South-East Asians from building close-knit communities in their respective countries. While countries like Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam are more homogenous compared to Malaysia and Singapore, social cohesion in the region remains high – averaging 72.4%, according to the South-East Asian Social Cohesion Radar 2025. The study, initiated in 2022 by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University, measures social ties across ethnic, religious and linguistic lines. 'There is a broad acceptance for cultural differences. Overall, more than seven in 10 are confident that people from diverse communities will help each other regardless of their identity,' says the school's Senior Fellow and Social Cohesion Research Programme head Dr Leong Chan-Hoon. And when we zoom in on Malaysia, the numbers appear to be heading in the right direction. Malaysia's overall social cohesion score rose from 68% in 2022 to 75% in 2025. The latest breakdown shows 80% in social relations (ties across ethnicity, religion and language), 70% in connectedness (ties between communities, institutions and government), and 75% in civic-mindedness or people's willingness to work together for the common good. According to the report, Malaysians 'feel strongly connected with their national and cultural identities, and are confident of other ethnic and religious groups.' 'Unity in diversity' Malaysia's national identity often revolves around the idea of 'unity in diversity'. So how do Malaysians mentally process pluralism – especially across generations, where values and cultural scripts may differ? Taylor's University Mental Health and Well-being Impact Lab director Professor Dr Rozainee Khairudin says national identity is shaped by this very diversity. 'Due to the country's multicultural landscape, most Malaysians are exposed from a young age to various ethnic groups, languages, traditions and religious practices,' she says. 'This exposure enables them to form mental representations such as schemas (basic knowledge structures) and cultural scripts (internalised rules for social interaction) that incorporate diversity.' She explains that a Malaysian child growing up in a multicultural school, for instance, may develop a schema that sees ethnic difference as normal and expected. 'Over time, these mental structures become automatic – helping individuals navigate diverse environments with more tolerance and less cognitive effort. 'This is pluralism in action – not just accepting difference, but engaging with it fluidly.' CLICK TO ENLARGE Social acceptance Universiti Sains Malaysia sociologist Dr Zaireeni Azmi says she was pleasantly surprised by Malaysia's 78.4% score under the acceptance in diversity indicator – a component of the social relations domain. 'It's one of the most influential dimensions of social cohesion,' she says. 'To be honest, I do worry when I see racial slurs like 'Type M' or 'Type C' still popping up on social media. 'But clearly, there's more good than bad among the people. I'd call Malaysia a success story in terms of a multiracial society – from the roti canai and nasi lemak we eat, to the 'lah' we use in daily conversation.' Zaireeni also highlights 'mamak-isation' as a symbolic expression of unity – where people of all races sit together at mamak restaurants to eat, chat and watch football. 'You rarely see that in Malay or Chinese restaurants. But at the mamak, Malays, Chinese and Indians hang out together. That reflects our society. It shows a sense of belonging and unity in diversity. 'The report also shows that we're proud of our national identity. That's good news.' Still, she cautions, unity in diversity is not without its cracks. 'There are issues around representation. We've had riots in the past. It's not perfect, but we are living together peacefully.' The report also underscores the role of national policy in shaping unity. For instance, following the May 13, 1969 riots, the government introduced the 'Rukun Negara'– a set of National Principles to promote unity: Belief in God; Loyalty to King and Country; Supremacy of the Constitution; Rule of Law; Courtesy and Morality. 'These principles are integrated into our education system and continue to influence national unity policies. 'The government also promotes the concept of Bangsa Malaysia – an inclusive national identity for all. Bahasa Melayu, as the national language, helps facilitate interaction between ethnic groups.' Zaireeni agrees and points to a recent example. 'When the Visit Malaysia Year montage didn't include any mosques, it wasn't just the Malays who questioned it – other races too felt it didn't represent Malaysia's vibrant cultural identity.' Growing commonality Malaysia also scores highly in the domain that measures focus on the common good –especially in civic participation (80%) and respect for social rules (81%), though solidarity and helpfulness lags slightly behind at 66%. When asked whether religion and culture can be forces for unity or division, Zaireeni says it depends on how people approach their differences. 'When we talk about religion or linguistic identities, we should celebrate them together. Look at how we observe all major religious festivals – Hari Raya, Chinese New Year, Deepavali and Christmas, among others. 'That shared heritage is our strength. We must always work for a common good.' But she warns that unity can unravel if differences are politicised. 'When people push a 'them vs us' narrative, it strains relationships. I don't know why some keep doing that.' The media, she adds, also plays a vital role in shaping public perception. 'Some media houses sensationalise differences for attention. That's harmful. Instead, let's highlight the positive – stories about people helping one another, about collaboration. 'We already have enough politicians doing the opposite.' Young and old The survey also notes that age, ethnicity and religion influence perceptions of social cohesion – especially in Malaysia. Younger people tend to view society more positively than older generations. Among 1,003 respondents, youths rated Perception of Fairness at a mean of 3.81, compared to 3.64 for adults and 3.25 for seniors. Similarly, in Identification, youth scored 4.14, adults 4.02, and seniors 3.82. Rozainee says these generational gaps can shape how pluralism is understood. 'Older generations may hold onto more rigid cultural scripts formed by past sociopolitical experiences, while younger Malaysians – especially those influenced by global media and inclusive education – develop more flexible, integrative ways of thinking about identity and diversity. 'These differing cognitive frameworks can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or value clashes between generations.'
