
How Boston remembers Anthony Burns, a man forcefully returned to slavery
On this day 171 years ago, federal officials escorted a man in chains downtown to remove him from Massachusetts.
Anthony Burns, then age 20, had escaped bondage in Virginia only to be forcefully returned.
Why it matters: Burns' arrest became a flashpoint for Boston at a time when the nation was starkly divided, and historical reenactments and discussions are keeping his legacy alive nearly two centuries later.
Between the lines: The nation was starkly divided over slavery.
Depending on whom you asked, Burns was either kidnapped by a Virginia slave owner with the help of federal officials or returned to his rightful owner, per National Park Service archives.
Anti-slavery activists debated whether the Fugitive Slave Act or a "higher law" should take precedence in a state that had abolished slavery decades earlier, says Shawn Quigley, lead ranger for the National Parks of Boston.
State of play: National Park Service rangers in Boston revive that debate in their town meeting programming, including a recent reenactment of a May 26, 1854, meeting anti-slavery activists held in Faneuil Hall.
Rangers pass out cards and ask the audience to deliver various arguments, Quigley says.
The latest event was at the Old South Meeting House, with support from Revolutionary Space, but the Burns events will resume weekly once a restoration project at Faneuil Hall wraps up later this month.
What they're saying: "The history of Faneuil Hall in Boston is not just the American Revolution, and it's a continuation of the American Revolution," Quigley tells Axios.
Flashback: While activists debated in Faneuil Hall, they got word that a group of radical abolitionists tried to break down the courthouse entrance to rescue Burns.
The abolitionists failed, and a federal marshal was fatally shot.
Burns lost his case in court, but the day he was removed from Boston surrounded by federal troops, more than 50,000 people in Boston protested — equivalent to nearly half of the city's population at the time, Quigley says.
A far smaller coalition led by the Twelfth Baptist Church in Boston tracked down Burns and paid for his freedom in 1855.
Burns returned to Boston briefly before studying at Oberlin College in Ohio and becoming a pastor in Canada.
Today, the nation is again divided over its collective identity.
Now, instead referring to slave catchers, activists are calling immigration agents " kidnappers," like in the arrest of Tufts international student Rümeysa Öztürk, while supporters hail the detention of pro-Palestinian protesters and call them terrorists.
Americans nationwide, including in Massachusetts, can't agree on immigration policies, LGBTQ+ issues, or diversity, equity and inclusion efforts — all at a time when the federal government is embattled over federally funded research, its workforce and national parks resources.
National Parks of Boston workers, including Quigley, wouldn't discuss the current political climate, citing restrictions under the Hatch Act.
What Quigley did say is that he wants people to consider the programming like the Burns discussions as an example of how the nation's revolutionary spirit has persisted after all these years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
GOP senators reach deal on AI regulation ban
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said Sunday that she reached a deal with Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on new text for a provision in President Trump's sweeping tax package that seeks to bar states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI).The updated text would enact a 'temporary pause,' banning states from regulating AI for five years if they want access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funding included in the bill. The original provision, which Blackburn opposed, sought to limit state legislation for a 10-year also includes new exemptions for state laws seeking to regulate unfair or deceptive practices, children's online safety, child sexual abuse material and publicity rights.'For decades, Congress has proven incapable of passing legislation to govern the virtual space and protect Americans from being exploited by Big Tech, and it's why I continue to fight to pass federal protections for Tennesseans and Americans alike,' Blackburn said in a statement.'To ensure we do not decimate the progress states like Tennessee have made to stand in the gap, I am pleased Chairman Cruz has agreed to update the AI provision to exempt state laws that protect kids, creators, and other vulnerable individuals from the unintended consequences of AI,' she has been a key proponent of legislation seeking to protect kids online. She reintroduced the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) last month alongside Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).'I look forward to working with him in the coming months to hold Big Tech accountable — including by passing the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework that gives consumers more power over their data,' she added. 'It's time to get the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to the President's desk so we can deliver on our promise of enacting the America First agenda.'It's unclear whether Blackburn and Cruz's deal on the AI provision will resolve the concerns of other lawmakers who have previously voiced opposition to the measure, including Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).The provision survived scrutiny from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough last week, who ruled that the AI moratorium did not violate the Byrd rule and can remain in the reconciliation Senate is expected to move forward with a series of votes on the package Monday morning, as they race to get the bill across the finish line before Trump's self-imposed deadline of July 4.


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
With code words and dog whistles, Zohran Mamdani puts a pretty face on hate
Zohran Mamdani sure is good at putting a pleasant face on hate. His platform's pointed reference to boosting property taxes on white New Yorkers is 'just naming things as they are,' he claimed Sunday, simply 'an assessment of what neighborhoods are being under-taxed versus over-taxed.' So why make a point of linking it to race, unless you're talking code? Similarly, he wouldn't back down on his defense of the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' which along with 'from the river to the sea' is blatantly about opposing Jews as Jews and eliminating Israel. But 'that's not language that I use,' he blurred: His language is about 'a belief in universal human rights' — rights that, strangely enough, Israel actually respects but not the Palestinian territories. Even his plans to hike taxes on businesses and the rich are somehow 'a vision for every single New Yorker, including business leaders across the city.' Sure, everyone has a place in his vision — but for many, it's as his villains who'll have to pay. His supporters hear the dog whistles; the rest of us are supposed to be snowed by his aw-shucks claims about how he's just being 'frank' and perhaps a trifle impolite in 'naming things as they are.' Let's see if he can keep up this nasty game all the way to Nov. 4.


UPI
7 hours ago
- UPI
CBO: $1 trillion cut from Medicaid in Senate's budget bill
U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, D-OR, uses a diagram to explain tax cuts at a press conference following the weekly Senate policy luncheon in the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on Tuesday. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo June 29 (UPI) -- A version of the budget reconciliation bill being considered by the Senate would make deeper cuts to social service programs and lead to fewer people having insurance than previous versions, the Congressional Budget Office has reported. According to the Congressional Budget office report, nearly 12 million Americans would lose coverage by 2034. Federal spending on Medicaid, SNAP and marketplace insurance benefits would drop by $1.1 trillion. $1 trillion would come from Medicaid. With its changes, he Senate version of the bill would add nearly $3.3 trillion to the national debt over a decade, the CBO report said, while the House version would add $2.4 to the debt. These estimates are based on including the costs of extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Republicans in the House and Senate have asked CBO, as well as the Joint Committee on Taxation, to score the bill using a method called "current policy baseline," which would not include the the cost of extending the cuts. When the cost of extending the tax cuts is excluded from estimates, both the House and Senate versions of the bill have been estimated to add between $400 billion and $600 billion to the debt over the next decade, according to the New York Times and Politico. Medicaid cuts have been at the center of a high profile debate as social service agencies and rural hospitals have planned for spending reductions that could come at the expense of the nation's hungry children and force some hospitals, especially in rural areas, to reduce services or close their doors. The Senate voted Saturday to open debate on the bill and began a full reading of the measure on the floor. The Trump administration has said it is reducing waste and fraud in social service programs, and that some of those responsibilities would be shifted to the states. President Donald Trump has said he wants the budget bill passed by July 4th. The cuts being considered to Medicaid would be the largest since it was launched in 1965.