Amid India-Pak rift, Senator Palwasha Zai Khan makes shocking remark on Ayodhya's Ram Mandir, sparks backlash
Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan
has added fuel to the already simmering tensions between
India
and Pakistan. Her remarks, delivered on April 29 in
Pakistan
's Upper House, have sparked widespread outrage, both diplomatically and on social media. The speech, which contained threats and religious rhetoric, has raised concerns about the future of bilateral relations between the two nuclear-armed nations.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
A Chinese shadow falls on Pahalgam terror attack case probe
How India can use water to pressure Pakistan
Buzzkill: How India can dissolve the Pakistan problem, not just swat it
The provocative speech
Senator Khan, a member of the
Pakistan Peoples Party
(PPP), addressed Pakistan's Senate with a fiery tone. During her speech, she controversially declared, 'The first brick of the new
Babri mosque
in
Ayodhya
will be laid by Pakistan Army soldiers, and the first azaan will be given by Army Chief Asim Munir himself.' These remarks referred to the Babri mosque, which was demolished in 1992, and were framed as part of a broader vision for a 'Muslim government' in the Indian subcontinent, one that would be led by Pakistan.
Her words echoed calls for religious and militaristic unity, stating, 'There is no doubt, this enmity is not with Pakistan or Pakistanis; this is enmity against Muslims and against Islam.' The senator's speech further intensified when she warned India of dire consequences, saying, 'If any hand reaches toward us, then the symbol of their power, the Red Fort of Delhi, will witness a bloodshed that its walls have never seen, and its ramparts will testify to it for centuries to come.'
GIF89a����!�,D;
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Baghdad - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
Nationalist and militaristic rhetoric
Khan's speech took on a highly militaristic tone, asserting that Pakistanis were not weak, remarking, 'We are not wearing bangles.' She cited the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, saying, 'We have guns, we have arms, we have trees—and if the enemy tries anything, we will hang their corpses from our trees.'
Live Events
Despite her strong language, Khan clarified that she did not have any quarrel with Indian citizens, stating, 'We have no enmity with the people of India.' This was part of her attempt to distinguish the actions of the Pakistani state from the people of India, although the threatening tone of her speech seemed to contradict this assertion.
Khan also attempted to stir religious divisions within the Indian armed forces, claiming, 'The Sikh army will not attack Pakistan because it's the land of Guru Nanak for them.' She went on to express admiration for Khalistani separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, praising him for his anti-India stance.
Calls for military preparedness
Concluding her speech, Khan issued a call to arms, declaring, 'Our army is not just six or seven lakh soldiers, we have 250 million people who, when the time comes, will stand shoulder to shoulder with our armed forces and become soldiers themselves, God willing.' Her statement further highlighted the nationalist sentiment she was rallying behind, presenting Pakistan's population as ready to defend the nation should the need arise.
The video of the speech has since gone viral on social media platforms, drawing sharp reactions. In particular, her remarks were made public just days after the deadly Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which left 26 civilians dead. The attack has already heightened tensions between the two nations, with Pakistan being accused of supporting cross-border terrorism.
The escalating India-Pakistan tensions
Relations between India and Pakistan have been fraught with tension for decades, but recent events have brought the two countries to the brink. The Pahalgam attack, coupled with Pakistan's ongoing ceasefire violations along the Line of Control (LoC), has escalated tensions further. India has responded with several retaliatory measures, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty and reducing the staff at the Pakistan High Commission.
In response, Pakistan has made several threats, including the closure of its airspace to Indian flights and the potential withdrawal from key agreements such as the Shimla Agreement. With the nuclear threat looming, both nations have been locked in a delicate and dangerous standoff.
The international community has expressed concern about the rhetoric and actions of both nations. The
United Nations
has called for restraint, urging both India and Pakistan to engage in diplomatic dialogue rather than resorting to military threats. As tensions continue to rise, the world watches closely, fearing that any misstep could lead to catastrophic consequences for the region.
Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan's speech has added fuel to the fire of an already volatile relationship between India and Pakistan. As both nations continue to exchange threats, the risk of further violence looms large. With deep-rooted political, religious, and historical factors at play, the path to peace seems more elusive than ever. Whether diplomacy can prevail over military threats remains to be seen, but the stakes are high for both countries and the wider region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
I am the senior most MLA, I have to oversee all of Haryana: Vij
A day after BJP's state president Mohan Lal Badoli appointed MLAs as in-charges of 42 Assembly constituencies where the party lost in the 2024 Assembly polls, Cabinet minister Anil Vij announced that he would soon begin a state-wide tour since he is the senior-most MLA of the BJP in Haryana. 'They have been assigned one constituency each, but I have to oversee entire Haryana. I am the senior most MLA of my party. I have won seven times. So, soon, I shall begin a state-wide tour to meet both new and veteran party workers across various locations and check on their well-being,' Vij said while interacting with media persons. The BJP appointed the MLAs to work at the grassroots level to strengthen the party, identify new development areas, listen to public grievances, meet ground-level party workers and expand the party's cadre. Vij has had a tumultuous relationship with former chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar, now a Union minister, and has previously made veiled comments about the current Chief Minister, Nayab Singh Saini. In January this year, Vij had taken a dig at CM Saini. He said, 'Since assuming office, he (Saini) had been on an 'udan khatola' [chopper]. If he comes down, he will see the suffering of people.' The seven-time MLA, who holds three portfolios of Energy, Transport and Labour, also issued a stern warning to government officials that during his tours, he would be monitoring their functioning and assess if the government schemes were being duly implemented by the officials at the ground level. 'Any laxity will not be tolerated,' he said. On the Opposition's saffronisation allegation against the Army in the context of 'Operation Mahadev and Shiv Shakti', Vij remarked that 'the Opposition is against all the traditions and beliefs of Hindustan'. Advising the Opposition, he said, 'They should know that every unit of our Army has temples and gurdwaras. They should also know that when our brave soldiers charge toward the enemy, they shout 'Jai Bajrang Bali!' They must understand that many military operations in our country have been named after Hindu traditions or Indian cultural identities.' 'The Opposition should be ashamed. Should we name our operations after Pakistani missiles or other foreign references? The Opposition has completely strayed from real issues. In the name of political opposition to the Prime Minister, they have now started opposing the country itself. They are even targeting our national beliefs, centres of faith and religious traditions,' Vij added. Later in the day, Vij heard grievances of people of his constituency. He also issued directions to the Superintendent of Police (Ambala) to investigate and register FIR in the matter of alleged forced eviction of people from Barfkhana area land in Ambala. 'Marcelino Noronha and his family, who have been residing on the Barfkhana land for approximately 85 years, submitted a complaint alleging that some individuals forcibly evicted them from their home through intimidation and threats. The family informed Minister Anil Vij that they had filed a complaint at the Cantonment police station on May 13, but no FIR was registered. Responding to the complaint, Vij instructed the SP to take strict action,' a spokesperson said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Is Maga sign off on 25% India tariff Trump's response to PM Modi's Miga pitch or is he playing to the gallery?
Trump's 25% tariff on India and MAGA sign-off sparks questions: Is it policy pushback against MIGA, or a performance for US voters ahead of elections? read more US President Donald Trump's abrupt imposition of a 25% tariff on all Indian imports and his brash 'MAGA!' sign-off has raised sharp questions about America's true intent: is this really about protecting US economic interests, or is Trump signalling to his political base just as much as he's responding to India's MEGA partnership push? Heavy-handed tariff, personal diplomacy undone Trump announcement to slap a sweeping 25% tariff on Indian imports beginning August 1, heaping on an additional 'penalty' for New Delhi's military and oil purchases from Russia. The move, which Trump justified by citing India's 'strenuous and obnoxious' trade barriers and non-tariff hurdles, stung especially after he started his announcement calling India 'our friend'. Yet, what set this measure apart from similar tariffs on other nations was Trump's conspicuous sign-off—MAGA ('Make America Great Again')—at the very end of his decree, a slogan with loaded domestic political meaning. Five months ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had projected his own vision during a state visit to the US: 'In India, we are working towards a Viksit Bharat, which in the American context translates into Make India Great Again (MIGA),' he said, explicitly linking the two leaders' slogans in hopes of forging a 'MEGA partnership'. At the time, both leaders touted a 'MEGA' partnership anchored in prosperity and trade expansion. The optics of that ambitious pitch are now in tatters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why the MAGA sign‑off? While the new 25% US tariff is roughly in line with