Sinar Daily
a day ago
- Sinar Daily
Here's the crunch: Towkay's open secret of Ipoh bean sprouts
IPOH - For those all too familiar with the delightful crunch of sweet Ipoh bean sprouts, this nutritious, little vegetable called 'taugeh' certainly holds a special place in the hearts of Malaysians. There is no question about it, that Ipoh bean sprouts are indeed more famous compared to bean sprouts grown in other places or states because of the crunchy texture, slightly sweet taste and plump shape that resembles a strangely, elongated punctuation mark … or is there? Behind this uniqueness, there definitely must be a secret to why bean sprouts from Buntong have found their way into markets not only in Perak but also in neighbouring states like Selangor, where the ubiquitous taugeh is synonymous as a signature dish with chicken rice in restaurants. So here's the crunch: An Ipoh bean sprout producer, a 'towkay' (or 'boss' in Chinese) who only wants to be known as Sam, divulged that the secret of delicious Ipoh bean sprouts lies in the source of water used in the production process. The secret behind the deliciousness of Ipoh bean sprouts lies in the water source used in their cultivation. Photo by Bernama "Here, the production uses underground mineral water that springs from the limestone hills around the factory here, this area (Buntong) which is located around the Kinta Valley exploits this natural advantage to be produce 'special' bean sprouts not found anywhere else," Sam, who is in his 40s, told Bernama. The father of two said that Buntong, an area in the Kinta Valley rich in limestone landscape and formations, is a strategic location for several bean sprout entrepreneurs who pump mineral water directly from underground to run their bean sprout business. He said the limestone water is said to be high in mineral content from the underground layered aquifers, contributing to the production of bean sprouts that are plump, fluffier, sweeter, of better quality, less pungent in smell, and rich in calcium. Sam explained that to produce quality bean sprouts, he uses black matpe beans (also known as Black Gram) imported from Myanmar, measuring 3.25 millimetres. The secret behind the deliciousness of Ipoh bean sprouts lies in the water source used in their cultivation. Photo by Bernama "The process begins with soaking the beans for a certain period, followed by a filtering process to separate and remove the damaged beans. Only the best beans are selected, placed in large tubs, where they are soaked with water at the right temperature and lighting,' he said. He said that the beans need to be watered every four hours daily, hence factory operations are carried out in shifts by workers to ensure that the watering schedule is followed precisely. This is crucial because the bean sprout production process is very sensitive to time, temperature and water quality. Sam further shared that after six days, the perfect bean sprouts are ready to be packed and delivered to wholesalers across Ipoh and several other districts in Perak. "It seems simple, but this process (producing bean sprouts) is difficult and demands high precision. If you don't control the time and temperature, the bean sprouts can be damaged or of poor quality. In a day, on average, three to four sacks of black beans have to be thrown away because they are not suitable for processing into bean sprouts," he said. Sam said he has been running the family-run business inherited from his grandfather and father for nearly 10 years. The business, which is over 40 years old, can produce up to one tonne (1,000 kilogrammes/kg) of bean sprouts daily. The bean sprouts come in two types: short and long, where short bean sprouts are sold at around RM3 per kg, while long bean sprouts are priced lower and can stay crunchy for three days if stored in the refrigerator. Meanwhile, a chicken rice trader Amirah Hanis Mohammad Asri, 37, said she chooses Ipoh bean sprouts due to high demand from customers. "I sell Chinese-style (called 'Nga Choy Kai Fun' or 'Ayam Taugeh') chicken rice served together with 'taugeh' bean sprouts as a side dish doused with soy sauce and oil. Most customers crave the short and plumper Ipoh bean sprouts, as they are tastier and crunchier. I buy fresh stock every day to keep customers satisfied and smiling," she added. - BERNAMA
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Tempoyak is so last season
Spicing things up: Ahmad Fauzi whipping up his family's unique recipe of durian sambal by pounding red and green chillies, salt and fresh durian flesh in a pestle and mortar. — THOMAS YONG/The Star Mealtimes get a kick from grandma's durian sambal JOHOR BARU: Durian and sambal are popular among Malaysians but durian sambal, anyone? Former chef Ahmad Fauzi Abd Aziz, 52, has the recipe, whipping up his family's unique durian sambal using red and green chillies, salt and fresh durian flesh. 'The recipe was passed down from my great-grandparents who used to have a durian orchard in Terengganu. 'My great-grandmother would make durian dishes such as dodol and when there was an excess, she got creative and made durian sambal by pounding the ingredients into a paste using a pestle and mortar,' he said in an interview. Ahmad Fauzi said while many are familiar with dishes like tempoyak (fermented durian), durian sambal was not commercialised. He said the secret was in using kampung durians instead of 'branded' varieties such as Musang King or D101. 'The kampung durian has a lighter taste and complements chillies well for a more balanced flavour. I do not add belacan to prevent strong flavours from clashing,' added Ahmad Fauzi, who is now a contractor based in Port Dickson. He said he would buy kampung durians from Negri Sembilan on the way back to Johor Baru if he gets a good price. 'I usually make the sambal in small batches to eat with kampung-style fried fish and ulam – my family looks forward to my return because they are used to the way I make it,' said Ahmad Fauzi, who previously spent years working as a chef serving Japanese, Western and local cuisine. He said he does not make too much durian sambal in one go because storing it in the fridge for long will result it in fermenting and turning into tempoyak.
