
Greek lawmakers vote on North Africa asylum ban as rights groups cry foul
The vote comes amid a surge in migrant arrivals to the island of Crete and as talks with Libya's Benghazi-based government to help stem the flow were cancelled acrimoniously this week.
Greece, one of the main gateways into the European Union for refugees and migrants from the Middle East, Asia and Africa, has taken an increasingly tough stance on migration since Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis' centre-right party came to power in 2019, building a fence at its northern land borders and boosting sea patrols in the east.
Sea arrivals of migrants travelling from northeastern Libya to its southern islands of Crete and Gavdos, the closest European territory to North Africa, have surged this year.
In response, Mitsotakis' government proposed legislation on Wednesday stipulating that migrants crossing illegally to Greece from North Africa by sea would not be able to file for an asylum for three months.
A vote on the law, which would also allow authorities to quickly deport those migrants without any prior identification process, was expected later on Thursday or early on Friday.
Human rights groups said the asylum ban would violate international and European law, and called on the Greek government to recall it.
"Seeking refuge is a human right; preventing people from doing so is both illegal and inhumane," the International Rescue Committee (IRC) said in a statement.
Mitsotakis - whose government controls 155 lawmakers in the 300-seated parliament - said on Wednesday the ban was "an emergency response to an emergency situation".
Greece has long been accused by aid groups of forcibly ejecting migrants at its sea and land borders, also known as "pushbacks," an illegal practice.
A Greek naval court has charged 17 coastguard officers over one of the Mediterranean's worst shipwrecks two years ago, in which hundreds of people are believed to have drowned. (Reporting by Angeliki Koutantou; Editing by Alex Richardson)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Markets await US CPI for tariff impact clues amid Trump's trade threats: Peter Cardillo
"The higher end of the tariff scale is just a threat and we just have to wait and see whether or not they will be imposed or whether or not they will have an inflationary impact. But again, they are just negotiating starts and that most nations will work out a deal and whether or not we get 10% or 6% in tariff implementation of tariffs is yet to be seen but some sort of a deal will be worked out. I do not think that Trump will go ahead with these steep tariffs," says Peter Cardillo , Spartan Capital Securities . US President Donald Trump yesterday made some bold comments surrounding Russia. One, he said he is disappointed with Russian President Putin. And he also said that if they do not come out with a deal over the next 50 days, then severe tariffs could be imposed. How do you read this and do you expect the dust to settle down over a period of time? Peter Cardillo: Well, obviously President Trump is imposing steep tariffs, not only is he indicating to Russia that if a deal is not made within 50 days that tariffs will be 100%, but he is doing it with most other countries that letters were sent out. It is just a bargaining point. And of course, in the case of Russia, it might be a little bit different because we are not talking about tariffs on imported goods, but rather on the war factor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo So, it is a question now whether or not Russia begins to think seriously on ending the war in Ukraine. And so, the more pressure that Trump puts on Russia along with other European nations, the greater the chances of some sort of a truce may happen. And let us not forget something very important that the Russian economy is in dire straits, so he really cannot afford steep tariffs nor can he afford more sanctions. So, there is a possibility that some sort of a truce could happen within the next 50 days. I wanted to understand your view on the tariffs that will be imposed starting August 1st on EU and Mexico as well. You did previously say that tariffs at these levels are unlikely to be implemented, but that August one deadline is looming. So, do you believe a resolution will be out before that or do you think these tariffs will be implemented at these levels? Peter Cardillo: Well, again, if I heard the question correctly because the audio is not that great, the situation with Mexico is like every other nation. However, Mexico did say that they have a contra plan and, of course, we have to see what this contra plan is all about and whether or not the administration accepts it. Live Events I believe there will be a deal with Mexico along with other major nations. It is just a question of what type of a deal. Do I believe that these steep tariffs that President Trump suggests that will be implemented on August 1st go through? I do not think so. They will be much less and then, of course there is the question of whether or not they will be met with a surge in tariff inflation. In fact, today we will be getting some inflation news that is the CPI and there could very well be some hint of whether or not inflation is beginning to emerge from some of the tariffs. But he has also made some comments on tariff on Russia and secondary tariffs on all those countries who buy Russian energy. Do you think that this is merely a threat and Trump is using it as a negotiating tool or perhaps could it translate into something concrete? Peter Cardillo: Well, it is a combination. It is a negotiating tool and it is also a way of Trump trying to bring together this trade war and lessen its burdens and this burden that could have on the global economy . So far, we have not seen any evidence of inflation popping up anywhere. We saw numbers out of India which suggest inflation continues to move lower and it all depends how steep these tariffs are going to be. So, so far, the higher end of the tariff scale is just a threat and we just have to wait and see whether or not they will be imposed or whether or not they will have an inflationary impact. But again, they are just negotiating starts and that most nations will work out a deal and whether or not we get 10% or 6% in tariff implementation of tariffs is yet to be seen but some sort of a deal will be worked out. I do not think that Trump will go ahead with these steep tariffs.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump bets constantly shifting tariff strategy can remake global trade