duties Trump has levied on other Asian exporters this year, the 'penalty' for buying Russian arms and oil appears custom-tailored for India, further amplifying the sense of a bilateral rift. Analysts note this approach is in line with Trump's long-standing grievance that India is a 'tariff king' which keeps US goods out while flooding America with its own, echoing criticisms dating back to his first presidential term. The agricultural and dairy sectors proved insurmountable sticking points: India's reluctance to open its vast rural market to US subsidised produce remains politically non-negotiable, with over 700 million livelihoods at stake. This 'red line' is partly why trade talks dragged on even as both leaders professed friendship and strategic cooperation. Yet, the MAGA-centric post stood out because Trump had not concluded earlier tariff threats on countries like South Korea, the Philippines or Egypt, with the same US-first bluster. Indian commentators and US-watchers see a calculated message: Trump is playing to his domestic gallery, reaffirming that even so-called 'friends' must ultimately yield to America's interests, especially in the run-up to a tough election season. There's a deeper context: MAGA supporters had recently criticised Trump for being 'soft' on India, especially after the appointment of a Chennai-born tech executive to head US AI policy and his earlier hints at easing immigration curbs for skilled Indian workers. With negotiations still underway and a new deadline looming, the move begs the question: is Trump responding to Modi's MIGA vision, or merely performing for his electoral gallery? India stands firm India's government has indicated that it's carefully reviewing the tariff implications while reaffirming its commitment to a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' trade agreement with the US. Some experts believe the tariffs are part of a negotiation tactic dubbed the 'TACO trade' — Trump Always Chickens Out, where threats escalate before backing off to secure deals under pressure. As Trump signals potential flexibility, suggesting cuts to Indian tariffs in return for wider concessions, the interplay of slogans and substance continues to unfold. Whether MAGA was a strategic policy pivot or political posturing remains open to interpretation, just like the final outcome of the India–US trade standoff. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump tariffs may drag India's FY26 GDP growth by 20-40 bps: Economists
India's gross domestic product (GDP) growth in 2025-26 (FY26) is likely to take a hit of 20-40 basis points (bps) as the steep 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on Indian exports takes effect from August 1, economists said. However, the impact is likely to remain limited as India's economy is domestically oriented and the country has relatively lower goods exports to the US than other emerging market peers, experts said. 'At these tariff rates, if the burden of higher tariffs is equally split between Indian producers and consumers, it could directly shave off 0.3 percentage point from India's GDP growth. The penalty rate, if levied, would shave off further from growth, and there could be an indirect growth drag as well, led by lower capital inflows and investments,' HSBC said in a statement. Apart from the 25 per cent tariff, Trump on Wednesday threatened to impose a penalty on India for buying Russian oil and defence equipment. Radhika Rao, senior economist, DBS Bank, said that the US is the largest export partner for India at 18 per cent of total exports, comprising smartphones, pharma, textiles, gems & jewellery, iron & steel, and machinery, among others. 'Goods exports were frontloaded in the first half of the year, with a payback likely in the second half until clarity surfaces on the exact landing rate. We had previously estimated around 25-30 bps of impact on growth if rates were uniform across sectors,' she added. Rajani Sinha, chief economist, CareEdge Ratings, said that factoring in the higher reciprocal tariffs and additional penalty on India's exports to the US, the potential impact on India's GDP could be around 0.3-0.4 percentage point. 'India's domestically driven economy and relatively lower goods exports to the US at around 2 per cent of GDP should offer some resilience. Going ahead, India-US trade negotiations are expected to continue and could bring some reprieve,' Sinha added. Echoing similar views, Aditi Raman, associate economist, Moody's Analytics, said that while the US is India's largest trade partner, the Indian economy is relatively more domestically oriented than most of the region and relies far less on trade. 'Pharmaceuticals, gems, and textiles are key sectors that are likely to be hit. A point of contention is market access to the key agricultural and dairy sector, which India has historically been reluctant to grant," she added. Goldman Sachs in a statement said that if the new tariffs are enforced, that would constitute a potential incremental drag of around 0.3 percentage point (annualised), based on India's goods exports exposure of roughly 4 per cent of GDP to US final demand. It also cautioned against indirect impact through the 'uncertainty channel' on domestic investment. 'Elevated policy uncertainty in the US can cause Indian firms, particularly those exposed to US tariffs, to postpone investment decisions,' it added. Meanwhile, Nomura Asia in a note said that its FY26 GDP growth forecast is maintained at 6.2 per cent, but flagged a downside risk of 0.2 percentage point as exports to the US account for 2.2 per cent of India's GDP, and include pharma, smartphones, gems & jewellery, industrial machinery, auto components, textiles, and iron & steel, most of which will likely face margin pressure.