WASHINGTON—President Trump's whirlwind of trade moves is driven by a bet that keeping other countries guessing will allow him to better dictate negotiating terms with trading partners, ultimately making it easier to bend them to his will, according to Trump's aides and allies. The downside risks of that bet have become clearer in recent days. Trump's tendency to back off deadlines threatens to weaken his hand, and his use of a novel legal theory to underpin much of his trade agenda opened him up to a legal challenge that might send the trade agenda back to the drawing board. In the past week, Trump upended his trade talks by sending letters to more than two dozen countries, outlining the tariffs importers will pay on their goods after Aug. 1. He said the deadline won't change and that his steep, so-called reciprocal tariffs would go into effect on that date—but urged countries to continue negotiating. Then over the weekend Trump unexpectedly hit two of the U.S.'s largest trading partners, the European Union and Mexico, with threats for higher tariffs, even as Mexico's economic team was in Washington, and an EU delegation was there days before. And on Monday, Trump said at a White House meeting that he would be fine with not striking any trade deals at all. That message contradicts senior aides, such as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who for months have said that dozens of pacts are just around the corner. 'He goes on television and he calms the market. I go on television, I rile the market," Trump said of Bessent, adding: 'did you make any deals today? We've got a lot of them, but the best deal is just sending out the [tariff letter]." Trump's allies say that statement, along with others playing down his desire for trade pacts, are all part of his negotiating style. And Trump has repeatedly touted the amount of money tariffs are bringing in, crediting Bessent with the revenues at the Monday event. The U.S. collected nearly $27 billion in tariffs last month, more than three times the June 2024 figure. 'Controlling timing is a huge advantage in a negotiation," said Everett Eissenstat, former deputy director of the National Economic Council in Trump's first term. 'He's controlling timing—the pace, the tempo, the terms, he's setting the table and he's making the final decision." The move-fast-and-break-things approach is animated by lessons from the first term, Eissenstat added, when Trump officials took a more methodical, legalistic approach to tariffs. Trump allies ultimately ended up feeling that they could have done more to reshape U.S. trading relationships and cut chronic trade deficits. 'Americans have a dealmaker in chief in the White House, and they can rest assured that President Trump is using every lever of executive power to continue delivering more deals, more opportunities, and more victories for the United States," said White House spokesman Kush Desai. But the strategy cuts both ways. Trump has sowed uncertainty by twice delaying his reciprocal tariffs. He used a never-before-used legal theory to underpin many of his duties, allowing him to implement them at-will but also inviting a legal challenge that could nullify his reciprocal levies. And some in Trump's own party worry that his contradictory statements risk undermining U.S. negotiating positions, particularly when he repeatedly splits with the economic advisers running negotiations. On Sunday, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said that Trump had been unsatisfied with trade proposals brought to him so far, saying on ABC's 'This Week" that Trump has seen the 'sketches of deals" from his economic team, but thinks they 'need to be better." A president repeatedly contradicting the negotiators 'creates an environment where your negotiators are not empowered," said Susan Schwab, former U.S. trade ambassador under George W. Bush. 'If they know the decider is not going to agree to what [the] lead negotiators conclude, we're not going to get their last, best and final offer." Some Trump allies acknowledge that the fast-moving trade approach has led to some mistakes or missteps where the team didn't appear to be on the same page. One example came in May, Eissenstat said, a day after the U.S. and China arrived at a tariff truce in Geneva. The Commerce Department issued export controls prohibiting the sale of advanced microchips to China. That move, The Wall Street Journal reported, caught officials at USTR and the Treasury Department off guard and sent 'mixed signals" to the Chinese, Eissenstat said. Damage from the uncertainty can be cumulative and irreversible, Schwab said. Trump's allies say it makes sense for Trump to push for final concessions, and argue the letters from Trump are simply a tactic to increase pressure on partners. 'A little more time" can beget 'a much, much better deal," said Sen. Bill Hagerty (R., Tenn.), Trump's former ambassador to Japan, who said that deals appear to be close with Tokyo and Seoul. 'When you take into account events in South Korea, with the recent change of government there, [and] an upper house election in Japan, both of those speak to giving a bit more time," Hagerty said. 'August 1 fits that timeline better than the earlier July [deadline]."


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Democrats report says US ceding global influence to China
US- China flags China is increasing its diplomatic reach as the Trump administration pares back America's international presence, Democrats from the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee said in a report Monday. The report was released as the administration makes deep cuts to the state department, including beginning Friday to fire more than 1,350 US-based employees. The administration has also cut billions of dollars in foreign aid. The 91-page report listed ways, from broadcasting to health programmes, that researchers said China is expanding its influence. "China is pursuing a clear vision for the international order while the Trump administration seeks to diminish America's engagement globally. " WH spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: "Under President Trump, America is strong again, and his foreign policy is effective because of his willingness to look anyone in the eye to get better deals for American people." Reuters & NYT